Abstract
The tasks necessary to keep a household running smoothly often go unnoticed and are referred to as invisible labor. One underlying cognitive construct that may help to quantify the mental component of invisible labor is prospective memory (PM), or memory for future actions. In the current study, parents completed self-report measures of their own PM demands, perceptions of their partners’ PM demands, and frequency of their own and their partners’ prospective and retrospective memory failures. Mothers reported maintaining greater PM demands than did fathers, particularly for their children’s PM intentions. Fathers’ and mothers’ PM demands did not differ for tasks that benefitted their partners; yet, mothers perceived themselves to provide more mnemonic support to their partners than their partners do for them. Mothers and fathers also differed in the extent to which they perceived their partners to carry the cognitive load related to their children. Finally, parents who perceived their partners to have potentially poor PM appear to take on more PM demands and doing so comes at a cost for fathers. The current work unifies themes within the mental labor and PM literatures and provides a framework through which researchers and clinicians can better understand parental cognitive demands.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Material
Data can be made available upon reasonable request.
References
Ahn, J. N., Haines, E. L., & Mason, M. F. (2017). Gender stereotypes and the coordination of mnemonic work within heterosexual couples: Romantic partners manage their daily to-dos. Sex Roles, 77(7–8), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0743-1
Anderson, F. T., Strube, M. J., & McDaniel, M. A. (2019). Toward a better understanding of costs in prospective memory: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 14(11), 1053–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000208
Arendell, T. (2001). The new care work of middle-class mothers: Managing childrearing, employment, and time. In K. J. Daly (Ed.), Minding the time in family experience: Emerging perspectives and issues (pp. 163–204). Elsevier Science.
Arnold, N. R., & Bayen, U. J. (2019). Prospective memory: Comparing self-and proxy-reports with cognitive modeling of task performance. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(2), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.04.001
Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. SAGE Publications.
Blair, S. L. (1998). Work roles, domestic roles, and marital quality: Perceptions of fairness among dual-earner couples. Social Justice Research, 11(3), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023290917535
Blair, S. L., & Johnson, M. P. (1992). Wives’ perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: The intersection of housework and ideology. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(3), 570–771. https://doi.org/10.2307/353243
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018). Employment characteristics of families, 2014. U.S. Department of Labor. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/famee.pdf
Cain Miller, C. (2018, August 17). The costs of motherhood are rising, and catching women off guard. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/17/upshot/motherhood-rising-costs-surprise.html
Casey, P., Huntsdale, C., Angus, G., & Janes, C. (1999). Memory in pregnancy. II: Implicit, incidental, explicit, semantic, short-term, working and prospective memory in primigravid, multigravid and postpartum women. Journal of Psychosomatic, Obstetrics, and Gynecology, 20(3), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.3109/01674829909075590
Christopher, E. (2020). Capturing conflicting accounts of domestic labour: The household portrait as a methodology. Sociological Research Online, 26(3), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780420951804
Ciciolla, L., & Luthar, S. S. (2019). Invisible household labor and ramifications for adjustment: Mothers as captains of households. Sex Roles, 81(7–8), 467–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-1001-x
Cohen, A. L. (2013). Attentional decoupling while pursuing intentions: A form of mind wandering? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 693. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00693
Cohen, A. L., Jaudas, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember. Memory & Cognition, 36(1), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.1.149
Coltrane, S. (1996). Family man: Fatherhood, housework and gender equity. Oxford University Press.
Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1208–1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.x
Crawford, J. R., Henry, J. D., Ward, A. L., & Blake, J. (2006). The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ): Latent structure, normative data and discrepancy analysis for proxy-ratings. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505X28748
Crawley, R. (2002). Self-perception of cognitive changes during pregnancy and the early postpartum: Salience and attentional effects. Applied Cognitive Psychology: THe Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 16(6), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.818
Crawley, R., Grant, S., & Hinshaw, K. (2008). Cognitive changes in pregnancy: Mild decline or societal stereotype? Applied Cognitive Psychology: THe Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 22(6), 1142–1162. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1427
Cuttler, C., Graf, P., Pawluski, J. L., & Galea, L. A. (2011). Everyday life memory deficits in pregnant women. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022844
Daminger, A. (2019). The cognitive dimension of household labor. American Sociological Review, 84(4), 609–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419859007
DeVault, M. L. (1987). Doing housework: Feeding and family life. In N. Ferstel & H. E. Gross (Eds.), Families and work (pp. 178–191). Temple University Press.
DeVault, M. L. (1991). Feeding the family. University of Chicago Press.
Eichler, M., & Albanese, P. (2007). What is household work? A critique of assumptions underlying empirical studies of housework and an alternative approach. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 32(2), 227–258. https://doi.org/10.2307/20460633
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.717
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., & Breneiser, J. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327
Ellis, J. (1996). Prospective memory or the realization of delayed intentions: A conceptual framework for research. In M. A. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 1–22). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Erickson, R. J. (2005). Why emotion work matters: Sex, gender, and the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(2), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00120.x
Frisco, M. L., & Williams, K. (2003). Perceived housework equity, marital happiness, and divorce in dual-earner households. Journal of Family Issues, 24(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X02238520
Gilbert, S. J. (2015). Strategic use of reminders: Influence of both domain-general and task-specific metacognitive confidence, independent of objective memory ability. Consciousness and Cognition, 33(1), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.006
Grose, J. (2019, June 11). A modest proposal for equalizing the mental load. The New York Times. https://parenting.nytimes.com/work-money/mental-load?module=article-group&topic=Work%20And%20Money&rank=3&position=2
Grundgeiger, T., Sanderson, P. M., & Dismukes, R. K. (2015). Prospective memory in complex sociotechnical systems. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 222(2), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000171
Guendouzi, J. (2006). “The guilt thing”: Balancing domestic and professional roles. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(4), 901–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00303.x
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based perspective (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Henry, J. D., Rendell, P. G., Phillips, L. H., Dunlop, L., & Kliegel, M. (2012). Prospective memory reminders: A laboratory investigation of initiation source and age effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(7), 1274–1287. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.651091
Hess, B. B. (1990). Book review—Invisible careers: Women civic leaders from the volunteer world. Gender & Society, 4(2), 283–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002021
Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (1989). The second shift. Viking Press.
Kamo, Y. (2000). “He said, she said”: Assessing discrepancies in husbands’ and wives’ reports on the division of household labor. Social Science Research, 29(4), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.2000.0674
Kliegel, M., & Jäger, T. (2006). Can the prospective and retrospective memory questionnaire (PRMQ) predict actual prospective memory performance? Current Psychology, 25(3), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-006-1002-8
Kliegel, M., Mackinlay, R., & Jäger, T. (2008). A life-span approach to the development of complex prospective memory. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 187–216). Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2002). Complex prospective memory and executive control of working memory: A process model. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 44(2), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.612
Kliegel, M., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Plan formation, retention, and execution in prospective memory: A new approach and age-related effects. Memory and Cognition, 28(6), 1041–1049. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209352
Lamont, E. (2020). The mating game: How gender still shapes how we date. University of California Press.
Lareau, A., & Weininger, E. B. (2008). Time, work, and family life: Reconceptualizing gendered time patterns through the case of children’s organized activities. Sociological Forum, 23(3), 419–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00085.x
Lee, Y. S., & Waite, L. J. (2005). Husbands’ and wives’ time spent on housework: A comparison of measures. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(2), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00119.x
Margrett, J. A., & Reese-Melancon, C. (2016). Collaborative cognition in middle and later life: Intimate partner negotiation of everyday tasks. In J. Bookwala’s (Ed.), Couple relationships in mid and late life: Their nature, complexity, and role in health and illness (pp. 219–238). American Psychological Association.
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Cook, G. I. (2005). On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.68
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., Hansen, J. S., & Pallos, A. L. (2003). Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 861–870. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.861
Martínez, P., Carrasco, M. J., Aza, G., Blanco, A., & Espinar, I. (2011). Family gender role and guilt in Spanish dual-earner families. Sex Roles, 65(11–12), 813–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0031-4
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(7), S127–S144. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.775
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2007). Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field. SAGE Publications.
Mederer, H. J. (1993). Division of labor in two-earner homes: Task accomplishment versus household management as critical variables in perceptions about family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55(1), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/352964
Meier, J. A., McNaughton-Cassill, M., & Lynch, M. (2006). The management of household and childcare tasks and relationship satisfaction in dual earner families. Marriage and Family Review, 40(2–3), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v40n02_04
Moore, J., & Abetz, J. S. (2019). What do parents regret about having children? Communicating regrets online. Journal of Family Issues, 40(3), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18811388
Moulton-Tetlock, E. E., Ahn, J. N., Haines, E. L., & Mason, M. F. (2019). Women’s work: Remembering communal goals. Motivation Science, 5(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000109
Niedźwieńska, A., & Zielińska, M. (2020). Gender differences in remembering about things to do depend on partnership status. Sex Roles, 84(3–4), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01158-6
Newkirk, K., Perry-Jenkins, M., & Sayer, A. G. (2017). Division of household and childcare labor and relationship conflict among low-income new parents. Sex Roles, 76(5–6), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0604-3
Oakley, A. (1974). The sociology of housework. Pantheon.
Offer, S. (2014). The costs of thinking about work and family: Mental labor, work–family spillover, and gender inequality among parents in dual-earner families. Sociological Forum, 29(4), 916–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12126
Onyper, S. V., Searleman, A., Thacher, P. V., Maine, E. E., & Johnson, A. G. (2010). Executive functioning and general cognitive ability in pregnant women and matched controls. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32(9), 986–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803391003662694
Parker, K., & Wang, W. (2013). Modern parenthood: Roles of moms and dads converge as they balance work and family. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/03/
Poortman, A. R., & Van Der Lippe, T. (2009). Attitudes toward housework and child care and the gendered division of labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00617.x
Rendell, P. G., & Henry, J. D. (2008). Prospective-memory functioning is affected during pregnancy and postpartum. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30(8), 913–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390701874379
Robertson, L. G., Anderson, T. L., Hall, M. E. L., & Kim, C. L. (2019). Mothers and mental labor: A phenomenological focus group study of family-related thinking work. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(2), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319825581
Rummel, J., & McDaniel, M. A. (2019). Prospective memory. Routledge.
Scullin, M. K., McDaniel, M. A., & Shelton, J. T. (2013). The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: Evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability. Cognitive Psychology, 67(1–2), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.07.001
Shaw, S. M. (2008). Family leisure and changing ideologies of parenthood. Sociology Compass, 2(2), 688–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00076.x
Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 299–322. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.299
Shin, N. Y., Bak, Y., Nah, Y., Han, S., Kim, D. J., Kim, S. J., & Lee, S. K. (2018). Disturbed retrieval network and prospective memory decline in postpartum women. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 5476. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23875-5
Smith, G., Del Sala, S., Logie, R. H., & Maylor, E. A. (2000). Prospective and retrospective memory in normal ageing and dementia: A questionnaire study. Memory, 8(5), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210050117735
Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.347
Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. (2004). A Multinomial Model of Event-Based Prospective Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(4), 756–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.756
Uttl, B., & Kibreab, M. (2011). Self-report measures of prospective memory are reliable but not valid. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022843
Walter, S., & Meier, B. (2014). How important is importance for prospective memory? A Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 657. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00657
Walzer, S. (1996). Thinking about the baby: Gender and divisions of infant care. Social Problems, 43(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.2307/3096999
Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). Springer.
Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 923–929. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.923
Winkler, A. E., & Ireland, T. R. (2009). Time spent in household management: Evidence and implications. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-009-9160-0
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Drs. Jennifer Byrd-Craven, Lucia Ciciolla, DeMond Grant, and Brandt Gardner for their insights and expertise shared during the conception of this study. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback on a previous version of this manuscript.
Funding
Funding for this study was provided by the Robberson Summer Dissertation Fellowship through the Oklahoma State University Graduate College, as well as the Department of Psychology at Oklahoma State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both of the authors made substantial contributions to the conception of this study, data collection, analysis, and interpretation, as well as in preparing the current manuscript for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Oklahoma State University.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for Publication
The authors have provided their consent for publication.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harrington, E.E., Reese-Melancon, C. Who is Responsible for Remembering? Everyday Prospective Memory Demands in Parenthood. Sex Roles 86, 189–207 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01264-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01264-z