Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Relationship between Rape Myths and Sexual Scripts: The Social Construction of Rape

  • Feminist Forum
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rape myths can influence sexual scripts that determine sexual attitudes and behavior. Sexual scripts are culturally determined patterns of behavior that inform desire and influence sexual behavior. Sexual scripts include hook up, seduction, rape, and acquaintance rape scripts (e.g., the too-much-to drink script, the man-is-ready-for-sex script, and the friends-gone-too-far script). However, research shows that many individuals still hold an erroneous real rape script, even when asked to describe acquaintance rape. This may prevent acquaintance rape victims from acknowledging their rape and it may allow acquaintance rapists to engage in sexual aggression while denying it is rape. Rape scripts research supports several of the rape myths reviewed by Edwards and her colleagues (Edwards, Turchik, Dardis, Reynolds, & Gidycz, 2011), but suggests two additional rape myths (i.e., the myth that men cannot stop once they have started to become sexually aroused and the myth that rapists are obviously different from other men). The study of the relationship between rape myths and sexual scripts may help to understand the social construction of rape and consensual sex. Rape myths and sexual scripts may work in conjunction to support rape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bart, P. B., & O’Brien, P. H. (1985). Stopping rape: Successful survival strategies. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauregard, E., Proulx, J., Rossmo, K., Leclerc, B., & Allaire, J. (2007a). Script analysis of the hunting process of serial sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1069–1084. doi:10.1177/0093854807300851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauregard, E., Rossmo, D. K., & Proulx, J. (2007b). A descriptive model of the hunting process of serial sex offenders: A rational choice perspective. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 449–463. doi:10.1007/s10896-007-9101-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohner, G., Eyssel, F., Pina, A., Siebler, F., & Viki, G. T. (2009). Rape myth acceptance: Cognitive affective and behavioural effects of beliefs that blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator. In M. Horvath & J. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 17–45). Devon: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondurant, B. (2001). University women’s acknowledgment of rape: Individual, situational, and social factors. Violence Against Women, 7, 294–314. doi:10.1177/1077801201007003004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouffard, L. A. (2010). Exploring the utility of entitlement in understanding sexual aggression. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 870–879. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, E. S., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (1996). Sexual coercion in dating relationships. New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (1988). The power of myth with Bill Moyers. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. L., & VanDeusen, K. M. (2004). Risk factors for male sexual aggression on college campuses. Journal of Family Violence, 19, 279–289. doi:10.1023/B:JOFV.0000042078.55308.4d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, M. H., & Clark, M. D. (2006). Men’s acquaintance rape scripts: A comparison between a regional university and a military academy. Sex Roles, 55, 469–480. doi:10.1007/s1199-006-9102-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. D., & Carroll, M. H. (2008). Acquaintance rape scripts of women and men: Similarities and differences. Sex Roles, 58, 616–625. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9373-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. D., Carroll, M. H., Bartoli, A. M., & Taylor, M. A. (2009). Flirting to rape: The influence of the traditional sexual script. In J. H. Ulrich & B. T. Cosell (Eds.), Handbook on gender roles (pp. 1–32). Hauppauge: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crome, S. A., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Adult rape scripting within a victimological perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 395–413. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00013-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deslauriers-Varin, N., & Beauregard, E. (2010). Victims’ routine activities and sex offenders’ target selection scripts: A latent analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 315–342. doi:10.1177/1079063210375975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, K. M., Turchik, J. A., Dardis, C., Reynolds, N., & Gidycz, C. A. (2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9943-2.

  • Feild, H. S. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 156–179. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.2.156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feild, H. S., & Bienen, L. B. (1980). Jurors and rape. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K. F. (1996). Women’s fear of victimization: Shadow of sexual assault? Social Forces, 75, 667–690. doi:10.2307/2580418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B. S., & Sloan, J. J. (2003). Unraveling the fear of victimization among college women: Is the “shadow of sexual assault hypothesis” supported? Justice Quarterly, 20, 633–659. doi:10.1080/07418820300095641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B. S., Daigle, L. E., Cullen, F. T., & Santana, S. A. (2007). Assessing the efficacy of the protective action-completion nexus for sexual victimizations. Violence and Victims, 22, 18–42. doi:10.1891/vv-v22i1a002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, H. (2009). Sexual scripts, sexual refusals, and rape. In M. Horvath & J. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 99–122). Devon: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavey, N. (2005). Just sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. T., & Riger, S. (1989). The female fear: The social costs of rape. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hald, G. M., & Malamuth, N. M. (2008). Self-perceived effects of pornography consumption. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 614–625. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9212-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hald, G. M., Malamuth, N. M., & Yuen, C. (2010). Pornography and attitudes supporting violence against women: Revisiting the relationship in nonexperimental studies. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 14–20. doi:10.1002/ab.20328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, M., & Brown, J. (2009). Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking. Devon: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, A. S., Mathie, V. A., & Torgler, C. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgement. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 53–66. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00296.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanin, E. J. (1967). Reference groups and sex conduct norm violations. Sociological Quarterly, 8, 495–504. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1967.tb01085.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanin, E. J. (1975). Selected dyadic aspects of male sex aggression. In L. G. Schultz (Ed.), Rape victimology (pp. 59–76). Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanin, E. J. (1985). Date rapists: Differential sexual socialization and relative deprivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 219–231. doi:10.1007/BF01542105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. L., Sorsoli, C. L., Collins, K., Zylbergold, B. A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 145–157. doi:10.1080/00224490701263660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, D. A., Malamuth, N. M., Fedoroff, P., & Marshall, W. L. (2009). The importance of individual differences in pornography use: Theoretical perspectives and implications for treating sex offenders. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 216–232. doi:10.1080/00224490902747701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., Dinero, T. E., Seibel, C. A., & Cox, S. L. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim’s experience? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1–24. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00924.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B., Bieneck, S., & Scheinberger-Olwig, R. (2007). Adolescents’ sexual scripts: Schematic representations of consensual and nonconsensual heterosexual interactions. Journal of Sex Research, 4, 316–327. doi:10.1080/00224490701580923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, H. L., & Axsom, D. (2003). Rape and seduction scripts of university students: Implications for rape attributions and unacknowledged rape. Sex Roles, 49, 465–475. doi:10.1023/A:1025824505185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, H., Breitkopf, C. R., & Berenson, A. B. (2007). Rape scripts of low-income European American and Latina women. Sex Roles, 56, 509–516. doi:10.1007/s/11199-007-9189-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, H., Tabernik, H., Canales, E. J., & Backstrom, T. (2009). Risky situation or harmless fun? A qualitative examination of college women’s bad hook-up and rape scripts. Sex Roles, 60, 793–804. doi:10.1007/s1199-009-9586-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704–711. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M., Addison, T., & Koss, M. (2000). Pornography and sexual aggression: Are there reliable effects and can we understand them? Annual Review of Sex Research, 11, 26–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. (1990). The cry for myth. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, N. B. (2010a). Sexual scripts: Social and therapeutic implications. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25, 96–120. doi:10.1080/14681990903550167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, N. B. (2010b). Preface to sexual scripts: Social and therapeutic implications. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25, 91–95. doi:10.1080/14681990903563707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, D., & White, J. W. (2006). Long-term effects of labeling a rape experience. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 96–105. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00266.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27–68. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labeling their own experience. Sex Roles, 51, 129–144. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000037758.95376.00.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007). Conceptualizing the “wantedness” of women’s consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: Implications for how women label their experiences with rape. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 72–88. doi:10.1080/00224490709336794.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D., & Campbell, J. L. (1982). Alcohol and rape: The effect of alcohol on attributions of blame for rape. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 468–476. doi:10.1177/0146167282083013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, K. (1986). [Rape and seduction scripts]. Unpublished raw data.

  • Ryan, K. (1988). Rape and seduction scripts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 237–245. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00939.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, K. M. (2004). Further evidence for a cognitive component of rape. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 579–604. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2003.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (1997). Sexual assault on the college campus. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senn, C. Y., & Dzinas, K. (1996). Measuring fear of rape: A new scale. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 28, 141–144. doi:10.1037/0008-400X.28.2.141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. J. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22, 53–60. doi:10.1007/BF02701260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. J. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120. doi:10.1007/BF01542219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. M., Noel, N. E., & Maisto, S. A. (2007). Rape blame as a function of alcohol presence and resistance type. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2766–2775. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.04.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 379–440). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchik, J. A., Probst, D. R., Irvin, C. R., Chau, M., & Gidycz, C. A. (2010). Prediction of sexual assault experiences in college women based on rape scripts: A prospective analysis. Psychology of Violence, 1, 76–83. doi:10.1037/2152-0828.1.S.76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, S. E. (2007). A 10-year update of “review and critique of empirical studies of rape avoidance.” Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 411–429. doi:10.1177/0093854806297117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, S. E., & Knight, R. A. (1991). A multivariate model for predicting rape and physical injury outcomes during sexual assault. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 724–731. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.5.724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vega, V., & Malamuth, N. M. (2007). Predicting sexual aggression: The role of pornography in the context of general and specific risk factors. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 104–117. doi:10.1002/ab.20172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warshaw, R. (1988). I never called it rape. New York: HarperPerennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., & Weaver, J. B. (1989). Pornography and men’s sexual callousness toward women. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Pornography: Research advances and policy considerations (pp. 95–125). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Thanks to M. Diane Clark for comments on this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, Box 1, Lycoming College, Williamsport, PA, 17701, USA

    Kathryn M. Ryan

Authors
  1. Kathryn M. Ryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn M. Ryan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryan, K.M. The Relationship between Rape Myths and Sexual Scripts: The Social Construction of Rape. Sex Roles 65, 774–782 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0033-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0033-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation