Sex Roles

, Volume 65, Issue 11–12, pp 774–782 | Cite as

The Relationship between Rape Myths and Sexual Scripts: The Social Construction of Rape

Feminist Forum

Abstract

Rape myths can influence sexual scripts that determine sexual attitudes and behavior. Sexual scripts are culturally determined patterns of behavior that inform desire and influence sexual behavior. Sexual scripts include hook up, seduction, rape, and acquaintance rape scripts (e.g., the too-much-to drink script, the man-is-ready-for-sex script, and the friends-gone-too-far script). However, research shows that many individuals still hold an erroneous real rape script, even when asked to describe acquaintance rape. This may prevent acquaintance rape victims from acknowledging their rape and it may allow acquaintance rapists to engage in sexual aggression while denying it is rape. Rape scripts research supports several of the rape myths reviewed by Edwards and her colleagues (Edwards, Turchik, Dardis, Reynolds, & Gidycz, 2011), but suggests two additional rape myths (i.e., the myth that men cannot stop once they have started to become sexually aroused and the myth that rapists are obviously different from other men). The study of the relationship between rape myths and sexual scripts may help to understand the social construction of rape and consensual sex. Rape myths and sexual scripts may work in conjunction to support rape.

Keywords

Rape Rape myths Rape scripts Sexual scripts 

References

  1. Bart, P. B., & O’Brien, P. H. (1985). Stopping rape: Successful survival strategies. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  2. Beauregard, E., Proulx, J., Rossmo, K., Leclerc, B., & Allaire, J. (2007a). Script analysis of the hunting process of serial sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1069–1084. doi:10.1177/0093854807300851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beauregard, E., Rossmo, D. K., & Proulx, J. (2007b). A descriptive model of the hunting process of serial sex offenders: A rational choice perspective. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 449–463. doi:10.1007/s10896-007-9101-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohner, G., Eyssel, F., Pina, A., Siebler, F., & Viki, G. T. (2009). Rape myth acceptance: Cognitive affective and behavioural effects of beliefs that blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator. In M. Horvath & J. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 17–45). Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
  5. Bondurant, B. (2001). University women’s acknowledgment of rape: Individual, situational, and social factors. Violence Against Women, 7, 294–314. doi:10.1177/1077801201007003004.Google Scholar
  6. Bouffard, L. A. (2010). Exploring the utility of entitlement in understanding sexual aggression. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 870–879. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byers, E. S., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (1996). Sexual coercion in dating relationships. New York: Haworth.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, J. (1988). The power of myth with Bill Moyers. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  10. Carr, J. L., & VanDeusen, K. M. (2004). Risk factors for male sexual aggression on college campuses. Journal of Family Violence, 19, 279–289. doi:10.1023/B:JOFV.0000042078.55308.4d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll, M. H., & Clark, M. D. (2006). Men’s acquaintance rape scripts: A comparison between a regional university and a military academy. Sex Roles, 55, 469–480. doi:10.1007/s1199-006-9102-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, M. D., & Carroll, M. H. (2008). Acquaintance rape scripts of women and men: Similarities and differences. Sex Roles, 58, 616–625. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9373-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, M. D., Carroll, M. H., Bartoli, A. M., & Taylor, M. A. (2009). Flirting to rape: The influence of the traditional sexual script. In J. H. Ulrich & B. T. Cosell (Eds.), Handbook on gender roles (pp. 1–32). Hauppauge: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  14. Crome, S. A., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Adult rape scripting within a victimological perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 395–413. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00013-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deslauriers-Varin, N., & Beauregard, E. (2010). Victims’ routine activities and sex offenders’ target selection scripts: A latent analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 315–342. doi:10.1177/1079063210375975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwards, K. M., Turchik, J. A., Dardis, C., Reynolds, N., & Gidycz, C. A. (2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9943-2.
  17. Feild, H. S. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 156–179. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.2.156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feild, H. S., & Bienen, L. B. (1980). Jurors and rape. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  19. Ferraro, K. F. (1996). Women’s fear of victimization: Shadow of sexual assault? Social Forces, 75, 667–690. doi:10.2307/2580418.Google Scholar
  20. Fisher, B. S., & Sloan, J. J. (2003). Unraveling the fear of victimization among college women: Is the “shadow of sexual assault hypothesis” supported? Justice Quarterly, 20, 633–659. doi:10.1080/07418820300095641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fisher, B. S., Daigle, L. E., Cullen, F. T., & Santana, S. A. (2007). Assessing the efficacy of the protective action-completion nexus for sexual victimizations. Violence and Victims, 22, 18–42. doi:10.1891/vv-v22i1a002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frith, H. (2009). Sexual scripts, sexual refusals, and rape. In M. Horvath & J. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 99–122). Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
  23. Gavey, N. (2005). Just sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Gordon, M. T., & Riger, S. (1989). The female fear: The social costs of rape. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hald, G. M., & Malamuth, N. M. (2008). Self-perceived effects of pornography consumption. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 614–625. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9212-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hald, G. M., Malamuth, N. M., & Yuen, C. (2010). Pornography and attitudes supporting violence against women: Revisiting the relationship in nonexperimental studies. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 14–20. doi:10.1002/ab.20328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Horvath, M., & Brown, J. (2009). Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking. Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
  28. Kahn, A. S., Mathie, V. A., & Torgler, C. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgement. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 53–66. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00296.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kanin, E. J. (1967). Reference groups and sex conduct norm violations. Sociological Quarterly, 8, 495–504. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1967.tb01085.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kanin, E. J. (1975). Selected dyadic aspects of male sex aggression. In L. G. Schultz (Ed.), Rape victimology (pp. 59–76). Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  31. Kanin, E. J. (1985). Date rapists: Differential sexual socialization and relative deprivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 219–231. doi:10.1007/BF01542105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim, J. L., Sorsoli, C. L., Collins, K., Zylbergold, B. A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 145–157. doi:10.1080/00224490701263660.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kingston, D. A., Malamuth, N. M., Fedoroff, P., & Marshall, W. L. (2009). The importance of individual differences in pornography use: Theoretical perspectives and implications for treating sex offenders. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 216–232. doi:10.1080/00224490902747701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koss, M. P., Dinero, T. E., Seibel, C. A., & Cox, S. L. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim’s experience? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1–24. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00924.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krahé, B., Bieneck, S., & Scheinberger-Olwig, R. (2007). Adolescents’ sexual scripts: Schematic representations of consensual and nonconsensual heterosexual interactions. Journal of Sex Research, 4, 316–327. doi:10.1080/00224490701580923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Littleton, H. L., & Axsom, D. (2003). Rape and seduction scripts of university students: Implications for rape attributions and unacknowledged rape. Sex Roles, 49, 465–475. doi:10.1023/A:1025824505185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Littleton, H., Breitkopf, C. R., & Berenson, A. B. (2007). Rape scripts of low-income European American and Latina women. Sex Roles, 56, 509–516. doi:10.1007/s/11199-007-9189-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Littleton, H., Tabernik, H., Canales, E. J., & Backstrom, T. (2009). Risky situation or harmless fun? A qualitative examination of college women’s bad hook-up and rape scripts. Sex Roles, 60, 793–804. doi:10.1007/s1199-009-9586-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704–711. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Malamuth, N. M., Addison, T., & Koss, M. (2000). Pornography and sexual aggression: Are there reliable effects and can we understand them? Annual Review of Sex Research, 11, 26–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. May, R. (1990). The cry for myth. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  43. McCormick, N. B. (2010a). Sexual scripts: Social and therapeutic implications. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25, 96–120. doi:10.1080/14681990903550167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McCormick, N. B. (2010b). Preface to sexual scripts: Social and therapeutic implications. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25, 91–95. doi:10.1080/14681990903563707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McMullin, D., & White, J. W. (2006). Long-term effects of labeling a rape experience. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 96–105. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00266.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27–68. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labeling their own experience. Sex Roles, 51, 129–144. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000037758.95376.00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007). Conceptualizing the “wantedness” of women’s consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: Implications for how women label their experiences with rape. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 72–88. doi:10.1080/00224490709336794.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Richardson, D., & Campbell, J. L. (1982). Alcohol and rape: The effect of alcohol on attributions of blame for rape. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 468–476. doi:10.1177/0146167282083013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ryan, K. (1986). [Rape and seduction scripts]. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  51. Ryan, K. (1988). Rape and seduction scripts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 237–245. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00939.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ryan, K. M. (2004). Further evidence for a cognitive component of rape. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 579–604. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2003.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  54. Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (1997). Sexual assault on the college campus. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Senn, C. Y., & Dzinas, K. (1996). Measuring fear of rape: A new scale. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 28, 141–144. doi:10.1037/0008-400X.28.2.141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. J. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22, 53–60. doi:10.1007/BF02701260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. J. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120. doi:10.1007/BF01542219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sims, C. M., Noel, N. E., & Maisto, S. A. (2007). Rape blame as a function of alcohol presence and resistance type. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2766–2775. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.04.013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 379–440). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  60. Turchik, J. A., Probst, D. R., Irvin, C. R., Chau, M., & Gidycz, C. A. (2010). Prediction of sexual assault experiences in college women based on rape scripts: A prospective analysis. Psychology of Violence, 1, 76–83. doi:10.1037/2152-0828.1.S.76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ullman, S. E. (2007). A 10-year update of “review and critique of empirical studies of rape avoidance.” Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 411–429. doi:10.1177/0093854806297117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ullman, S. E., & Knight, R. A. (1991). A multivariate model for predicting rape and physical injury outcomes during sexual assault. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 724–731. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.5.724.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vega, V., & Malamuth, N. M. (2007). Predicting sexual aggression: The role of pornography in the context of general and specific risk factors. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 104–117. doi:10.1002/ab.20172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Warshaw, R. (1988). I never called it rape. New York: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar
  65. Zillmann, D., & Weaver, J. B. (1989). Pornography and men’s sexual callousness toward women. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Pornography: Research advances and policy considerations (pp. 95–125). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology Department, Box 1Lycoming CollegeWilliamsportUSA

Personalised recommendations