Skip to main content
Log in

Renewable energy research 1995–2009: a case study of wind power research in EU, Spain, Germany and Denmark

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper reports the developments and citation patterns over three time periods of research on Renewable Energy generation and Wind Power 1995–2011 in EU, Spain, Germany and Denmark. Analyses are based on Web of Science and incorporate journal articles as well as conference proceeding papers. Scientometric indicators include publication collaboration ratios, top-player distribution as well as citedness and correspondence analyses of citing publications, relative citation impact, distributions of top-cited as well as top-citing institutions and publication sources and cluster analysis of citing title terms to map knowledge export areas. Findings show an increase in citation impact for Renewable Energy and Wind Power research albeit hampered by scarcely cited conference papers. Although EU maintains its global top position in producing Renewable Energy and Wind Power research the developments of EU and German world shares as well as citation impact are negative during the most recent 7 year period. During the same time the citation impact of Spain and Denmark increase and place both nations among the top-ranking countries in Wind Power research. Spain is the only EU country that increases its world production share from 2000. China is currently ranked three after EU and USA in research output, however with a very low citation impact. Spain, Denmark and Germany each demonstrates distinct collaboration patterns and publication source and citation distribution profiles. More than half the citations to EU Wind Power research are EU-self citations. An expected intensified EU collaboration in the Wind Energy field does not come about. The most productive research institutions in Denmark and Spain are also the most cited ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Analyses of patents and other indicators of technical innovation and developments are published in later publications.

References

  • Comisión Europea. (2008). La economía de los ecosistemas y la biodiversidad: informe provisional. Luxemburgo: Oficina de Publicaciones de las Comunidades Europeas. p 64.

  • EWEA. (2012a). Wind in Power: 2011. European Wind Energy Association (EWEA).

  • EWEA. (2012b). Green growth: the impact of wind energy on jobs and the economy. European Wind Energy Association (EWEA), April 2012.

  • Giljum, S., Behrens, A., Hinterberger, F., Lutz, C., & Meyer, B. (2008). Modelling scenarios towards a sustainable use of natural resources in Europe. Environmental Science & Policy, 11(3), 204–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenacre, M. (2010). ca: Simple, Multiple and Joint Correspondence Analysis. R package version 0.33.

  • GWEC. (2007). Global Wind Statistics 2006. Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC).

  • GWEC. (2012). Global Wind Statistics 2011. Bruxelles: Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC), 07-02-2012.

  • IDEA. (2005). Plan de Energias Renovables en España, 2005–2010. Instituto para la Diversificacion y Ahorrade la Energia (IDEA), 2005. Available at: https://owa.iva.dk/owa/redir.aspx?C=1fc21aa354ab4b0b8388ed832f639cdb&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.idae.es%2findex.php%2fmod.documentos%2fmem.descarga%3ffile%3d%2fdocumentos_PER_2005-2010_8_de_gosto-2005_Completo.(modificacionpag_63)_Copia_2_301254a0.pdf.

  • Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B. & Wormell, I. (2000). Applying diachronic citation analysis to research program evaluations. In B. Cronin and H. B. Atkins, (Eds.), Web of Knowledge: Festschrift for Eugene Garfield (pp. 373–388). Medford: Information Today.

  • Johansson, T. B., & Turkenburg, W. (2004). Policies for renewable energy in the European Union and its member states: an overview. Energy for Sustainable Development, 8(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, N., Hašcic, I., & Popp, D. (2010). Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts. Environmental & Resource Economics, 45, 133–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajikawa, Y., Ohno, J., Takeda, Y., Matsushima, K., & Komiyama, H. (2007). Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: an analysis of the citation network. Sustainability Science, 2(2), 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajikawa, Y., Yoshikawa, J., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2008). Tracking emerging technologies in energy research: toward a roadmap for sustainable energy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(6), 771–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldellis, J. K., & Zafirakis, D. (2011). The wind energy (r)evolution: a short review of a long history. Renewable Energy, 36, 1887–1901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Medio Ambiente Rural y Marino. (2009). España: El medio Ambiente en Europa: Cuarta evaluación. Madrid: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente Rural y Marino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, H. A. (2009). The European Commission’s sustainable consumption and production and sustainable industrial policy action plan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(4), 496–498.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. W. & Larsen, B. (2009). Rapport vedrørende bibliometrisk analyse af dansk klimaforskning 20032007. København: Ministeriet for Videnskab, Teknologi og Udvikling.

  • Siche, R., Agostinho, F., & Ortega, E. (2010). Net primary production (ENPP) as basis for calculation of ecological footprint. Ecological Indicators, 10(2), 475–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streimikiene, D., & Šivickas, G. (2008). The EU sustainable energy policy indicators framework. Environment International, 34(8), 1227–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trieb, F., & Müller-Steinhagen, H. (2007). Europe–Middle East–North Africa cooperation for sustainable electricity and water. Sustainability Science, 2(2), 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Web of Science. (2012). Available at: [http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science_products/a-z/web_of_science/].

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under the project CSO2010-21759-C02-01 titled “Análisis de las capacidades científicas y tecnológicas de la eco-economía en España a partir de indicadores cuantitativos y cualitativos de I + D + i “(Analysis of scientific and technological capacities of Eco-economy in Spain, throughout I + D + i quantitative and qualitative indicators), and by Carlos III University of Madrid-Banco de Santander Chairs of Excellence Program for 2011/2012 academic year.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Ingwersen.

Appendix: Retrieval profiles SAPIENS

Appendix: Retrieval profiles SAPIENS

Block A: Renewable Energy Generation

Renewable Energy Sub-field: # 2 7,104 TS = (“renew* energ*” OR “alternative energ*” OR “green energ*” OR “energy polic*”) AND PY = (2005–2009)

Refined by: Document Type = (ARTICLE OR PROCEEDINGS PAPER OR REVIEW)

Databases = SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH Timespan = 1995–2011

Lemmatization = On.

Wind Power sub-field: # 5 7,018 TS = (”wind power” OR “wind turbine*” OR “wind energy*” OR “wind farm*” OR “wind generation” OR “wind systems”) AND PY = (2005–2009)

Refined by: Document Type = (PROCEEDINGS PAPER OR ARTICLE OR REVIEW) AND [excluding] Web of Science Categories = (ASTRONOMY ASTROPHYSICS)

Databases = SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH Timespan = 1995–2011

Lemmatization = On

Solar Energy sub-field: # 8 26,585 TS = (“solar energy*” OR “solar radiation” OR “solar cell*” OR “solar photovoltaic*” OR “solar power” OR “solar heat*” OR “solar plant*” OR “solar concentrate*” OR “solar thermal” OR “solar collect*” OR “solar technolog*”) AND PY = (2005–2009)Refined by: Document Type = (ARTICLE OR PROCEEDINGS PAPER OR REVIEW) AND [excluding] Web of Science Categories = (HORTICULTURE OR PLANT SCIENCES OR FORESTRY)Databases = SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH Timespan = 1995–2011Lemmatization = On

Geothermal Energy sub-field: # 10 2,615 TS = geothermal AND PY = (2005–2009)

Refined by: Document Type = (ARTICLE OR PROCEEDINGS PAPER OR REVIEW)

Databases = SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH Timespan = 1995–2011

Lemmatization = On

Ocean Wave Power Energy sub-field: # 14 1,554 TS = (“wave power” OR “wave energy*” OR “wave convers*” OR “marine energy” OR “ocean energy”) AND PY = (2005–2009)

Refined by: Document Type = (ARTICLE OR PROCEEDINGS PAPER OR REVIEW) AND [excluding] Web of Science Categories = (ASTRONOMY ASTROPHYSICS OR REMOTE SENSING OR PHYSICS APPLIED OR PHYSICS FLUIDS PLASMAS OR NANOSCIENCE NANOTECHNOLOGY OR OPTICS OR CLINICAL NEUROLOGY OR MATERIALS SCIENCE COATINGS FILMS OR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OR ACOUSTICS OR CHEMISTRY PHYSICAL OR PHYSICS CONDENSED MATTER OR RADIOLOGY NUCLEAR MEDICINE MEDICAL IMAGING OR PHYSICS PARTICLES FIELDS) AND [excluding] Web of Science Categories = (HEMATOLOGY OR IMAGING SCIENCE PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY OR ENGINEERING BIOMEDICAL OR TOXICOLOGY OR BIOLOGY OR BIOPHYSICS OR CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE OR PHYSIOLOGY OR CARDIAC CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS OR FORESTRY OR GASTROENTEROLOGY HEPATOLOGY OR ENGINEERING AEROSPACE OR HORTICULTURE OR MEDICINE GENERAL INTERNAL OR PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE OR MEDICINE RESEARCH EXPERIMENTAL OR UROLOGY NEPHROLOGY OR PHARMACOLOGY PHARMACY OR ELECTROCHEMISTRY OR PSYCHIATRY OR REHABILITATION OR NEUROSCIENCES OR SPECTROSCOPY)

Databases = SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH Timespan = 1995–2011

Lemmatization = On

Topics to be excluded from “Ocean Wave Power Energy” sub-field:

# 15 414,737 TS = (“micro wave*” OR microwave* OR electromagnetic OR laser* OR quantum OR radio) AND PY = (2005–2009)

Databases = SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH Timespan = 1995–2011

Lemmatization = On.

Ocean Wave Power Energy sub-field—final: # 16 1,444 #14 NOT #15.

Renewable Energy Generation Block: # 17 41,797 #16 OR #10 OR #8 OR #5 OR #2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanz-Casado, E., Garcia-Zorita, J.C., Serrano-López, A.E. et al. Renewable energy research 1995–2009: a case study of wind power research in EU, Spain, Germany and Denmark. Scientometrics 95, 197–224 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0825-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0825-3

Keywords

Navigation