Abstract
This article portrays the formation of a new problem area within Swedish educational policy in the 1960s, namely the need of scientific manpower and the demands to entice more individuals into studies in science and technology. As a consequence school science was given the mission to be interesting, fun and to change young people’s attitudes towards these subjects. In the 1970s and 1980s many initiatives were taken to increase the numbers of applicants at high school and university levels, both within curricular frames and out-of-school activities such as science clubs. Through an approach inspired by governmentality studies, I describe the strategies deployed to remedy the problem as rationalities of liberal governmentality. The actions taken were executed in a way to make school children choose science or technology out of their free will. It was an exercise of power that was not meant to restrain but instead to enable action.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adolfsson, T. (1977). Gymnasieskolans fysik, Årskurs 1: Lärarhandledning. Malmö: LiberLäromedel.
Andersson, B. (1989). Grundskolans naturvetenskap: Forskningsresultat och nya idéer. Stockholm: Utbildningsförlaget.
Andrée, M., & Hansson, L. (2013). Marketing the ‘Broad Line’: Invitations to STEM education in a Swedish recruitment campaign. International Journal of Science Education, 35(1), 147–166.
Andrée, M., & Hansson, L. (2014). Recruitment campaigns as a tool for social and cultural reproduction of scientific communities: A case study on how scientists invite young people to science. International Journal of Science Education. (E-publication ahead of print). Accessed March 11, 2014.
Arbetsmarknadsstyrelsen. (1978). Yrkesvägledningsenheten 1978-10-09. Archive of the National Board of Education, National Archive of Sweden, SE/RA/420262/30/09/F I c, pp. 1–3.
Belloni, G. (1999). Teknorama: 15 års science center-verksamhet. In Höjeberg, M. (Ed.), Daedalus: Tekniska museets årsbok 1999, 67 171–180.
Bergwik, S. (2005). Framtidsskaparna: Vetenskapens ungdomskultur vid svenska läroverk 1930–1970. Lund: Arkiv.
Bergwik [Wennerholm], S. (2004). Unga forskare sökes. Att tilltala vetenskapens påläggskalvar i teknikerbristens tidevarv. In A. Ekström (Ed.), Den mediala vetenskapen (pp. 141–162). Nora: Nya Doxa.
Berner, B. (2003). Kön, teknik och naturvetenskap i skolan. In B. Berner (Ed.), Vem tillhör tekniken? Kunskap och kön i teknikens värld (pp. 119–144). Lund: Arkiv.
Dahlin, E., & Thorén, G. (1976). Varför lämnar flickor gymnasiets N-linje. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Edholm, E. (1977). Lägesrapport, bil.2 in Rapport 1977-03-25. Archive of the National Board of Education, National Archive of Sweden, SE/RA/420262/30/09/F I c, p. 8.
Ekström, A. (2000). Konsten att se ett landskapspanorama: Om åskådningspedagogik och exemplarisk realism under 1800-talet. In M. Bergström, F. Lundgren & A. Ekström (Eds.), Publika kulturer. Att tilltala allmänheten: 1700–1900, En inledning. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Elgström, O., & Riis, U. (1990). Läroplansprocesser och förhandlingsdynamik: Exemplet obligatorisk teknik i grundskolan. Linköping: Linköping University.
Erlander, T. (1962). Valfrihetens samhälle. Stockholm: Tiden.
EU. (2004). Europe needs more scientists. Report by the high level group on increasing human resources for science and technology in Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/research/conferences/2004/sciprof/pdf/conference_review_en.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2014.
Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (pp. 119–133). New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
García-Belmar, A., Bertomeu-Sánchez, J. R., & Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2005). The power of didactic writings: French chemistry textbooks of the nineteenth century. In D. Kaiser (Ed.), Pedagogy and the practice of science: Historical and contemporary perspectives (pp. 219–251). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Godin, B. (2005). Measurements and statistics on science and technology: 1920 to the present. London: Routledge.
Government Bill No. 1, 1969/1970, suppl. 10. Stockholm. Riksdagen.
Government Bill no. 1, 1974/9175, suppl. 10. Stockholm. Riksdagen.
Government Bill No. 100, 1975/1976, suppl. 10. Stockholm: Riksdagen.
Government Bill No. 100 1976/1977, suppl. 12. Stockholm: Riksdagen.
Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998). Science in public: Communication, culture and credibility. Cambridge: Perseus.
Hanås, I., & Hanås, B. (1999). Science center: Ett intresseväckande sätt att presentera teknik och naturvetenskap. In M. Höjeberg (Ed.), Daedalus: Tekniska museets årsbok 1999, 67, 157–170.
Härnqvist, K. (1996). Pedagogikforskarens roll i utbildningsplanering kring 1960. In C. Gustafsson (Ed.), Pedagogikforskarens roll i utbildningsplanering (pp. 14–25). Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Hedlin, M. (2011). How the girl choosing technology became the symbol of the non-traditional pupil’s choice in Sweden. Gender and Education, 2011(23), 447–459.
Husén, T. (1973). Svensk skola i internationell belysning. 2 vols., Vol. 1: Naturorienterande ämnen. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Husén, T. (1988). Skolreformerna och forskningen. Stockholm: Verbum Gothia.
Israelsson, A. (2013). Science centers in Sweden: Development and new roles, http://www.cirst.uqam.ca/pcst3/PDF/Communications/ISRAELSSON.pdf. Accessed June 13, 2013.
Jensen, F., & Sjaastad, J. (2013). A Norwegian out-of-school mathematics project’s influence on secondary students’ stem motivation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(6), 1437–1461.
Johansson, U. (2000). Normalitet, kön och klass: Liv och lärande i svenska läroverk 1927-1960. Stockholm: Tavelsjö.
Johnsson, P., & Ljungman, A. (1995). Livsstil, intresse eller nödvändigt ont: En diskussion om ungdomars attityder till naturvetenskap och teknik, ur Förbundet Unga Forskares perspektiv. Stockholm: FUB.
Johnsson, G., & Wallner, B. (1974). 3 U: Undersöka, upptäcka, uppleva, 6 vols., Vol. 1 [Föremål, material, organismer]. Växjö: Skrivab.
Kaiser, D. (2005). Introduction: Moving pedagogy from the periphery to the center. In D. Kaiser (Ed.), Pedagogy and the practice of science: Historical and contemporary perspectives (pp. 1–8). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kaiserfeld, T. (1999). Laboratoriets didaktik. Fysiken på läroverken i början av 1900-talet. In S. Widmalm (Ed.), Vetenskapsbärarna: Naturvetenskapen i det svenska samhället, 1880–1950 (pp. 188–231). Hedemora: Gidlunds.
Kohlstedt, S. G. (2010). Teaching children science: Hands-on nature study in north America, 1890–1930. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lind, I. (1986). Tekniska museet, Teknorama. Öppet museum: Några försök med populärvetenskap för barn, Rapport – Forskningsrådnämnden, 86:4. Stockholm: FRN.
Lindskoug, I. (1977a) “Fortbildning inom ungdomsskolans NO-sektor. PM-Ideskiss”, 1977-10-04, Archive of the National Board of Education, National Archive of Sweden, SE/RA/420262/54/02.
Lindskoug, I. (1977b). “Diskussionsunderlag 1977-09-05”, Archive of the National Board of Education, National Archive of Sweden, SE/RA/420262/30/06/F I bb.
Lövheim, D. (2006).Att inteckna framtiden: Läroplansdebatter gällande naturvetenskap, matematik och teknik i svenska allmänna läroverk 1900–1965. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Lucena, J. (2005). Defending the nation: U.S. policymaking to create scientists and engineers from Sputnik to the War Against Terrorism. University Press of America.
Lynning, K. (2007). Portraying science as humanism: A historical case study of cultural boundary-work from the dawn of the ‘Atomic Age’. Science & Education, 16, 479–510.
Mählck, L. (1975). Om rekryteringen till högre naturvetenskapliga och tekniska studier: Kunskapsnivå och attityder hos elever från Na- och Te-linjen. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Marklund, S. (1989). Skolsverige, 6 vols. Vol. 6: Rullande reform. Stockholm: Liber.
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1993). Governing economic life. In M. Gane & T. Johnson (Eds.), Foucault’s new domains (pp. 1–31). London: Routledge.
Norgren, M. (1984). Teknikcentrum ger alla intresserade chansen att… pröva på själva! Kommun-aktuellt, 19, 18–19.
OECD. (1961). New thinking in school chemistry. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (1962). Country reviews: Sweden. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (1964). The residual factor and economic growth: Study group in the economics of education. Paris: OECD.
Olesko, K. (2006). Science pedagogy as a category of historical analysis. Past, present and future. Science & Education, 15, 863–880.
Oppenheimer, F. (1968). Rationale for a science museum. Curator: The Museum Journal, 1, 206–209.
Osborne, J. F., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079.
Papadopoulos, G. (1994). Education 1960–1990: The OECD perspective. Paris: OECD.
Peters, M. (2009). Introduction: Governmentality, education and the end of neoliberalism? In M. Peters, M. Olsson, S. Maurer, & S. Weber (Eds.), Governmentality studies in education (pp. xxvii–xlviii). Rotterdam: Sense.
Pettersson, L. (1985). Engineer training in Sweden during the postwar period in the context of technical and structural change. The Scandinavian Economic History Review, 33, 108–121.
Quin, M. (1993). Clone, hybrid or mutant? The evolution of European science museums. In J. Durant & J. Gregory (Eds.), Science and culture in Europe. London: Science Museum.
Rantatalo, P. (2002). Den resande eleven: Folkskolans reserörelse 1890–1940. Umeå: Umeå University.
Reid, N. (2011). Attitude research in science education. In I. Saleh & M. Khine (Eds.), Attitude research in science education: Classic and contemporary measurements (pp. 3–44). Charlotte: Information Age.
Richardson, G. (1968). Från Na-grupp till SH-linje. Stockholm: Skolöverstyrelsen.
Riis, U. (1995). Teknik- och naturvetenskapscentra i Sverige: Miljöer för upplevelse, utforskande och kompetensutveckling. Stockholm: Skolverket.
Rose, N. (2010). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought, ninth edition, first edition 1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology, 43, 173–205.
Rudolph, J. (2002). Scientists in the classroom: The cold war reconstruction of American science education. New York: Palgrave.
Rudolph, J. (2003). Portraying epistemology: School science in historical context. Science Education, 87, 64–79.
Rudolph, J. (2008). Historical writing on science education: A view of the landscape. Studies in Science Education, 44, 63–82.
Ruin, O. (1990). Tage Erlander: Serving the welfare state, 1946–1969. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
SCB. (1946). Statistisk årsbok för Sverige 1946. Stockholm: SCB.
SCB. (1967). Statistisk årsbok för Sverige 1967. Stockholm: SCB.
Schreiner, C., & Sjöberg, S. (2007). Science education and youth’s identity construction—two incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in the science curriculum (pp. 231–247). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense publishers.
Shapiro, A. (2012). Between training and popularization: Regulating science textbooks in secondary education. ISIS, 103, 99–110.
Simons, M. (2006). Learning as investment: Notes on governmentality and biopolitics. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38, 523–540.
Skolöverstyrelsen. (1969). Budgetäskande 1969/70. Aktuellt från Skolöverstyrelsen 1968/69, 22.
Skolöverstyrelsen. (1975a). Naturorienteringen gäller vår tids stora frågor. Pedagogiska Meddelanden från Skolöverstyrelsen, 9, 6–8.
Skolöverstyrelsen. (1975b). Nya studieplaner kommer i biologi, kemi, fysik. Pedagogiska Meddelanden från Skolöverstyrelsen, 9, 36–37.
Skolöverstyrelsen. (1975c). Naturkunskap populärt när eleverna lär om foto. Pedagogiska Meddelanden från Skolöversstyrelsen, 9, 31.
Skolöverstyrelsen. (1975d). Högstadieelever utforskar vattendrag på hemorten. Pedagogiska Meddelanden från Skolöverstyrelsen, 9, 19–20.
Skolöverstyrelsen. (1975e). Naturvetenskaplig utbildning i ungdomsskolan: Lägesrapport från N-gruppen, en arbetsgrupp inom SÖ Vol. 1, 3 vols. Stockholm: Skolöverstyrelsen.
Skolöverstyrelsen. (1975f). Gymnasister ‘pryade’ på universitets fysikinstitution. Pedagogiska Meddelanden från Skolöverstyrelsen, 9, 32.
Skolöverstyrelsen. (1977a). Lgy 70, Fysik – treårig naturvetenskaplig linje och fyraårig teknisk linje. Supplement 32. Stockholm: LiberUtbildningsförlaget.
Skolöverstyrelsen. (1977b). Naturvetenskaplig utbildning i ungdomsskolan: Lägesrapport från N-gruppen, en arbetsgrupp inom SÖ Vol. 2, 3 vols. Stockholm: Skolöverstyrelsen.
Skolöverstyrelsen. (1979). Gymnasister värvar flickor till teknisk linje. Pedagogiska Meddelanden från Skolöverstyrelsen, 1, 12–14.
SOU 1963: 42. (1963). Ett nytt gymnasium. 1960 års gymnasieutredning IV. Stockholm.
Stevens, R. (1969). Out-of-school science activities for young people. Paris: Unesco.
SYO-bulletinen. (1975). TEK-NA-projektet. SYO-bulletinen, 2, 3.
SYO-bulletinen. (1976). Debatten fortsätter: TEK-NA-projektet. SYO-bulletinen, 1, 11–12.
TEK-NA-projektet. (1975a). Elevbroschyr. Stockholm: National Library of Sweden.
TEK-NA projektet. (1975b). Syo-konsulentbroschyr. Stockholm: National Library of Sweden.
Vicedo, M. (2012). The secret lives of textbooks. ISIS, 103, 83–87.
Tekniska museet. (1999). Tekniska museet 75 år: En kavalkad av bilder och minnen. In M. Höjeberg (Ed.), Daedalus: Tekniska museets årsbok 1999, 67, 129–144.
Terzian, S. (2013). Science education and citizenship: Fairs, clubs and talent searches for American youth, 1918–1958. New York: Palgrave.
UNESCO. (1986). Unesco sourcebook for out-of-school science and technology education. Paris: Unesco.
Unga Forskare. (1987). Unga forskares skolturné 1987–88: Ett projekt av ungdomar – för ungdomar!, version 1.1/released 87-08-07. Archive of Unga Forskare, National Archive of Sweden, SE/RA/730525/Sk1.
Acknowledgments
Financial support for this research was provided by the Swedish Research Council. The author wishes to thank Professor John L. Rudolph and his graduate seminar at the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Madison-Wisconsin for comments on an earlier version. Helpful comments were also given by participants at seminars in Department of History of Science and Ideas, Uppsala University and Department of Education, Stockholm University. Finally I would like to thank the anonymous referees for their comments on the text.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lövheim, D. Scientists, Engineers and the Society of Free Choice: Enrollment as Policy and Practice in Swedish Science and Technology Education 1960–1990. Sci & Educ 23, 1763–1784 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9693-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9693-y