Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Agnotology, Scientific Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Climate Change: A Response to Legates, Soon and Briggs

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agnotology is a term that has been used to describe the study of ignorance and its cultural production (Proctor in Agnotology: the making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2008). For issues that are contentious in the societal realm, though largely not in the scientific realm, such as human evolution or the broad basics of human-induced climate change, it has been suggested that explicit study of relevant misinformation might be a useful teaching approach (Bedford in J Geogr 109(4):159–165, 2010). Recently, Legates et al. (Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s11191-013-9588-3, 2013) published an aggressive critique of Bedford’s (J Geogr 109(4):159–165, 2010) proposals. However, the critique is based on a comprehensive misinterpretation of Bedford’s (J Geogr 109(4):159–165, 2010) paper. Consequently, Legates et al. (Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s11191-013-9588-3, 2013) address arguments not actually made by Bedford (J Geogr 109(4):159–165, 2010). This article is a response to Legates et al. (Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s11191-013-9588-3, 2013), and demonstrates their errors of interpretation of Bedford (J Geogr 109(4):159–165, 2010) in several key areas: the scientific consensus on climate change; misinformation and the public perception of the scientific consensus on climate change; and agnotology as a teaching tool. We conclude by arguing that, although no single peer-reviewed publication on climate change, or any other scientific issue, should be accepted without due scrutiny, the existence of a scientific consensus—especially one as overwhelming as exists for human-induced climate change—raises the level of confidence that the overall findings of that consensus are correct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, I., Bindoff, N. L., Bindschadler, R. A., Cox, P. M., de Noblet, N., England, M. H., et al. (2011). The Copenhagen diagnosis: Updating the world on the latest climate science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderegg, W. R., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., & Schneider, S. H. (2010). Expert credibility in climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(27), 12107–12109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, D. (2010). Agnotology as a teaching tool: Learning climate science by studying misinformation. Journal of Geography, 109(4), 159–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benestad, R. E., Hygen, H. O., Dorland, R. V., Cook, J., & Nuccitelli, D. (2013). Agnotology: Learning from mistakes. Earth System Dynamics Discussions, 4(1), 451–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman-Woods, R., Boswell, T., Cawsey, I., Dorries, N., Harris, E., Iddon, B., Marsden, G., Naysmith, D., Spink, B., Stewart, I., Stringer, G., Turner, D., & Wilson, R. (2010). The disclosure of climate data from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/387/387i.pdf. Accessed May 21, 2013.

  • Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate?: Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the U.S. prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brysse, K., Oreskes, N., O’Reilly, J., & Oppenheimer, M. (2013). Climate change prediction: Erring on the side of least drama? Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 327–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll, S. (2012). Private empire: ExxonMobil and American power. New York: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S. A., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., et al. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8(2), 024024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crichton, M. (2004). State of fear. New York: Avon Books, HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, J. H., Jr. (1998). Industrial group plans to battle climate treaty. The New York Times April 26 1998. http://www.nytimes.com/1998/04/26/us/industrial-group-plans-to-battle-climate-treaty.html. Accessed May 14, 2013.

  • Doran, P. T., & Zimmerman, M. K. (2009). Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 90(3), 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Tang, D. T. W. (2010). Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 38, 1087–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser, S. W., & Dunlap, R. E. (2012). Leading voices in the denier choir: Conservative columnists’ dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 754–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, G. T., & Cook, J. (2013). Climate change science: A modern synthesis (pp. 445–466). Springer: Netherlands.

  • Foley, H., Scaroni, A., & Yekel, C. (2010). RA-10 Inquiry Report: Concerning the allegations of research misconduct against Dr. Michael E. Mann, Department of Meteorology, College of Earth and Mineral Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University. http://www.research.psu.edu/orp/documents/Findings_Mann_Inquiry.pdf. Accessed May 21, 2013.

  • Freudenburg, W. R., & Muselli, V. (2010). Global warming estimates, media expectations, and the asymmetry of scientific challenge. Global Environmental Change, 20(3), 483–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoggan, J., & Littlemore, R. (2009). Climate cover-up: The crusade to deny global warming. Vancouver, Toronto, Berkeley: Greystone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, P., & Taylor, A. K. (2009). The effect of refuting misconceptions in the introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 36(3), 153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legates, D. R., Soon, W., & Briggs, W. M. (2013). Learning and teaching climate science: The perils of consensus knowledge using agnotology. Science & Education,. doi:10.1007/s11191-013-9588-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz, A. (2008) American opinions on global warming: A Yale University/Gallup/ClearVision poll. http://environment.research.yale.edu/documents/downloads/a-g/. AmericansGlobalWarmingReport.pdf. Accessed May 14, 2013.

  • Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Howe, P. (2012). Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in September, 2012. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/Climate-Beliefs-September-2012.pdf. Accessed May 14, 2013.

  • Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Howe, P. (2013). Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in April, 2013. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/Climate-Beliefs-April-2013.pdf. Accessed May 14, 2013.

  • Lindzen, R. S. (2009). The climate science isn’t settled. The Wall Street Journal November 30 2009. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703939404574567423917025400.html. Accessed May 14, 2013.

  • McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: an analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Social Problems, 47, 499–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, D. A., Bewes, J., Sharma, M. D., & Reiman, P. (2008). Saying the wrong thing: Improving learning with multimedia by including misconceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 144–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, D. A., & Sharma, M. D. (2012, October). Tackling misconceptions in introductory physics using multimedia presentations. In Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference).

  • Murdock, D. (2008). Globe may be cooling on global warming. Scripps Howard News Service. http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/32821. Accessed 22 April 2009.

  • Nisbet, M. C., & Myers, T. (2007). Twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(3), 444–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 3606(5702), 1686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N. (2007). The scientific consensus on climate change: How do we know we’re not wrong? In J. F. C. DiMento & P. Doughman (Eds.), Climate change: What it means for us, our children, and our grandchildren (pp. 65–99). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N. (2010). My facts are better than your facts: spreading good news about global warming. In M. S. Morgan & P. Howlett (Eds.), How do facts travel? (pp. 135–166). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2008). Challenging knowledge: How climate science became a victim of the cold war. In R. N. Proctor & L. Schiebinger (Eds.), Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance (pp. 55–89). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxburgh, R. (2010). Report of the International Panel set up by the University of East Anglia to examine the research of the Climatic Research Unit. http://www.uea.ac.uk/mac/comm/media/press/CRUstatements/SAP. Accessed May 21, 2013.

  • Peterson, T. C., Connolley, W. M., & Fleck, J. (2008). The myth of the 1970s global cooling scientific consensus. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 89(9), 1325–1337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew. (2012). More say there is solid evidence of global warming. Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/10-15-12%20Global%20Warming%20Release.pdf. Accessed May 14, 2013.

  • Plimer, I. (2009). Heaven & earth: Global warming, the missing science. Ballan, Victoria, Australia: Connor Court Publishing Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. N. (2008). Agnotology: A missing term to describe the cultural production of ignorance (and its study). In R. N. Proctor & L. Schiebinger (Eds.), Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance (pp. 1–33). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmstorf, S., Foster, G., & Cazenave, A. (2012). Comparing climate projections to observations up to 2011. Environmental Research Letters, 7(4), 044035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, M., Boulton, G., Clarke, P., Eyton, D. & Norton, J. (2010). The Independent Climate Change E-mails Review. http://www.cce-review.org/pdf/FINAL%20REPORT.pdf. Accessed May 21, 2013.

  • Shwed, U., & Bearman, P. S. (2010). The temporal structure of scientific consensus formation. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 817–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroeve, J., Serreze, M., Drobot, S., Gearheard, S., Holland, M., Maslanik, J., et al. (2008). Arctic sea ice extent plummets in 2007. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 89(2), 13–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2007). Climate change: A hot topic gets hotter. March 15. http://www.economist.com/node/8867858. Accessed May 15, 2013.

  • The Great Global Warming Swindle. (2007). DVD. Directed by M. Durkin. London, UK: Wag TV.

  • Wald, M. L. (1991). Pro-coal ad campaign disputes warming idea. The New York Times July 08 1991. http://www.nytimes.com/1991/07/08/business/pro-coal-ad-campaign-disputes-warming-idea.html. Accessed May 29, 2013.

  • Walsh, J. E., & Chapman, W. L. (2001). 20th-century sea-ice variations from observational data. Annals of Glaciology, 33(1), 444–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, H., & Cook, J. (2011). Climate change denial: Heads in the sand. London, UK, & Washington, DC: Earthscan.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geography Department, Weber State University, 1210 University Circle, Ogden, UT, 84408-1210, USA

    Daniel Bedford

  2. Global Change Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    John Cook

  3. School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

    John Cook

Authors
  1. Daniel Bedford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Cook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Bedford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bedford, D., Cook, J. Agnotology, Scientific Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Climate Change: A Response to Legates, Soon and Briggs. Sci & Educ 22, 2019–2030 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9608-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9608-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation