Abstract
Despite a near universal consensus among scientists regarding the perils of climate change for human civilizations, climate change has not emerged as a key issue among science educators. This position paper advocates for the centrality of climate change in science education. Using Polanyi’s critique of market in capitalist societies, it positions global climate change as an outcome of commodification of nature in market dominated societies. Thus, the paper argues that global climate change is primarily a societal issue that needs a societal response much more than a technological one. Further, it presents a case for considering science education as an important element of societal response to global climate change. In the end, the paper presents some ideas for re-imagining science education for the global climate change era.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
TAR stands for IPCC’s third assessment report that was released in (2001).
The binary between humans and nature has only heuristic value here. I acknowledge that humans too are very much a part of ‘nature’ as it exists on our planet.
References
Bakker, K. (2005). Neoliberalizing nature? market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(3), 542–565.
Borenstein, S. (2009). Obama considers climate engineering to cool globe. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/weather/climate/globalwarming/2009-04-08-obama-climate-engineering_N.htm.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1987). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brahic, C. (2005). US confirms belief in ‘technical fix’ to climate change. Science and Development Network. Retrieved from http://www.scidev.net/en/news/us-confirms-belief-in-technical-fix-to-climate-c.html.
Bridges, D. (2008). Educationalization: On the appropriateness of asking educational institutions to solve social and economic problems. Educational Theory, 58(4), 461–474.
Broome, J. (2008). The ethics of climate change: Pay now or pay more later?. Scientific American, 298(6). Retrieved from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-ethics-of-climate-change.
Brown, P. (2004). Melting ice: the threat to London’s future. The Guardian. Retrieved July 23, 2010, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2004/jul/14/sciencenews.environment.
Bruce, M., & Nies, Y. D. (2009). Obama unveils race for school billions. ABC World News. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=8167411&page=1.
Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.
Carter, L. (2008). Sociocultural influences on science education: Innovation for contemporary times. Science Education, 92(1), 165–181.
Cicerone, R. J. (2009). Avoiding Unmanageable Climate Change and Managing Unavoidable Changes. Paper presented at the science and technology in society forum. from http://www.nasonline.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ABOUT_President_Speeches_STS_Forum_Oct_2009.
Clark, B., & York, R. (2005). Carbon metabolism: Global capitalism, climate change, and the biospheric rift. Theory and Society, 34(4), 391–428.
Cuban, L. (2004). Making public schools business-like… Again. PS: Political Science and Politics, 37, 237–240.
Cuban, L., & Shipps, D. (Eds.). (2000). Reconstructing the common good in education: Coping with intractable american dilemmas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Daily, G. C., & Ellison, K. (2002). The new economy of nature: The quest to make conservation profitable. Washington, DC: Island Press.
DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.
Depaepe, M., & Smeyers, P. (2008). Educationalization as an ongoing modernization process. Educational Theory, 58(4), 379–389.
Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. School Journal, 54, 77–80. Retrieved from http://dewey.pragmatism.org/creed.htm.
Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington: National Research Council.
Fendler, L. (2008). New and improved educationalising: faster, more powerful and longer lasting. Ethics and Education, 3(1), 15–26.
Foster, J. B. (1999). Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 366.
G8+5 Academies’ joint statement: Climate change and the transformation of energy technologies for a low carbon future. (2009). Retrieved from www.nationalacademies.org/includes/G8+5energy-climate09.pdf.
Galbraith, J. K. (2008). The predator state. New York: Free Press.
Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795.
Glass, G. V. (2008). Fertilizers, pills, and magnetic strips: The fate of public education in America. Charlotte, N.C: Information Age Publishing.
Golden, B. W., & Saka, Y. Y. (2009). Emphasis given to climate change in state science standards: Are states warming up to the science? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structures: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
Gruenewald, D. A. (2004). A Foucauldian analysis of environmental education: Toward the socioecological challenge of the earth charter. Curriculum Inquiry, 34(1), 71–107.
Gruenewald, D. A., & Smith, G. A. (Eds.). (2008). Place-based education in the global age : local diversity. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., Beerling, D., Berner, R., Masson-Delmotte, V., et al. (2008). Target atmospheric CO2: Where should humanity aim? Open Atmospheric Science Journal, 2, 217–231.
Hardin, G. (2009). The tragedy of the commons. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 1(3), 243–253.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hasselmann, K., Latif, M., Hoos, G., Azar, C., Edenhoffer, O., Jaeger, C. C., et al. (2006). The challenge of long-term climate change. In D. Kennedy (Ed.), State of the planet 2006–2007 (pp. 172–182). Washington DC: American Association for the advancement of science.
Henderson, S., & Agency, E. P. (1993). Global climates–past. Washington D. C: Office of Research and Development, Present, and Future. Activities for Integrated Science Education.
Henson, R. (2008). The rough guide to climate change. New York: Rough Guides Ltd.
Hocking, C. (1990). Global warming & the greenhouse effect: [teacher's guide]. Berkeley, Calif.: Great Explorations in Math and Science (GEMS), Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California.
IPCC. (2001). Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
IPCC. (2007a). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
IPCC. (2007b). IPCC fourth assessment report climate change 2007. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
IPCC. (2007c). Technical summary. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge, UK: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
IPCC. (2008). Climate change and water. Technical paper of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: IPCC Secretariat.
Kajikawa, Y., Ohno, J., Takeda, Y., Matsushima, K., & Komiyama, H. (2007). Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: An analysis of the citation network. Sustainability Science, 2(2), 221–231.
Kempton, W., Boster, J. S., & Hartley, J. A. (1995). Environmental values and American culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kerr, R. A. (2007). Climate change: Global warming is changing the world. Science, 316(5822), 188–190.
Kliebard, H. M. (2004). The Struggle for the American curriculum 1893–1958 (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge Falmer.
Komiyama, H., & Takeuchi, K. (2006). Sustainability science: Building a new discipline. Sustainability Science, 1(1), 1–6.
Labaree, D. F. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39–81.
Labaree, D. F. (2008). The winning ways of a losing strategy: Educationalizing social problems in the united states. Educational Theory, 58(4), 447–460.
Lambeir, B., & Ramaekers, S. (2008). Humanizing education and the educationalization of health. Educational Theory, 58(4), 435–446.
Leiserowitz, A. (2007). Human development report 2007/2008: International public opinion, perception, and understanding of global climate change. New York: UNDP.
Lester, B. T., Ma, L., Lee, O., & Lambert, J. (2006). Social activism in elementary science education: A science, technology, and society approach to teach global warming. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 315–339.
Lobell, D. B., Burke, M. B., Tebaldi, C., Mastrandrea, M. D., Falcon, W. P., & Naylor, R. L. (2008). Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science, 319(5863), 607–610.
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, 17(3/4), 445–459.
Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 73–95.
Lueddecke, S. B., Pinter, N., & McManus, S. A. (2001). Greenhouse effect in the classroom: A project- and laboratory-based curriculum. Journal of Geoscience Education, 49(3), 274.
Lynch, J. (2006). It’s not easy being interdisciplinary. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35(5), 1119–1122.
Malhi, Y., Roberts, J. T., Betts, R. A., Killeen, T. J., Li, W., & Nobre, C. A. (2008). Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science, 319(5860), 169–172.
Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston, MA: Beaton.
Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N., Hare, W., Raper, S. C. B., Frieler, K., Knutti, R., et al. (2009). Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature, 458(7242), 1158–1162.
Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 675–698.
Monastersky, R. (2009). Climate crunch: A burden beyond bearing. Nature, 458(7242), 1091–1094.
Morello-Frosch, R., Pastor, M., & Shonkoff, S. B. (2009). The climate gap. Los Angeles, CA: USC Center for sustainable cities, University of Southern California.
Morris, S. A., & Martens, B. V. d. V. (2008). Mapping research specialties. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42(1), 213–295.
NRC. (1996). National Science Education Standards: The National Academies.
Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy. New York: State University of New York Press.
Ostrom, E. (1991). Governing the commons : The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Pew (2010). Little change in opinions about global warming, from http://people-press.org/report/669/.
Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory?. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Polanyi, K. (2001). The economy as instituted process. In M. S. Granovetter & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The sociology of economic life (pp. 31–50). Boulder, Colarado: Westview Press.
Robertson, M. M. (2006). The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24(3), 367–387.
Romps, D., & Zhiming, K. (2009). Climate: Cyclones take it higher. Nature, 459(7245), 302.
Rudolph, J. L. (2005). Inquiry, instrumentalism, and the public understanding of science. Science Education, 89(5), 803–821.
Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42.
Sadler, T. D. (Ed.). (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research. New York: Springer.
Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). what do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391.
Schmidt, G., & Archer, D. (2009). Climate change: Too much of a bad thing. Nature, 458(7242), 1117–1118.
Schnaiberg, A., Pellow, D. N., & Weinberg, A. (2000). The treadmill of production and the environmental state. Evanston, IL: Institute for Policy Research.
Schneider, S. (2009). The worst-case scenario. Nature, 458(7242), 1104–1105.
Schreiner, C., Henriksen, E. K., & Kirkeby Hansen, P. J. (2005). Climate education: Empowering today’s youth to meet tomorrow’s challenges. Studies in Science Education, 41(1), 3–49.
Smith, J. B., Schneider, S. H., Oppenheimer, M., Yohe, G. W., Hare, W., Mastrandrea, M. D., et al. (2009). Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) “reasons for concern”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(11), 4133–4137.
Sterman, J. D., & Sweeney, L. B. (2007). Understanding public complacency about climate change: Adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Climatic Change, 80(3/4), 213–238.
Stern, N. H. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stern, N. (2009). The global deal: Climate change and the creation of a new era of progress and prosperity. New York: Public Affairs.
Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important Ideas? Findings from project 2061’s curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538–568.
Swedberg, R. (2005). The economic sociology of capitalism: An introduction and agenda. In V. Nee & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The economic sociology of capitalism (pp. 4–39). Princeton, MA: Princeton University Press.
Tans, P. (2009). Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide–Mauna Loa. from NOAA/ESRL: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/.
Tippins, D. J., Mueller, M. P., Eijck, M. v., & Adams, J. D. (Eds.). (2010). Cultural studies and environmentalism. New York: Springer.
Treanor, B. (2010). Environmentalism and public virtue. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23(1), 9–28.
Vandermeer, J. H., & Perfecto, I. (2005). Breakfast of biodiversity : The political ecology of rain forest destruction. Oakland, Calif, New York: Food First Books.
Wertsch, J. V., Tulviste, P., & Hagstrom, F. (1993). A sociocultural approach to agency. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Yager, R. E. (1996). Science, technology, society as reform in science education. Albany, NY: State Univ. of New York Press.
Ziman, J. (2002). Real science: What it is, and what it means. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to Denise Glynn, Cory Buxton and Irfan Muzaffar for their critical comments and inputs on different version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, A. Global Climate Change: What has Science Education Got to Do with it?. Sci & Educ 21, 33–53 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9372-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9372-1