Abstract
Scientists’ science differs remarkably from school science. In order to be taught to students, science is recontextualized from scientific research communities to science classrooms. This paper examines scientific discourse in scientific research communities, and discusses its transformation from an internally-persuasive and authoritative discourse to a purely authoritative discourse under recontextualization. It presents the challenges that recontextualization of science poses for achievement of science literacy goals, and discusses remedial steps that science education community can take to meet them.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1994) Benchmarks for science literacy, Retrieved March 29, 2007 from http://www.project2061.org/publications/bsl/online/bolintro.htm
Abd-El-Khalick F (2002) The influence of a philosophy of science course on preservice secondary science teachers’ Views of Nature of Science; Retrieved December, 15, 2006 from http://www.aets.chem.pitt.edu
Anderson CW (1999) Inscriptions and science learning. J Res Sci Teach 36(9):973–974
Anderson CW (2003) Teaching science for motivation and understanding. Retrieved March 29, 2007 from http://www.msu.edu/course/te/804/Sp05Sec1819/Science05/public/TE402Readings.html
Anderson CW, Richmond G (2003) Learning to teach science: building patterns of practice. Unpublished book prospectus. Retrieved March 29, 2007, from http://www.SciRes.educ.msu.edu/TEScience/Index.htm
Anderson RD (2002) Reforming science teaching: what research says about inquiry. J Sci Teach Educ 8(4):269–282
Ayelet Baram-Tsabari AY (2005) Text genre as a factor in the formation of scientific literacy. J Res Sci Teach 42(4):403–428
Bakhtin MM (1981) The dialogic imagination. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas
Bakhtin MM (1986) Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas
Banks D (2005) On the historical origins of nominalized process in scientific text. Eng Spec Purposes 24(3):347–357
Barrow LH (2006) A brief history of inquiry: from Dewey to Standards. J Sci Teach Educ 17(3):265–278
Bazerman C (1988) Shaping written knowledge. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Bell RL, Lederman N, Fouad A (2000) Developing and acting upon one’s conception of the nature of science: a follow-up study. J Res Sci Teach 37(6):563–581
Bernstein B (2000) Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland
Brent D (1994) Writing classes, writing genres, and writing textbooks. Retrieved March 29, 2007, from http://www.ucalgary.ca/∼dabrent/art/genre.htm
Budiansky S (2001) The trouble with textbooks. Retrieved March 29, 2007, from http://www.project2061.org/newsinfo/research/articles/asee.htm
Burbules NC, Bruce BC (2001) Theory and research on teaching as dialogue. In: Richardson V (ed) Handbook of research on teaching. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC
Cazden CB (2001) Classroom discourse: the language of teaching and learning. Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH
Ceccarelli L (2001) Rhetorical criticism and the rhetoric of science. Western J Comm 65(3):314–329
Celik S, Bayrakceken S (2006) The effect of a “science, technology and society” course on prospective teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. Res Sci Technol Educ 24(2):255–273
Chinn CA, Malhotra BA (2002) Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: a theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Sci Educ 86(2):175–218
Christie F (1998) Science and apprenticeship. In: Martin JR, Veel R (eds) Reading science: critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. Routledge, New York, pp 152–177
Clive S (1993) Figuring out a scientific understanding. J Res Sci Teach 30(10):1215–1227
Cunningham C, Helms J (1998) Sociology of science as a means to a more authentic, inclusive science education. J Res Sci Teach 35(5):483–499
Dewey J (1910) Science as subject-matter and as method. Science 31:121–127
Doyle W (1983) Academic work. Rev Educ Res 53:159–199
Duschl RA (2006) The elementary level science methods course: breeding ground of an apprehension toward science? A case study. J Res Sci Teach 20(8):745–754
Dyson AH (1993) Social worlds of children learning to write in an urban Primary School. Teachers College Press, New York
Eflin J, Glennan S, Reisch G (1999) The nature of science: a perspective from the philosophy of science. J Res Sci Teach 36(1):107–116
Epidemeologic Inquiry: H-index calculator of scientist impact and influence. (n.d.). Retrieved March 29, 2007, from http://www.epidemiologic.org/2006/12/h-index-calculator-of-scientist-impact.html
Fairclough N (2003) Analysing discourse: text analysis for social research. Routledge, London
Finn PJ (1999) Literacy with an attitude: educating working-class children in their own self-Interest. State University of New York Press, New York
Foss SK, Foss KA et al (1991) Contemporary perspectives on rhetoric. Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, Illinois
Gallagher JJ (1991) Perspective and practicing secondary school science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Sci Educ 75:121–134
Gee J (1999) What is literacy? In: Mitchell C, Weiler K (eds) Rewriting literacy: culture and the discourse of the other. Bergin & Garvin, Westport, CN
Gonzalez N (2005) Beyond culture: the hybridity of funds of knowledge. In: Gonzalez N, Moll LC, Amanti C (eds) Funds of knowledge: theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey
Grandy R, Duschl RA (2007) Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Analysis of a conference. Sci & Educ 16:141–166
Halliday M, Martin J (1994) Writing science: literacy and discursive power. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Halliday MAK (2004) The language of science. Continuum, New York
Hand BM, Alvermann DE, Gee J, Guzzetti BJ, Norris SP, Phillips LM et al (2003) Message from the “Island group”: what is literacy in science literacy? J Res Sci Teach 40(7):607–615
Hawkins D (1990) Defining and bridging the gap. In: Duckwith E, Easley J, Dawkins D, Henriques A (eds) Science education: a minds-on approach for the elementary years. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 97–139
Hayes MT (2002) Elementary preservice teachers’ struggles to define inquiry-based science teaching. J Sci Teach Educ 13(2):147–165
Heath SB (1983) Ways with words: language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge University Press, New York
Henderson JG (1989) Positioned reflective practice: a curriculum discussion. J Teach Educ 40(3):10–14
Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X et al (2001) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Retrieved Dec. 16, 2006 from: http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/index.htm
IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. IPCC
Kademani BS, Kumar V, Sagar A, Kumar A (2006) World literature on thorium research: A scientometric study based on Science Citation Index. Scientometrics 69(2):347–364
Kesidou S, Roseman JE (2002) How well do middle school science programs measure up? findings from Project 2061’s curriculum review. J Res Sci Teach 39(6):522–549
Latour B (2004) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Crit Inq 30:225–248
Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Latour B, Woolgar S (1979) Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Sage Publications, Baverly Hills, CA
Lemke J (1990) Talking science: language, learning and values. Ablex, Norwood, NJ
Locke DM (1992) Science as writing. Yale University Press, New Haven
Luera GR, Otto CA (2005) Development and evaluation of an inquiry-based elementary science teacher education program reflecting current reform movements. J Sci Teach Educ 16(3):241–258
Martin JR, Veel R (1998) Introduction to part III. In: Martin JR, Veel R (eds) Reading science: critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. Routledge, New York, pp 83–85
McBride JW, Bhatti MI, Hannan MA, Feinberg M (2004) Using an inquiry approach to teach science to secondary school science teachers. Phys Educ 39(5):434–439
Miller R (1998) Rhetoric and reality: what practical work in science education is really for. In: Wellington J (ed) Practical work in school science: which way now? Routledge, London
Miller SM (1992) Creating change: towards a dialogic pedagogy. Retrieved Nov. 30, 2006, from http://www.eric.ed.gov
Moje EB, Ciechanowski KM et al (2004) Working toward third space in content area literacy: an examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Res Quart 39(1):38–70
Moje EB, Collazo T, Carrillo R, Marx RW (2001) “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: language, literacy and discourse in project-based science. J Res Sci Teach 38(4):469–498
Mortimer EF, Scott PH (2003) Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Open University Press, Philadelphia, PA
Newman WJ, Abell SK, Hubbard PD, McDonald J, Otaala J, Martini M (2005) Dilemmas of teaching inquiry in elementary science methods. J Sci Teach Educ 15(4):257–279
Newton P, Rosalind. D, Osborne J (1999) The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. Int J Sci Educ 21(5):553–576
Norris SP, Phillips LM (2003) How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Sci Educ 87(2):224–240
National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. Retrieved March 12, 2005, from http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/nses/
National Science Teachers Association (2006) Science teacher preparation. Retrieved March12, 2005, from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/preparation.aspx
Oreskes N (2004) Beyond the ivory tower: the scientific consensus on climate change. Science 306(5702):1686
Osborne J (2002) Science without literacy: a ship without a sail? Cambridge J Educ 32(2):203–218
Parsons K (ed) (2003) The science wars: debating scientific knowledge and technology. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY
Pickering A (1993) The mangle of practice: agency and emergence in the sociology of science. Am J Sociol 99(3):559–589
Popkewitz T (2002) How the alchemy makes enquiry, evidence, and exclusion. J Teach Educ 53(3):262–267
Prigogine I, Stengers I (1984) Order out of chaos: man’s new dialogue with nature. Bantam Books, New York
Roth WM, McGinn MK, Bowen GM (1998) How prepared are preservice teachers to teach scientific inquiry? Levels of performance in scientific representation practices. J Sci Teach Educ 9(1):25–48
Rutherford FJ, Ahlgren A (1991) Science for all Americans. Retrieved November, 13, 2005 from http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/sfaatoc.htm
Schwab JJ (1960) Inquiry, the science teacher, and the educator. School Rev 68(2):176–195
Schwarz CV, Gwekwerere YN (2007) Using a guided inquiry and modeling instructional framework (EIMA) to support preservice K-8 science teaching. Sci Educ 91(1):158–186
Smith LK, Gess-Newsome J (2004) Elementary science methods courses and the National science education standards: are we adequately preparing teachers? J Sci Teach Educ 15(2):91–110
Stinner A (1995) Science textbooks: their present role and future form. In: Glynn SM, Duit R (eds) Learning science in the schools: research reforming practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp 275–296
Tyack D, Cuban L (1995) Tinkering towards utopia: a century of public school reforms. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Usher R (2000) Deconstructive happening, ethical moment. In: Simmons H, Usher R (eds) Situated ethics in educational research. Routledge, London, pp 162–185
Windschitl M, Thompson J (2006) Transcending simple forms of school science investigation: the impact of preservice instruction on teachers’ understandings of model-based inquiry. Am Educ Res J 43(4):783–835
Yager RE (2005) Accomplishing the visions for professional development of teachers advocated in the national science education standards. J Sci Teach Educ 16(2):95–102
Yore LD, Treagust DF (2006) Current realities and future possibilities: language and science literacy—empowering research and informing instruction. Int J Sci Educ 28(2–3):291–314
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by grants from the Knowles foundation and the United States Department PT3 Program (Grant Number P342A00193, Yong Zhao, Principal Investigator). The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the position, policy, or endorsement of the supporting agencies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, A., Anderson, C.W. Recontextualization of Science from Lab to School: Implications for Science Literacy. Sci & Educ 18, 1253–1275 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9112-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9112-8