Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evolution as a controversial issue: a review of instructional approaches

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although evolution has long been considered a controversial issue, little effort has been made to ensure that instructional approaches address the controversial nature of the issue. A framework for understanding the nature of controversy and some defining characteristics of controversial issues are provided. In light of this framework evolution is evaluated to address the defining characteristics of the issue that make it controversial. The purpose of this exploratory review of evolution instruction is to identify a range of instructional approaches reported in extant literature and to determine the extent to which each approach is commensurate with teaching evolution as a controversial issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993) Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey C (1975) Neutrality and rationality in teaching. In: Bridges D, Scrimshaw P (eds) Values and authority in schools. Hodder and Stoughton, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Berra TM (1990) Evolution and the myth of creationism: a basic guide to the facts in the evolution debate. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop B, Anderson CW (1990) Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. J Res Sci Teach 27:415–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brem SK, Ranney M, Schindel J (2003) Perceived consequences of evolution: college students perceived negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Sci Educa 87:181–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse NW, Dagher ZR, Letts WJ IV, Shipman HL (2000) Diversity of students’ views about evidence, theory, and the interface between science and religion in an astronomy course. J Res Sci Teach 37:340–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges D (1986) Dealing with controversy in the curriculum: a philosophical perspective. In: Wellington JJ (ed) Controversial issues in the curriculum

  • Cherif A, Adams G, Loehr J (2001) What on “earth” is evolution?: the geological perspective of teaching evolutionary biology effectively. Am Biol Teach 64:569–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colburn A, Henriques L (2006) Clergy views on evolution, creationism, science, and religion. J Res Sci Teach 43:419–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearden RF (1981) Controversial issues and the curriculum. J Curriculum Stud 13:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demastes SS, Settlage JS, Jr. Good R (1995) Students’ conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: cases of replication and comparison. J Res Sci Teach 32:535–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dembski WA (2000) The third mode of explanation: detecting evidence of intelligent design in the sciences. In: Behe MJ, Dembski WA, Meyer SC (eds) Science and evidence for design in the universe, Ignatius Press, San Francisco, pp 17–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T (1973) Nothing in biology makes sense except in light of evolution. Am Biol Teach 35:125–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Duveen J, Solomon J (1994) The great evolution trial: use of role-play in the classroom. J Res Sci Teach 31:575–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecker R (1990) Dictionary of science and creationism. Prometheus, Buffalo

  • Farber P (2003) Teaching evolution and the nature of science. Am Biol Teach 65:347–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner P (1984) Another look at controversial issues. J Curriculum Stud 16:379–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddis AN (1991) Improving the quality of science classroom discourse on controversial issues. Sci Educ 75:169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (1999) Rocks of ages: science and religion in the fullness of life. Ballantine Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover H (1985) Evolving state policy on creationism. Educ Leadersh 42:69–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J, Lally V (1988) Problem solving and controversial issues in biotechnology. J Biol Educ 22:144–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann R (2005) The Interaction of belief and understanding of controversial science concepts: toward a grounded theory of cognitive apartheid. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, Texas

  • Ingram EL, Nelson CE (2006) Relationship between achievement and students acceptance of evolution or creation in and upper-level evolution course. J Res Sci Teach 43:7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DF, Doster EC, Meadows L, Wood T (1995) Hearts and minds in the science classroom: the education of a confirmed evolutionist. J Res Sci Teach 32:585–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jane B (2002) The Evolution/Creation science controversy: educate rather than debate. Proceedings from the International Organization for Science and Technology Education, Parana, Brazil

  • Jensen MS, Finley FN (1995) Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Sci Educ 72:147–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MS, Finley FN (1996) Changes in students’ understanding of evolution resulting from different curricular and instructional strategies. J Res Sci Teach 33:879–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MS, Finley FN (1997) Teaching evolution using historically rich curriculum and paired problem solving instructional strategy. Am Biol Teach 59:208–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RL, Peeples EE (1987) The role of scientific understanding in college: student acceptance of evolution. Am Biol Teach 49:93–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolstø SD (2001) Scientific literacy for citizenship: tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Sci Educ 85:291–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupperman JJ (1985) Why some topics are controversial. Educ Leadersh 42:69–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson AE, Weser J (1990) The rejection of nonscientific beliefs about life: effects of instruction and reasoning skills. J Res Sci Teach 27:589–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson AE, Worsnop WA (1992) Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior knowledge, Prior belief and religious commitment. J Res Sci Teach 29:143–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson R (2002) Teaching ethical issues in science. Proceedings from the International Organization for Science and Technology Education, Parana, Brazil

  • Lord T, Marino S (1993) How university students view the theory of evolution. J Coll Sci Teach 22:353–357

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie WJ, Lin Y-G, Strayer J (2002) Creationist vs. evolutionary beliefs: effects on learning biology. Am Biol Teach 64:89–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead JM, Scharmann LC (1994) Enhancing critical thinking through structured academic controversy. Am Biol Teach 56:416–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows L, Doster E, Jackson DF (2000) Managing the conflict between evolution & religion. Am Biol Teach 62:102–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JD, Scott EC, Okamoto S (2006) Public acceptance of evolution. Science 313:765–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore R (2004) How well do biology teachers understand the legal issues associated with the teaching of evolution? BioScience 54:860–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morishita F (1991) Teaching about controversial issues: resolving conflict between creationism and evolution through law-related education. Am Biol Teach 53:91–93

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Science (1998) Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Biology Teachers (1997) Position statement of the teaching of evolution. NABT News & Views, 4–5

  • National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teachers Association (1997) An NSTA position statement on the teaching of evolution. J Coll Sci Teach 27(1):7–8

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board (2002) Science and Engineering Indicators-2002. National Science Foundation

  • Nicholls JG, Nelson JR (1992) Students’ conceptions of controversial knowledge. J Educ Psychol 2:224–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickels MK, Nelson CE, Beard J (1996) Better biology teaching by emphasizing evolution and the nature of science. Am Biol Teach 59:332–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Nord WA (1999) Science, religion, and education. Phi Delta Kappan 81:28–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Oulton C, Dillon J, Grace MM (2004) Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues, international. J Sci Educ 26:411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss M (1992) How should science teachers teach the relationship between science and religion?. Sch Sci Rev 74:127–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge ML, Mitchell MA (2002) High school biology teachers’ knowledge structure, acceptance & teaching of evolution. Am Biol Teach 64: 21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharmann LC (1990) Enhancing an understanding of the premises of evolutionary theory: the influence of a diversified instructional strategy. Sch Sci Math 90:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott EC, Branch G (2003) Evolution: what’s wrong with ‘teach the controversy. Trends Ecol Evol 18:499–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipman HL, Brickhouse NW, Dagher Z, Letts WJ IV (2002) Changes in student views of religion and science in a college astronomy course. Sci Educ 86:526–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra GM, Southerland SA, McConaughy F, Demastes JW (2003) Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. J Res Sci Educ 40:510–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair A, Pendarvis MP (1997) Evolution vs. conservative religious beliefs: can biology instructors assist students with their dilemma?.J Coll Sci Teach 27:167–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge JE, Wandersee JH (1994) Identifying critical junctures in learning in a college course on evolution. J Res Sci Teach 31:459–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Koevering TE, Stiehl RB (1989) Evolution, creation & wisconsin biology teachers. Am Biol Teach 51:200–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rooy W (1999) Controversial biological issues: an exploratory tool for accessing teacher thinking in relation to classroom practice. In: Annual meeting of the national association for research in science teaching, Boston, MA

  • Woods CS, Scharmann LC (2001) High school students’ perceptions of evolutionary theory, electronic. J Sci Educ 6:2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Doctoral Programs in Mathematics and Science Education, Morgan State University, 24 South View Road, Rising Sun, MD, 21911, USA

    Ronald S. Hermann

Authors
  1. Ronald S. Hermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald S. Hermann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hermann, R.S. Evolution as a controversial issue: a review of instructional approaches. Sci & Educ 17, 1011–1032 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9074-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9074-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation