Abstract
Models are often used when teaching science. In this paper historical models and students’ ideas about genetics are compared. The historical development of the scientific idea of the gene and its function is described and categorized into five historical models of gene function. Differences and similarities between these historical models are made explicit. Internal and external consistency problems between the models are identified and discussed. From the consistency analysis seven epistemological features are identified. The features vary in such ways between the historical models that it is claimed that learning difficulties might be the consequence if these features are not explicitly addressed when teaching genetics. Students’ understanding of genetics, as described in science education literature, is then examined. The comparison shows extensive parallelism between students’ alternative understanding of genetics and the epistemological features, i.e., the claim is strengthened. It is also argued that, when teaching gene function, the outlined historical models could be useful in a combined nature of science and history of science approach. Our findings also raise the question what to teach in relation to preferred learning outcomes in genetics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd-El-Khalick F, Lederman NG (2000) The influence of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 37(10):1057–1095
Bahar M, Johnstone AH, Hansell MH (1999) Revisiting learning difficulties in biology. J Biol Educ 33(2):84–86
Banet E, Ayuso E (2000) Teaching genetics at secondary school: a strategy for teaching about the location of inheritance information. Sci Educ 84(3):313–343
Boulter C, Buckley B (2000) Constructing a typology of models for science education. In: Gilbert J, Boulter C (eds) Developing models in science education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 41–58
Cadogan A (eds) (2000) Biological nomenclature—standard terms and expressions used in the teaching of biology, 3rd edn. The Institute of Biology, London
Carlson EA (1966) The gene: a critical history. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia and London
Carlson EA (1991) Defining the gene: an evolving concept. J Hum Genet 49(2):475–487
Carlson EA (2004) Mendel’s legacy: the origin of classical genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
Cavallo AML (1996) Meaningful learning, reasoning ability, and students understanding and problem solving of topics in genetics. J Res Sci Teach 33(6):625–656
Dietrich MR (2000) From gene to genetic hierarchy: richard goldschmidt and the problem of the Gene. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 91–114
Dutilh BE, Huynen MA, Snel B (2006) A global definition of expression context is conserved between orthologs, but does not correlate with sequence conservation. BMC Genomics 7(10), http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471–2164/7/12
Falk R (2000) The gene—a concept in tension. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 317–348
Finkel EA (1996) Making sense of genetics: students’ knowledge use during problem solving in a high school genetics class. J Res Sci Teach 33(4):345–368
Fogle T (1990) Are genes units of inheritance? Biol Philos 5(3):349–371
Fogle T (2000) The dissolution of protein coding genes in molecular biology. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–25
Forissier T, Clément P (2003) Teaching biological identity as genome/environment interactions. J Biol Educ 37(2):85–90
Fox Keller E (2000) Decoding the genetic program: or, some circular logic in the logic of circularity. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 159–177
Gaudillière JP, Rheinberger HJ (2004) Introduction. In: Gaudillière JP, Rheinberger HJ (eds) From molecular genetics to genomics: the mapping cultures of twentieth-century genetics. Routledge, London and New York, pp. 1–6
Gayon J (2000) From measurement to organization: a philosophical scheme for the history of the concept of heredity. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 69–90
Giere RN (1988) Explaining science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Giere RN (1994) The cognitive structure of scientific theories. Philos Sci 61:276–296
Gifford F (2000) Gene concepts and genetic concepts. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 40–66
Gilbert JK, Boulter C, Rutherford M (1998) Models in explanations, part 1: horses for courses? Int J Sci Educ 20(1):83–97
Gilbert J, Boulter C, Elmer R (2000) Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In: Gilbert J, Boulter C (eds) Developing models in science education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 3–17
Gilbert SW (1991) Model building and a definition of science. J Res Sci Teach 28(1):73–79
Griesemer JR (2000) Reproduction and the reduction of genetics. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 240–285
Griffiths PE (2002) Lost: one gene concept. Reward to finder. Biol Philos 17(2):271–283
Griffiths PE, Neumann-Held EN (1999) The many faces of the gene. Bioscience 49:656–662
Grosslight L, Unger C, Jay E, Smith C (1991) Understanding models and their use in science; conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. J Res Sci Teach 28(9):799–822
Halldén O (1990) Questions asked in common sense contexts and in scientific contexts. In: Lijnse PL, Licht P, de Vos W, Waarlo AJ (eds) Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles. CD-β Press, Utrecht, pp. 119–130
Halloun IA (2004) Modeling theory in science education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Harré R (1970) The principles of scientific thinking. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL
Harrison AG, Treagust DF (2000) A typology of school science models. Int J Sci Educ 22(9):1011–1026
Hoffmeyer J (1988) Naturen I huvudet. Rabén & Sjögren, Simrishamn, Sweden
Johnstone AH, Mahmoud NA (1980) Isolating topics of high perceived difficulty in school biology. J Biol Educ 14(2):163–166
Justi R (2000) Teaching with historical models. In: Gilbert J, Boulter C (eds) Developing models in science education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 209–228
Justi R, Gilbert JK (1999) A cause of a historical science teaching: use of hybrid models. Sci Educ 83(2):163–177
Kincaid H (1990) Molecular biology and the unity of science. Philos Sci 57:575–593
Kinnear J (1991) Using an historical perspective to enrich the teaching of linkage in genetics. Sci Educ 75(1):69–85
Kitcher P (1982) Genes. Br J Philos Sci 33(4):337–359
Knippels MCPJ (2002) Coping with the abstract and complex nature of genetics in biology education. CD-β Press, Utrecht
Kuhn D, Amsel E, O’Loughlin M (1988) The development of scientific thinking skills. Academic Press Inc., London
Kuhn TS (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd edn. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Lawrence PA (1992) The making of a fly: the genetics of animal design. Blackwell Scientific, London
Leatherdale WH (1974) The role of analogy, model and metaphor in science. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam
Lederman NG (1992) Students and teachers conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. J Res Sci Teach 29(4):331–359
Lewis J, Leach J, Wood-Robinson C (2000a) All in the genes?—young people’s understanding of the nature of genes. J Biol Educ 34(2):74–79
Lewis J, Leach J, Wood-Robinson C (2000b) Chromosomes: the missing link – young people’s understanding of mitosis, meiosis, and fertilisation. J Biol Educ 34(4):189–199
Lewis J, Kattmann U (2004) Traits, genes, particles and information: re-visiting students’ understandings of genetics. Int J Sci Educ 26(2):195–206
Lewis J, Wood-Robinson C (2000) Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance—do students see any relationship. Int J Sci Educ 22(2):177–195
Marbach-Ad G (2001) Attempting to break the code in student comprehension of genetic concepts. J Biol Educ 35(4):183–189
Marbach-Ad G, Stavy R (2000) Students cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena. J Biol Educ 34(4):200–205
Martins I, Ogborn J (1997) Metaphorical reasoning about genetics. Int J Sci Educ 19(1):47–63
Matthews M (1992) History, philosophy and science teaching: the present rapprochement. Sci Educ 1(1):11–47
Mayr E (1982) The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution and inheritance. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Mayr E (1997) This is biology: the science of the living world. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Nersessian NJ (1992) How do scientists think? capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In: Giere RN (ed) Cognitive models of science. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 3–44
Pashley M (1994) A-level students: their problem with gene and allele. J Biol Educ 28(2):120–126
Passmore C, Stewart J (2002) A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. J Res Sci Teach 39(3):185–204
Portin P (1993) The concept of the gene: short history and present status. Q Rev Biol 68(2):173–223
Rheinberger HJ (2000) Gene concepts: fragments from the perspective of molecular biology. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 219–239
Rosenberg A (1985) The structure of biological science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rosenberg A (2000) Philosophy of science: a contemporary introduction. Routledge, New York, NY
Roth M (1995) Authentic school science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Sarkar S (1999) From Reaktionsnorm to the adaptive norm: the norm of reaction, 1909–1960. Biol Philos 14:235–252
Schwartz S (2000) The differential concept of the gene: past and present. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 24–40
Singer M, Berg P (1991) Genes and genomes: a changing perspective. University Science Books, Mill Valley
Stewart J, Hafner R (1991) Extending the conception of problem in problem-solving research. Sci Educ 75(1):105–120
Stewart J, Rudolph JL (2001) Considering the nature of scientific problems when teaching science curricula. Sci Educ 85(3):207–222
Van Driel JH, Verloop N (1999) Teachers knowledge of models and modelling in science. Int J Sci Educ 21(11):1141–1153
Venville GJ, Treagust DF (1998) Exploring conceptual change in genetics using a multidimensional interpretive framework. J Res Sci Teach 35(9):1031–1055
Waters KC (1994) Genes made molecular. Philos Sci 61(2):163–185
Weber M (1998) Representing genes: classical mapping techniques and the growth of genetic knowledge. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 29:295–315
Weber M (2004) Walking on the chromosome: Drosophila and the molecularization of development. In: Gaudillière JP, Rheinberger HJ (eds) From molecular genetics to genomics: the mapping cultures of twentieth-century genetics. Routledge, London and New York, pp. 63–78
Wimsatt WC (1987) False models as means to truer theories. In: Nitecki MH, Hoffman A (eds) Neutral models in biology. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, pp. 23–55
Wood-Robinson C (1994) Young people’s ideas about inheritance and evolution. Stud Sci Educ 24:29–47
Wood-Robinson C, Lewis J, Leach J (2000) Young peoples understanding of genetic information in the cells of an organism. J Biol Educ 35(1):29–35
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gericke, N.M., Hagberg, M. Definition of historical models of gene function and their relation to students’ understanding of genetics. Sci & Educ 16, 849–881 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9064-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9064-4