Abstract
Following two decades of corroboration, modeling theory is presented as a pedagogical theory that promotes mediated experiential learning of model-laden theory and inquiry in science education. Students develop experiential knowledge about physical realities through interplay between their own ideas about the physical world and particular patterns in this world. Under teacher mediation, they represent each pattern with a particular model that they develop through a five-phase learning cycle, following particular modeling schemata of well-defined dimensions and rules of engagement. Significantly greater student achievement has been increasingly demonstrated under mediated modeling than under conventional instruction of lecture and demonstration, especially in secondary school and university physics courses. The improved achievement is reflected in more meaningful understanding of course materials, better learning styles, higher success rates, lower attrition rates and narrower gaps between students of different backgrounds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for All Americans Project 2061. Oxford University Press, New York
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy, Project 2061. Oxford University Press, New York
Association of American Colleges and Universities (2002). Greater Expectations: A New Vision for Learning as a Nation Goes to College. AAC&U, Washington DC
Bachelard, G.: 1940, La Philosophie du Non, Quadrige (4th edn, 1994)/Presses Universitaires de France, Paris
Bower G.H., Morrow D.G. (1990). Mental Models in Narrative Comprehension. Science 247:44–48
Bullock B. (1979). The Use of Models to Teach Elementary Physics. Physics Education 14:312–317
Bunge M. (1967). Scientific Research I & II. Springer-Verlag, New York
Casti J.L. (1989). Alternate Realities. Mathematical Models of Nature and Man. Wiley-Interscience, New York
Clement J. (1989). Learning via Model Construction and Criticism. In: Glover G., Ronning R., Reynolds C. (eds), Handbook of Creativity, Assessment, Theory and Research. Plenum, New York
Clement J. (1993). Using Bridging Analogies and Anchoring Intuitions to Deal with Students’ Preconceptions in Physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30(10):1241–1257
Cobern W.W. (1993). College Students’ Conceptualizations of Nature: An Interpretive World View Analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30(8):935–951
Cobern W.W. (1995). Science Education as an Exercise in Foreign Affairs. Science & Education 4(3):287–302
Doerr H.M. (1996). Integrating the Study of Trigonometry, Vectors, and Force Through Modeling. School Science and Mathematics 96(8):407–418
Drake S. (1974). Galileo at Work: His Scientific Biography. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Erduran S. (2001). Philosophy of Chemistry: An Emerging Field with Implications for Chemistry Education. Science & Education 10(6):581–593
Ericsson K.A., Charness N. (1994). Expert Performance. Its Structure and Acquisition. American Psychologist 49(8):725–747
Eylon B.S., Reif, F. (1984). Effects of Knowledge Organization on Task Performance. Cognition and Instruction 1(1):5–44
Feuerstein, R. & Jensen, M.R.: 1980, ‚Instrumental Enrichment: Theoretical Basis, Goals, and Instruments’, The Educational Forum,44: 401–423
Fisher K.M. (1990). Semantic Networking: The New Kid on the Block. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27(10):1001–1018
Gee B. (1978). Models as a Pedagogical Tool: Can We Learn From Maxwell?. Physics Education 13:287–291
Gentner D., Stevens A.L. (eds) (1983). Mental Models. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Giere R.N. (1988). Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Giere R.N. (eds) (1992). Cognitive Models of Science Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. XV. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Giere R.N. (1994). The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Theories. Philosophy of Science 61:276–296
Gilbert S.W. (1991). Model Building and a Definition of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28(1):73–79
Glas E. (2002). Klein’s Model of Mathematical Creativity. Science & Education 11(1):95–104
Goldberg, F., Bendall, S. & Bach, N.: 1991, ‚Development of Computer-Video-Based Learning Activities and Assessment of Student Understanding in the Domain of Geometrical Optics’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
Hafner R., Stewart J. (1995). Revising Explanatory Models to Accommodate Anomalous Genetic Phenomena: Problem Solving in the “Context of Discovery”. Science Education 79(2):111–146
Hake R.R. (1987). Promoting Student Crossover to the Newtonian World. American Journal of Physics 55(10):878–884
Hake R.R. (1992). Socratic Pedagogy in the Introductory Physics Laboratory. The Physics Teacher 30:546–552
Halloun, I.: 1984, The Use of Models in Teaching Newtonian Mechanics, PhD dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe
Halloun I. (1986). Le Réalisme Naif et L’apprentissage de la Physique. Recherches Pédagogiques 17:23–47
Halloun I. (1994), Teaching Model Construction for Solving Physics Problems. Recherches Pédagogiques 19:5–17
Halloun I. (1996). Schematic Modeling for Meaningful Learning of Physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33(9):1019–1041
Halloun I. (1998a). Schematic Concepts for Schematic Models of the Real World. Science Education 82(2):239–263
Halloun I. (1998b). Interactive Model-Based Education: An Alternative to Outcomes-Based Education in Physics. South African Journal of Science 94:313–318
Halloun I. (2000). Model-Laden Inquiry: A Prescription for Effective Physics Instruction. THEMES 1(4):339–355
Halloun I. (2001a). Apprentissage par Modélisation: La Physique Intelligible. Phoenix Series/Librairie du Liban Publishers, Beirut
Halloun I. (2001b). Student Views about Science: A comparative Survey. Phoenix Series/Educational Research Center, Lebanese University, Beirut
Halloun, I.: 2003, ‚Evaluating Science and Technology Learning Materials: The Case of the Modeling Curriculum’, Paper presented at UNESCO Regional Workshop on the Evaluation of MST Curricula, Beirut, Lebanon.
Halloun I. (2004a). Modeling Theory in Science Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Halloun, I.: 2004b, ‚Modeling Theory for Paradigmatic Evolution’, Proceedings of the 12th annual meeting of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, SAARMSTE, Durban, South Africa, pp. 325–342.
Halloun, I.: 2004c, ‚Mediated Modeling for Meaningful Learning of Science’, Proceedings of the 8th Annual Science and Math Teachers Conference. SMEC & UNESCO, Beirut
Halloun I., Hestenes D. (1985a). Common Sense Concepts about Motion. American Journal of Physics 53(11):1056–1065
Halloun I., Hestenes D. (1985b). The Initial Knowledge State of College Physics Students. American Journal of Physics 53(11):1043–1055
Halloun I., Hestenes D. (1987). Modeling Instruction in Mechanics. American Journal of Physics 55(5):455–462
Halloun I., Hestenes D. (1998). Interpreting VASS Dimensions and Profiles. Science & Education 7(6):553–577
Harré R. (1970). The Principles of Scientific Thinking. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Harré R. (1978). Models in Science. Physics Education 13(5):275–278
Harte J. (2002). Toward a Synthesis of the Newtonian and Darwinian Worldviews. Physics Today 55(10):29–34
Heller, P., Foster, T. & Heller, K.: 1997, ‚Cooperative Group Problem Solving Laboratories for Introductory Classes’, in E. F. Redish & J. S. Rigden (eds), The Changing Role of Physics Departments in Modern Universities. Proceedings of ICUPE, American Institute of Physics, College Park, pp. 913–933
Helm H., Novak J. (eds) (1983). Proceedings of the International Seminar: Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics. Cornell University, Ithaca
Hempel C.G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation. The Free Press, Macmillan New York
Hesse M.B. (1970). Models and Analogies in Science. University of Notre Dame Press, South Bend
Hestenes, D.: 1995. Modeling software for learning and doing physics. in C. Bernardini, C.Tarsitani and M. Vincentini (eds.), Thinking Physics for Teaching, Plenum, New York, pp.25–66
Hestenes D., Wells M., Swackhamer G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher 30(3):141–158
Johnson-Laird P.N. (1983). Mental Models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Joshua S., Dupin J.J. (1989). Représentations et Modélisations : Le Débat Scientifique dans la Cclasse et l’Apprentissage de la Physique. Peter Lang, Berne
Joshua, S. & Dupin, J.J.: 1999, Introduction à la Didactique des Sciences et des Mathématiques. 2nd Ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France
Justi R., Gilbert J.K. (2002). Models and Modelling in Chemical Education. In: Gilbert J.K., de Jong O., Justi R., Treagust D.F., van Driel J.H. (eds), Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 47–68
Karplus R. (1977). Science Teaching and the Development of Reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 14(2):169–175
Lakoff G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Matthews M.R. (2000). Time for Science Education. How Teaching the History and Philosophy of Pendulum Motion Can Contribute to Science Literacy. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York
Moreira, M.A. & Greca, H.: April 1995, ‚Kinds of Mental Representations – Models, Propositions, and Images – Used by Students and Physicists Regarding the Concept of Field’, Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco CA, USA
Mortimer E.F. (1995). Conceptual Change or Conceptual Profile Change?. Science & Education 4(3):267–285
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press, Washington
National Science Teachers Association. (1995). Scope, Sequence, and Coordination of Secondary School Science. Vol. 3. A High School Framework for National Science Education Standards. NSTA, Washington DC
Nersessian N.J. (1995). Should Physicists Preach what they Practice? Constructive Modeling in Doing and Learning Physics. Science & Education 4(3):203–226
Novak J.D. (1990). Concept Mapping: A Useful Tool for Science Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27(10):937–949
Novak J. (eds) (1993). Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Cornell University, Ithaca
Novak J. (eds) (1987). Proceedings of the Second International Seminar: Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Vol I, II, III. Cornell University, Ithaca
Novak J.D., Gowin D.B., Johansen G.T. (1983). The Use of Concept Mapping and Knowledge Vee Mapping with Junior High School Science Students. Science Education 67:625–645
Passmore C., Stewart J. (2002). A Modeling Approach to Teaching Evolutionary Biology in High Schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39(3):185–204
Raman V.V. (1980). Teaching Aristotelian Physics through Dialogue. The Physics Teacher 18(8):580–583
Redish E. (1994). Implications of Cognitive Studies for Teaching Physics. American Journal of Physics 62(9):796–803
Reif F., Allen S. (1992). Cognition for Interpreting Scientific Concepts: A Study of Acceleration. Cognition and Instruction 9(1):1–44
Reif F., Heller J.I. (1982). Knowledge Structure and Problem Solving in Physics. Educational Psychologist 17(2):102–127
Reif F., Larkin J.H. (1991). Cognition in Scientific and Everyday Domains: Comparison and Learning Implications. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28(9):733–760
Roychoudhury A., Roth W.M. (1996). Interactions in an Open-Inquiry Physics Laboratory. International Journal of Science Education 18(4):423–445
Seiler G., Tobin K., Sokolic J. (2001). Design, Technology, and Science: Sites for Learning, Resistance, and Social Reproduction in Urban Schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38(7):746–767
Shore L.S., Erickson M.J., Garik P., Hickman P., Stanley E., Taylor E.F., Trunfio P.A. (1992). Learning Fractals by “Doing Science”: Applying Cognitive Apprenticeship Strategies to Curriculum Design and Instruction. Interactive Learning Environments 2(3&4):205–226
Smit J.J.A., Finegold M. (1995). Models in Physics: Perceptions Held by Final-Year Prospective Physical Science Teachers Studying at South African Universities. International Journal of Science Education 17(5):621–634
Steen L.A. (eds) (1990). On the Shoulders of Giants. New Approaches to Numeracy. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Taconis R., Ferguson-Hessler M.G.M., Broekkamp H. (2001). Teaching Science Problem Solving: An Overview of Experimental Work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38(4):442–468
Viau, E.A.: 1994, ‚The Mind as a Channel: A Paradigm for the Information Age’, Educational Technology Review 3: 5–10
Wartofsky M.W. (1968). Conceptual Foundations of Scientific Thought. MacMillan, New York
White B.Y. (1993). ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education. Cognition and Instruction 10(1):1–100
Windschitl M. (2004). Folk Theories of “Inquiry”: How Preservice Teachers Reproduce the Discourse and Practice of an Atheoretical Scientific Method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41(5):481–512
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Halloun, I.A. Mediated Modeling in Science Education. Sci & Educ 16, 653–697 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9004-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9004-3