Skip to main content
Log in

The latent demand for bank debt: characterizing “discouraged borrowers”

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concerns that small firms encounter credit constraints are well entrenched in the literature, despite widespread empirical evidence that a relatively small proportion of small firms have their loan applications rejected. However, many firms may be discouraged from applying for fear of rejection. These businesses are the focus of this paper. Based on responses to a large-scale postal survey of UK small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), we find that twice as many businesses were discouraged from applying for a bank loan than had their loan request denied. More particularly, we observe a number of distinguishing characteristics of “discouraged borrowers” (relative to applicants). These include: strategy, sector, prior entrepreneurial experience and banking relationships. The implications of our findings for policy and future research are briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Our ability to disaggregate further is constrained by technical and interpretive considerations. Here, “production” includes manufacturing, construction, mining and quarrying, electricity, and gas and water supply; “knowledge services” includes financial services, business services, computer and related services, research and development (R&D) services and real estate services; “wholesale and retail” is largely self-explanatory and also includes sale and repair of motor vehicles.

  2. The proportion of personal wealth invested may also indicate confidence or attitude to risk. However, it certainly signals the availability of resources beyond the firm that banks may call on in the event of default. We are grateful to a reviewer for raising this point.

  3. We are grateful to the editor and an anonymous reviewer for guidance on this point.

  4. We also tested for the possibility of a non-linear relationship by including a quadratic term in firm size. However, this was not significant and was dropped from the final model.

  5. Chi-grams compare the expected and observed frequencies, such that \( \chi {\text{score}} = {\raise0.7ex\hbox{${\left( {O - E} \right)}$} \!\mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {O - E} \right)} {\sqrt E }}}\right.\kern-\nulldelimiterspace} \!\lower0.7ex\hbox{${\sqrt E }$}} \).

  6. See the variables comprising this factor in Appendix A.

  7. Of course, this assumes that existing interventions are both appropriate and adequate. Assessment of this is beyond the scope of the current paper.

  8. We are grateful to David Storey for suggesting the terms “appropriately discouraged” and “inappropriately discouraged”.

  9. Multicollinearity diagnostics are given in the models (Han et al. 2009, p. 421). The condition numbers for the various manipulations of the D&B score are all greater than 10 and as high as 43.

References

  • Arenius, P., & Autio, E. (2006). Financing of small businesses: Are Mars and Venus more alike than different? Venture Capital, 8, 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, R., Bostic, R., & Samolyk, K. (1998). The role of personal wealth in small business finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 1019–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J., Gellatly, G., & Gaudreault, V. (2002). Financing innovation in new small firms: New evidence from Canada, 11F0019, No. 190. Ottawa, ON: Micro-Economic Analysis Division, Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank of England. (2000). Finance for small businesses in deprived communities. London: Domestic Finance Division, Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2003). Small business and debt finance. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, J., & White, M. (2004). Bankruptcy and small firms’ access to credit. Rand Journal of Economics, 35, 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binks, M. R., & Ennew, C. T. (1996). Growing firms and the credit constraints. Small Business Economics, 8, 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binks, M. R., & Ennew, C. T. (1997). The relationship between UK banks and their small business customers. Small Business Economics, 9, 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, M. K. (2006). Gendered lending: Institutions, perceptions, and women’s access to business financing. Venture Capital, 8, 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, B., & Letterie, W. (2008). Business starters and credit rationing: An empirical analysis of credit application and denial. Small Business Economics, 30, 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S., Mason, C., & Tagg, S. (2006). Lifting the barriers to growth in UK small businesses: The FSB biennial membership survey 2006. London: Federation of Small Businesses. ISBN 0906779480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S., Shaw, E., Lam, W., & Wilson, F. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurship, and bank lending: The criteria and processes used by bank loan officers in assessing applications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 427–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalluzzo, K., & Wolken, J. (2005). Small business loan turndowns, personal wealth and discrimination. Journal of Business, 78, 2153–2178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBR. (2000). British enterprise in transition. Cambridge, UK: ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccato, V., & Haining, R. (2005). Assessing the geography of vandalism: Evidence from a Swedish city. Urban Studies, 42, 1637–1656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. (2000). Access to capital and terms of credit: A comparison of men- and women-owned small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 38(3), 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosh, A., & Hughes, A. (Eds.). (2003). Enterprise challenged: Policy and performance in the British SME sector 1999–2002. Cambridge: ESRC Centre for Business Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, M., & Mitchell, P. (2003). Is the small firms loan guarantee scheme hazardous for banks or helpful to small business? Small Business Economics, 21, 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressy, R. (1996). Are business startups debt rationed? The Economic Journal, 106(438), 1253–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressy, R. (1999). Small business failure: Failure to fund or failure to learn by doing? In Z. Acs & B. Carlsson (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, SMEs and the macro economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressy, R. (2002). Funding gaps: A symposium. The Economic Journal, 112, F1–F16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, J. (2005). A detailed study of financial exclusion in the UK. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28, 75–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elyasiani, E., & Goldberg, L. G. (2004). Relationship lending: A survey of the literature. Journal of Economics and Business, 56, 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, Z., & Nieto, M. J. (2005). Internationalization strategy of small and medium-sized family businesses: Some influential factors. Family Business Review, 18, 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, S. (2004). Finance for small and medium-sized enterprises: A report on the 2004 UK Survey of SME Finances. CSME, University of Warwick. http://www.wbs.ac.uk/downloads/research/wbs-sme-main.pdf.

  • Freel, M. (2007). Are small innovators credit rationed? Small Business Economics, 28, 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, M. A., & Vilaseca, A. (1996). Finance in family business. Family Business Review, 9, 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, W. M., & Hubbard, R. G. (2004). Entrepreneurship and household saving. Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy, 4(1), 1053.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A. A., & Ritchie, J. R. (1982). Understanding the process of starting small businesses. European Small Business Journal, 1, 26–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, L., Fraser, S., & Storey, D. J. (2009). Are good or bad borrowers discouraged from applying for loans? Evidence from the US small business credit markets. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33, 415–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. (1931). Annual survey of economic theory: The theory of monopoly. Econometric, 3, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howells, J. (2000). Innovation and services: New conceptual frameworks. CRIC Discussion paper 38, University of Manchester.

  • Howells, J. (2003). Barriers to innovation and technology transfer in services. Technology Monitor, 20(3), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japelli, T. (1990). Who is credit constrained in the U.S. economy? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. B., & McGuckin, R. H. (1997). Firm Performance and Evolution: Empirical Regularities in the US Microdata. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1), 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J., Lowe, J., & Taylor, P. (1998). Strategy and financial policy in UK small firms. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 25, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keasey, K., & Watson, R. (1994). The bank financing of small firms in the U.K.: Issues and evidence. Small Business Economics, 6, 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kon, Y., & Storey, D. J. (2003). A theory of discouraged borrowers. Small Business Economics, 21, 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, A. R., & Willard, K. L. (2000). Do firms get the financing they want? Measuring credit rationing experienced by small business in the U.S.? Small Business Economics, 14, 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyshon, A., & Thrift, N. (1996). Financial exclusion and the shifting boundaries of the financial system. Environment and Planning A, 28, 1150–1156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. (1998). Comment on Avery, Bostic, and Samolyk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 1062–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlow, S., & Patton, D. (2005). All credit to men? Entrepreneurship, finance and gender. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 717–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. (2009). Public policy support for the informal venture capital market in Europe. International Small Business Journal, 27, 536–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirchandani, K. (1999). Feminist insight on gendered work: New directions in research on women and entrepreneurship. Gender, Work and Organization, 6(4), 224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics. (2005). UK business: Activity, size and location–2005. London: Office for National Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orser, B., Riding, A., & Manley, K. (2006). Women entrepreneurs and financial capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 643–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. (2002). Do banks ration credit to new enterprises? And should governments intervene? Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 49, 162–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. C. (2004). The economics of self-employment and entrepreneurship. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1995). The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 407–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, M., & Smallbone, D. (2003). Policies to support ethnic minority enterprise: The English experience. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15, 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, L. (1998). The financing of small businesses: A comparative study of male and female business owners. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riding, A., & Haines, G. (2001). Loan guarantees: Costs of default and benefits to small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 595–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano, C. A., Tanewski, G. A., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2000). Capital structure decision making: A model for family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 285–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2006). Loan officer turnover and credit availability for small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 44, 544–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small Business Service. (2005). Business start-ups and closures: VAT registrations and deregistrations in 2004. Statistical Press Release URN 05/11 12th October 2005. London: Small Business Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallbone, D., Ram, M., Deakins, D., & Baldock, R. (2003). Access to finance by ethnic minority businesses in the UK. International Small Business Journal, 21, 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stam, E., Audretsch, D., & Meijaard, J. (2008). Renascent entrepreneurship. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18, 493–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 71, 393–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D. (1994). Understanding the small business sector. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnik, B., & Fidell, L. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tether, B. (2004). Do Services Innovate (Differently)? CRIC Discussion Paper 66, University of Manchester.

  • Treichel, M., & Scott, J. (2006). Women-owned businesses and access to bank credit: Evidence from three surveys since 1987. Venture Capital, 8, 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tylecote, A. (1994). Financial systems and innovation. In M. Dodgson & R. Rothwell (Eds.), The handbook of industrial innovation (pp. 259–267). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheul, I., & Thurik, A. R. (2001). Start-up capital: Does gender matter? Small Business Economics, 16(4), 329–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos, E., Yeh, A., Carter, S., & Tagg, S. (2007). The happy story of small business financing. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31, 2648–2672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (2006). External funding and firm growth: Comparing female- and male-controlled SMEs. Venture Capital, 8, 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J., & Everett, J. (1999). Small business failure rates: Choice of definition and industry effects. International Small Business Journal, 17, 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., & Storey, D. (1997). Financial constraints on the growth of high-technology small firms in the United Kingdom. Applied Financial Economics, 7, 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., & Binks, M. (2005). Novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneur behaviour and contributions. Small Business Economics, 25, 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wölfl, A. (2005). The Service Economy in OECD Countries. STI Working Paper 2005/3. OECD, Paris.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the editor and two anonymous reviewers of earlier drafts of the manuscript, whose comments and guidance greatly improved both the technical aspects of the paper and conceptual framing of our work. Nonetheless, any errors remain our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Freel.

Appendix A

Appendix A

See Table 5.

Table 5 Factor analysis of strategic focus

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freel, M., Carter, S., Tagg, S. et al. The latent demand for bank debt: characterizing “discouraged borrowers”. Small Bus Econ 38, 399–418 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9283-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9283-6

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation