Abstract
Drawing upon a sample of 256 small firms who applied for bank loans, the current paper is concerned with the extent to which ‘innovativeness’ is associated with a lower level of loan application success. The paper records the proportion of loan successfully applied for and estimates a series of tobit models utilising a number of proxy measures for innovation (in terms of inputs, outputs, and commercial significance to the firm) and incorporating standard controls. In general, the models suggest (as anticipated) that the most innovative firms are less successful in loan markets than their less innovative peers – though there is some variation by proxy. Moreover, there is tentative evidence that ‘a little innovation may be a good thing’.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams A. (1982). Barriers to Product innovation in Small Firms: Policy Implications. European Small Business Journal 1: 67–86
Arrow K. (1971). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: Arrow, K. (eds) Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, pp. Markham, Chicago
Baldwin J., G. Gellatly and V. Gaudreault, 2002, Financing innovation in new small firms: New evidence from Canada, 11F0019, No. 190, Micro-Economic Analysis Division, Statistics Canada
Bank of England, 1996, The Financing of Technology-Based Small Firms, London, October
Bank of England, 2001, The Financing of Technology-Based Small Firms, London, February
Bank of England, 2004. Finance for Small Firms – An Eleventh Report, London, April
Beck T., A. Demirgüç-Kunt and V. Maksimovic, 2003, Bank Competition, Financing Obstacles, and Access to Credit, World Bank Policy Research WP 2996
Binks M., 1979, Finance for expansion in the small firm, Lloyds Bank Review, October
Binks M. R. and Ennew C. T. (1996). Growing Firms and the Credit Constraints. Small Business Economics 8: 17–25
Boocock G. and Woods M. (1997). The evaluation criteria used by venture capitalists: evidence from a UK venture fund. International Small Business Journal 16: 36–57
Brophy D. and Shulman J. (1993). Financial Factors which Stimulate Innovation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 17: 61–75
Bullock A. and A. Hughes, 2000, The Survey Method, the SME Panel Database and Sample Attrition, in CBR British Enterprise in Transition, ESCR Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge
Canepa A. and P. Stoneman, 2002, Financial constraints on innovation: A European cross country study, United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies, Maastricht, NL
CBI, 1996. Tech Stars: Breaking the growth barriers for technology-based SMEs, London
Centre for Business Research (CBR), 1996, The Changing State of British Enterprise, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge
Centre for Business Research (CBR), 1998, Enterprise Britain, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge
Centre for Business Research, 2000, British Enterprise in Transition, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge
Centre for Business Research (CBR), 2003, Enterprise Challenged, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge
Cohen W. (1995). Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity. In: Stoneman, P. (eds) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, pp 182–264. Blackwell, Oxford
Cosh A., A. Hughes and E. Wood, 1998, Innovation surveys and very small enterprises, WP89, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge
Cressy R. (1996). Are Business Startups Debt Rationed. The Economic Journal 106: 1253–1270
Cressy R. and Olofsson C. (1997). European SME Financing: An Overview. 9: 87–86
Ennew C. and Binks M. (1995). The Provision of Finance to Small Firms: Does the Banking Relationship Constrain Performance?. Journal of Small Business Finance 4: 69–85
Freel M. (1999). The Financing of Small Firm Product Innovation in the UK. Technovation 19: 707–719
Freel M. (2003). Sectoral Patterns of Small Firm Innovation, Networking and Proximity. Research Policy 32: 751–770
Giudici G. and Paleari S. (2000). The Provision of Finance to Innovation: A Survey Conducted Among Italian Technology-based Small Firms. Small Business Economics 14: 37–53
Guiso L. (1998). High-tech Firms and Credit Rationing. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 35: 39–59
HM Treasury, 1998, Financing of High Technology Businesses: A report to the Paymaster General, London, November
Hoffman K., Milady P., Bessant J. and Perren L. (1998). Small firms, R&D, Technology and Innovation in the UK: A Literature Review. Technovation 18: 39–55
Jensen J. B. and McGuckin R. H. (1997). Firm Performance and Evolution: Empirical Regularities in the US Microdata. Industrial and Corporate Change 6: 25–47
Keeton W. (1979). Equilibrium Credit Rationing. Garland Publishing, New York
Levenson A. R. and Willard K. L. (2000). Do Firms Get the Financing They Want? Measuring Credit Rationing Experienced by Small Businesses in the U.S.. Small Business Economics 14: 83–94
Love B. and Roper S. (1999). The Determinants of Innovation: R&D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects. Review of Industrial Organisation 15: 43–64
Martin S. and Scott J. (2000). The Nature of Innovation Market Failure and the Design of Public Support for Private Innovation. Research Policy 29: 437–448
Moore I. and Garnsey E. (1993). Funding for Innovation in Small Firms: The Role of Government. Research Policy 22: 507–519
Murray G. and Lott J. (1993). Have UK Venture Capitalists a Bias against Investment in New Technology-based Firms?. Research Policy 24: 283–299
Myers S. and Majluf N. (1984). Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms have Information that Investors do not. Journal of Financial Economics 13: 187–221
Oakey R., 1997, A Review of Policy and Practice Relating to High Technology Small Firms in the United Kingdom, WP 359, MBS, University of Manchester
Oakey R., R. Rothwell and S. Cooper, 1988, Management of Innovation in High Technology Small Firms, Pinter, London
Parker S. (2002). Do Banks Ration Credit to New Enterprises? And should Governments Intervene?. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 49: 162–195
SBRC, 1992. The State of British Enterprise, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge
Seaton J. and Walker I. (1997). The Pattern of R&D Finance for Small UK Companies. In: Oakey, R. and Mukhtar, S.-M. (eds) New technology-based firms in the 1990s, pp 71–91. Paul Chapman, London
Stiglitz J., 1993. Endogenous growth and cycles, NBER WP 4286
Stinchcombe A. L. (1965). Social Structure and Organizations. In: March, J. G. (eds) Handbook of Organizations, pp 142–193. Rand McNally & Company, Chicago
Storey D., 1994. Understanding the Small Business Sector, London, Routledge
Symeonidis G., 1996. Innovation, Firm Size and Market Structure: Schumpeterian Hypotheses and Some New Themes, Economics Dept. WP 161, OECD, Paris
Tabachnik B. and L. Fidell, 2001. Using multivariate statistics, 4th ed., Pearson, Needham Heights, MA
Tylecote A. (1994). Financial Systems and Innovation. In: Dodgson, M. and Rothwell, R. (eds) The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, pp 259–267. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Westhead P. and Storey D. (1997). Financial Constraints on the Growth of High-Technology Small Firms in the United Kingdom. Applied Financial Economics 7: 197–201
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Freel, M.S. Are Small Innovators Credit Rationed?. Small Bus Econ 28, 23–35 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-6058-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-6058-6