Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do people respond to low probability risks? Evidence from tornado risk and manufactured homes

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whether people perceive and respond to low-probability natural hazards is a research question of considerable policy relevance. We obtain evidence by considering the response of housing choice to tornado risk for manufactured homes. The vulnerability of manufactured housing, combined with its growing share of the U.S. housing market, has led to proposed mandates for community shelters in mobile home parks. Expected utility theory, however, predicts that households should account for tornado risk in their housing choice. We test for an effect of tornado risk on manufactured housing demand using cross-sectional state data, as well as counties in three tornado prone states. We find that people do respond to tornado risk; our estimates indicate that each expected annual state tornado death per million residents reduces demand for manufactured homes by about 3%. The estimated quantity effect is consistent with the market studies of the price elasticity of manufactured homes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The National Weather Service uses the term “permanent homes” to refer to single family homes, duplexes, town homes, and apartments.

  2. The source for all tornado records is a national archive of tornadoes since 1950 maintained by the Storm Prediction Center.

  3. The cross-state correlation between Fatality Rate and Damage Area equals 0.82, which is high enough to consider the two measures compatible but not so high as to cause redundancy.

  4. We also included in specifications not reported here the poverty rate and the Gini coefficient, but they did not attain significance or alter the inferences.

  5. The two artificial regressors are the expectation of the latent index and the generalized residuals. Thus for the uncensored observations the variables consist of the fitted index and residuals from the Tobit model (8). For the censored observations, the generalized residuals equal−σuϕ(δ’W i u)/(1-Φ(δ’W i u)), where ϕ and Φ are respectively the standard normal density and distribution functions, and σu, δ’W i are evaluated at the Tobit estimates. To compute the expected index for the censored observations, subtract the generalized residual from the fitted index.

  6. Note that the model in column (c) of Table 2 includes two endogenous variables (Fatality Rate and Relative Price), while the matrix W i uses three instruments: median home price, tornadoes per capita, and Damage Area. The model thus imposes one overidentifying restriction. A test of the restriction yields an asymptotic t-statistic equal to 1.01. The test therefore does not reject the instruments.

  7. The estimates omit one exceptionally small Texas county due to incomplete data.

  8. Relatively little is known about the location or severity of tornado injuries. Some rough calculations indicate that under any plausible assumptions the value of injuries is less than 10 percent of the value of fatalities. We therefore focus exclusively on fatalities.

  9. Including the value of the state-median risk brings the full cost to $1,630.

References

  • American Meteorological Society. (1997). Policy statement: Mobile homes and severe windstorms. Bulleting of the American Meteorological Society, 78(5), 850–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beron, K. J., Murdoch, J. C., Thayer, M. A., & Vijverberg, W. P. M. (1997). An analysis of the housing market before and after the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Land Economics, 73(1), 101–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, H. E., & Doswell III, C. A. (2002). Deaths in the 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City tornado from a historical perspective. Weather and Forecasting, 17, 354–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire, D. S., Thayer, M. A., Tschirhart, J., & Schulze, W. D. (1985). A test of the expected utility model: Evidence from earthquake risks. Journal of Political Economy, 93(2), 369–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F., & Kunreuther, H. (1989). Decision processes for low probability events: Policy implications. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 8(4), 565–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, J. C., Hallstrom, D. G., & Smith, V. K. (2006). Can natural experiments measure behavioral responses to environmental risks? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 33(3), 273–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash, N., & Gladwin, H. (2007). Evacuation decision making and behavioral responses: Individual and household. Natural Hazards Review, 8(3), 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Alessi, L. (1996). Error and bias in benefit-cost analysis: HUD’s case for the wind rule. Cato Journal, 16(1), 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, J. H., & Snow, J. T. (1991). Mitigation against extreme windstorms. Reviews of Geophysics, 29(4), 477–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallstrom, D. G., & Smith, V. K. (2005). Market responses to hurricanes. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50(3), 541–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D. H., & Kunreuther, H. C. (2007). Goals and plans in decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(3), 137–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H. (1978). Disaster insurance protection: Public policy lessons. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H. (1996). Mitigating disaster losses through insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 12, 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H., & Kleffner, A. (1992). Should earthquake mitigation measures be voluntary or required? Journal of Regulatory Economics, 4, 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H., & Pauly, M. (2004). Neglecting disaster: Why don’t people insure against large losses? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 28(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H., Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Making low probabilities useful. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23(2), 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, D. N., Murdock, J. C., & White, H. L. (1987). Uncertain hazards, insurance, and consumer choice: Evidence from housing markets. Land Economics, 63, 361–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, G. H., Schulze, W. D., & Coursey, D. L. (1993). Insurance for low-probability hazards: A bimodal response to unlikely events. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7, 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. I., & Marsh, T. L. (2007). Consumer and investment demand for manufactured housing units. Journal of Housing Economics, 16, 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeks, C. B. (1995). Manufactured Home Life. Arlington, VA: Manufactured Housing Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, D., Simmons, K. M., & Sutter, D. (2005). The determinants of tornado fatalities and the benefits of tornado shelters. Land Economics, 81(1), 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. J. (2006). Why we under-prepare for hazards. In R. J. Daniels, D. F. Kettl, & H. Kunreuther (Eds.), On Risk and Disaster. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm, R. (1998). The demand for disaster insurance: Residential coverage. In H. Kunreuther & R. J. Roth Sr. (Eds.), Paying the Price. Washington DC: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidlin, T., Hammer, B., King, P., Ono, Y., Miller, L. S., & Thumann, G. (2002). Unsafe at any (wind) speed? Testing the stability of motor vehicles in severe winds. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 83(12), 1821–1830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidlin, T. W., Hammer, B., & Knabe, J. (2001). Tornado shelters in mobile home parks in the United States. Journal of the American Society of Professional Emergency Planners, 8, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilling, J. D., Benjamin, J. D., & Sirmans, C. F. (1985). Adjusting comparable sales for floodplain location. Appraisal Journal, 53, 429–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, K. M., & Sutter, D. (2007). Tornado shelters and the manufactured home parks market. Construction Management and Economics, 25(11), 1119–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, K. M., Kruse, J. B., & Smith, D. A. (2002). Valuing mitigation: real estate market response to hurricane loss measures. Southern Economic Journal, 68(3), 660–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K., Carbone, J. C., Pope, J. C., Hallstrom, D. G., & Darden, M. (2006). Adjusting to natural disasters. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 33(1/2), 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreyer, J. F., & Ragas, W. R. (1991). Housing prices and flood risk: An examination using spline regression. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4, 395–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vella, F. (1993). A simple estimator for simultaneous models with censored endogenous regressors. International Economic Review, 34(2), 441–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K., & Aldy, J. E. (2003). The value of a statistical life: A critical review of market estimates throughout the world. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27(1), 5–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2006). National survey evidence on disasters and relief: Risk beliefs, self-interest, and compassion. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 33(1/2), 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the editor and two anonymous referees for helpful comments. An earlier draft of this paper was presented at the Southern Economics Association meetings. Harold Brooks and Brent McAloney of NOAA for supplying us with the data on tornado fatality locations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Sutter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sutter, D., Poitras, M. Do people respond to low probability risks? Evidence from tornado risk and manufactured homes. J Risk Uncertain 40, 181–196 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-010-9087-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-010-9087-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation