Skip to main content
Log in

Disappointment without prior expectation: a unifying perspective on decision under risk

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The central idea of Disappointment theory is that an individual forms an expectation about a risky alternative, and may experience disappointment if the outcome eventually obtained falls short of the expectation. We abandon the hypothesis of a well-defined prior expectation: disappointment feelings may arise from comparing the outcome received with anyof the gamble’s outcomes that the individual failed to get. This leads to a new, general form of Disappointment model. It encompasses Rank Dependent Utility with an explicit one-parameter probability transformation, and Risk-Value models with a generic risk measure including Variance, providing a unifying behavioral foundation for these models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdellaoui, Mohammed (2000). “Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions,” Management Science 46, 1497–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, David (1983). “Risk Premiums for Decision Regret,” Management Science 29(10), 1156–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, David (1985). “Disappointment in Decision Making under Uncertainty,” Operations Research 33, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleichrodt, Han and José Luis Pinto (2000). “A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis,” Management Science 46, 1485–1496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delquié, Philippe and Alessandra Cillo (2006). “Expectations, Disappointment, and Rank-Dependent Probability Weighting,” Theory and Decision 60(2–3), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diecidue, Enrico and Peter Wakker (2001). “On the Intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 23, 281–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul, Faruk (1991). “A Theory of Disappointment Aversion,” Econometrica 59, 667–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, Jianmin and James S. Dyer (1996). “A Standard Measure of Risk and Risk-Value Models,” Management Science 45, 519–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia, Jianmin, Dyer, James S., and John C. Butler (2001). “Generalized Disappointment Models,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 22(1), 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica 47, 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, Graham and Robert Sugden (1986). “Disappointment and Dynamic Consistency in Choice under Uncertainty,” Review of Economic Studies 53, 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machina, Mark J (1982). “Expected Utility Analysis Without the Independence Axiom,” Econometrica 50, 277–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellers, Barbara A., Alan Schwartz, Katty Ho, and Ilana Ritov (1997). “Decision Affect Theory: Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Risky Options,” Psychological Science 8(6), 423–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordóñez, Lisa D., Connolly, Terry, and Richard Coughlan (2000). “Multiple Reference Points in Satisfaction and Fairness Assessment,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13(3), 329–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, John (1982). “A Theory of Anticipated Utility,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3, 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman (1992). “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, Wilco W., and Marcel Zeelenberg (2002). “What Do We Talk about When We Talk about Disappointment? Distinguishing Outcome-Related Disappointment from Person-Related Disappointment,” Cognition and Emotion 16(6), 787–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, George and Richard Gonzalez (1996). “Curvature of the Probability Weighting Function,” Management Science 42, 1677–1690.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Delquié.

Additional information

JEL Classification D80 . D81

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delquié, P., Cillo, A. Disappointment without prior expectation: a unifying perspective on decision under risk. J Risk Uncertainty 33, 197–215 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-006-0499-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-006-0499-4

Keywords

Navigation