Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Use of Future Scenarios as a Pedagogical Approach for Science Teacher Education

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Futures studies is usually a transdisciplinary study and as such embraces the physical world of the sciences and system sciences and the subjective world of individuals and cultures, as well as the time dimension—past, present and futures. Science education, where student interests, opportunities and challenges often manifest themselves, can provide a suitable entry point for futures work. In this paper, we describe how we have used futures themes, concepts and techniques both implicitly and explicitly in our undergraduate middle school teacher education courses and, in particular, science curriculum and general studies courses. Taking a critical orientation to the past and the present in these courses enables the future to be more than a mere reproduction of the status quo and opens up a range of possible futures in the areas of current interest. For example, having studied middle school teaching and learning in mathematics and science, students explore the past, present and possible future of a natural part of a university campus. In a general studies course on the science of the Earth’s atmosphere, students construct a normative futures scenario on living in a changing climate. One way to gain insight into an uncertain future is to construct scenarios. This technique has been used since the 1970s to bring issues of environment and development—areas with strong science content—to the attention of both scientists and policymakers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Due to staff changes, data was not collected for Atmosphere and Climate after 2010.

References

  • Amara, R. (1981). The futures field: searching for definitions and boundaries. Futures, 15(2), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014). http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/ Accessed Sep 2014.

  • Australian National School Network (2001–2002). Assessment by exhibition project and kit (2001–2002) http://www.ansn.edu.au/content/authentic-assessment Accessed Sep. 2014

  • Awbrey, S. M., Dana, D., Miller, V. W., Robinson, P., Ryan, M. M., & Scott, D. K. (2006). Integrative learning and action: a call to wholeness. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. C., & Osborne, M. D. (2002). Reconstructing the harsh world: science with/for social action. In W. M. Roth & J. Desautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 167–184). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. (1996). An overview of futures studies. In R. Slaughter (Ed.), The knowledge base of futures studies: foundations (pp. 28–56). Hawthorn: DDM Media Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. (1997). Futures studies comes of age: where are we now and where are we going? Futures Research Quarterly, 13(4), 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. (1998). Understanding the futures field. In D. Hicks & R. Slaughter (Eds.), Futures education (pp. 15–26). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. (2001). Futures studies comes of age: twenty five years after ‘The limits to growth’. Futures, 33(1), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. (2007). Foundations of futures studies: history, purpose, and knowledge. London: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezold, C. (2010). Anticipatory democracy and aspirational futures. Journal of Futures Studies, 15(2), 167–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1956). The image: knowledge in life and society. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, E. (1996). The challenge of imaging peace in wartime. In R. Slaughter (Ed.), The knowledge base of futures studies (Vol. 2, pp. 223–243). Hawthorn: DDM Media Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, E. (1977). The study of the future: an introduction to the art and science of understanding and shaping tomorrow’s world. Bethesda: World Future Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R. (2000). Visions of alternative (unpredictable) futures and their use in policy analysis. Conservation Ecology, 4(1), 5. http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss1/art5/. Accessed Nov 2014.

  • Costanza, R. (2003). A vision of the future of science: reintegrating the study of humans and the rest of nature. Futures, 35(6), 651–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby-Hobbs, L. (2012). Responding to a relevance imperative in school science and mathematics: humanising the curriculum through story. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dator, J. (1996). Futures studies as applied knowledge. In R. Slaughter (Ed.), New thinking for a new millennium (pp. 105–115). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jouvenel, B. (1967). The art of conjecture (N. Lary, trans.). London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department Education and Childrens Services (DECS). (2002). South Australian curriculum, standards and assessment framework. http://www.sacsa.sa.edu.au/index_fsrc.asp?t=EL. Accessed Sep 2014.

  • Eckersley, R. (1988). Casualities of change: the predicament of youth in Australia. Carlton: Commission for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. (1999). Quality of life in Australia: an analysis of public perceptions. Lyneham: Australia Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. (2002). Future visions, social realities, and private lives: young people and their personal well-being. In J. Gidley & S. Inayatullah (Eds.), Youth futures: comparative research and transformative visions (pp. 31–41). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. (2010). Population health—a forgotten dimension of social resilience. In S. Cork (Ed.), Resilience and transformation: preparing Australia for uncertain futures (pp. 115–120). Collingwood: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. (2012). Whatever happened to Western civilization? The cultural crisis, 20 years later. The Futurist, 46(6), 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (2014). It’s the numbers, stupid! In J. Goldie & K. Betts (Eds.), Sustainable futures: linking population, resources and the environment (pp. 1–11). Collingwood: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R. (2007). The real wealth of nations: creating a caring economics. CA: Berrett–Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. (2000). Issues for the schooling of science. In R. Cross & P. Fensham (Eds.), Science and the citizen: for educators and the public (pp. 73–77). Victoria, Australia: Melbourne Studies in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. (2003). What do the “all” need in science education? Paper presented at The Third International Conference on Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, East London, South Africa.

  • Flannery, T. (2010). Here on earth: an argument for hope. Melbourne: Text.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francoeur, R. T. (1976). Human nature and human relations. In R. Bundy (Ed.), Images of the future: the twenty-first century and beyond (pp. 125–134). New York: Prometheus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. E. (1964). Man’s search for meaning: an introduction to logotherapy (I. Lasch, trans.). London: Hodder and Staughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallopin, C. (2002). Planning for resilience: scenarios, surprises, and branch points. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems (pp. 361–392). London: Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The quark and the jaguar: adventures in the simple and the complex. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidley, J. (2002). Holistic education and visions of rehumarized futures. In J. Gidley & S. Inayatullah (Eds.), Youth futures: comparative research and transformative visions (pp. 155–167). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidley, J., & Inayatullah, S. (2002). Youth futures: comparative research and transformative visions. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giri, A. K. (2002). The calling of a creative transdisciplinarity. Futures, 34(1), 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldie, J., & Betts, K. (2014). Sustainable futures: linking population, resources and the environment. Collingwood: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, J. (2003). Education for effective stewardship. In B. van der Zwaan & A. Peterson (Eds.), Sharing the planet (pp. 228–232). Delft: Eburon Academic.

  • Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrum, D., & Rennie, L. (2007). Australian school science education national action plan, 2008–2012. http://apo.org.au/research/australian-school-science-education-national-action-plan-2008-2012. Accessed Sep 2014.

  • Gough, N. (1989). Seven principles for exploring futures in the curriculum. In R. Slaughter (Ed.), Studying the future: an introductory reader (pp. 51–59). Carlton: The Australian Commission for the Future and the Australian Bicentennial Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. R. (Ed.). (1988). The re-enchantment of science. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groundwater-Smith, S., Mitchell, J., & Mockler, N. (2007). Learning in the middle years more than a transition. South Melbourne: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (2013). The constructivist credo. Walnut Creek: Left Coast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz, S. (2015). Global megatrends: seven patterns of change shaping our future. Clayton South: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. (2009). Storms of my grandchildren: the truth about the coming climate catastrophe and our last chance to save humanity. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, H. (1998). A futurist reflects. In D. Hicks & R. Slaughter (Eds.), Futures education (pp. 5–14). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (1996). Young peoples’ hopes and fears for the future. In R. Slaughter (Ed.), The knowledge base of futures studies: organisations, practices, products (pp. 192–203). Hawthorn: DDM Media Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (1998). Identifying sources of hope in postmodern times. In D. Hicks & R. Slaughter (Eds.), Futures education (pp. 217–229). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (2002). Lessons for the future: the missing dimension in education. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (2012). Sustainable schools, sustainable futures: a resource for teachers. www.teaching4abetterworld.co.uk/downloads.html Accessed June 2014.

  • Hicks, D., & Slaughter, R. (1998). Futures education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, C. (2002). Citizens of a new century: perspectives from the United Kingdom. In J. Gidley & S. Inayatullah (Eds.), Youth futures: comparative research and transformative visions (pp. 131–142). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, F. P. (1996). Educating beyond violent futures. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, F. P., & Herborn, P. J. (2012). Landscapes for peace: a case study of active learning about urban environments and the future. Futures, 44, 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inayatullah, S. (1998). Pedagogy, culture, and futures studies. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(3), 386–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., Buntting, C., Hipkins, R., McKim, A., Conner, L., & Saunders, K. (2012). Developing students’ futures thinking in science education. Research in Science Education, 42(4), 687–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolbert, E. (2014). The sixth extinction: an unnatural history. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, E. (2001). Macroshift: navigating the transition to a sustainable world. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S. (1990). The making of a constructivist. In E. G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialogue: options for social science inquiry (pp. 67–87). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D. (2001). The use of a guided fantasy to explore student expectations of the future. The International Journal of Learning. 8. http://ijl.cgpublisher.com/product/pub.30/prod.306. Accessed June 2015.

  • Lloyd, D. (2003). An integral approach to science learning: exploratory thoughts. In D. Fisher & T. Nash (Eds.), Third International Conference on Science, Mathematics and Technology Education (Vol. 1, pp. 415–421). East London, South Africa.

  • Lloyd, D. (2004). Educating for the 21 century: planning a teacher education program for primary and middle schooling. www.aaee.org.au/docs/2004conference/Lloyd%20D.doc. Accessed June 2015.

  • Lloyd, D. (2007a). Exploring students’ futures images. In P. C. Taylor & J. Wallace (Eds.), Contemporary qualitative research: exemplars for science and mathematics education (pp. 57–66). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D. (2007b). An integral approach to learning: learning for environments in middle schooling teacher education. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 2(6), 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D. (2010). Futures scenario construction around contemporary issues: tertiary students’ perceptions of their value. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 6(4), 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D. (2011). Connecting science to students’ lifeworlds through futures scenarios. International Journal of Science in Society, 2(2), 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D., & Wallace, J. (2004). Imaging the future of science education: the case for making futures studies explicit in student learning. Studies in Science Education, 40, 139–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D., Vanderhout, A., Lloyd, L., & Atkins, D. (2010). Futures scenarios in science learning. Science Teaching, 56(2), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. (2014). A rough ride to the future. London: Akkan Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, I. (2005). Achieving a sustainable future. In J. Goldie, B. Douglas, & B. Furnass (Eds.), In search of sustainability (pp. 165–175). Collingwood: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, I. (2009). A big fix: radical solutions for Australia’s environmental crisis (2nd ed.). Melbourne: Black Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuel, F. E., & Manuel, F. P. (1979). Utopian thought in the western world. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masini, E. B. (1993). Why futures studies? London: Grey Seal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milojevic, I. (2005). Educational futures: dominant and contested visions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, M. (2007). From mad cows to disappearing bees: safeguarding Australia from emerging diseases of animals. https://www.science.org.au/safeguarding-australia-emerging-diseases-animals Accessed June 2015.

  • Ogilvy, J. A. (2002). Creating better futures: scenario planning as a tool for a better tomorrow. New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, J. (1996). Education systems as agents of change: an overview of futures education. In R. A. Slaughter (Ed.), New thinking for a new millennium (pp. 126–136). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, K., Lloyd, D., & Chartres, M. (2008). Moving towards transdisciplinarity: an ecological sustainable focus for science and mathematics pre-service education in the primary/middle years. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polak, F. (1973). The image of the future (E. Boulding, trans.). London: Elsevier Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, P. (2013). Game on:The basis of hope in a time of despair. Great transition Initiative, 1–8.

  • Raskin, P., Banuri, T., Gallopin, G., Gutman, P., Hammond, A., Kates, R., & Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environmental Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeder, L., Eckersley, R., & Olsen, A. (2010). The Australian youth forum asks the next big question: report to the minister for early childhood education, childcare and youth. Australia21, Canberra. www.australia21.org.au

  • Roth, W. M., & Désautels, J. (Eds.). (2002). Science education as/for sociopolitical action. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, A. (2013). Hidden, inconsistent, and influential: images of the future in changing times. Futures, 45, S38–S44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, P. (1982). The awakening earth: the global brain. London: Arkana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, K., & Rennie, L. (2013). A pedagogical model for ethical inquiry into socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 253–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, R. A. (1987). Futures scenarios futures tools and techniques. Bailrigg: University of Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, R. A. (1988). Recovering the future. Melbourne: Graduate School of Environmental Education, Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, R. A. (1989). Studying the future. Melbourne: The Commission for the Future and the Australian Bicentennial Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, R. A. (1995a). The foresight principle: cultural recovery in the 21st century. London: Adamantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, R. A. (1995b). Futures tools and techniques. Melbourne: Futures Studies Centre and DDM Media Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, R. A. (1996a). The knowledge base of futures studies. Hawthorn: DDM Media Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, R. A. (1996b). Futures studies: from individual to social capacity. Futures, 26(8), 751–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, R. A. (2002). From rhetoric to reality: the emergence of futures into the educational mainstream. In J. Gidley & S. Inayatullah (Eds.), Youth futures: comparing research and transformative visions (pp. 175–186). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, R.A. (2004). Futures beyond dystopia: creating social foresight. London: Routledge

  • Snoek, M. (2003). The use and methodology of scenario making. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(1), 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S. R. (2001). Sustainable education: re-visioning learning and change. Totnes: Green Books for The Schumacher Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, D. (1990). Inventing the future: reflections on science, technology and nature. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, D. (2010). The legacy: an elder’s vision for our sustainable future. Vancouver: David Suzuki Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tognettim, S. S. (1999). Science in a double-bind: Gregory Bateson and the origins of post-normal science. Futures, 31(7), 689–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tough, A. (1995). Crucial questions about the future. London: Adamantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.

  • Venville, G., Wallace, J., Rennie, L., & Malone, J. (2002). Curriculum integration: eroding the high ground of science as a school subject? Studies in Science Education, 37, 43–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visvanathan, S. (2002). The future of science studies. Futures, 34(1), 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, K. (1997). The eye of spirit: an integral vision for a world gone slightly mad. Boston: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, K. (1998). The marriage of sense and soul: integrating science and religion. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, K. (2000). A theory of everything: an integral vision for business, politics, science and spirituality. Boston: Gateway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, K. (2006). Integral spirituality. Boston: Integral Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

    Kathryn Paige & David Lloyd

Authors
  1. Kathryn Paige
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Lloyd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn Paige.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paige, K., Lloyd, D. Use of Future Scenarios as a Pedagogical Approach for Science Teacher Education. Res Sci Educ 46, 263–285 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9505-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9505-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation