Abstract
Over the past decade, institutionally-funded financial aid (or “tuition discounts”) have been the fastest-growing item within most public four-year college and university operating budgets. One explanation for this trend is due to the changing structure of public colleges’ revenue streams, as tuition and fees have replaced state appropriations as a viable and predictable source of funding. This analysis explores the extent to which expenditures on institutionally-funded financial aid generates additional revenue for public four-year colleges and universities. Using institutional data (n = 174) from 2002 to 2008, the analysis implements a generalized method of moments (GMM) technique and concludes that aid indeed can be leveraged for revenue generation. However, this relationship is only sustainable to a certain point. When unfunded tuition discount rates exceed approximately 13%, institutions may experience diminishing revenue returns to this financial aid investment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Hereafter, “tuition and fees” is referred to as “tuition.”
Tuition discount rates are calculated by dividing total institutional aid expenditures by gross tuition revenue, as advocated by Baum and Lapovsky (2006).
References
Allan, R., & Lapovsky, L. (2005, July). Financial aid: Does it matter whether it’s funded? Business Officer Magazine.
Angrist, J. D. (2006). Instrumental variables methods in experimental criminological research: What, why and how? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2(1), 23–44.
Archibald, R. B., & Feldman, D. H. (2008). Explaining increases in higher education costs. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 268–295.
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.
Austin, D. A. (2010). Do lower lender subsidies reduce guaranteed student loan supply? Education Finance and Policy, 5(2), 138–176.
Baum, S., & Lapovsky, L. (2006). Tuition discounting: Not just a private practice. New York: The College Board.
Baum, S., & Ma, J. (2010). Tuition discounting: Institutional aid patterns at public and private colleges and universities, 2000–01 to 2008–09 (p. 8). New York: The College Board.
Baum, C. F., Schaffer, M. E., & Stillman, S. (2003). Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. Stata Journal, 3(1), 1–31.
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.
Blundell, R., Bond, S., & Windmeijer, F. (2000). Estimation in dynamic panel data models: Improving on the performance of the standard GMM estimator. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 53–92.
Bond, S. R. (2002). Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1(2), 141–162.
Bound, J., Jaeger, D. A., & Baker, R. M. (1995). Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 443–450.
Bowen, H. R. (1980). The costs of higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Breneman, D., Doti, J., & Lapovsky, L. (2001). Financing private colleges and universities: The role of tuition discounts. In M. B. Paulsen & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy, and practice (pp. 279–461). New York: Algora Publishing.
Brewer, D., Gates, S., & Goldman, C. (2002). In pursuit of prestige. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
Brinkman, P., & Morgan, A. (2010). Financial planning: Strategies and lessons learned. Planning for Higher Education, 38(3), 5–14.
Chen, R., & DesJardins, S. L. (2010). Investigating the impact of financial aid on student dropout risks: Racial and ethnic differences. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(2), 179–208.
Cheslock, J. J. (2006). Applying economics to institutional research on higher education revenues. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2006(132), 25–41.
College Board. (2010). SAT-ACT concordance tables. Retrieved October 14, 2010, from http://professionals.collegeboard.com/data-reports-research/sat/sat-act.
Curs, B. R. (2008). The effects of institutional merit-based aid on the enrollment decisions of needy students. Enrollment Management Journal, 2(1), 10–31.
Curs, B. R., & Dar, L. (2010). Does state financial aid affect institutional aid? An analysis of the role of state policy on postsecondary institutional pricing strategies. SSRN eLibrary. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1641489
Curs, B. R., & Singell, L. D. (2010). Aim high or go low? Pricing strategies and enrollment effects when the net price elasticity varies with need and ability. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(4), 515–543.
Davis, J. S. (2003). Unintended consequences of tuition discounting. Indianapolis: Lumina Foundation.
DesJardins, S. L., & McCall, B. P. (2010). Simulating the effects of financial aid packages on college student stopout, reenrollment spells, and graduation chances. The Review of Higher Education, 33(4), 513–541.
Desrochers, D., Lenihan, C., & Wellman, J. (2010). Trends in college spending, 1998–2008 (p. 56). Washington, DC: Delta Project on Postsecondary Education Costs, Productivity, and Accountability.
Doyle, W. R. (2010). Changes in institutional aid, 1992–2003: The evolving role of merit aid. Research in Higher Education, 51(8), 789–810.
Doyle, W. R., Delaney, J. A., & Naughton, B. A. (2009). Does institutional aid compensate for or comply with state policy? Research in Higher Education, 50(5), 502–523.
Duffy, E. A., & Goldberg, I. (1998). Crafting a class: College admissions and financial aid, 1955–1994. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ehrenberg, R., Zhang, L., & Levin, J. (2006). Crafting a class: The trade-off between merit scholarships and enrolling lower-income students. The Review of Higher Education, 29(2), 195–211.
Halaby, C. N. (2004). Panel models in sociological research: Theory into practice. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 507–544.
Heller, D. (2006). State support of higher education: Past, present, and future. In D. M. Priest & E. P. S. John (Eds.), Privatization and public universities (pp. 11–37). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hossler, D. (2000). The role of financial aid in enrollment management. New Directions for Student Services, 2000(89), 77–90.
Hossler, D. (2004). Refinancing public universities: Student enrollment, incentive-based budgeting, and incremental revenue. In E. P. St. John & M. D. Parsons (Eds.), Public funding of higher education: Changing contexts and new rationales (pp. 145–163). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hossler, D. (2006). Students and families as revenue: The impact on institutional behaviors. In D. M. Priest & E. P. S. John (Eds.), Privatization and public universities (pp. 109–128). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hossler, D., Ziskin, M., Gross, J. P., Kim, S., & Cekic, O. (2009). Student aid and its role in encouraging persistence. In C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 389–425). New York: Agathon Press.
Johnstone, D. B. (2004). The economics and politics of cost sharing in higher education: Comparative perspectives. Economics of Education Review, 23(4), 403–410.
Johnstone, B. D., & Marcucci, P. N. (2010). Financing higher education worldwide. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Kiviet, J. F. (1995). On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models 1. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 53–78.
Lapovsky, L. (2007). Critical endowment policy issues. New Directions for Higher Education, 2007(140), 99–110.
Lasher, W., & Sullivan, C. (2005). Follow the money: The changing world of budgeting in higher education. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 19, pp. 197–240). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Martin, R. E. (2004). Tuition discounting without tears. Economics of Education Review, 23(2), 177–189.
Martin, R. E. (2005). Cost control college access and competition in higher education. Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Massa, R. J., & Parker, A. S. (2007). Fixing the net tuition revenue dilemma: The Dickinson College story. New Directions for Higher Education, 140, 87–98.
McPherson, M. S., & Schapiro, M. O. (1998). The student aid game: Meeting need and rewarding talent in American higher education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McPherson, M. S., & Schapiro, M. O. (2006). US higher education finance. In E. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 2, pp. 1403–1434). Amsterdam: Elsevier Press.
Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417–1426.
Perna, L. W. (2010). Toward a more complete understanding of the role of financial aid in promoting college enrollment: The importance of context. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 25, 129–179.
Perna, L., Lundy-Wagner, V., Yee, A., Brill, L., & Tadal, T. (2010). Showing them the money: The role of institutional financial aid policies and communication strategies in attracting low-income students. In A. Kezar (Ed.), Recognizing and serving low-income students in higher education: An examination of institutional policies, practices, and culture. New York: Routledge.
Potter, D. A., & Sidar, A. G., Jr. (1978). No-need/merit awards: A survey of their use at four-year public and private colleges and universities. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Redd, K. E. (2000). Discounting toward disaster: Tuition discounting, college finances, and enrollments of low-income undergraduates. Indianapolis, IN: USA Group Foundation.
Reed, M., & Shireman, R. (2008). Time to reexamine institutional cooperation on financial aid (p. 35). Washington, DC: The Institute for College Access and Success.
Roodman, D. (2006). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
Roodman, D. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.
Stock, J. H., & Yogo, M. (2002). Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. NBER Working Paper #284.
Summers, J. A. (2004). Net tuition revenue generation at private liberal arts colleges. Education Economics, 12(3), 219.
Thelin, J. R. (2004). A history of American higher education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Titus, M. A. (2009). The production of bachelor’s degrees and financial aspects of state higher education policy: A dynamic analysis. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(4), 439–468.
U.S. Department of Education. (2009). 2007–08 National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:08): Undergraduate data analysis system. Retrieved October 8, 2010, from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/npsas/.
Weisbrod, B. A., Ballou, J. P., & Asch, E. D. (2008). Mission and money: Understanding the university. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilkinson, R. (2005). Aiding students, buying students: Financial aid in America. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1), 25–51.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zhang, L. (2007). Nonresident enrollment demand in public higher education: An analysis at national, state, and institutional levels. The Review of Higher Education, 31(1), 1–25.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank David Tandberg and two anonymous reviewers for comments on previous versions of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hillman, N.W. Tuition Discounting for Revenue Management. Res High Educ 53, 263–281 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9233-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9233-4