Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fouling in reverse osmosis (RO) membrane in water recovery from secondary effluent: a review

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reverse osmosis (RO) is the most preferable process for water recovery from secondary effluent (SE) because of its higher rejection of impurities with lower associated cost and higher quality of product. Fouling still is a major challenge during the water recovery due to higher contaminant loadings in SE and high rejection capability of this membrane. The presence of suspended solids, colloidal and organic matters, and high level of biological activities in SE further elevate fouling potentiality. This review was performed to identify major foulants causing hindrance in sustainable application of reverse osmosis and to present available pre-treatment options for these foulants. There are four fouling types present in RO namely; bio-fouling, inorganic/scaling, organic, and particulate fouling. Among them; bio-fouling is less understood but dominant since the pre-treatment options are not well developed. Other fouling mechanisms have been overcome by well developed pre-treatments. The major foulants for RO are dissolved and macromolecular organic substances, sparingly soluble inorganic compounds, colloidal and suspended particles, and micro-organisms. Some of these potential fouling water quality parameters (PFWQPs) are interrelated with each others such as electrical conductivity is a surrogate measure of total dissolved solids with established stable relationship. Most of these PFWQPs such as total suspended solids, turbidity, chemical oxygen demand can be removed by conventional pre-treatment; some such as colloidal particles and micro-organisms by modern options and even others such as endocrine disrupting compounds, pharmaceutical and personal care products are still challenging for current pre-treatments. These foulants need to be identified properly to integrate appropriate pre-treatments for minimizing fouling potentiality to increase water recovery at minimal costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd El-Aleem FA, Al-Sugair KA, Alahmad MI (1998) Biofouling problems in membrane processes for water desalination and reuse in Saudi Arabia. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 41:19–23

  • Abdessemed D, Nezzal G, Ben Aim R (2000) Coagulation-adsorption-ultrafiltration for wastewater treatment and reuse. Desalination 131:307–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn KH, Song Cha JHY, Song KG, Yoo H (1998) Application of tubular ceramic membrane for building wastewater reuse. In: IAWQ 19th international conference, Vancouver

  • Al-Amoudi A, Lovitt R (2007) Fouling strategies and the cleaning system of NF membranes and factors affecting cleaning efficiency. J Membr Sci 303:4–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amjad Z, Zibrida JF, Zuhi RW (1997) A new antifoulant for controlling silica fouling in reverse osmosis systems. In: International desalination association world congress on desalination and water reuse, Cleveland, OH. Internation Desalination Association

  • Ang WS, Elimelech M (2007) Protein (BSA) fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: implications for wastewater reclamation. J Membr Sci 296(1–2):83–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arora ML, Trompeter KM (1983) Fouling of RO membranes in wastewater applications. Desalination 48(3):299–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baek SO, Chang IS (2009) Pretreatments to control membrane fouling in membrane filtration of secondary effluents. Desalination 244(1–3):153–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker DJ, Stuckey DC (1999) A review of soluble microbial products (SMP) in wastewater treatment systems. Water Res 33(14):3063–3082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels CR, Wilf M, Andes K, Long J (2005) Design consideration for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis. Water Sci Technol 51:473–482

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bellona C, Drewes JE, Xu P, Amy G (2004) Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment-a literature review. Water Res 38(2004):2795–2809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bick A, Oron G (2001) Assessing the linkage between deed water quality and reverse osmosis membrane performance. Desalination 137:141–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouver EJ, Crowe PB (1988) Biological processes in drinking water treatment. J AWWA 80(9):82

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabassud C, Labories S, Durand-Bourlier L, Laine JM (2001) Air sparging in ultrafiltration hollow fibres: relationship between flux enhancement, cake characteristics and hydrodynamic parameters. J Membr Sci 181:57–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Champlin TL (2000) Using circulation tests to model natural organic matter adsorption and particle deposition by spiral-wound nano-filtration membrane elements. Desalination 131:103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choksuchart P, Heran M, Grasmick A (2002) Surface water clarification by ultrafiltration with an immersed membrane system: effect of coagulation/aeration on flux enhancement. In: Proceedings of membranes in drinking and industrial water production, Mulherim/Ruhr, Germany, International Water Association, London, UK

  • Clifford FFJ (1988) Electronic-grade water production using reverse osmosis technology. In: Parekh BS (ed) Reverse osmosis technology application for high-purity-water production. Marcel Dekker, INC, New York, p 516

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh TA (1995) The role of desalination in sustaining economic growth in the Gulf. In: Proceedings of the IDA world congress on desalination and water sciences, UAE, Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Publishing Co.

  • Defrance L, Jaffrin MY, Gupta B, Paulier P, Gaengey V (2000) Contribution of various constituents of activated sludge to membrane bioreactor fouling. Bioresour Technol 73:105–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DOW (1995) Filmtec membranes technical manual. D. L. Separations, Midland

    Google Scholar 

  • DOW (2008) FILMTEC reverse osmosis membranes technical manual 2008, DOW water & process solutions. p 178

  • Drewes J, Fox P (1999) Fate of natural organic matter (NOM) during groundwater recharge using reclaimed water. Water Sci Technol 40(9):241–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drewes JE, Heberer T, Reddersen K (2002) Fate of pharmaceuticals during indirect potable reuse. Water Sci Technol 46:73–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drioli EA, Criscuoli EC (2002) Integrated membrane operations for seawater desalination. Desalination 147:77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont (1980) Permasep engineering design manual. Wilmington, Delaware

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranceau SJ (2001) Membrane practices for water treatment. American Water Works Association, Denver, pp 59–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Egozy Y, Jeffrey PD, Ganzi GC (1988) The role of reverse osmosis in production in laboratory water. In: Parekh BS (ed) Reverse osmosis technology application for high-purity-water production, vol 35. Marcel Dekker, INC, New York, p 516

  • Elimelech M, Wiesner M (2002) Membrane separations in aquatic systems. Environ Eng Sci 19:341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elimelech M, Zhu X, Childress AE, Seungkwan H (1997) Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide RO membranes. J Membr Sci 127:101–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flemming HC (1993) Mechanistic aspects of reverse osmosis membrane biofouling and prevention. In: Zahid A (ed) Reverse osmosis: membrane technology, water chemistry and industrial application. Von Nostrand Reinhold, NY, pp 163–209

  • Flemming HC, Schaule G (1988) Biofouling of membranes—a microbiological approach. Desalination 70:95–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flemming HC, Tamachkiarow A (2002) Monitoring of biofilms in technical systems—a crucial components of advanced anti-fouling strategies. In: Proceedings of membranes in drinking and industrial water production, Mulherim/Ruhr, Germany, International Water Association, London

  • Flemming HC, Griebe T, Schaule G (1996) Antifouling strategies in technical systems—a short review. Water Sci Technol 34(5–6):517–524

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flemming HC, Schaule G, Griebe T, Schmitt J, Tamachkiarowa A (1997) Biofouling-the Achilles heel of membrane processes. Desalination 113:215–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geselbracht J, Crook J (1996) A proposed alternate means of meeting TOC requirements for ground-water recharge projects. Proceedings of WateReuse symposium XII. WateReuse Association, Fountain Valley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghayeni SBS, Beatson PJ, Schneider RP, Fane AG (1998a) Adhesion of waste water bacteria to reverse osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 138:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghayeni SBS, Beatson PJ, Schneider RP, Fane AG (1998b) Water reclamation from municipal wastewater using combined micro filtration-reverse osmosis (ME-RO): preliminary performance data and microbiological aspects of system operation. Desalination 116:65–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghose K, Schnitzer M (1980) Macromolecular structures of humic substances. Soil Sci 129:226–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray S (2003) NOM removal with membranes. Natural organic matter in drinking water: problems and solutions. CRC for water quality and treatment: Occasional paper 6, pp 5–9

  • Hilal N, Al-Zoub H, Darwish NA, Mohammad AW, Abu Arabi M (2004) A comprehensive review of NF membranes: treatment, pre-treatment modelling, and atomic force microscopy. Desalination 170:281–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek EMV, Allred J, Knoell T, Jeong B-H (2008) Modeling the effects of fouling on full-scale reverse osmosis processes. J Membr Sci 314(1–2):33–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hong SK, Elimelech M (1997) Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (nom) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 132:159–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarusutthirak C, Amy G (2001) Membrane filtration of wastewater effluent for reuse: effluent organic matter rejection and fouling. Water Sci Technol 43(10):225–232

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarusutthirak C, Amy G (2006) Role of soluble microbial products (SMP) in membrane fouling and flux decline. Environ Sci Technol 40:969–974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarusutthirak C, Amy G, Croue JP (2002) Fouling characteristics of wastewater effluent organic matter isolates on NF and UF membranes. Desalination 145:247–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarusutthirak C, Amy G, Croue JP, Von Gunten U (2003) Fouling of high-pressure (NF and RO) membranes by soluble microbial products (SMPs) associated with wastewater effluent organic matter (EfOM). In: Proceedings of the American water works association membrane technology conference, Denver, CO, American Water Works Association

  • Jegatheesan V, Lamsal PR, Visvanathan C, Ngo HH, Shu L (2002) Effects of natural organic compounds on the removal of organic carbon in coagulation and flocculation processes. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 2(5–6):473–479

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kasper DR (1993) Pre- and post treatment processes for membrane water treatment systems. In: Proceedings of the American water works association membrane technology conference, Denver, CO, American Water Works Association

  • Khedr MG (2003) Development of reverse osmosis desalination membranes composition and configuration: future prospects. Desalination 153:295–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH, Moon JH, Cho J (2003) Evaluation of UF membranes for effective wastewater effluent organic matter (EfOM) removal with hydrophilic polymer additives. In: Proceedings of the 2002 water quality technology conference, Denver, CO, American Water Works Association

  • Kim J, DiGiano FA, Reardon DR (2008) Autopsy of high-pressure membranes to compare effectiveness of MF and UF pretreatment in water reclamation. Water Res 42(3):697–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-H, Min C-S, Cho J (2011) Comparison of different pretreatments for seawater desalination, accepted manuscripts, desalination and water treatment (www.deswater.com) Proof DWT 8303 @ 2011 Desalination Publications

  • Kweon J, Lawler DF (2002) Effects of characteristics of softening as a pre-treatment for ultrafiltration. In: Proceedings of membranes in drinking and industrial water production, Mulherim/Ruhr, Germany, International Water Association, London, UK, pp 757–764

  • Laine JM, Campos C, Baudin I, Janex ML (2002) Understanding membrane fouling: a review of over a decade of research. In: Proceedings of membranes in drinking and industrial water production, Mulherim/Ruhr, Germany, International Water Association, London, UK

  • Lazarova V, Levine B, Sack J, Cirelli G, Jefferey P, Muntau H, Salgot M, Brissaud F (2001) Role of water reuse for enhancing integrated water management in Europe and Mediterranean countries. Water Sci Technol 43(10):23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Gouellec YDS, Elimelech M (2002) Calcium sulfate (gypsum) scaling in nanofiltration of agricultural drainage water. J Membr Sci 205:279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Roux I, Krieg HM, Yeates CA, Breytenbach JC (2005) Use of chitosan as an antifouling agent in a membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci 248:127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KC, Rittmann BE (2003) Effects of pH and precipitation on autohydrogenotrophic denitrification using the hollow-fiber membrane-biofilm reactor. Water Res 37:1551–1556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levine AD, Tchobanoglous G, Asano T (1991) Size distributions of particulate contaminants in wastewater and their impact on treatability. Water Res 25:911–922

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Caothien S, Jennifer H, Tom C, Takehiko O, Takashi O (2001) Membrane chemical cleaning: from art to science 25

  • López-Ramírez JA, Oviedo MDC, Alonso JMQ (2006) Comparative studies of reverse osmosis membranes for wastewater reclamation. Desalination 191(1–3):137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makdissy G, Croue JP, Amy G, Lee N, Habarau H, Buisson H (2002) Advances in the knowledge of the fouling of an ultrafiltration membrane. In: Proceedings of the 2002 water quality technology conference, Denver, CO, American Water Works Association

  • Malpei F, Rozzi A, Colli S, Uberti M (1997) Size distribution of TOC in mixed municipal-textile effluents after biological and advanced treatment. J Membr Sci 131:71–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mänttäri M, Puro L, Jutta N-J, Nyström M (2000) Fouling effects of polysaccharides and humic acid in NF. J Membr Sci 165:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer M, Boller M (1999) Modelling of phosphorus precipitation in wastewater treatment plants with enhanced biological phosphorus removal. Water Sci Technol 39(1):147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy WF, Olson BH (1986) Relationship among turbidity, particle counts and bacteriological quality within water distribution lines. Water Res 20:1023–1029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. (2003) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. McGraw Hill, New York

  • Mickley M, Hamilton R, Truesdall J (1993) Membrane concentrate disposal. AWWA Research Foundation, Denver

  • Miura Y, Hiraiwa MN, Ito T, Itonaga T, Watanabe Y, Okabe S (2007) Bacterial community structures in MBRs treating municipal wastewater: relationship between community stability and reactor performance. Water Res 41:627–637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munro A (1999) Biological control on membrane surfaces. Asian Water 15(8):22–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey SR, Jegatheesan V, Baskaran K, Muthukumaran S (2011) Ranking of pre-treatment technologies for reverse osmosis for water recovery. In: Orhon D et al. (ed) Proceeding of the 8th international symposium on waste management problems in agro-industries (AGRO’2011) 22–24 June 2011, Çeşme, Izmir, Turkey, pp 463–470

  • Paranjape S, Reardon R, Foussereau X (2003) Pretreatment technology for reverse osmosis membrane used in wastewater reclamation application past, present and future a literature review. Proc Water Environ Fed 2003:459–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettygrove GS, Asano T (1985) Irrigation with reclaimed municipal wastewater-a guidance manual. Lewis Publishers Inc., Chelsea

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts DE, Ahlert RC, Wang SS (1981) A critical review of fouling of RO membranes. Desalination 36:235–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon R, DiGiano F, Aitken M, Paranjabe S, Kim JH, Chang SY (2005) Membrane treatment of secondary effluent for subsequent reuse, Water Environment Research Foundation Report, IWA Publishing

  • Ridgway HF, Flemming HC (1996) Membrane biofouling in water treatment. Membrane processes. McGraw Hill, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Roudman AR, DiGiano FA (2000) Surface energy of experimental and commercial NF membranes: effects of wetting and NOM fouling. J Membr Sci 175:61–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sablani SS, Goosen MFA, Al-Belushi R, Wilf M (2001) Concentration polarization in ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis: a critical review. Desalination 141:269–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sahachaiyunta P, Koo T, Sheikholeslami R (2002) Effect of several inorganic species on silica fouling in RO membranes. Desalination 144:373–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer AI, Fane AG, Waite TD (1998) Nano-filtration of natural organic matter: removal, fouling and the influence of multivalent ions. Desalination 118:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer AI, Fane AG, Waite TD (2005) Nano-filtration-principle and applications. Elsevier Advanced Technology, Oxford, UK, pp 1–543

  • Schäfer AI, Pihlajamäki A, Fane AG, Waite TD, Nyström M (2004) Natural organic matter removal by nanofiltration: effects of solution chemistry on retention of low molar mass acids versus bulk organic matter. J Membr Sci 242(2004):73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider RP, Ferreira LM, Binder P, Ramos JR (2005) Analysis of foulant layer in all elements of an RO train. J Membr Sci 261:152–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shon HK, Vigneswaran S, Kim IS, Cho J, Ngo HH (2004) Effect of pretreatment on the fouling of membranes: application in biologically treated sewage effluent. J Membr Sci 234:111–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shon HK, Vigneswaran S, Ben Aim R, Ngo HH, Kim IS, Cho J (2005) Influence of flocculation and adsorption as pretreatment on the fouling of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes: application with biologically treated sewage effluent. Environ Sci Technol 39(10):3864–3871

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shon HK, Vigneswaran S, Ngo HH (2006a) Effects of partial flocculants and adsorption as pretreatment to ultrafiltration. J AIChE 52(1):207–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shon HK, Vigneswaran S, Snyder SA (2006b) Effluent organic matter (EfOM) in wastewater: constituents, effects, and treatment. In: Logan TJ (ed) Critical reviews in environmental science and technology, vol 36, Issue 4. Taylor & Francis, UK, pp 327–374

  • Shon HK, Vigneswaran S, Kandasamy J, Cho J (2009) Membrane Technology For Organic Removal In Wastewater. In: (Vigi) Vigneswaran S (ed) Water and wastewater treatment technologies, in encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS) Developed under the auspices of the UNESCO. Eolss Publishers, Oxford, UK available at http://www.eolss.net. Retrieved at 24 Aug 2011

  • Snyder SA, Wert E, Yoon Y, Westerhoff P (2006) Role of membranes and activated carbon in the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceutical during water treatment processes. Desalination

  • Song L (1998) Flux decline in crossflow microfiltration and ultrafiltration: mechanisms and modelling of membrane fouling. J Membr Sci 139:183–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Speth TF, Summers RS, Gusses AM (1998) Nanofiltration foulants from a treated surface. Environ Sci Technol 32:3612–3617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanninen J, Kamppinen L, Nyström M (2004) Pretreatment/hybrid processes. Chapter 10 in Schaefer A., Fane A. and Waite T. Nanofiltration: principles and applications. Elsevier

  • Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL (1991) Wastewater engineering: treatment, disposal, and reuse. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Temperely TG (1995) The coming age of desalination. In: Proceedings of the IDA world congress on desalination and water sciences, UAE, Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Publishing Co.

  • USEPA (2004) Guidelines for water reuse 2004. N. Office of Research and Development, Technology Transfer and Support Division, Paris, Lynnann

  • Vander Bruggen B, Vandecasteele C (2002) Distillation vs membrane filtration: overview of process evolutions in seawater desalination. Desalination 143:207–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Visvanathan C, Boonthanon N, Sathasium A, Jegatheesan V (2002) Pre-treatment of seawater for biodegradable organic content removal using membrane bioreactor. Desalination 153:133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrouwenvelder JS, van der Kooij D (2001) Diagnosis, prediction and prevention of bio-fouling of NF and RO membranes. Desalination 139:65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WEF (2005) Membrane systems for wastewater treatment. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing, Blacklick

    Google Scholar 

  • Wend CF, Steward PS, Jones W, Camper AK (2003) Pre-treatment for membrane water treatment systems: a laboratory study. Water Res 37:3367–3378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner MR, Chellan S (1999) The promise of membrane technologies. Environ Sci Technol 33:360A–366A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winfield BA (1979a) A study of the factors affecting the rate of fouling of reverse osmosis membranes treating secondary sewage effluents. Water Res 13(7):565–569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winfield BA (1979b) The treatment of Sewage effluent by reverse osmosis-pH based studies of the fouling layer and its removal. Water Res 13:561–564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu P, Bellona C, Drewes JE (2010) Fouling of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes during municipal wastewater reclamation: membrane autopsy results from pilot-scale investigations. J Membr Sci 353(1–2):111–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang HL, Huang C, Pan JR (2008) Characteristics of RO foulants in a brackish water desalination plant. Desalination 220:353–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon SH, Lee CH, Kim KJ, Fane AG (1998) Effects of calcium ion on the fouling of nanofiltration by humic acid in drinking water production. Water Res 32:2180–2186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan W, Zydney AL (1999) Humic acid fouling during micro-filtration. J Membr Sci 157:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeiher EHK, Ho B, Williams KD (2003) Novel antiscalant dosing control. Desalination 157:209–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Song L, Ong SL (2010a) Fouling behavior and foulant characteristics of reverse osmosis membranes for treated secondary effluent reclamation. J Membr Sci 349(1–2):65–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Song L, Ong SL (2010b) Fouling of RO membranes by effluent organic matter (EfOM): relating major components of EfOM to their characteristic fouling behaviors. J Membr Sci 349(1–2):75–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC, 3216, Australia

    Santosh Raj Pandey, Veeriah Jegatheesan, Kanagaratnam Baskaran & Li Shu

Authors
  1. Santosh Raj Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Veeriah Jegatheesan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kanagaratnam Baskaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Li Shu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santosh Raj Pandey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pandey, S.R., Jegatheesan, V., Baskaran, K. et al. Fouling in reverse osmosis (RO) membrane in water recovery from secondary effluent: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 11, 125–145 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-012-9272-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-012-9272-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation