Skip to main content
Log in

Individual perception of accessible social capital and attitude to thrift

  • Published:
Review of Economics of the Household Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We empirically assess the effects of individual perception of accessible social capital on individual attitude to thrift in this paper, based on the view that social capital serves as an informal insurance. We look at individual-level data from the World Values Survey. After controlling for demographic characteristics as well as wave and country fixed effects, we find that individual perception of accessible social capital does matter. One who is more generally trusting or has a broader social network tends to value thrift less.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See "Many in U.S. Think Lottery, Not Savings, Is Path to Security", Wall Street Journal—Eastern Edition, 10/29/1999, 234 (85), pA6.

  2. Available at http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org.

  3. A new wave of surveys during 2010–2014 is yet to come.

References

  • Agarwal, S., Chomsisengphet, S., & Liu, C. (2011). Consumer bankruptcy and default: The role of individual social capital. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 632–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2010). The power of the family. Journal of Economic Growth, 15, 93–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. L., & Nevitte, N. (2006). Teach your children well: Values of thrift and saving. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S., Waldron, M., & Williams, R. (2009). Household saving. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 49(3), 191–201.

  • Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., Graham, B. (2002). Longevity and life cycle savings. NBER Working Paper, No. 8808.

  • Chou, S. Y., Liu, J. T., & Hammitt, J. K. (2003). National health insurance and precautionary saving: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 1873–1894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigno, A., Giannelli, G. C., Rosati, F. C., & Vuri, D. (2006). Is there such a thing as a family constitution? A test based on credit rationing. Review of Economics of the Household, 4(3), 183–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duflo, E., & Saez, E. (2003). The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 815–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, B. H. (1996). Culture, class, and connections. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 217–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2004). The role of social capital in financial development. The American Economic Review, 94(3), 526–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., Norris, P., & Welzel, C. (2002). Gender equality and democracy. Comparative Sociology, 1, 321–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, S. E., & Fishback, P. V. (1996). Precautionary saving, insurance, and the origins of workers’ compensation. Journal of Political Economy, 104(2), 419–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashima, E. S., & Kashima, Y. (1998). Culture and language: The case of cultural dimensions and personal pronoun use. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(3), 461–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashima, E. S., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Erratum to Kashima and Kashima (1998) and reiteration. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(3), 396–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35, 659–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loayza, N., Schmidt-Hebbel, K., & Servén, L. (2000). What drives private saving across the world? Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(2), 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyhus, E. K., & Webley, P. (2001). The role of personality in household saving and borrowing behaviour. European Journal of Personality, 15, S85–S103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, P. (2002). Social capital and democracy: an interdependent relationship. American Sociological Review, 67, 254–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platteau, J. (1994). Behind the market stage where real societies exist - Part I and II. Journal of Development Studies, 30(3), 533-577, 753-817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1995a). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1995b). Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science and Politics, 28, 664–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. (2005). All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58(1), 41–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafft, K. A., & Brown, D. L. (2000). Social capital and grassroots development: The case of Roma self-governance in Hungary. Social Problems, 47, 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son, J., & Lin, N. (2008). Social capital and civic action: A network-based approach. Social Science Research, 37, 330–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. H., Yogo, M. (2002). Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. NBER Technical Working Paper No. 284.

  • Tabellini, G. (2008). Institutions and culture. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6, 255–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabellini, G. (2010). Culture and institutions: Economic development in the regions of Europe. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(4), 677–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Gaag, M., & Snijders, T. (2005). The resource generator: Social capital quantification with concrete items. Social Networks, 27, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, D. W. (1991). Household spending and saving: Measurement, trends, and analysis. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 77(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zak, P. J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. The Economic Journal, 111(470), 295–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Alberto Alesina, Mao-Liang Ye, and Sheng-Chun Zhou for helpful comments and suggestions. We gratefully acknowledge financial supports from Hangzhou Normal University (No. 2012QDW106).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meng-Na Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, MN., Wang, ML. Individual perception of accessible social capital and attitude to thrift. Rev Econ Household 13, 487–500 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-014-9240-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-014-9240-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation