Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effects of Multiple Green Factors on Condominium Prices

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the transaction prices of green buildings assessed on the basis of multiple green factors. Our theoretical model demonstrates that the initial green premium can be negative but becomes positive as the building ages if a green building has a higher life-cycle cost and a longer economic life. Our empirical analysis of green condominiums in Tokyo confirms this prediction. We additionally find that the longer-life design is associated with a price premium, but the use of renewable energy and recycled materials and water is associated with price discounts. The price discounts are interpreted as the capitalization of a greater life-cycle user cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For example, see Architectural Institute of Japan (2000).

  2. Comprehensive measures are also adopted by other major green labels, such as the Comprehensive Assessment System for Building Environmental Efficiency (CASBEE) in Japan and the BRE Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) in the UK.

  3. The life-cycle cost estimate is provided by Komatsu (2010). The average life is provided by the National Infrastructure Council of Japan, January 2008.

  4. Ordinance No. 215 is formally named “Tomin no Kenko to Anzen wo Kakuho Suru Kankyo ni Kansuru Jourei.” For more information, see http://www2.kankyo.metro.tokyo.jp/sgw/English/.

  5. In this paper, we report exp(b + 0.5σ 2) − 1 as the percentage difference when we interpret the coefficient b on the dummy variables with standard error σ (Van Garderen and Shah 2002).

  6. Japan Housing Finance Agency, 2009. A Survey on Attitudes Toward Housing. http://www.jhf.go.jp/files/100014048.pdf

  7. For example, Matsushita et al. (2006) report higher life-cycle costs and inferior strength and durability of recycled aggregate in concrete.

References

  • Architectural Institute of Japan. (2000). Architectural charter for a global environment. Tokyo, Japan.

  • Aroul, R. R., & Hansz, J. A. (2012). The value of “green”: evidence from the first mandatory residential green building program. Journal of Real Estate Research, 34(1), 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, S. (2008). The market value and cost of solar photovoltaic electricity production, UCEI Working Paper CSEM WP, 176.

  • Brounen, D., & Kok, N. (2011). On the economics of energy labels in the housing market. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62(2), 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dastrup, S. R., Zivin, J. G., Costa, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2012). Understanding the solar home price premium: electricity generation and “green” social status. European Economic Review, 56(5), 961–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y., Li, Z., & Quigley, J. M. (2012). Economic returns to energy-efficient investments in the housing market: evidence from Singapore. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42, 506–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinan, T.M., & Miranowski, J.A. (1989). Estimating the implicit price of energy efficiency improvements in the residential housing market: a hedonic approach. Journal of Urban Economics, 25(1), 52–67.

  • Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2010). Doing well by doing good? Green office buildings. American Economic Review, 100(5), 2492–2509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuerst, F., & McAllister, P. (2011a). Green noise or green value? Measuring the effects of environmental certification on office values. Real Estate Economics, 39(1), 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuerst, F., & McAllister, P. (2011b). The impact of energy performance certificates on the rental and capital values of commercial property assets. Energy Policy, 39(10), 6608–6614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmer, R. W. (1989). Energy labels and economic search. Energy Economics, 11(3), 213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbens, G. W. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 4–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, D., Stanton, R., & Wallace, N. (2011). Energy factors, leasing structure and the market price of office buildings in the U.S. Working paper.

  • Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012). Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 51–84.

  • Knight, J. R., & Sirmans, C. F. (1996). Depreciation, maintenance, and housing prices. Journal of Housing Economics, 5, 369–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komatsu, Y. (2010). The life-span of buildings. Presentation material for committee on PRE strategy. Japan: Ministry of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. (1971). Consumer demand: A new approach, New York 1971.

  • Laquatra, J. (1986). Housing market capitalization of thermal integrity. Energy Economics, 8(3), 134–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuven, E., & Sianesi, B. (2003). PSMATCH2: stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html.

  • Matsushita, H., Sagawa, Y., & Kawabata, Y. (2006). The effect of microstructure on strength and durability of mortar incorporating recycled fine aggregate. Journal of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 62(1), 230–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N., Spivey, J., & Florance, A. (2008). Does green pay off? Unpublished Manuscript.

  • Pivo, G., & Fisher, J. D. (2010). Income, value and returns in socially responsible office properties. Journal of Real Estate Research, 32(3), 243–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 34–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). The bias due to incomplete matching. Biometrics, 41, 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Garderen, K. J., & Shah, C. (2002). Exact interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Econometrics Journal, 5, 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmsson, M. (2008). House price depreciation rates and level of maintenance. Journal of Housing Economics, 17(1), 88–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, S., Wu, J., Kahn, M. E., & Deng, Y. (2012). The nascent market for “green” real estate in Beijing. European Economic Review, 56, 974–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank John Quigley, Piet Eichholtz, Nils Kok, Austin Jaffe, Brent Ambrose, Ed Coulson, Joshua Graff-Zivin, Jenny Schuetz, Kerry Vandell, Patrick McAllister, Erin Mansur, James Conklin, Moussa Diop, Sun Young Park, and the participants of seminars at the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism (MLIT); the AREUEA Denver conference; the Berkeley-Maastricht Conference on Green Buildings; and 2013 NBER Japan Meeting for their comments. We also thank the members of the Tokyo Association of Real Estate Appraisers for their valuable comments and support in configuring the data. We gratefully acknowledge the grants from MLIT and the Institute for Real Estate Studies at the Pennsylvania State University that have supported this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiro Yoshida.

Appendixes

Appendixes

Appendix 1: Green Factors in the Tokyo Green Building Program

Energy Efficiency

  1. (1)

    Reduction of thermal loads

    Sun shaded windows and the insulation of walls, roofs, floors, windows, etc.

  2. (2)

    Use of renewable energy

    Using natural light, photovoltaic power generation, wind power generation, solar heating systems, other renewable energies, etc.

Resource Efficiency

  1. (3)

    Use of eco-friendly materials

    Using recycled aggregates in concrete, blended cement (e.g., blast-furnace slag coarse cement), recycled steel, and other recycled building materials.

  2. (4)

    Water recycling

    Recycling rain and wastewater through on-site sewage treatment; using rainfall infiltration.

Long Life Span of Buildings

  1. (5)

    Long-life design of the building

    Flexible structure enabling easy maintenance, renovation, and conversion (e.g., skeleton-infill separation, modular configuration of plumbing, beams, floor height, etc.) and physical durability (e.g., quality of cement, thickness of reinforced concrete, and exterior material)

Planting

  1. (6)

    Planting

    A larger area of planting; planting on the wall and roof of the building; optimal mix of shrubs and trees; coordination with surrounding green areas; attention to the local eco-system.

Appendix 2

Table 6 Cross-correlations of key variables (Propensity-score matched sample)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoshida, J., Sugiura, A. The Effects of Multiple Green Factors on Condominium Prices. J Real Estate Finan Econ 50, 412–437 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-014-9462-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-014-9462-3

Keywords

JEL

Navigation