Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The effects of morphological and syntactic knowledge on reading comprehension in spanish speaking children

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reading comprehension is a complex task requiring many underlying skills. Syntactic awareness and morphological awareness are two such skills that have been shown to be related to reading comprehension. However, the majority of studies have been carried out in English, and very few have explored these skills in monolingual Spanish speaking children. Here we explored to what extent syntactic awareness and morphological awareness contributed to text comprehension in Spanish. 501 typically developing Spanish speaking 4th graders were assessed on non-verbal intelligence, word and nonword reading, oral vocabulary, morphological and syntactic knowledge, along with reading comprehension ability. After excluding children with poor decoding or low non-verbal intelligence, 234 children were retained for analysis. Multiple linear regression modelling was used to assess the unique contribution of each variable to reading comprehension. As per findings reported in English, syntactic knowledge was a significant predictor of comprehension after controlling for age, gender, non-verbal IQ, word reading and oral vocabulary, as well as morphological knowledge. In contrast, and contrary to results normally reported for English speaking children, morphological knowledge did not explain any variance in reading comprehension beyond that explained by the control variables. These results highlight the important contribution of syntactic knowledge to text comprehension in Spanish speaking children, as well as the importance of undertaking research in languages other than English.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We thank an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.

References

  • Altani, A., Protopapas, A., Katopodi, K., & Georgiou, G. K. (in press). From individual word recognition to word list and text reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology. Downloaded from https://psyarxiv.com/t58mw/download/?format=pdf.

  • Bavin, E. (Ed.). (2009). The Cambridge handbook of child language (Cambridge handbooks in language and linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V. (1989). Test for the reception of grammar: (TROG). Swindon: Medical Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizama, M., Arancibia, B., Sáez, K., & Loubiês, L. (2017). Conciencia sintáctica y comprensión de lectura en niñez vulnerable. [Syntactic awareness and reading comprehension in vulnerable children]. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales Niñez y Juventud,15, 219–232. https://doi.org/10.11600/1692715x.1511323012015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J. A. (1986). Syntactic awareness in relation to reading skill and ongoing reading comprehension monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,41, 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(86)90041-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brimo, D., Lund, E., & Sapp, A. (2018). Syntax and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis of different spoken-syntax assessments. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders,53, 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K. (2007). Deriving word meanings from context: Does explanation facilitate contextual analysis? Journal of Research in Reading,30, 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00336.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology,76, 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X67610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., Barnes, M. A., & Bryant, P. E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition,29, 850–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo, M. S., & Martín, J. (1999). Prueba de eficiencia lectora (TECLE) [Reading efficiency test]. Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain. (Unpublished paper).

  • Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the Simple View of Reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J. B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading,3, 331–361. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0304_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, P., Jiménez, J., Rodríguez, C., Baker, D., & Park, Y. (2018). Differences in growth reading patterns for at-risk Spanish-monolingual children as a function of a Tier 2 intervention. The Spanish Journal of Psychology,21, E4. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2018.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuadro, A., Costa, D., Trías, D., & Ponce de León, P. (2009). Evaluación del nivel lector. Test de eficacia lectora (TECLE) de J. Marín y M. Carrillo. Manual Técnico [Assessment of reading level. Reading Efficacy Test (TECLE) of J. Marín and M. Carrillo. Technical handbook]. Montevideo, Uruguay: Prensa Médica.

  • Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E., & Arribas, D. (2007). PROLEC-R. Evaluación de los Procesos Lectores, Revisada [PROLEC-R. Evaluation of Reading Processes, Revised]. Madrid: TEA.

  • Cutting, L. E., Materek, A., Cole, C. A., Levine, T. M., & Mahone, E. M. (2009). Effects of fluency, oral language, and executive function on reading comprehension performance. Annals of Dyslexia,59, 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0022-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading,10, 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Alessio, M. J., Jaichenco, V., & Wilson, M. A. (2018). The role of morphology in word naming in Spanish-speaking children. Applied Psycholinguistics,39, 1065–1093. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics,25, 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defior, S., Fonseca, L., Gottheil, B., Aldrey, A., Rosa, G., Pujals, M., et al. (2006). LEE Test de Lectura y Escritura en Español [LEE Reading and Writing Test in Spanish]. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demont, E., & Gombert, J. E. (1996). Phonological awareness as a predictor of recoding skills and syntactic awareness as a predictor of comprehension skills. British Journal of Educational Psychology,66, 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01200.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, LI. M., Dunn L. M., & Arribas, D. (2006). PPVT-III Peabody Test de vocabulario en imágenes. Adaptación y baremo españoles [PPVT-III Peabody Picture Vocabulary test. Spanish Adaptation]. Madrid: TEA.

  • Gentaz, E., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Theurel, A. (2015). Differences in the predictors of reading comprehension in first graders from low socio-economic status families with either good or poor decoding skills. PLoS ONE,10(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes-Koban, C., Simpson, I. C., Valle, A., & Defior, S. (2017). Oral vocabulary training program for Spanish third-graders with low socio-economic status: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE,12(11), e0188157. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education,7, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., Restrepo, M. A., Bedore, L., Penña, E., & Anderson, R. (2000). Language sample analysis in Spanish-speaking children. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools,31, 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.3101.88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinshaw, S. P. (1992). Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence: Causal relationships and underlying mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin,111, 127–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing,2, 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. S. G. (2015). Developmental, component-based model of reading fluency: An investigation of predictors of word-reading fluency, text-reading fluency, and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly,50, 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Bowers, P. N., Izenberg, L., Wade-Woolley, L., & Parrila, R. (2012). Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing,25, 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kudo, M. F., Lussier, C. M., & Swanson, H. L. (2015). Reading disabilities in children: A selective meta-analysis of the cognitive literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities,40, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levesque, K. C., Kieffer, M. J., & Deacon, S. H. (2017). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Examining mediating factors. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,160, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Escribano, C. (2016). Training reading fluency and comprehension of Spanish children with dyslexia. In A. Khateb & I. Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency (pp. 141–161). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Escribano, C., de Juan, M. R. E., Gómez-Veiga, I., & García-Madruga, J. A. (2013). Estudio predictivo de la comprensión lectora en estudiantes españoles de tercero de Primaria [A predictive study of reading comprehension in third-grade Spanish students]. Psicothema,25, 199–205. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2012.175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Ornat, S. (2011). La adquisición del lenguaje, un resumen en 2011 [Language acquisition, a summary in 2011]. Revista de Investigación en Logopedia,1, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCardle, P., Scarborough, H. S., & Catts, H. W. (2001). Predicting, explaining, and preventing children’s reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,16, 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/0938-8982.00023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, E., Carballo, G., Muñoz, J., & Fresneda, M. D. (2005). Test de Comprensión de Estructura Gramaticales (CEG) [Grammar structure comprehension test]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones, S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., Adams, J. W., Bowyer-Crane, C. A., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Working memory deficits in poor comprehenders reflect underlying language impairments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,73, 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1999.2498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., Cocksey, J., Taylor, J., & Bishop, D. (2010). A longitudinal investigation of the early language and reading skills in children with reading comprehension impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,51, 1031–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02254.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language,39(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2000). Factors influencing syntactic awareness skills in normal readers and poor comprehenders. Applied Psycholinguistics,21, 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400002046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the NationalReading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. (NIHPublication No. 00-4769). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • National Research Council. (2012). Improving adult literacy instruction: Options for practice and research. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pek, J., Wong, O., & Wong, A. C. (2018). How to address non-normality: A taxonomy of approaches, reviewed, and illustrated. Frontiers in Psychology,9, 2104. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading,18, 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puyuelo, M., Renom, J., Solanas, A., & Wiig, E. H. (2007). Batería de Lenguaje Objetiva y Criterial Screening Revisada (BLOC-SR) [Screening Battery for Objective and Criterial Language—Revised]. Barcelona: Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puyuelo, M., Wiig, E. H., Renom, J., & Solanas, A. (1998). Batería de Lenguaje Objetiva y Criterial (BLOC) [Screening Battery for Objective and Criterial Language]. Madrid: Editorial Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastle, K. (2018). The place of morphology in learning to read in English. Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1995). Raven Matrices Progresivas (Escalas: CPM, SPM; APM). [Raven’s Progressive Matrices (Forms: CPM; SPM, APM)]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones, S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, J. (2011). Research review: Reading comprehension in developmental disorders of language and communication. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,52, 1111–1123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02438.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripoll, J. C., & Aguado, G. (2013). La mejora de la comprensión lectora en español: un meta-análisis [Reading comprehension improvement for Spanish students: A meta-analysis]. Revista de Psicodidáctica,19, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.9001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvador Mata, F., Gallego, J. L., & Mieres, C. G. (2007). Habilidades lingüísticas y comprensión lectora. Una investigación empírica. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía,59(1), 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin,134, 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, R. D., Proctor, C. P., Harring, J. R., Hartranft, A. M., Doyle, B., & Zelinke, S. B. (2015). Language skills and reading comprehension in English monolingual and Spanish-English bilingual children in grades 2–5. Reading and Writing,28, 1381–1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9575-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, M., Wagner, R. K., & Petscher, Y. (2019). The reading comprehension and vocabulary knowledge of children with poor reading comprehension despite adequate decoding: Evidence from a regression-based matching approach. Journal of Educational Psychology,111(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stothard, S. E., & Hulme, C. (1992). Reading comprehension difficulties in children. Reading and Writing,4, 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suárez-Coalla, P., Martínez-García, C., & Cuetos, F. (2017). Morpheme-based reading and writing in Spanish children with dyslexia. Frontiers in Psychology,8, 1952. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, X., Deacon, S. H., & Cain, K. (2014). Morphological and syntactic awareness in poor comprehenders: Another piece of the puzzle. Journal of Learning Disabilities,47(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413509971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, X., Deacon, S. H., Kirby, J. R., Cain, K., & Parrila, R. (2011). Morphological awareness: A key to understanding poor reading comprehension in English. Journal of Educational Psychology,103, 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivas, D. M. (1979). Order of acquisition of Spanish grammatical morphemes: Comparison to English and some cross-linguistic methodological problems. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics,4(1), 77–105. https://doi.org/10.17161/kwpl.1808.659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltzman, D. E., & Cairns, H. S. (2000). Grammatical knowledge of third grade good an poor readers. Applied Psycholinguistics,21, 263–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yovanoff, P., Duesbery, L., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2005). Grade-level invariance of a theoretical causal structure predicting reading comprehension with vocabulary and oral reading fluency. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,24(3), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2005.00014.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuill, N. M., & Oakhill, J. V. (1991). Children’s problems in text comprehension: An experimental investigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was possible thanks to the funding received from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Spain), via its Plan Estatal 2013–2016 Excelencia–Proyectos I + D programme (PSI2015-65656-P).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Human Neuroscience Lab, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, C/Energía Solar 1, 41014, Seville, Spain

    Ian Craig Simpson

  2. University of Seville, Seville, Spain

    Francisco Javier Moreno-Pérez, Isabel de los Reyes Rodríguez-Ortiz, Marta Valdés-Coronel & David Saldaña

Authors
  1. Ian Craig Simpson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francisco Javier Moreno-Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Isabel de los Reyes Rodríguez-Ortiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marta Valdés-Coronel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David Saldaña
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Craig Simpson.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simpson, I.C., Moreno-Pérez, F.J., Rodríguez-Ortiz, I.R. et al. The effects of morphological and syntactic knowledge on reading comprehension in spanish speaking children. Read Writ 33, 329–348 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09964-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09964-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation