Abstract
This study examined the relationship of different measures of syntactic complexity with rated quality for two genres of text produced by middle school students. It was hypothesized that different measures would be associated with distinct aspects of syntactic complexity; words per clause with greater use of structures more typical of expository texts, and clauses per T-unit with structures more typical of conversational or narrative registers. A sample of 41 seventh and eighth grade students from suburban middle schools composed a narrative and persuasive essays. Texts were rated for quality and coded for syntactic features including words per clause and clauses per T-unit. Syntactic complexity as measured in words per clause was positively correlated with quality for essays but not for narratives. Clauses per T-unit was positively correlated with quality for narratives, but negatively correlated with quality for essays. The relationships between syntactic complexity and text quality were thus found to be dependent both on the genre of the text, and the measure of syntactic complexity used.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, R., Torgerson, C., Beverton, S., Freeman, A., Locke, T., Low, G., et al. (2006). The effect of grammar teaching on writing development. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 39–55.
Berman, R. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2002). Developing text production abilities. Written Language and Literacy, 5, 1–44.
Berninger, V. W., & Fuller, F. (1992). Gender differences in orthographic, verbal, and compositional fluency: Implications for assessing writing disabilities in primary grade children. Journal of School Psychology, 30, 363–382.
Biber, D. (2001). On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multi-dimensional analysis. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 215–240). London: Longman.
Botvin, G. J., & Sutton-Smith, B. (1977). The development of structural complexity in children’s fantasy narratives. Developmental Psychology, 13, 377–388.
Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 591–620.
Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (2000). Is graphic activity cognitively costly? A developmental approach. Reading and Writing, 13, 183–196.
Chafe, W., & Danielewicz, J. (1987). Properties of spoken and written language. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 83–113). New York: Academic Press.
Coirier, P. (1996). Composing argumentative texts: Cognitive and/or textual complexity. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 317–338). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Connors, R. J. (2000). The erasure of the sentence. College Composition and Communication, 52, 96–128.
Cragg, L., & Nation, K. (2006). Exploring written narrative in children with poor reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 26, 55–72.
Crowhurst, M. (1980). Syntactic complexity and teachers’ quality ratings of narrations and arguments. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 223–231.
Crowhurst, M. (1983). Syntactic complexity and writing quality: A review. Canadian Journal of Education, 8, 1–16.
Crowhurst, M., & Piche, G. L. (1979). Audience and mode of discourse effects on syntactic complexity in writing at two grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 101–109.
Donovan, C. A., & Smolkin, L. B. (2006). Children’s understanding of genre and writing development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 131–143). New York: The Guilford Press.
Faigley, L. (1979). The influence of generative rhetoric on the syntactic maturity and writing effectiveness of college freshmen. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 197–206.
Fang, Z., Schleppegrell, M. J., & Cox, B. E. (2006). Understanding the language demands of schooling: Nouns in academic registers. Journal of Literacy Research, 38, 247–273.
Gambell, T., & Hunter, D. (2000). Surveying gender differences in Canadian school literacy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 689–719.
Gebhard, A. O. (1978). Writing quality and syntax: A transformational analysis of three prose samples. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 211–232.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1987). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 55–82). San Diego: Academic Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in social-semiotic perspective. Geelong, VIC, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Higgins, B., Miller, M., & Wegmann, S. (2006). Teaching to the test . . .not! Balancing best practice and testing requirements in writing. The Reading Teacher, 60, 310–319.
Hillocks, G. Jr. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written and three grade levels (Research Report No. 3). Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Hunt, K. W. (1966). Sentence structures used by superior students in grade four and twelve and by superior adults. Tallahassee: Florida State University.
Hunt, K. W. (1970). Syntactic maturity in school children and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 35 (1, Serial No. 134).
Iwashita, N. (2006). Syntactic complexity measures and their relation to oral proficiency in Japanese as a foreign language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3, 151–169.
Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Loban, W. (1976). Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve (Research Report No. 18). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Newkirk, T. (2000). Misreading masculinity: Speculations on the great gender gap in writing. Language Arts, 77, 294–298.
Nippold, M. A., Hesketh, L. J., & Duthie, J. K. (2005). Conversational versus expository discourse: A study of syntactic development in children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1048–1064.
Nippold, M. A., Mansfield, T. C., & Billow, J. L. (2007). Peer conflict explanations in children, adolescents, and adults: Examining the development of complex syntax. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 179–188.
Nold, E. W., & Freedman, S. (1977). An analysis of readers’ responses to essays. Research in the Teaching of English, 11, 164–174.
Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (2004). 6+1 trait writing – about. Retrieved August 2, 2007, from http://www.nwet.org/assessment/about.php? odelay=1&d=1.
O’Donnell, R. C. (1976). A critique of some indices of syntactic maturity. Research in the Teaching of English, 10, 31–38.
O’Donnell, R. C, Griffin, W. J., & Norris, R. C. (1967). Syntax of kindergarten and elementary school children: A transformational analysis (Research Report No. 8). Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
O’Hare, F. (1973). Sentence-combining: Improving student writing without formal grammar instruction (Research Report No. 15). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Olson, D. R., & Astington, J. W. (1990). Talking about text: How literacy contributes to thought. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 705–721.
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24, 492–518.
Otto, B. (2006). Language development in early childhood (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Purcell-Gates, V. (1988). Lexical and syntactic knowledge of written narrative held by well-read-to kindergartners and second graders. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 128–157.
Ravid, D. D. (2005). Emergence of linguistic complexity in later language development: Evidence from expository text construction. In D. D. Ravid & H. B. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (pp. 337–356). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Reece, J. E., & Cumming, G. (1996). Evaluating speech-based composition methods: Planning, dictation, and the listening word processor. In C. M. Levy, & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 361–382). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Richardson, K., Calnan, M., Essen, J., & Lambert, L. (1976). The linguistic maturity of 11-year-olds: Some analyses of the written compositions of children in the National Child Development Study. Journal of Child Language, 3, 99–115.
Saddler, B., & Graham, S. (2005). The effects of peer-assisted sentence-combining instruction on the writing performance of more and less skilled young writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 43–54.
Schuele, C. M., & Dykes, J. C. (2005). Complex syntax acquisition: A longitudinal case study of a child with specific language impairment. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19, 295–318.
Scott, C. M. (1988). Spoken and written syntax. In M. A. Nippold (Ed.), Later language development: Ages nine through nineteen (pp. 49–95). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Scott, C. M. (2004). Syntactic contributions to literacy learning. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 340–362). New York: The Guilford Press.
Scott, C. M., & Windsor, J. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 324–339.
Smith, M. W., Cheville, J., & Hillocks, G. Jr. (2006). “I guess I’d better watch my English”: Grammars and the teaching of the English language arts. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 263–274). New York: The Guilford Press.
Smith, T. T., Lee, E., & McDade, H. L. (2001). An investigation of T-units in African American English-speaking and standard American English-speaking fourth grade children. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 22, 148–157.
Standards for the English language arts. (1996). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English/International Reading Association.
Stewart, M. F., & Grobe, C. H. (1979). Syntactic maturity and mechanics of writing: Their relationship to teachers’ quality ratings. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 207–216.
Woodcock, R., & Johnson, B. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson psychoeducational battery-III tests of achievement. Chicago, IL: Riverside Publishing.
Writing Study Group of the NCTE Executive Committee (2004). NCTE beliefs about the teaching of writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. Retrieved on August 1, 2006, from http://www.ncte.org/about/over/positions/category/write/118876.htm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beers, S.F., Nagy, W.E. Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which genre?. Read Writ 22, 185–200 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9107-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9107-5