Skip to main content
Log in

EQ-5D-3L health status and health state utilities of the oldest-old (85 +) in Germany: results from the AgeCoDe-AgeQualiDe study

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To describe health status and health state utilities measured by the EQ-5D-3L in a population-based sample of individuals aged 85 + in Germany, and to analyze associations with basic socio-demographic variables.

Methods

Cross-sectional data from follow-up wave 7 (n = 761) of the German AgeCoDe Study were used. The EQ-5D-3L questionnaire was used to record problems in five health dimensions, its visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) was used to record self-rated health status, and the German EQ-5D-3L index was used to derive health state utilities.

Results

Mean age of respondents was 88.9 years (SD 2.9; range 85 to 100), 67.4% were female. 81.9% reported problems in at least one of the EQ-5D dimensions, with 15.3% reporting extreme problems. Most frequent were problems with pain/discomfort (64.8%), followed by mobility (62.5%), usual activities (42.6%), self-care (28.2%), and anxiety/depression (20.5%). Mean EQ VAS score was 62.4 (SD 18.8), and mean EQ-5D index was 0.77 (SD 0.24). Multiple regression analysis showed associations of problem frequency in various EQ-5D dimensions with age, gender, living situation, marital status, and education. The EQ VAS score was negatively associated with age (β =  − 0.56; p < 0.05) and female gender (β =  − 3.49; p < 0.05). The EQ-5D index was negatively associated with not living in the community (β =  − 0.10; p < 0.001) and being single (β =  − 0.09; p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The results show a substantially impaired health status of the oldest-old population. The data can be used for comparing health status of population groups as well as for health economic models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Campion, E. (1994). The oldest old. The New England Journal of Medicine, 330(25), 1819–1820. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199406233302509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Suzman, R., & Riley, M. (1985). Introducing the "oldest old". The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, Health and Society, 63(2), 177–186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis) (2016). Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit. Rückgerechnete und fortgeschriebene Bevölkerung auf Grundlage des Zensus 2011. Retrieved June 26, 2020 from https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Bevoelkerungsstand/Publikationen/Downloads-Bevoelkerungsstand/rueckgerechnete-bevoelkerung-5124105119004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

  4. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis) (2017). Bevölkerung Deutschlands bis 2060. Ergebnisse der 14. koordinierten Bevölkerungsvorausberechnung - Hauptvarianten 1 bis 9. Retrieved June 26, 2020 from https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Bevoelkerungsvorausberechnung/Publikationen/Downloads-Vorausberechnung/bevoelkerung-deutschland-2060-5124202199014.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

  5. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis) (2017). Krankheitskosten 2015. Retrieved June 26, 2020 from https://www.destatis.de/GPStatistik/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/DEHeft_derivate_00033175/2120721159004.pdf%3Bjsessionid%3DB19129ECF3A61F8DB331D847FC4E599C

  6. EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Drummond, M., Sculpher, M., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G., & Torrance, G. (2015). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Teerawattananon, Y., Luz, A., Culyer, A., & Chalkidou, K. (2020). Charging for the use of survey instruments on population health: The case of quality-adjusted life years. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 98(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.19.233239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramsey, S., Willke, R., Briggs, A., Brown, R., Buxton, M., Chawla, A., et al. (2005). Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: The ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report. Value in Health, 8(5), 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00045.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013). Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013. Retrieved June 26, 2020 from https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/chapter/foreword

  11. EUnetHTA Joint Action 2 Work Package 7 Subgroup 3, Heintz, E., Gerber-Grote, A., Ghabri, S., Hamers, F., Rupel, V., et al. (2016). Is There a European view on health economic evaluations? Results from a synopsis of methodological guidelines used in the EUnetHTA partner countries. PharmacoEconomics, 34(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-015-0328-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Szende, A., Janssen, B., & Cabases, J. (2014). Self-reported population health: An international perspective based on EQ-5D. Amsterdam: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Janssen, M., Szende, A., Cabases, J., Ramos-Goñi, J., Vilagut, G., & König, H. (2019). Population norms for the EQ-5D-3L: A cross-country analysis of population surveys for 20 countries. The European Journal of Health Economics, 20(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-018-0955-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. König, H., Heider, D., Lehnert, T., Riedel Heller, S., Angermeyer, M., Matschinger, H., et al. (2010). Health status of the advanced elderly in six European countries: Results from a representative survey using EQ-5D and SF-12. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hong, E. (2015). Age differences in health-related quality of life among South Korean elderly. Journal of Nursing and Health Science, 1(4), 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Luthy, C., Cedraschi, C., Allaz, A. F., Herrmann, F. R., & Ludwig, C. (2015). Health status and quality of life: Results from a national survey in a community-dwelling sample of elderly people. Quality of Life Research, 24(7), 1687–1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0894-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mangen, M. J., Bolkenbaas, M., Huijts, S. M., van Werkhoven, C. H., Bonten, M. J., & de Wit, G. A. (2017). Quality of life in community-dwelling Dutch elderly measured by EQ-5D-3L. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0577-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, S., Chen, J., Johannesson, M., Kind, P., Xu, L., Zhang, Y., et al. (2011). Population health status in China: EQ-5D results, by age, sex and socio-economic status, from the National Health Services Survey 2008. Quality of Life Research, 20(3), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9762-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Luck, T., Riedel Heller, S., Luppa, M., Wiese, B., Wollny, A., Wagner, M., et al. (2010). Risk factors for incident mild cognitive impairment–results from the German study on ageing, cognition and dementia in primary care patients (AgeCoDe). Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 121(4), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01481.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Greiner, W., Claes, C., Busschbach, J., & von der Schulenburg, J. (2005). Validating the EQ-5D with time trade off for the German population. The European Journal of Health Economics, 6(2), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-004-0264-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Arnold, M., Pfeifer, K., & Quante, A. (2019). Is risk-stratified breast cancer screening economically efficient in Germany? PLoS ONE, 14(5), e0217213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Norström, F., Waenerlund, A., Lindholm, L., Hygren, R., Sahlén, K., & Brydsten, A. (2019). Does unemployment contribute to poorer health-related quality of life among Swedish adults? BMC Public Health, 19(1), 457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sapin, C., Fantino, B., Nowicki, M., & Kind, P. (2004). Usefulness of EQ-5D in assessing health status in primary care patients with major depressive disorder. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-2-20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Brauns, H., & Steinmann, S. (1999). Educational reform in France, West-Germany and the United Kingdom: Updating the CASMIN educational classification. ZUMA Nachrichten, 23(44), 7–44.

    Google Scholar 

  26. König, H., Bernert, S., & Angermeyer, M. (2005). Gesundheitszustand der deutschen Bevölkerung: Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Befragung mit dem EuroQol-Instrument. Gesundheitswesen, 67(3), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-857991.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Janssen, B., & Szende, A. (2014). Population norms for the EQ-5D. In A. J. Szende & B. J. Cabases (Eds.), Self-reported population health: An international perspective based on EQ-5D (pp. 19–30). Amsterdam: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Hinz, A., Klaiberg, A., Brähler, E., & König, H. (2006). Der Lebensqualitätsfragebogen EQ-5D: Modelle und Normwerte für die Allgemeinbevölkerung. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 56(2), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-867061.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mielck, A., Vogelmann, M., Schweikert, B., & Leidl, R. (2010). Gesundheitszustand bei Erwachsenen in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Befragung mit dem EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D). Gesundheitswesen, 72(8–9), 476–486. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1239508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Borowiak, E., & Kostka, T. (2004). Predictors of quality of life in older people living at home and in institutions. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 16(3), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03327386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Karakaya, M. G., Bilgin, S. C., Ekici, G., Köse, N., & Otman, A. S. (2009). Functional mobility, depressive symptoms, level of independence, and quality of life of the elderly living at home and in the nursing home. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 10(9), 662–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2009.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, C., Liu, G. G., Shi, Q. L., Sun, Y., Zhang, H., Wang, M. J., et al. (2020). Health-related quality of life and associated factors among oldest-old in China. The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, 24(3), 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1327-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kwon, S., Park, J. H., Kim, W. S., Han, K., Lee, Y., & Paik, N. J. (2018). Health-related quality of life and related factors in stroke survivors: Data from Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2008 to 2014. PLoS ONE, 13(4), e0195713. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lei, P., Xu, L., Nwaru, B. I., Long, Q., & Wu, Z. (2016). Social networks and health-related quality of life among Chinese old adults in urban areas: Results from 4th National Household Health Survey. Public Health, 131, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.10.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. N'Goran, A. A., Déruaz-Luyet, A., Haller, D. M., Zeller, A., Rosemann, T., Streit, S., et al. (2017). Comparing the self-perceived quality of life of multimorbid patients and the general population using the EQ-5D-3L. PLoS ONE, 12(12), e0188499. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Park, H. E., Song, H. Y., Han, K., Cho, K. H., & Kim, Y. H. (2019). Number of remaining teeth and health-related quality of life: The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010–2012. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1078-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Linden, M., Gilberg, R., Horgas, A., & Steinhagen-Thiessen, E. (2010). Die Inanspruchnahme medizinischer und pflegerischer Hilfe im hohen Alter. In U. Lindenberger, J. Smith, K. Mayer, & P. Baltes (Eds.), Die Berliner Altersstudie (pp. 499–519). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hajek, A., Brettschneider, C., Ernst, A., Posselt, T., Wiese, B., Prokein, J., et al. (2016). Longitudinal predictors of informal and formal caregiving time in community-dwelling dementia patients. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 51(4), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-015-1138-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis) (2017). Pflegestatistik. Pflege im Rahmen der Pflegeversicherung. Deutschlandstatistik. Retrieved from June 26, 2020 from https://www.destatis.de/GPStatistik/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/DEHeft_derivate_00042871/5224001159004.pdf

  40. Long, J., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (3rd ed.). College Station: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M., Kind, P., Parkin, D., et al. (2011). Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Quality of Life Research, 20(10), 1727–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Devlin, N., Shah, K., Feng, Y., Mulhern, B., & van Hout, B. (2018). Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Economics, 27(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ludwig, K., Graf von der Schulenburg, J., & Greiner, W. (2018). German value set for the EQ-5D-5L. PharmacoEconomics, 36(6), 663–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0615-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2019). Position statement on use of the EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Retrieved from June 26, 2020 from https://www.nice.org.uk/about/what-we-do/our-programmes/nice-guidance/technology-appraisal-guidance/eq-5d-5l

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank both all participating patients and their general practitioners for their good collaboration. Members of the AgeCoDe & AgeQualiDe Study Group: Wolfgang Maier (Principal Investigator), Martin Scherer (Principal Investigator), Steffi G. Riedel-Heller (Principal Investigator), Heinz-Harald Abholz, Christian Brettschneider, Cadja Bachmann, Horst Bickel, Wolfgang Blank, Hendrik van den Bussche, Sandra Eifflaender-Gorfer, Marion Eisele, Annette Ernst, Angela Fuchs, André Hajek, Kathrin Heser, Frank Jessen, Hanna Kaduszkiewicz, Teresa Kaufeler, Mirjam Köhler, Hans-Helmut König, Alexander Koppara, Diana Lubisch, Tobias Luck, Dagmar Lühmann, Melanie Luppa, Tina Mallon, Manfred Mayer, Edelgard Mösch, Michael Pentzek, Jana Prokein, Alfredo Ramirez, Susanne Röhr, Anna Schumacher, Janine Stein, Susanne Steinmann, Franziska Tebarth, Hendrik van den Bussche (Principal Investigator 2002-2011), Carolin van der Leeden, Michael Wagner, Klaus Weckbecker, Dagmar Weeg, Jochen Werle, Siegfried Weyerer, Birgitt Wiese, Steffen Wolfsgruber, Thomas Zimmermann.

Funding

This publication is part of the German Research Network on Dementia (KND), the German Research Network on Degenerative Dementia (KNDD; German Study on Ageing, Cognition and Dementia in Primary Care Patients; AgeCoDe), and the Health Service Research Initiative (Study on Needs, health service use, costs and health-related quality of life in a large sample of oldest-old primary care patients (85 + ; AgeQualiDe)) and was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grants KND: 01GI0102, 01GI0420, 01GI0422, 01GI0423, 01GI0429, 01GI0431, 01GI0433, 01GI0434; grants KNDD: 01GI0710, 01GI0711, 01GI0712, 01GI0713, 01GI0714, 01GI0715, 01GI0716; Grants Health Service Research Initiative: 01GY1322A, 01GY1322B, 01GY1322C, 01GY1322D, 01GY1322E, 01GY1322F, 01GY1322G). The publication was also supported by the study “Healthy Aging: Gender specific trajectories into latest life” (AgeDifferent.De) that was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Nos. 01GL1714A; 01GL1714B; 01GL1714C; 01GL1714D).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Helmut König.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

All authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval

The AgeCoDe and the AgeQualiDe study have been approved by the ethics committees of all participating study centers (Approval Numbers: Hamburg: OB/08/02, 2817/2007, MC-390/13; Bonn: 050/02; 174/02, 258/07, 369/13; Mannheim: 0226.4/2002, 2007-253E-MA, 2013-662N-MA; Leipzig: 143/2002, 309/2007, 333-1318112013; Düsseldorf: 2079/2002, 2999/2008, 2999; Munich: 713/02, 713/02 E) and comply with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, as revised in 1983.

Informed consent

All participants gave written informed consent prior to participation.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

König, HH., Brettschneider, C., Lühmann, D. et al. EQ-5D-3L health status and health state utilities of the oldest-old (85 +) in Germany: results from the AgeCoDe-AgeQualiDe study. Qual Life Res 29, 3223–3232 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02597-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02597-0

Keywords

Navigation