Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Health-related quality of life and utilities in primary-care patients with generalized anxiety disorder

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is prevalent and significantly impacts patient health-related quality of life (HRQL) and disability.

Purpose

This study evaluated the effect of GAD and anxiety symptom severity on the HRQL of primary-care patients with GAD.

Methods

Patients 18 years or older with GAD were recruited from an integrated health care delivery system. Clinical assessments included the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), GAD Questionnaire-IV (GAD-Q-IV), and the Patient Health Questionnaire depression module (PHQ). HRQL was assessed by the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire—Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), SF-12 Health Survey (SF-6D), and the Health Utilities Index (HUI2, HUI3).

Results

The sample included 297 patients, 72% women with mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 47.6 ± 13.7 years. At baseline, the mean HAM-A score was 16.8 ± 7.6 (suggesting the presence of moderate anxiety symptoms). Anxiety and depression symptoms were significantly correlated with mental component summary (MCS), Q-LES-Q-SF, SDS, SF-6D, HUI2, and HUI3 scores (all P < 0.001). The mean HRQL and all of the preference-based measures varied significantly by anxiety severity groups (all P < 0.001). Anxiety and depression symptoms significantly predicted HRQL and preference-based scores (R 2 values ranged from 0.22 to 0.57).

Conclusions

Anxiety symptoms reported by GAD patients resulted in significant impairment to HRQL and functional outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kessler, R. C., Keller, M. B., & Wittchen, H. U. (2001). The epidemiology of generalized anxiety disorder. In O. Brawman-Mintzer (Ed.), Psychiatric Clinics of North America: Generalized Anxiety Disorder (pp. 19–40). Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kessler, R. C., Mickelson, K. D., Barber, C., & Wang, P. (2001). The effects of chronic medical conditions on work impairment. In A. S. Rossi (Ed.), Caring and doing for others: Social responsibility in the domains of the family, work, and community (pp. 403–426). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wittchen, H. U., & Hoyer, J. (2001). Generalized anxiety disorder: Nature and course. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 62(Suppl 11), 15–19. discussion 20–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wittchen, H. U., Kessler, R. C., Beesdo, K., Krause, P., Höfler, M., & Hoyer, J. (2002). Generalized anxiety and depression in primary care: Prevalence, recognition, and management. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 63(Suppl 8), 24–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wittchen, H. U., Zhao, S., Kessler, R. C., & Eaton, W. W. (1994). DSM-III-R generalized anxiety disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51(5), 355–364.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ansseau, M., Dierick, M., Buntinkx, F., Cnockaert, P., De Smedt, J., Van Den Haute, M., et al. (2004). High prevalence of mental disorders in primary care. Journal of Affective Disorders, 78(1), 49–55. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00219-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ansseau, M., Fischler, B., Dierick, M., Mignon, A., & Leyman, S. (2005). Prevalence and impact of generalized anxiety disorder and major depression in primary care in Belgium and Luxemburg: The GADIS study. European Psychiatry, 20(3), 229–235. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2004.09.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wittchen, H. U. (2002). Generalized anxiety disorder: Prevalence, burden, and cost to society. Depression and Anxiety, 16(4), 162–171. doi:10.1002/da.10065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kessler, R. C., DuPont, R. L., Berglund, P., & Wittchen, H. U. (1999). Impairment in pure and comorbid generalized anxiety disorder and major depression at 12 months in two national surveys. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(12), 1915–1923.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kessler, R. C., & Wittchen, H. U. (2002). Patterns and correlates of generalized anxiety disorder in community samples. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 63(Suppl 8), 4–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Massion, A. O., Warshaw, M. G., & Keller, M. B. (1993). Quality of life and psychiatric morbidity in panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 150(4), 600–607.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wittchen, H. U., Carter, R. M., Pfister, H., Montgomery, S. A., & Kessler, R. C. (2000). Disabilities and quality of life in pure and comorbid generalized anxiety disorder and major depression in a national survey. International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 15(6), 319–328.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stein, M. B., Roy-Byrne, P. P., Craske, M. G., Bystritsky, A., Sullivan, G., Pyne, J. M., et al. (2005). Functional impact and health utility of anxiety disorders in primary care outpatients. Medical Care, 43(12), 1164–1170. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000185750.18119.fd.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fryback, D. G., Dunham, N. C., Palta, M., Hanmer, J., Buechner, J., Cherepanov, D., et al. (2007). US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement study. Medical Care, 45(12), 1162–1170.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mittal, D., Fortney, J. C., Pyne, J. M., Edlund, M. J., & Wetherell, J. L. (2006). Impact of comorbid anxiety disorders on health-related quality of life among patients with major depressive disorder. Psychiatric Services (Washington, DC), 57(12), 1731–1737. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.57.12.1731.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pyne, J. M., Patterson, T. L., Kaplan, R. M., Ho, S., Gillin, J. C., Golshan, S., et al. (1997). Preliminary longitudinal assessment of quality of life in patients with major depression. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 33(1), 23–29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Revicki, D. A., & Wood, M. (1998). Patient-assigned health state utilities for depression-related outcomes: Differences by depression severity and antidepressant medications. Journal of Affective Disorders, 48(1), 25–36. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(97)00117-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sullivan, P. W., Lawrence, W. F., & Ghushchyan, V. (2005). A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Medical Care, 43(7), 736–749. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000172050.67085.4f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brooks, R. (1996). EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy (Amsterdam), 37(1), 53–72. doi:10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Feeny, D. H., Torrance, G. W., & Furlong, W. J. (1996). Health Utilities Index. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (2nd ed.) (pp. 239–252). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaplan, R. M., & Anderson, J. P. (1996). The general health policy model: An integrated approach. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. (1996). Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Segal, D. L., Hersen, M., & Van Hasselt, V. B. (1994). Reliability of the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R: An evaluative review. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 35(4), 316–327. doi:10.1016/0010-440X(94)90025-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., Gibbon, M., & First, M. B. (1992). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). I: History, rationale, and description. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49(8), 624–629.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dreessen, L., & Arntz, A. (1998). Short-interval test–retest interrater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders (SCID-II) in outpatients. Journal of Personality Disorders, 12(2), 138–148.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rohde, P., Lewinsohn, P. M., & Seeley, J. R. (1997). Comparability of telephone and face-to-face interviews in assessing axis I and II disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(11), 1593–1598.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Simon, G. E., Revicki, D., & VonKorff, M. (1993). Telephone assessment of depression severity. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 27(3), 247–252. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(93)90035-Z.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams, J. B. W. (1996). Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale: SIGH-A. New York, NY: New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research Department.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kobak, K. A., Taylor, L. H., Dottl, S. L., Greist, J. H., Jefferson, J. W., Burroughs, D., et al. (1997). A computer-administered telephone interview to identify mental disorders. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(11), 905–910. doi:10.1001/jama.278.11.905.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Newman, M., Zuellig, A., Kachin, K., Constantino, M. J., Przeworski, A., Erickson, T., et al. (2002). Preliminary reliability and validity of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-IV: A revised self-report diagnostic measure of Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Behavior Therapy, 33, 215–233. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(02)80026-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Endicott, J., Nee, J., Harrison, W., & Blumenthal, R. (1993). Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: A new measure. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 29(2), 321–326.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kroenke, K., & Spitzer, R. L. (2002). The PHQ-9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatric Annals, 32, 509–521.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ware, J. E., Jr, Turner-Bowler, D. M., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (2004). SF-12v2: How to Score Version 2 of the SF-12 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brazier, J. E., & Roberts, J. (2004). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Medical Care, 42(9), 851–859. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000135827.18610.0d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Torrance, G. W., Goldsmith, C. H., Zhu, Z., DePauw, S., et al. (2002). Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Medical Care, 40(2), 113–128. doi:10.1097/00005650-200202000-00006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Horsman, J., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., & Torrance, G. (2003). The Health Utilities Index (HUI): Concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 54. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-1-54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Torrance, G. W., Feeny, D. H., Furlong, W. J., Barr, R. D., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Q. (1996). Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Medical Care, 34(7), 702–722. doi:10.1097/00005650-199607000-00004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Statistics Canada and U.S. National Center for Health Statistics. Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health, 2002–03: Joint Canada/United Status Survey of Health Statistics. 2004.

  41. Luo, N., Johnson, J. A., Shaw, J. W., Feeny, D., & Coons, S. J. (2005). Self-reported health status of the general adult U.S. population as assessed by the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index. Medical Care, 43(11), 1078–1086. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000182493.57090.c1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Leon, A. C., Olfson, M., Portera, L., Farber, L., & Sheehan, D. V. (1997). Assessing psychiatric impairment in primary care with the Sheehan Disability Scale. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 27(2), 93–105.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Medical Expenditures Panel Survey (MEPS). Journal [serial on the Internet]. 2004 Date; 2006 (December 7): Available from: http://www.meps.ahrq.gov.

  44. Simon, G. E., Revicki, D. A., Grothaus, L., & Vonkorff, M. (1998). SF-36 summary scores: Are physical and mental health truly distinct? Medical Care, 36(4), 567–572. doi:10.1097/00005650-199804000-00012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Walters, S. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2003). What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 4. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-1-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Walters, S. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2005). Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Quality of Life Research, 14(6), 1523–1532. doi:10.1007/s11136-004-7713-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Maddigan, S. L., Feeny, D. H., Majumdar, S. R., Farris, K. B., & Johnson, J. A. (2006). Health Utilities Index mark 3 demonstrated construct validity in a population-based sample with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(5), 472–477. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis A. Revicki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Revicki, D.A., Brandenburg, N., Matza, L. et al. Health-related quality of life and utilities in primary-care patients with generalized anxiety disorder. Qual Life Res 17, 1285–1294 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9406-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9406-6

Keyword

Navigation