Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An instrument to assess mental patients’ capacity to appraise and report subjective quality of life

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality of life (QOL) is increasingly recognized as an important outcome measure in treatment studies and service evaluation. However, patients or service users may sometimes lack the capacity to either evaluate or express their subjective QOL, for example due to cognitive impairment, communication disorders, symptom distress or burden of completing the assessment itself. This paper describes the development of an instrument, the capacity to report subjective quality of life inventory (CapQOL), which evaluates the ability of patients to appraise their subjective QOL and to complete related measures. The CapQOL is a simple and brief screening tool, designed for use in people with a wide range of mental disabilities. It helps researchers to identify individuals who are unable to appraise or report their subjective quality of life. We administered the CapQOL to 442 patients with early psychosis. About 89% of the participants were assessed to be able to complete a subjective QOL measure. The CapQOL demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. Further validation studies in people with psychosis as well as other mental disabilities are indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • World Health Organization. WHOQOL-BREF: Introduction, Administration, Scoring and Generic Version of the Assessment. Geneva, 1996.

  • FM Andrews SB Withey (1976) Social Indicators of Well-being: Americans’ Perceptions of Life Quality. Plenum Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • KCA Sneeuw NK Aaronson MAG Sprangers SB Detmar LDV Wever JH Schornagel (1998) ArticleTitleComparison of patient and proxy EORTC QLQ-C30 ratings in assessing the quality of life of cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol 51 IssueID7 617–631

    Google Scholar 

  • J Addington-Hall L Kalra (2001) ArticleTitleMeasuring quality of life: Who should measure quality of life? Br Med J 322 1417–1420

    Google Scholar 

  • AF Lehman LT Postrado LT Rachuba (1993) ArticleTitleConvergent validation of quality of life assessments for persons with severe mental illnesses. Qual Life Res 2 327–333

    Google Scholar 

  • RG Logsdon LE Gibbons SM McCurry L Teri (2002) ArticleTitleAssessing quality of life in older adults with cognitive impairment. Psychosom Med 64 510–519

    Google Scholar 

  • L Voruganti R Heslegrave AG Awad MV Seeman (1998) ArticleTitleQuality of life measurement in schizophrenia: Reconciling the quest for subjectivity with the question of reliability. Psychol Med 28 165–172 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0033291797005874 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ksVKrtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9483693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PN Prince GJ Gerber (2001) ArticleTitleMeasuring subjective quality of life in people with serious mental illness using the SEIQoL-DW. Qual Life Res 10 114–122

    Google Scholar 

  • JA DePalma (2001) ArticleTitleMeasuring quality of life of patients of traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Nurs Q 23 IssueID4 42–51

    Google Scholar 

  • WML Finlay E Lyons (2001) ArticleTitleMethodological issues in interviewing and using self-report questionnaires with people with mental retardation. Psychol Assess 13 IssueID3 319–335

    Google Scholar 

  • J Rust S Golombok (1999) Modern Psychometrics: The Science of Psychological Assessment EditionNumber2 Routledge London and New York 204

    Google Scholar 

  • CK Sigelman EC Budd JL Winer CJ Schoenrock PW Martin (1982) ArticleTitleEvaluating alternative techniques of questioning mentally retarded persons. Am J Ment Defic 86 IssueID5 511–518

    Google Scholar 

  • J Perry D Felce (2002) ArticleTitleSubjective and objective quality of life assessment: Responsiveness, response bias, and resident: Proxy concordance. Ment Retard 40 IssueID6 445–456

    Google Scholar 

  • PN Prince CR Prince (2001) ArticleTitleSubjective quality of life in the evaluation of programs for people with serious and persistent mental illness. Clin Psychol Rev 21 IssueID7 1005–1036

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josephine G.W.S. Wong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wong, J.G., Cheung, E.P., Chen, E.Y. et al. An instrument to assess mental patients’ capacity to appraise and report subjective quality of life. Qual Life Res 14, 687–694 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-1215-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-1215-y

Keywords

Navigation