Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Federal legislative activism in Australia: a new approach to testing Wagner’s law

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers the relationship between government growth and real GDP per capita by developing models of federal legislative output in Australia since 1901. Growth in legislation is found to be negatively related to growth in real income per capita in the short-run, implying that legislation responds to temporary economic shocks, but without a robust long-run relationship with the level of income. The growth in the number of pages of legislation enacted and legislative complexity also show a negative short-run relationship with growth in real national income per capita and a positive long-run relationship with the level of income.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barber, S., Lawley, C., & Newman, G. (2008). Federal election results 1901–2007. Canberra: Parliamentary Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bårdsen, G. (1989). Estimation of long run coefficients in error correction models. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 51(2), 345–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, A. (1985). Australian government finances: a statistical overview, 1850–1982. Canberra: Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, C. (2008). The growth of Australia’s regulatory state: ideology, accountability and the mega-regulators. Melbourne: Institute of Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. (1977). Why does government grow? In T. Borcherding (Ed.), Budgets and bureaucrats: the sources of government growth. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T., Liu, W., & Caudill, S. (2004). A re-examination of Wagner’s law for ten countries based on cointegration and error-correction modelling techniques. Applied Financial Economics, 14, 577–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollery, B., & Singh, S. (2000). Explaining the real size of government in Australia: an application of the Ferris and West model. Economic Analysis and Policy, 30(2), 157–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durevall, D., & Henrekson, M. (2010). The futile quest for a grand explanation of long-run government expenditure. IFN Working Paper No. 818. Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics.

  • Easterly, W., & Rebelo, S. (1993). Fiscal policy and economic growth: an empirical investigation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(3), 417–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, N., & MacKinnon, J. (2002). Distributions of error correction tests for cointegration. Econometrics Journal, 5, 285–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, R. (1996). Australian economic statistics, 1949–50 to 1994–95. Occasional Paper No. 8. Sydney: Reserve Bank of Australia.

  • Lindert, P. (1996). What limits social spending? Explorations in Economic History, 33(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, I., Mackerras, M., & Boldiston, C. (1997). Australian political facts. South Melbourne: Macmillan Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, L. (1994). Cointegration, causality and Wagner’s law: a test for Britain, 1870–1913. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 41(3).

  • Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia (2005). House of representatives practice (5th ed.). Canberra: Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, A. & Scott A. (2000). The curious attraction of Wagner’s law. Public Choice, 102, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of long-run relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, R. (1987). Wagner’s hypothesis in time series and cross-section perspectives: evidence from ‘real’ data for 115 countries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(2), 194–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, C. (2007). The size and composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 91(11–12), 2230–2260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V., & Schuknecht, L. (2000). Public spending in the 20th century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, A. (1890). Finanzwissenschaft. Leipzig: Puttkammer & Mühlbrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B., Shepsle, K., & Johnsen, C. (1981). The political economy of benefits and costs: a neoclassical approach to distributive politics. The Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 642–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Economics Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW, 2007, Sydney, Australia

    Stephen Kirchner

Authors
  1. Stephen Kirchner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Kirchner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirchner, S. Federal legislative activism in Australia: a new approach to testing Wagner’s law. Public Choice 153, 375–392 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9799-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9799-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation