Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The inflation-productivity trade-off revisited

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our aim in this paper is threefold. First, to test the robustness of the relation between total factor productivity growth and inflation to the specification of the estimating model; second, to test the stability of their relationship in the short run and in the long run, and third, to investigate the direction of causality between these two variables. To accomplish the first objective, we estimate a generalized Box–Cox cost function using data from the two-digit Standard Industrial Classification of manufacturing industries in Greece during the period 1964–1980. The results show that: (a) the acceleration of inflation from 1964–1972 to 1973–1980 reduced total factor productivity growth in a way that was both statistically significant and sizeable, and (b) even when the effect of inflation is separated from the effects of technical change and economies of scale, the choice of functional form is most crucial. With respect to the second objective, somewhat to our surprise, we find that the inflation-productivity trade-off prevails even in the long run. And, finally, regarding the third objective, it emerges that in the great majority of two-digit manufacturing industries the causality runs from inflation to productivity. On these grounds we conclude that for a precise estimation of the relationship under consideration it is imperative to sort out the three effects involved, do so by adopting the most general flexible functional form for the cost function, and run the appropriate stability and causality tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Christensen et al. (1971, 1973, 1975).

  2. See also Diewert (1971).

  3. In addition to the time trend and the constant, the set of instrumental variables included: the number of establishments, the average annual employment, the numbers of working proprietors, salaried employees and wage earners, the gross value of production, the amounts paid in salaries and wages, and the values of gross investment in machinery, buildings and transport equipment.

  4. The results of the tests based on the Eqs. (25), (27), and (29) at the two-digit Standard Industrial Classification of Greek manufacturing industries over the 1988–2004 period are available on request from the authors.

References

  • Amemiya T (1977) The maximum likelihood and the nonlinear three-stage-least-squares estimator in the general nonlinear simultaneous system. Econometrica 45:955–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum E (1979) On the choice of functional forms. Int Econ Rev 20:449–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH, Griffin JM (1988) A general index of technical change. J Politic Econ 96(1):20–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro R (1991) Inflation and economic growth. Bank England Econ Bull 1–11

  • Berndt ER, Khaled MS (1979) Parametric productivity measurement and choice among flexible functional forms. J Politic Econ 81:1220–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitros GC, Panas EE (1998) Is there an inflation-productivity trade off? Some evidence from the manufacturing sector in Greece. Appl Econ 33:1961–1969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck AJ, Fitzroy F (1988) Inflation and productivity growth in the Federal Republic of Germany. J Post Keynes Econ X(3):428–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen LR, Jorgenson DW, Lau LJ (1975) Transcendental logarithmic utility functions. Am Econ Rev 65:367–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen LR, Jorgenson DW, Lau LJ (1973) Transcendental logarithmic production frontiers. Rev Econ Stat 55:28–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen LR, Jorgenson DW, Lau LJ (1971) Conjugate duality and the transcendental logarithmic production function. Econometrica 39:255–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark TE (1997) Cross-country evidence on long run growth and inflation. Econ Inquir xxxv:70–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozier B, Selody J (1992) Inflation and macroeconomic performance: Some cross-country evidence. Working Paper 92-6, Bank of Canada

  • Denny M, Fuss M, Waverman L (1981) The measurement and interpretation of total factor productivity in regulated industries with an application to Canadian telecommunication. In: TG Cowing, RE Stevenson (eds). Productivity measurement in regulated industries. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert WE (1974) Applications of duality theory. In: Intrilligator MD, Kendrick DA (eds). Frontiers of quantitative economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert WE (1971) An application of the Shephard duality theorem: Generalized Leontief production function. J Politic Econ 70:481–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders W (1995) Applied econometric time series. J. Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer S (1993) The role of macroeconomic factors in growth. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 4565

  • Gallant AR (1977) Three-stage-least-squares estimators for a system of simultaneous nonlinear implicit equations. J Economet 5:71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ (1988) Some recent developments in a concept of causality. J Economet 38:199–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes A (1991) The effects of inflation on growth: some international evidence. Weltwirtschftliches Archiv 127:631–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanoch G (1975) The elasticity of scale and the shape of average costs. Am Econ Rev 65:492–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz L (1971). On the problem of integrability of demand functions. In: Chipman J (eds). Preferences, utility and demand. Harcourt Brace, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz L, Uzawa H (1971). On the integrability of demand functions. In: Chipman J. (eds). Preferences, utilities and demand. Harcourt Brace, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintis A (1986) Estimates of capital stock and capital utilisation rate. Centre of Economic Research, Athens University of Economics and Business, Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine R, Renelt D (1992) A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. Am Econ Rev 82: 942–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Motley B (1998) Growth and inflation: A cross-country study. Econ Rev 1, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, pp 15–28

  • Smyth DJ (1995) The supply side effects of Inflation in the United States: Evidence from multifactor productivity. Appl Econ Lett 2:482–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer A (1982) A primer on Box-Cox Estimation. Rev Econ Stati 64:307–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian A (1978) Microeconomic analysis. Norton and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We like to thank the editor and an anonymous referee for their constructive comments regarding the issue of causality between inflation and productivity.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George C. Bitros.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bitros, G.C., Panas, E.E. The inflation-productivity trade-off revisited. J Prod Anal 26, 51–65 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-006-0005-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-006-0005-7

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation