Skip to main content
Log in

After Deployment, Adaptive Parenting Tools: 1-Year Outcomes of an Evidence-Based Parenting Program for Military Families Following Deployment

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 02 November 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

Despite significant stressors facing military families over the past 15 years of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, no parenting programs adapted or developed for military families with school-aged children have been rigorously tested. We present outcome data from the first randomized controlled trial of a behavioral parent training program for families with a parent deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan. In the present study, 336 primarily National Guard and Reserve families with 4–12-year-old children were recruited from a Midwestern state. At least one parent in each family had deployed to the recent conflicts: Operations Iraqi or Enduring Freedom, or New Dawn (OIF/OEF/OND). Families were randomized to a group-based parenting program (After Deployment, Adaptive Parenting Tools (ADAPT)) or web and print resources-as-usual. Using a social interaction learning framework, we hypothesized an indirect effects model: that the intervention would improve parenting, which, in turn, would be associated with improvements in child outcomes. Applying intent-to-treat analyses, we examined the program’s effect on observed parenting, and children’s adjustment at 12-months post baseline. Controlling for demographic (marital status, length, child gender), deployment variables (number of deployments), and baseline values, families randomized to the ADAPT intervention showed significantly improved observed parenting compared to those in the comparison group. Observed parenting, in turn, was associated with significant improvements in child adjustment. These findings present the first evidence for the effectiveness of a parenting program for deployed military families with school-aged children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 02 November 2017

    The authors would like to indicate the corrections to Table 2 of the above referenced article, below. The note is missing, and the CACE indirect coefficients should be .18** and .16** instead of .16** and .15**. The corrected table is shown below.

Notes

  1. We hypothesize indirect effects of change in parenting to improvements in child adjustment, rather than mediating effects because mediation is more robustly tested with the mediator as a temporal antecedent to a distal outcome. We also expected and tested replication of PMTO findings from Forgatch and DeGarmo (1999) who found that parenting, as target of the intervention, showed preliminary sensitivity to change with indirect associations to child outcomes at 12-month post baseline, demonstrating full mediation at later follow-ups.

  2. It was for that reason—as well as consideration of participant burden—that we opted not to gather observational parenting data at posttest (T2). That is why the current report focuses on change from T1 to T3.

References

  • Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.

  • Asher, S. R., & Wheeler, V. A. (1985). Children’s loneliness: A comparison of rejected and neglected peer status. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(4), 500–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. H., Wang, W., Kellam, S. G., Muthen, B. O., Petras, H., Toyinbo, P., et al. (2008). Methods for testing theory and evaluating impact in randomized filed trials: Intent-to-treat analysis for integrating the perspective of person, place and time. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95, S74–S104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

  • Conger, R. D., Wallace, L. E., Sun, Y., Simons, R. L., McLoyd, V. C., & Brody, G. H. (2002). Economic pressure in African American families: A replication and extension of the family stress model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 179–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Creech, S. K., Hadley, W., & Borsari, B. (2014). The impact of military deployment and reintegration on children and parenting: A systematic review. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 45, 452–464.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L., Hanson, S. K., Zamir, O., Gewirtz, A. H., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2015). Associations of contextual risk and protective factors with fathers’ parenting practices in the postdeployment environment. Psychological Services, 12, 250–260.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Defense, D. of (2009). Profile of the Military Community. Washington D.C. Retrieved from http://download.militaryonesource.mil/12038/MOS/Reports/2009-Demographics-pdf.

  • Dishion, T., Peterson, J., Winter, C. E., Jabson, J. M., & Hogansen, J. M. (2007). Family assessment task coder impressions. Unpublished coding manual.

  • Dishion, T., Forgatch, M., Chamberlain, P., & Pelham III, W. E. (2015). The Oregon model of behavior family therapy: From intervention design to promoting large-scale system change. Behavior Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2016.02.002.

  • Doty, J. L., Rudi, J., Pinna, K., Hanson, S. K., & Gewirtz, A. H. (2016). If you build it, will they come? Patterns of internet-based and face-to-face participation in a parenting program for military families. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18, e169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J. A., & Wells, A. M. (1997). Primary prevention mental health programs for children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 115–152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., et al. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6, 151–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forehand, R., Lafko, N., Parent, J., & Burt, K. B. (2014). Is parenting the mediator of change in behavioral parent training for externalizing problems of youth? Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 608–619.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Forgatch, M., Patterson, G., Degarmo, D., & Beldavs, Z. (2009). Testing the Oregon delinquency model with 9-year follow-up of the Oregon Divorce Study. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 637-660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000340.

  • Forgatch, M. S., & DeGarmo, D. S. (1999). Parenting through change: An effective prevention program for single mothers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 711–724.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forgatch, M. S., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2011). Sustaining fidelity following the nationwide PMTO™ implementation in Norway. Prevention Science, 12, 235–246.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Forgatch, M. S., & Patterson, G. R. (2010). Parent management training—Oregon model: An intervention for antisocial behavior in children. In J. R. Weisz & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgatch, M. S., Knutson, N. M., & Mayne, T. (1992). Coder impressions of ODS lab tasks. Eugene: Oregon Social Learning Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgatch, M. S., Patterson, G. R., & Gewirtz, A. H. (2013). Looking forward: The promise of widespread implementation of parent training programs. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 682–694.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, A. H., & Youssef, A. M. (2016). Parenting and children’s resilience in military families. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, A. H., Forgatch, M., & Wieling, E. (2008). Parenting practices as potential mechanisms for child adjustment following mass trauma. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 34, 177–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, A. H., Pinna, K. L. M., Hanson, S. K., & Brockberg, D. (2014). Promoting parenting to support reintegrating military families: After deployment, adaptive parenting tools. Psychological Services, 11, 31–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, A. H., DeGarmo, D. S., Lee, S., Morrell, N., & August, G. (2015). Two-year outcomes of the early risers prevention trial with formerly homeless families residing in supportive housing. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 242–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, A.H., DeGarmo, D.S., Plowman, E., August, G.J., & Realmuto, G. (2009). Parenting, parental mental health, and child functioning in families residing in supportive housing. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79, 336-347.

  • Gewirtz, A. H., DeGarmo, D. S., & Zamir, O. (2016). Effects of a military parenting program on parental distress and suicide ideation: After deployment adaptive parenting tools. Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior (Special Issue), 46, S23–S31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, A. H., DeGarmo, D. S., & Zamir, O. (2017). Testing a military family stress model. Family Process. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12282.

  • Griffith, J. (2009). After 9/11, what kind of reserve soldier? Considerations given to emerging demands, organizational orientation, and individual commitment. Armed Forces and Society, 35, 214-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X07312490.

  • Jo, B. (2002). Estimation of intervention effects with noncompliance: Alternative model specifications. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 27(4), 385–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, M. L., & Jouriles, E. N. (2011). An introduction to the special section on U.S. military operations: Effects on military members’ partners and children. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 459–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, H. C., Wilson, G. T., Fairburn, C. G., & Agras, W. S. (2002). Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 877–883.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, P., Peterson, K., Reeves, J., Knauss, L., Glover, D., Mogil, C., et al. (2010). The long war and parental deployment: Effects on military children and at-home spouses. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49, 310.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J., & Yau, L. H. Y. (1998). Statistical techniques for analyzing data from prevention trials: Treatment of no-shows using Rubin’s causal model. Psychological Methods, 3, 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. NY: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

  • McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables: user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: StatModel.

  • National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics. (2016). Profile of Post-911 Veterans: 2014. Department of Veteran’s Affairs, Office of Policy and Planning. Retrieved from http://www.va.gov/vetdata/docs/SpecialReports/Post_911_Veterans_Profile_2014.pdf.

  • Park, N. (2011). Military children and families. American Psychologist, 66, 65–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene: Castalia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R. (2005). Next generation of PMTO models. Behavior Therapist, 28, 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R., Forgatch, M. S., & Degarmo, D. S. (2010). Cascading effects following intervention. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 949–970.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, R., Foster, S., Kent, R., & O’Leary, K. (1979). Multivariate assessment of conflict in distressed and nondistressed mother-adolescent dyads. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 691–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2004). Behavior assessment scale for children. Bloomington: Pearson Assessments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, I. N., Schoenfelder, E. N., Wolchik, S. A., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). Long-term impact of prevention programs to promote effective parenting: Lasting effects but uncertain processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 299–329.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J., Reid, J., Stoolmiller, M., Howe, G., Brown, H., Dagne, G., & Cross, W. (2006). The role of behavior observation in measurement systems for randomized prevention trials. Prevention Science, 7, 43–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Haggerty, K., & Ward, T. (1995). A controlled parenting skills outcome study examining individual difference and attendance effects. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 57, 449–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, K., Capp, G., Gilreath, T. D., Benbenishty, R., Roziner, I., & Astor, R. A. (2015). Substance abuse and other adverse outcomes for military-connected youth in California. JAMA Pediatrics, 169, 922–928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolchik, S. A., Sandler, I. N., Tein, J.-Y., Mahrer, N. E., Millsap, R. E., Winslow, E., et al. (2013). Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized trial of a preventive intervention for divorced families: Effects on mental health and substance use outcomes in young adulthood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 660–673.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by the National Institute of Health, R01 DA 030114; 2010–2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abigail H. Gewirtz.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gewirtz, A.H., DeGarmo, D.S. & Zamir, O. After Deployment, Adaptive Parenting Tools: 1-Year Outcomes of an Evidence-Based Parenting Program for Military Families Following Deployment. Prev Sci 19, 589–599 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0839-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0839-4

Keywords

Navigation