Prevention Science

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 589–599 | Cite as

After Deployment, Adaptive Parenting Tools: 1-Year Outcomes of an Evidence-Based Parenting Program for Military Families Following Deployment

  • Abigail H. Gewirtz
  • David S. DeGarmo
  • Osnat Zamir
Article

Abstract

Despite significant stressors facing military families over the past 15 years of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, no parenting programs adapted or developed for military families with school-aged children have been rigorously tested. We present outcome data from the first randomized controlled trial of a behavioral parent training program for families with a parent deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan. In the present study, 336 primarily National Guard and Reserve families with 4–12-year-old children were recruited from a Midwestern state. At least one parent in each family had deployed to the recent conflicts: Operations Iraqi or Enduring Freedom, or New Dawn (OIF/OEF/OND). Families were randomized to a group-based parenting program (After Deployment, Adaptive Parenting Tools (ADAPT)) or web and print resources-as-usual. Using a social interaction learning framework, we hypothesized an indirect effects model: that the intervention would improve parenting, which, in turn, would be associated with improvements in child outcomes. Applying intent-to-treat analyses, we examined the program’s effect on observed parenting, and children’s adjustment at 12-months post baseline. Controlling for demographic (marital status, length, child gender), deployment variables (number of deployments), and baseline values, families randomized to the ADAPT intervention showed significantly improved observed parenting compared to those in the comparison group. Observed parenting, in turn, was associated with significant improvements in child adjustment. These findings present the first evidence for the effectiveness of a parenting program for deployed military families with school-aged children.

Keywords

Parenting Military Parental deployment Child adjustment Prevention 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.Google Scholar
  2. Asher, S. R., & Wheeler, V. A. (1985). Children’s loneliness: A comparison of rejected and neglected peer status. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(4), 500–505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, C. H., Wang, W., Kellam, S. G., Muthen, B. O., Petras, H., Toyinbo, P., et al. (2008). Methods for testing theory and evaluating impact in randomized filed trials: Intent-to-treat analysis for integrating the perspective of person, place and time. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95, S74–S104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Conger, R. D., Wallace, L. E., Sun, Y., Simons, R. L., McLoyd, V. C., & Brody, G. H. (2002). Economic pressure in African American families: A replication and extension of the family stress model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 179–193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Creech, S. K., Hadley, W., & Borsari, B. (2014). The impact of military deployment and reintegration on children and parenting: A systematic review. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 45, 452–464.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, L., Hanson, S. K., Zamir, O., Gewirtz, A. H., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2015). Associations of contextual risk and protective factors with fathers’ parenting practices in the postdeployment environment. Psychological Services, 12, 250–260.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Defense, D. of (2009). Profile of the Military Community. Washington D.C. Retrieved from http://download.militaryonesource.mil/12038/MOS/Reports/2009-Demographics-pdf.
  10. Dishion, T., Peterson, J., Winter, C. E., Jabson, J. M., & Hogansen, J. M. (2007). Family assessment task coder impressions. Unpublished coding manual.Google Scholar
  11. Dishion, T., Forgatch, M., Chamberlain, P., & Pelham III, W. E. (2015). The Oregon model of behavior family therapy: From intervention design to promoting large-scale system change. Behavior Therapy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2016.02.002.
  12. Doty, J. L., Rudi, J., Pinna, K., Hanson, S. K., & Gewirtz, A. H. (2016). If you build it, will they come? Patterns of internet-based and face-to-face participation in a parenting program for military families. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18, e169.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Durlak, J. A., & Wells, A. M. (1997). Primary prevention mental health programs for children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 115–152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., et al. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6, 151–175.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Forehand, R., Lafko, N., Parent, J., & Burt, K. B. (2014). Is parenting the mediator of change in behavioral parent training for externalizing problems of youth? Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 608–619.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Forgatch, M., Patterson, G., Degarmo, D., & Beldavs, Z. (2009). Testing the Oregon delinquency model with 9-year follow-up of the Oregon Divorce Study. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 637-660.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000340.
  17. Forgatch, M. S., & DeGarmo, D. S. (1999). Parenting through change: An effective prevention program for single mothers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 711–724.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Forgatch, M. S., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2011). Sustaining fidelity following the nationwide PMTO™ implementation in Norway. Prevention Science, 12, 235–246.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Forgatch, M. S., & Patterson, G. R. (2010). Parent management training—Oregon model: An intervention for antisocial behavior in children. In J. R. Weisz & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  20. Forgatch, M. S., Knutson, N. M., & Mayne, T. (1992). Coder impressions of ODS lab tasks. Eugene: Oregon Social Learning Center.Google Scholar
  21. Forgatch, M. S., Patterson, G. R., & Gewirtz, A. H. (2013). Looking forward: The promise of widespread implementation of parent training programs. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 682–694.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Gewirtz, A. H., & Youssef, A. M. (2016). Parenting and children’s resilience in military families. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Gewirtz, A. H., Forgatch, M., & Wieling, E. (2008). Parenting practices as potential mechanisms for child adjustment following mass trauma. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 34, 177–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gewirtz, A. H., Pinna, K. L. M., Hanson, S. K., & Brockberg, D. (2014). Promoting parenting to support reintegrating military families: After deployment, adaptive parenting tools. Psychological Services, 11, 31–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Gewirtz, A. H., DeGarmo, D. S., Lee, S., Morrell, N., & August, G. (2015). Two-year outcomes of the early risers prevention trial with formerly homeless families residing in supportive housing. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 242–252.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gewirtz, A.H., DeGarmo, D.S., Plowman, E., August, G.J., & Realmuto, G. (2009). Parenting, parental mental health, and child functioning in families residing in supportive housing. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79, 336-347.Google Scholar
  27. Gewirtz, A. H., DeGarmo, D. S., & Zamir, O. (2016). Effects of a military parenting program on parental distress and suicide ideation: After deployment adaptive parenting tools. Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior (Special Issue), 46, S23–S31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gewirtz, A. H., DeGarmo, D. S., & Zamir, O. (2017). Testing a military family stress model. Family Process.  https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12282.
  29. Griffith, J. (2009). After 9/11, what kind of reserve soldier? Considerations given to emerging demands, organizational orientation, and individual commitment. Armed Forces and Society, 35, 214-240.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X07312490.
  30. Jo, B. (2002). Estimation of intervention effects with noncompliance: Alternative model specifications. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 27(4), 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kelley, M. L., & Jouriles, E. N. (2011). An introduction to the special section on U.S. military operations: Effects on military members’ partners and children. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 459–460.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kraemer, H. C., Wilson, G. T., Fairburn, C. G., & Agras, W. S. (2002). Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 877–883.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lester, P., Peterson, K., Reeves, J., Knauss, L., Glover, D., Mogil, C., et al. (2010). The long war and parental deployment: Effects on military children and at-home spouses. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49, 310.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Little, R. J., & Yau, L. H. Y. (1998). Statistical techniques for analyzing data from prevention trials: Treatment of no-shows using Rubin’s causal model. Psychological Methods, 3, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. NY: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  36. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables: user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: StatModel.Google Scholar
  38. National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics. (2016). Profile of Post-911 Veterans: 2014. Department of Veteran’s Affairs, Office of Policy and Planning. Retrieved from http://www.va.gov/vetdata/docs/SpecialReports/Post_911_Veterans_Profile_2014.pdf.
  39. Park, N. (2011). Military children and families. American Psychologist, 66, 65–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene: Castalia.Google Scholar
  41. Patterson, G. R. (2005). Next generation of PMTO models. Behavior Therapist, 28, 25–32.Google Scholar
  42. Patterson, G. R., Forgatch, M. S., & Degarmo, D. S. (2010). Cascading effects following intervention. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 949–970.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Prinz, R., Foster, S., Kent, R., & O’Leary, K. (1979). Multivariate assessment of conflict in distressed and nondistressed mother-adolescent dyads. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 691–700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2004). Behavior assessment scale for children. Bloomington: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  45. Sandler, I. N., Schoenfelder, E. N., Wolchik, S. A., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). Long-term impact of prevention programs to promote effective parenting: Lasting effects but uncertain processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 299–329.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Snyder, J., Reid, J., Stoolmiller, M., Howe, G., Brown, H., Dagne, G., & Cross, W. (2006). The role of behavior observation in measurement systems for randomized prevention trials. Prevention Science, 7, 43–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Haggerty, K., & Ward, T. (1995). A controlled parenting skills outcome study examining individual difference and attendance effects. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 57, 449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sullivan, K., Capp, G., Gilreath, T. D., Benbenishty, R., Roziner, I., & Astor, R. A. (2015). Substance abuse and other adverse outcomes for military-connected youth in California. JAMA Pediatrics, 169, 922–928.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wolchik, S. A., Sandler, I. N., Tein, J.-Y., Mahrer, N. E., Millsap, R. E., Winslow, E., et al. (2013). Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized trial of a preventive intervention for divorced families: Effects on mental health and substance use outcomes in young adulthood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 660–673.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abigail H. Gewirtz
    • 1
  • David S. DeGarmo
    • 2
  • Osnat Zamir
    • 3
  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.University of OregonEugeneUSA
  3. 3.Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations