Abstract
There is emerging interest in evaluating the uncertainty of agricultural production to support the production process and for guidance in decision making. The main objective of this work was to estimate the spatial and temporal maize yield uncertainty using stochastic simulation techniques to reduce the economic risk considering the producer risk profile and the international prices of maize and inputs. The results showed that (i) the class yield percentage variation in yield stochastic simulation depends on the sampling density; (ii) higher sampling densities promote an overestimation of low and high yield values compared to those of real yield data; (iii) reducing sampling density promotes the low and high values of overestimation reduction while increasing the central classes values compared to those of real yield data; (iv) the ideal point density for yield stochastic simulation is approximately 65 points/ha; (v) in Mediterranean environments, more than 3–4 years’ worth of real yield data considered as a whole do not seem to improve the parcel level of confidence when cropping irrigated maize; and (vi) the number of equi-probable surfaces that were generated by sequential Gaussian simulation helped to calculate the yield class uncertainty and permitted the study of class yield probabilities for a particular position of the parcel and, therefore, to manage the yield risk and support future decisions. The approach that is presented in this paper may increase prior knowledge of agricultural parcel behavior in the absence of multi-year data, thereby increasing the possibility of reducing economic risks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amirinejad, A. A., Kamble, K., Aggarwal, P., Chakraborty, D., Pradhan, S., & Mittal, R. B. (2011). Assessment and mapping of spatial variation of soil physical health in a farm. Geoderma, 160, 292–303. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.09.021.
Ayoubi, S., Zamani, S. M., & Khormali, F. (2007). Spatial variability of some soil properties for site specific farming in northern Iran. International Journal of Plant Production, 1(2), 225–235.
Basso, B., Cammarano, D., Chen, D., Cafiero, G., Amato, M., Bitella, G., et al. (2009). Landscape position and precipitation effects on spatial variability of wheat yield and grain protein in Southern Italy. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 195, 301–312. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00351.x.
Basso, B., Ritchie, J. T., Pierce, F. J., Braga, R. P., & Jones, J. W. (2001). Spatial validation of crop models for precision agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 68(2), 97–112.
Batchelor, W. D., Basso, B., & Paz, J. O. (2002). Examples of strategies to analyze spatial and temporal yield variability using crop models. European Journal of Agronomy, 18, 141–158.
BioMedware (2012). SpaceStat 3.6.5. Geospatial Research and Software. Ann Arbor, MI, Washington, USA.
Blackmore, B. S., & Moore, M. R. (1999). Remedial correction of yield map data. Precision Agriculture Journal, 1, 53–66.
Cambardella, C. A., & Karlen, D. L. (1999). Spatial analysis of soil fertility parameters. Precision Agriculture, 1, 5–14.
Cambardella, C. A., Moorman, T. B., Novak, J. M., Parkin, T. B., Karlen, D. L., Turco, R. F., & Konopka, A. E. (1994). Field scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58, 1501–1511.
Casa, R., & Castrignanò, A. (2008). Analysis of spatial relationships between soil and crop variables in a durum wheat field using a multivariate geostatistical approach. European Journal of Agronomy, 28, 331–342.
Diacono, M., Castrignanò, A., Troccoli, A., De Benedetto, D., Basso, B., & Rubino, P. (2012). Spatial and temporal variability of wheat grain yield and quality in a Mediterranean environment: A multivariate geostatistical approach. Field Crops Research, 131, 49–62.
ESRI. (2009). ARCGIS 933. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
FAO (1998).World reference base for soil resources. World Soil Resources Reports, 84. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/W8594E/W8594E00.htm. Accessed 10 September 2012.
Goovaerts, P. (1998a). Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physico-chemical soil properties. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 27, 315–334.
Goovaerts, P. (1998b). Accounting for estimation optimality criteria in simulated annealing. Mathematical Geology, 30(5), 511–534. doi:10.1023/A:1021738027334.
Goovaerts, P. (1999). Geostatistics in soil science: State-of-the-art and perspectives. Geoderma, 89, 1–45. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00078-0.
Goovaerts, P. (2000). Estimation or simulation of soil properties? Na optimization problem with conflicting criteria. Geoderma, 97, 165–186. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00037-9.
Hansen, J. W., & Jones, J. W. (2000). Scaling-up crop models for climate variability applications. Agricultural Systems, 65(1), 43–72. doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00025-1.
IBM, SPSS Statistics. (2009). PASW Statistic 18.0.0. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. New York: IBM Corporation.
Isaaks, E. H., & Srivastava, R. M. (1989). An introduction to applied geostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press. Chapter 7.
Kravchenko, A. N., & Bullock, D. G. (2002). Spatial variability of soybean quality data as a function of field topography: I. Spatial data analysis. Crop Science, 42, 804–815. doi:10.2135/cropsci2002.8040.
Kroulík, M., Mimra, M., Kumhala, F., Prošek, V. (2006). Mapping spatial variability of soil properties and yield by using geostatic method. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 1, 17–24.
Moral, F. J., Terrón, J. M., & Marques da Silva, J. R. (2010). Delineation of management zones using mobile measurements of soil apparent electrical conductivity and multivariate geostatistical techniques. Soil & Tillage Research, 106, 335–343. doi:10.1016/j.still.2009.12.002.
Murteira, B., Ribeiro, C. S., Silva, J. A., & Pimenta, C. (2010). Introdução à estatística (Introduction to statistics). Escolar Editora: Lisboa. (Chapter 1).
Nourzadeh, M., Mahdian, M. H., Malakouti, M. J., & Khavazi, K. (2012). Investigation and prediction spatial variability in chemical properties of agricultural soil using geostatistics. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 58(5), 461–475. doi:10.1080/03650340.2010.532124.
Oliver, M. A. (2010). An overview of geostatistics and precision agriculture. In M. Oliver (Ed.), Geostatistical applications for precision agriculture. Chapter 1 (pp. 1–34). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9133-8.
Panagopoulos, T., de Jesus, J., Blumberg, D., & Ben-Asher, J. (2014). Spatial variability of durum wheat yield as related to soil parameters in an organic field. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 45(15), 2018–2031. doi:10.1080/00103624.2014.919311.
Remy, N. (2002). Stanford geostatistical modeling software. Stanford: Leland Stanford University.
Schepers, A. R., Shanahan, J. F., Liebig, M. A., Schepers, J. S., Johnson, S. H., & Luchiari, A, Jr. (2004). Appropriateness of management zones for characterizing spatial variability of soil properties and irrigated corn yields across years. Agronomy Journal, 96, 195–203. doi:10.2134/agronj2004.1950.
Soares, A. (2006). Geoestatística para as Ciências da Terra e do Ambiente (Geostatistics for Earth Sciences and Environment). Colecção Ensino da Ciência e da Tecnologia (2nd ed.). Lisboa: IST Press.
Virgilio, N. D., Monti, A., & Venturi, G. (2007). Spatial variability of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) yield as related to soil parameters in a small field. Field Crops Research, 101, 232–239. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2006.11.009.
Acknowledgments
The authors are very grateful to Eng. Castro Duarte for all of his material and immaterial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grifo, A.R.L., da Silva, J.R.M. Stochastic simulation of maize productivity: spatial and temporal uncertainty in order to manage crop risks. Precision Agric 16, 668–689 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-015-9401-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-015-9401-1