Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial analysis of yield monitor data: case studies of on-farm trials and farm management decision making

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 3-year case study was undertaken of how North American farmers use yield monitors for on-farm trials in farm management decision making. Case study methods were used because relatively few farmers quantitatively analyze yield monitor data. At this early research stage, insufficient farm management information about the data was available to ask the right questions in a large-scale survey. In addition to the formal case study of farmers experienced at using yield monitors to collect on-farm trial data, the study evaluated the effect of yield monitor data quality on farm decisions. Two levels of yield data quality included standard output where the default settings of farm-level mapping software were accepted and where filtering of the data was undertaken. Results indicated that yield data quality affects farm management decisions. In addition, farmers receiving a spatial analysis of their on-farm trial data tended to use split-field designs instead of replicated split-planter designs. They were also more confident in their decisions than before participation in the spatial analysis project, and made decisions more quickly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models (p. 284). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., Bongiovanni, R., & Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. (2004). A spatial econometric approach to the economics of site-specific nitrogen management in corn production. Am J Agric Econ, 86(3), 675–687. doi:10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00610.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehlje, M. D., & Eidman, V. R. (1984). Farm Management (p. 806). New York, USA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, S. (2006). Yield Editor 1.02 Beta Version User’s Manual. Available online at: http://www.ars.usda.gov/services/software/software.htm (last accessed - February 26, 2008).

  • Erickson, B. (2005). Workshop helps farmers utilize one of their key resources: Information. Site Specific Management Center Newsletter, November. Available online at: www.purdue.edu/ssmc (last accessed—February 26, 2008).

  • Fountas, S., Blackmore, S., Ess, D., Hawkins, S., Blumhoff, G., Lowenberg-DeBoer, J., et al. (2005). Farmer experience with precision agriculture in Denmark and the US Eastern corn belt. Precis Agric, 6, 121–141. doi:10.1007/s11119-004-1030-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, T. W. (2006). Decision-making from on-farm experiments: Spatial analysis of precision agriculture data. Purdue University, USA. Ph.D. Dissertation. p. 294.

  • Griffin, T. W., Dobbins, C. L., Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. (2006a). Whole farm profitability impact from implementing and harvesting on-farm trials: A linear programming model. Site Specific Management Center Newsletter, August. Available online at: www.purdue.edu/ssmc (last accessed—February 26, 2008).

  • Griffin, T. W., Fitzgerald, G., Lambert, D. M., Lowenberg-DeBoer, J., Barnes, E. M., Roth, R. (2005). Testing appropriate on-farm trial designs and statistical methods for cotton precision farming. In: Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. Available online at: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide (last accessed—February 26, 2008).

  • Griffin, T. W., Florax, R. J. G. M., Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. (2006b). Field-scale experimental designs and spatial econometric methods for precision farming: Strip-trial Designs for rice production decision making. In: Proceedings of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meetings. Available online at: http://agecon.lib.umn.edu/ (last accessed—February 26, 2008).

  • Hurley, T. M., Oishi, K., & Malzer, G. L. (2005). Estimating the potential value of variable rate nitrogen applications: A comparison of spatial econometric and geostatistical models. J Agric Resour Econ, 30(2), 231–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. M., Lowenberg-DeBoer, J., & Bongiovanni, R. (2004). A comparison of four spatial regression models for yield monitor data: A case study from Argentina. Precis Agric, 5, 579–600. doi:10.1007/s11119-004-6344-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. (2002). Blocks vs. strips for on-farm experimentation. Site Specific Management Center Newsletter, June. Available online at: www.purdue.edu/ssmc (last accessed—February 26, 2008).

  • Nistor, A., Florax, R. J. G. M. (2007). Farmers and consultants receive training in spatial analysis of yield monitor data. Site Specific Management Center Newsletter, April. Available online at: www.purdue.edu/ssmc (last accessed—February 26, 2008).

  • Urcola, H. (2003). Economic value added by yield monitor data from the producer’s own farm in choosing hybrids and varieties. Purdue University, USA. M.S. Thesis. p. 178.

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 3rd, p. 181). CA, USA: Sage Publishing, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A United States Department of Agriculture—Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (USDA-SARE) Graduate Student Grant Program funded this project. The authors thank the farmer-collaborators who have assisted in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry W. Griffin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffin, T.W., Dobbins, C.L., Vyn, T.J. et al. Spatial analysis of yield monitor data: case studies of on-farm trials and farm management decision making. Precision Agric 9, 269–283 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9072-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9072-2

Keywords

Navigation