Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Textural analysis of soil images to quantify and characterize the spatial variation of soil properties using a real-time soil sensor

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary aim of this work was to predict soil moisture content and soil organic matter using soil image texture statistics. Co-occurrence method texture statistics were used to characterize Andisol soils to extend the possibility of using RGB color space in representing composite soil color. Four co-occurrence method textural features; angular second moment (ASM), contrast (CON), correlation (COR) and inverse difference moment (IDM) calculated from generalized matrix for image texture representation were used to describe soil moisture content variation under laboratory conditions. It was found that CON and COR had negative responses to moisture content (MC) and ASM had positive response to MC. The same were also observed in direct captured field soil images in terms of textural indices against MC and soil organic matter (SOM). The correlations were significant for ASM and COR in fertilizer and combined (fertilizer-manure) plots and insignificant in manure plots. To relate sub-surface image textural indices and soil properties for individual years, stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR) and supervised feed-forward neural networks (NN) were investigated in an attempt to provide minimal prediction errors. The improvements achieved by NN with minimal prediction errors were better than SMLR in different years. It was assumed that several years of data sets with a much larger number of observations could be used to differentiate fundamental soil properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamchuk VI, Hummel JW, Morgan MT, Upadhyaya SK (2004) On-the-go soil sensors for precision agriculture. Comput Electron Agric 44:71–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black CA (1965) Methods of soil analysis—Part 2. The American Society of Agronomy, Inc., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodun PO, Shibusawa S, Sasao A, Sakai K, Nonaka H (2000) Dredged sludge moisture prediction by textural analysis of the surface image. J Terramechanics 37:3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady NC (1984) The nature and properties of soils, 9th edn. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Burks TF, Shearer SA, Payne FA (1998) Evaluation of statistical discriminant analysis techniques for classification of weed species using machine vision. ASAE Paper No. 98–3037. St. Joseph, MI, USA

  • Burks TF, Shearer SA, Gates RS, Donohue KD (2000) Backpropagation neural network design and evaluation for classifying weed species using color image texture. Trans ASAE 43(4):1029–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell B (1994) Introduction to remote sensing. The Guilford Press, A Div. of Guilford Publication, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman TL, Agbu PA, Montgomery OL (1993) Spectral differentiation on surface soils and soil properties: is it possible from space platform? Soil Sci 155(4):283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Faki MS, Zhang N, Peterson DE (2000) Factors affecting color-based weed detection. Trans ASAE 43(4):1001–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. SMC-3(6):610–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Han YJ, Hayes JC (1990) Soil cover determination by image analysis of textural information. Trans ASAE 33(2):681–686

    Google Scholar 

  • Huete AR, Warrick AW (1990) Assessment of vegetation and soil water regimes in partial canopies with optical remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 32:155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan P, Butler BJ, Hummel JW (1981) Close-range sensing of soil organic matter. Trans ASAE 24(2):306–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammertyn L, Nicolai B, De Smedt V, De Baerdemaeker J (1998) Non-destructive measurement of acidity, soluble solid and firmness of Janagold Apples Using NIR-spectroscopy. Trans ASAE 41(4):1089–1094

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee WS, Slaughter DC, Giles DK (1999) Robotics weed control system for tomatoes. Precis Agric 1(1):95–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Paulsen MR (2000) Corn whiteness measurement and classification using machine vision. Trans ASAE 43(3):757–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael AM (1987) Irrigation—theory and practice. Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., India

    Google Scholar 

  • Moris N, Singh MM (1980) Manual of laboratory methods of chemical soil analysis. Printed and published by Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo N, Ting KC (1998) Robotics for bioproduction systems. ASAE publication 05–98, St. Joseph, MI, USA, p 68

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearer SA, Holmes RG (1990) Plant identification using color co-occurrence matrices. Trans ASAE 33(6):2037–2044

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibusawa S, Li MZ, Sakai K, Sasao A, Sato H, Hirako S, Otomo, A (1999) Spectrophotometer for real-time under-ground soil sensing. Paper No. 993030, ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, USA

  • Shibusawa S, Sato H, Hirako S, Otomo A, Sasao A (2000) A revised soil spectrophotometer. In: Shibusawa S, Monta M, Murase H (eds) IFAC bio-robotics, information technology and intelligent—control for bio-production systems. Sakai, Osaka, Japan, pp 231–236

  • Shibusawa S (2003) Precision farming Japan model. Agric Informat Res 12(2):125–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibusawa S, I Made Anom SW, Hache C, Sasao A, Hirako S (2003) Site-specific crop response to temporal trend of soil variability determined by the real-time soil spectrophotometer. In: Stafford JV, Werner A (Eds) Proceeding of the 4th european conference on precision agriculture (ECPA). Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 639–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter DC, Chen P, Curley RG (1999) Vision guided precision cultivation. Precis Agric 1(2):199–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudduth KA, Hummel JW (1991) Evaluation of reflectance methods for soil organic matter sensing. Trans ASAE 34(4):1900–1909

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscarra Rossel RA, McBratney AB (1998) Laboratory evaluation of a proximal sensing technique for simultaneous measurement of soil clay and water content. Geoderma 85:19–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscarra Rossel RA, Walter C, Fouad Y (2003) Assessment of two reflectance techniques for the quantification of field soil organic carbon. In: Stafford JV, Werner A (eds) Proceeding of the 4th european conference on precision agriculture (ECPA). Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 697–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrindts E, De Baerdemaeker J, Ramon H (2002) Weed detection using canopy reflection. Precis Agric 3(1):63–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woebbecke DM, Meyer GE, Von Bargen K, Mortensen DA (1995) Shape features for identifying young weeds using image analysis. Trans ASAE 38(1):271–281

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Fellowship Program for supporting this research. The authors would like to express their appreciation to Dr. T. Kaho, Dr. E. Morimoto, Dr. A. Sasso, Dr. N. Kondo, Dr. Mamada, Ms Y. Kato and Ms C. Hache for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsuyoshi Okayama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roy, S.K., Shibusawa, S. & Okayama, T. Textural analysis of soil images to quantify and characterize the spatial variation of soil properties using a real-time soil sensor. Precision Agric 7, 419–436 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-006-9018-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-006-9018-5

Keywords

Navigation