Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of broad-leaved dock (Rumex obtusifolius L.) on grassland by means of digital image processing

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digital image processing has the potential to support the identification of plant species required for site-specific weed control in grassland swards. The present study focuses on the identification of one of the most invasive and persistent weed species on European grassland, the broad-leaved dock (Rumex obtusifolius L., R.o.), in complex mixtures of perennial ryegrass with R.o. and other herbs.

A total of 108 digital photographs were obtained from a field experiment under constant recording geometry and illumination conditions. An object-oriented image classification was performed. Image segmentation was done by transforming the red, green, blue (RGB) colour images to greyscale intensity images. Based on that, local homogeneity images were calculated and a homogeneity threshold (0.97) was applied to derive binary images. Finally, morphological opening was performed. The remaining contiguous regions were considered to be objects. Features describing shape, colour and texture were calculated for each of these objects. A Maximum-likelihood classification was done to discriminate between the weed species. In addition, rank analysis was used to test how combinations of features influenced the classification result.

The detection rate of R.o. varied with the training dataset used for classification. Average R.o. detection rates ranged from 71 to 95% for the 108 images, which included more than 3,600 objects. Misclassifications of R.o. occurred mainly with Plantago major (P.m.). Between 9 and 16% R.o. objects were classified incorrectly as P.m. and 17–24% P.m. objects were misclassified as R.o. The classification result was influenced by the defined object classes (R.o., P.m., T.o., soil, residue vs. R.o., residue). For instance, classification rates were 86–91% and 65–82% for R.o. exclusively and R.o. against the remaining herb species, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonesmo, H., Kaspersen, K., & Bakken, A. K. (2004). Evaluating an image analysis system for mapping white clover pastures. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B–Soil and Plant Science, 54, 76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burks, T. F., Shearer, S. A., Heath, J. R., & Donohue, K.D. (2005). Evaluation of neural-network classifiers for weed species discrimination. Biosystems Engineering, 91, 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, H. D., & Sun, Y. (2000). A hierarchical approach to color image segmentation using homogeneity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 9, 2071–2082.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dicke, D., Fries, A., & Gerhards, R. (2004). Determination of weed thresholds for site-specific weed control in malting barley. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz—Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, Special Issue XIX, 413–421.

  • Du, C. J., & Sun, D. W. (2004). Recent developments in the applications of image processing techniques for food quality evaluation. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 15, 230–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., & Stork, D. G. (2001). Pattern classification. New York, USA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, J. H., Anderson, G. L., Escobar, D. E., Davis, M. R., Spencer, N. R., & Andrascik, R. J. (1995). Use of remote-sensing for detecting and mapping leafy spurge (Euphorbia-Esula). Weed Technology, 9, 599–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhards, R., Sökefeld, M., Timmermann, C., Krohmann, P., & Kühbauch, W. 2000. Precision weed control—more than just saving herbicides. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz—Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection Special Issue XVII, 179–186.

  • Glenn, N. F., Mundt, J. T., Weber, K. T., Prather, T. S., Lass, L. W., & Pettingill, J. (2005). Hyperspectral data processing for repeat detection of small infestations of leafy spurge. Remote Sensing of Environment, 95, 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, R. C., & Woods, R. E. (1992). Digital image processing. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, J. A., & Onyango, C. M. (2003). Comparison of a Bayesian classifier with a multilayer feed-forward neural network using the example of plant/weed/soil discrimination. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 39, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petry, W., & Kühbauch, W. (1989). Automatic distinction of weed species using form parameters by means of digital image processing. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science—Zeitschrift für Acker und Pflanzenbau, 163, 345–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellberg, J., Möseler, B. M., Kühbauch, W., & Rademacher, I. F. (1999). Long-term effects of fertilizer on soil nutrient concentration, yield, forage quality and floristic composition of a hay meadow in the Eifel mountains, Germany. Grass and Forage Science, 54, 195–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soille, P. (2000). Morphological image analysis applied to crop field mapping. Image and Vision Computing, 18, 1025–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sökefeld, M., Gerhards, R., & Kühbauch, W. (2000). Site-specific weed control—from weed recording to herbicide application. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz—Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, Special Issue XVII, 227–233.

  • Stork , D. G., Yom-Tov, E., & Duda, R. O. (2004). Computer manual in MATLAB to accompany pattern classification. Hoboken, USA: Wiley–Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J. G. (2004). Ecology and non-chemical control of Rumex crispus and R. obtusifolius (Polygonaceae): A review. Weed Research, 44, 414–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was funded by the German Research Group (DFG), within the Research Training Group (Graduiertenkolleg) 722 “Information Techniques for Precision Crop Protection” at the University of Bonn (Germany). The authors gratefully acknowledge valuable input to the manuscript by an unknown reviewer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Gebhardt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gebhardt, S., Schellberg, J., Lock, R. et al. Identification of broad-leaved dock (Rumex obtusifolius L.) on grassland by means of digital image processing. Precision Agric 7, 165–178 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-006-9006-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-006-9006-9

Keywords

Navigation