Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Control of individual microsprinklers and fault detection strategies

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on yield variability in orchards, it is evident that many trees receive too much or too little water and fertilizer under uniform management. Optimizing water and nutrient management based on the demand of individual trees could result in improved yield and environmental quality. A microsprinkler sensor and control system was developed to provide spatially variable delivery of water and fertilizer, and a prototype was installed in a nectarine orchard. Fifty individually addressable microsprinkler nodes, one located at every tree, each contained control circuitry and a valve. A drip line controller stored the irrigation schedule and issued commands to each node. Pressure sensors connected to some of the nodes provided lateral line pressure feedback. The system was programmed to irrigate individual trees for specific durations or to apply a specific volume of water at each tree. Time scheduled irrigation demonstrated the ability to provide microsprinkler control at individual trees, but also showed variation in discharge because of pressure differences between laterals. Volume scheduled irrigation used water pressure feedback to control the volume applied by individual microsprinklers more precisely, and the average error in application volume was 3.7%. Fault detection was used to check for damaged drip lines and clogged or damaged emitters. A pressure monitoring routine automatically logged errors and turned off the microsprinklers when drip line breaks and perforations caused pressure loss. Emitter diagnosis routines correctly identified clogged and damaged microsprinkler emitters in 359 of 366 observations. Irrigation control at the individual tree level has many useful features and should be explored further to characterize fully the benefits or disadvantages for orchard management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barash, S., Brandman, Y., Cohen, Y., Shporn, S., Vishnipolsky, J., & Yanai, E. (1980). Computer-controlled irrigation system. U.S. Patent No. 4209131.

  • Beckie, H. J., Moulin, A. P., & Pennock, D. J. (1997). Strategies for variable rate nitrogen fertilization in hummocky terrain. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 77, 589–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, R. W. (2005). Precision irrigation in orchards: Development of a spatially variable microsprinkler system. Davis, California: MS thesis. University of California, Davis, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, B. A., Reeder, R. E., Wall, R. W., & Stark, J. C. (2002). Comparison of site-specific and conventional uniform irrigation management for potatoes. ASAE Paper No. 022175. St. Joseph, Michigan.

  • Koch, B., Khosla, R., Frasier, W. M., Westfall, D. G., & Inman, D. (2004). Economic feasibility of variable-rate nitrogen application utilizing site-specific management zones. Agronomy Journal, 96, 1572–1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Povoa, A. F., & Hills, D. J. (1994). Sensitivity of microirrigation system pressure to emitter plugging and lateral line perforations. Transactions of the ASAE, 37, 793–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues de Miranda, F. (2003). A site-specific irrigation control system. ASAE Paper No. 031129. St. Joseph, Michigan.

  • Torre-Neto, A., Schueller, J. K., & Haman, D. Z. (2000). Networked sensing and valve actuation for spatially-variable microsprinkler irrigation. ASAE Paper No. 001158. St. Joseph, Michigan.

  • Verhagen, J. (1997). Site specific fertiliser application for potato production and effects on N-leaching using dynamic simulation modelling. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment, 66, 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Prato, T., Qiu, Z., Kitchen, N. R., & Sudduth, K. A. (2003). Economic and environmental evaluation of variable rate nitrogen and lime application for claypan soil fields. Precision Agriculture, 4, 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C., Everitt, J. H., & Bradford, J. M. (2001). Comparisons of uniform and variable rate nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer applications for grain sorghum. Transactions of the ASAE, 44, 201–209.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zaman, Q. U., Schumann, A. W., & Miller, W. M. (2005). Variable rate nitrogen application in Florida citrus based on ultrasonically-sensed tree size. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 21, 331–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Q., Brown, P. H., & Holtz, B. A. (2001). Potassium fertilization affects soil K, leaf K concentration, and nut yield and quality of mature pistachio trees. HortScience, 36, 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the California Department of Food and Agriculture through a grant from the Fertilizer Research and Education Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Delwiche.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coates, R.W., Delwiche, M.J. & Brown, P.H. Control of individual microsprinklers and fault detection strategies. Precision Agric 7, 85–99 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-006-9001-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-006-9001-1

Keywords

Navigation