Skip to main content
Log in

Automated Crop and Weed Monitoring in Widely Spaced Cereals

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An approach is described for automatic assessment of crop and weed area in images of widely spaced (0.25 m) cereal crops, captured from a tractor mounted camera. A form of vegetative index, which is invariant over the range of natural daylight illumination, was computed from the red, green and blue channels of a conventional CCD camera. The transformed image can be segmented into soil and vegetative components using a single fixed threshold. A previously reported algorithm was applied to robustly locate the crop rows. Assessment zones were automatically positioned; for crop growth directly over the crop rows, and for weed growth between the rows. The proportion of crop and weed pixels counted was compared with a manual assessment of area density on the basis of high resolution plan view photographs of the same area; this was performed for views with a range of crop and weed levels. The correlation of the manual and automatic measures was examined, and used to obtain a calibration for the automatic approach. The results of mapping of a small field, at two times, are presented. The results of the automated mapping appear to be consistent with manual assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blair AM, Jones P, Orson JH (1997) Integration of row widths, chemical and mechanical weed control and the effect on winter wheat yield. Asp Appl Biol 50:385–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum H, Nagel RN (1978) Shape description using weighted symmetric axis features. Pattern Recogn 10:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum H (1973) Biological shape and visual science. J Theor Biol 38:205–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhards R, Christensen S (2003) Real-time weed detection, decision making and patch spraying in maize, sugarbeet, winter wheat and winter barley. Weed Res 43(6):385–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hague T, Tillett ND (2001) A bandpass filter based approach to crop row location and tracking. Mechatronics 11(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemoud S, Ustin SL, Verdebout J, Schmuck G, Andreoli G, Hosgood B (1996) Estimating leaf biochemistry using the PROSPECT leaf optical properties model. Remote Sensing Environ 56(3):194–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Manh A-G, Rabatel G, Assémat L, Aldon M-J (2001) Weed leaf image segmentation by deformable templates. J Agric Eng Res 80(2):139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant JA, Onyango CM (2002) Shadow-invariant classification for scenes illuminated by daylight. J Opt Soc Am A 17(11):1952–1961

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant JA, Tillett ND, Onyango CM (2004) Dealing with colour changes caused by natural illumination in outdoor machine vision. Cybernetics Syst 35(1)

  • Paice MER, Miller PCH, Bodle J (1995) An experimental sprayer for the spatially selective application of herbicides. J Agri Eng Res 60(2):107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez AJ, Lopez F, Benlloch JV, Christensen S (2000) Colour and shape analysis techniques for weed detection in cereal fields. Comp Electron Agric 25(3):197–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipp I, Rath T (2002) Improving plant descrimination in image processing by use of different colour space transformations. Comp Electron Agric 35(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert PC (1999) Precision agriculture: research needs and status in the USA. In: Stafford JV (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on Precision Agriculture, Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, UK, pp 19–33

  • Slaughter DC, Chen P, Curley RG (1997) Computer vision guidance system for precision cultivation. Paper no. 97-1079, ASAE, St Joseph, MI, USA

  • Sogaard HT, Olsen HJ (2003) Determination of crop rows by image analysis without segmentation. Comp Electron Agric 38(2):141–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian LF, Slaughter DC (1998) Environmentally adaptive segmentation algorithm for outdoor image segmentation. Comp Electron Agric 21(3):153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Tottman DR (1987) The decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrations. Ann Appl Biol 110(2):441–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Vioix J-B, Douzals J-P, Truchetet F, Assémat L, Guillemin J-P (2002) Spatial and Spectral methods for weed detection and localization. EURASIP J Appl Signal Procassing 7:679–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrindts E, de Baerdemaeker J (1997) Optical discrimination of crop, weeds and soil for on-line weed detection. In: Stafford JV (ed) Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Precision Agriculture, Bios Scientific Publishers Ltd, Oxford, UK, pp 537–544

  • Woebbecke DM, Meyer GE, von Bargen K, Mortensen D (1992) Plant species identification, size, and enumeration using machine vision techniques on near-binary images. SPIE Opt Agric Forest 1836:208–219

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Hague.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hague, T., Tillett, N.D. & Wheeler, H. Automated Crop and Weed Monitoring in Widely Spaced Cereals. Precision Agric 7, 21–32 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-005-6787-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-005-6787-1

Keywords

Navigation