Skip to main content
Log in

Image Processing Performance Assessment Using Crop Weed Competition Models

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Precision treatment of both crops and weeds requires the accurate identification of both types of plant. However both identification and treatment methods are subject to error and it is important to understand how misclassification errors affect crop yield. This paper describes the use of a conductance growth model to quantify the effect of misclassification errors caused by an image analysis system.

Colour, morphology and knowledge about planting patterns have been combined, in an image analysis algorithm, to distinguish crop plants from weeds. As the crop growth stage advances, the algorithm is forced to trade improved crop recognition for reduced weed classification. Depending on the chosen method of weed removal, misclassification may result in inadvertent damage to the crop or even complete removal of crop plants and subsequent loss of yield. However incomplete removal of weeds might result in competition and subsequent yield reduction. The plant competition model allows prediction of final crop yield after weed or crop removal. The competition model also allows the investigation of the impact on yield of misclassification in the presence of both aggressive and benign weed types. The competition model and the image analysis algorithm have been linked successfully to investigate a range of misclassification scenarios in scenes containing cabbage plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. Hemming T. Rath (2001) ArticleTitleComputer-vision-based weed identification under field conditions using controlled lighting Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 78 233–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Manh et al. (2001) ArticleTitleWeed leaf image segmentation by deformable templates Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 80 139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Marchant R. D. Tillett R. Brivot (1998) ArticleTitleReal time segmentation of plants and weeds Real Time Imaging 4 243–253

    Google Scholar 

  • C. M. Onyango J. A. Marchant (2001) ArticleTitlePhysics based colour image segmentation for scenes containing vegetation and soil Journal of Image and Vision Computing 19 523–538

    Google Scholar 

  • S. E. Park L. R. Benjamin D. P. Aikman A. R. Watkinson (2001) ArticleTitlePredicting the growth interactions between plants in mixed species stands using a simple mechanistic model Annals of Botany 87 523–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Søgaard, S. T. and Heisel, T. 2002. Machine vision identification of weed species based on active shape models. In: Proceedings of 12th European Weed Research Society Symposium edited by H. H. van Laar et al., (EWRS, Wageningen, The Netherlands).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Onyango.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Onyango, C., Marchant, J., Grundy, A. et al. Image Processing Performance Assessment Using Crop Weed Competition Models. Precision Agric 6, 183–192 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-005-1034-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-005-1034-3

Keywords

Navigation