Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Frontline Participatory Behavior in Networks: Identity Work and the Corresponding Behavioral Determinations

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies that adequately reflect on the distinctive workings of collaborative networks and, more specifically, the importance of the participatory behaviors of frontline workers are in short supply. To address this gap in the literature, this article reports on a quantitative study of the identity work tensions and corresponding behavioral determinations of a set of frontline workers from thirteen collaborative social welfare networks in Virginia. This study found some evidence that their roles as enacted inside of the boundaries of their home organizations and the associated identities may differ from or conflict with their interorganizational, boundary spanning roles and associated identities. In some instances, the resulting tensions complicated the achievement of behavioral determinations by these frontline workers that would favor the realization of a collaborative advantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The ordinal levels of convergence are as follows: Strong the σ is ≤5% of the mean, Moderate the σ ranges between 6 and 10% of the mean, Weak the σ ranges between 11 and 15% of the mean, and Very Weak the σ is ≥16% of the mean.

References

  • Agranoff, R. (2007). Manging within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajsen, I., & Madden, T. (1986). Prediction of goal directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and percieved behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to action: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J., Comfort, M., & Weiner, B. (1998). Governance in public-private community health partnerships: A survey of the community care network SM demonstration sites. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 8(4), 311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., Ashcrat, K. L., & Thomas, R. (2008). Identity matters: Reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization, 15, 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta- analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E. (2001). Role transitions in organizational life: An identity-based perspective. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, A. (2006). Transforming public services - transforming the public servant. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(6), 556–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bland, J. T. (2017). Street-level divergence in the functioning of social welfare networks. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 3(2), 135–154. doi:10.20899/jpna.3.2.135-154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. (2014). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118619179.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. W. (2016). A collaboration-based model of work motivation and role ambiguity in public organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 39, 655–675. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1137763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B. (2010). Atecedents or processes? Determinants of perceived effectiveness of interorganizational collaborations for public service delivery. International Public Management Journal, 13(4), 381–407. doi:10.1080/10967494.2010.524836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choo, C. (1998). The knowing organization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, S95–S120. doi:10.1086/228943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Considine, M., & Lewis, J. (1999). Governance at ground level: The frontline bureaucrat in the age of markets and networks. Public Administration Review, 59(6), 467–480. doi:10.2307/3110295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Considine, M., & Lewis, J. (2012). Networks and interactivity: Ten years of street-level governance in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Australia. Public Management Review, 14(1), 1–22. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.589613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 263–282. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administraton Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Employment Advancement for TANF Participants. (2011). Retrieved from Virginia Departmetn of Social Services: https://www.dss.virginia.gov/form/grants/ben-13-045.html.

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974). Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, I., & Oliver, D. (2016). To imitate or differentiate: Cross-level identity work in an innovation network. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 32, 197–208. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2016.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, S., & Eggers, W. (2004). Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant Coordinator, Network #2. (2011, March 15). Personal interviews.

  • Grant Coordinator, Network #4. (2011, March 15). Personal interview.

  • Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M., Neal, A., & Parker, S. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groff, T., & Jones, T. (2003). Introduction to knowledge management. Amsterdam: Butterworth Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair Jr., J., Hult, G., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modleing (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb, P., & Martinson, K. (2002). Putting policy into practice: Fiver years of welfare reform. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huemer, L., Becerra, M., & Lunnan, R. (2004). Organizational identity and network identification: Relating within and beyond imaginary boundaries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 20(1), 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C. (1996). Advantage or inertia: Making collaboration work. In R. Paton, G. Glark, G. Jones, J. Lewis, & P. Quintas (Eds.), The new management reader (pp. 238–254). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Issacs, W. (1993). Taking flight: Dialogue, collective thinking, and organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 24–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarventie-Thesleff, R., & Tienari, J. (2016). Roles as mediators in identity work. Organization Studies, 37(2), 237–265. doi:10.1177/0170840615604500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keast, R., & Mandell, M. (2013). Network performance: A complex interplay of form and action. International Review of Public Administration, 18(2), 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keast, R., Mandell, M., Brown, K., & Woolcock, G. (2004). Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 363–371. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00380.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohtamaki, M., Thorgren, S., & Wincent, J. (2016). Organizational identity and behaviors in strategic networks. Journal of Business & Marketing, 31(1), 36–46. doi:10.1108/jbim-07-2014-0141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korschun, D. (2015). Boundary-spanning employees and relationships with external stakeholders: A social identity approach. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 611–629. doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire, R. H. (2017). Managing collaborative effort: How simmelian ties advance public sector networks. American Review of Public Administration, 1–16. doi:10.1177/0275074017700722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. (1991). The motivation sequence, the motivation hub, and the motivation core. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 288–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandell, M. (1990). Network management: Strategic behavior in the public sector. In R. Gage, & M. Mandell, Strategies for Managing Intergovernmental Policies and Networks. New York: Praeger.

  • Mandell, M., & Steelman, T. (2003). Understanding what can be accomplished through interorganizational innovations: The importance of typologies, context, and management strategies. Public Management Review, 5(2), 197–224. doi:10.1080/1461667032000066417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • \Mandell, M., Keast, R., & Chamberlain, D. (2016). Collaborative networks and the need for a new management language. Public Management Review, 19(3), 326–341. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1209232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margerum, R. (2001). Organizational commitment to integrated and collaborative management: Matching strategies to constraints. Environmental Management, 28(4), 421–431. doi:10.1007/s002670010234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margerum, R. (2002). Collaborative planning building consensus and building a distinct model for practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 237–253. doi:10.1177/0739456x0202100302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroulis, S., & Wilensky, U. (2014). Social and task interdependencies in the street-level implementation of innovation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), 721–750. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milward, H., & Provan, K. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 359–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minbaeva, D., & Pedersen, T. (2010). Governing individual knowledge sharing behavior. International Journal of Strategic Change Management, 2, 200–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Bjorkman, I., Fey, C., & Jeong Park, H. (2003). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6), 586–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miscenko, D., & Day, D. (2016). Identity and identification at work. Organizational Psychology Review, 6(3), 215–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, S, Tenkasi, R., & Mohrman, A. J. (2003). The role of networks in fundamental organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(3), 301–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S., & Swan, J. (2000). Trust and inter-organizational networking. Human Relations; Studies Towards the Integration of the Social Sciences, 53(10), 1287–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L., Steers, R., Mowday, R., & Boulian, P. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603–609. doi:10.1037/h0037335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigopoulou, I., Theodosiou, M., Katsikea, E., & Perdikis, N. (2012). Information control, role perceptions, and work outcomes of boundary-spanning frontline managers. Journal of Business Research, 65, 626–633. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, J., House, R., & Lirtzman, S. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romzek, B., LeRoux, K., Johnston, J., Kempf, R., & Piatak, J. (2014). Informal accountability in multi-sector service delivery collaborations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(4), 813–842. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandfort, J. (1999). The structural impediments to human service collaboration: Examining welfare reform at the front lines. Social Science Review, 73(3), 314–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schifter, D., & Ajzen, I. (1985). Intention, percieved control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 843–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J., & Scarbrough, H. (2005). The politics of networked innovation. Human Relations; Studies Towards the Integration of the Social Sciences, 58(7), 913–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, A., & Perry, J. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 20–32. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touati, N., Denis, J., Roberge, D., & Brabant, B. (2015). Learning in health care organizations and systems: An alternative approach to knowledge management. Administration and Society, 47(7), 767–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschirhart, M., Christensen, R., & Perry, J. (2005). The paradox of branding and collaboration. Public Performance and Management Review, 29(1), 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. J. (2008). Managing identity: Identity work, personal predicaments and structural circumstances. Organization, 15(1), 121–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Beverly Hills: Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weirich, T., Perlmutter, F., & Richan, W. (1977). Interorganizational behavior patters of line staff and services integration. The Social Service Review, 51(4), 674–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, J., & Arnold, T. (2016). Frontline employee customer-oriented attitude in the presence of job demands and resources: the influence upon deep and surface acting. Journal of Service Research, 19(1), 102–117. doi:10.1177/1094670515589956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Travis Bland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bland, J.T. Frontline Participatory Behavior in Networks: Identity Work and the Corresponding Behavioral Determinations. Public Organiz Rev 18, 461–485 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-017-0389-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-017-0389-z

Keywords

Navigation