Skip to main content
Log in

Negotiating Development Prescriptions: The Case of Population Policy in Nigeria

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Countries of the global south must constantly respond to development prescriptions from donor organizations. In this paper, I develop a spectrum of response to these prescriptions that applies to key actors at the country level—national leaders, technocratic elites, and social groups—and ranges from acceptance to negotiation to rejection. The interplay of these responses in conjunction with the social, economic, and political context drives the overall response to, and impact of, development prescriptions. To illustrate this process I use the case of population policy in Nigeria, where a technocratic elite led by a charismatic minister of health accepted the policy largely on its own merits; national leaders negotiated the policy so it facilitated state-society relations, promoted nationalism, deflected blame for economic woes, and represented commitment to political restructuring; and the representatives of social groups rejected the policy. Donor pressure served as a backdrop to the whole process. Parsing country responses to development prescriptions in this manner explains why Nigeria, a country with pronatalist citizens and in which population was highly politicized, adopted a policy aiming to limit fertility. It also demonstrates that different actors within countries of the global south use development prescriptions as opportunities to achieve locally important goals. To make these arguments, I draw on rich primary data from key informants and Nigerian government documents. Ultimately, the rejection of the policy by women’s organizations and religious groups, combined with financial duress, political chaos, and continued high desired fertility, prevented the policy from strongly influencing contraceptive provision or fertility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. While population policies can address all aspects of population composition, I use the term to refer to an explicit policy with a goal to reduce fertility rates and ultimately population growth. Kenya and Ghana adopted population policies much earlier, in 1967 and 1969, respectively (Chimbwete et al. 2005; Locoh and Makdessi 1996). See Sullivan (2007) for a full discussion of the factors explaining differential timing in adoption of population policies across African countries.

  2. The level of social development also began to play a role in redistribution algorithms in 1981, and the size and terrain of states were incorporated into these algorithms in 1990 (Suberu 2001).

  3. These plans were the primary means through which Nigeria organized government economic and social responsibilities until the mid-1980s, and paralleled the planning processes of many sub-Saharan African nations at the time.

  4. Foucault developed the theories of biopower and governmentality in reference to shifts in the locus of state power between the 16th and 18th centuries in Europe. Their applicability to the African case is, however, relevant given that the modern, liberal form of the state, which African countries inherited upon independence, still contains these elements.

  5. Three of these technocratic elites participated in creating the 1988 policy; the remainder were people who came to work in the population field immediately after 1988 and were intimately familiar with the policy. All were located through a snowball sampling process carried out while in Nigeria and worked for the federal ministries, NGOs, and donors involved in creating and implementing the 1988 policy. All respondents were Nigerian, half were women, all had above-average levels of education, and many had obtained this education in Europe or the United States. I did not collect information on respondents’ religious or ethnic backgrounds.

  6. The author has been able to locate the text of approximately two-thirds of African population policies; of those, no other comes from the Ministry of Health.

  7. An exception is Adegbola (2008), who mentions Ransome-Kuti in the conclusion.

  8. Section 5.3.1 reads, “The patriarchal family system in the country shall be recognised for stability of the home” (Federal Republic of Nigeria 1988).

References

  • Adegbola, O. (2008). Population policy implementation in Nigeria, 1988–2003. Population Review, 47(1), 56–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adepoju, A. (1981). Military rule and population issues in Nigeria. African Affairs, 80(318), 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avong, H. N. (2000). Perception of and attitudes toward the Nigerian federal population policy, family planning program and family planning in Kaduna State, Nigeria. African Journal of Reproductive Health/La Revue Africaine de la Santé Reproductive, 4(1), 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett D. (1995). Reproducing persons as a global concern: The making of an institution. Unpublished Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford.

  • Barrett, D., & Frank, D. J. (1999). Population control for national development: From world discourse to national policies. In J. Boli & G. M. Thomas (Eds.), Constructing world culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875 (pp. 198–221). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, D., Kurzman, C., & Shanahan, S. (2010). For export only: diffusion professionals and population policy. Social Forces, 88(3), 1183–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, D., & Tsui, A. O. (1999). Policy as symbolic statement: International response to national population policies. Social Forces, 78(1), 213–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckfield, J. (2003). Inequality in the world polity: The structure of international organization. American Sociological Review, 68(3), 401–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biersteker, T., & Lewis, P. M. (1997). The rise and fall of structural adjustment in Nigeria. In L. Diamond, A. Kirk-Greene, & O. Oyediran (Eds.), Transition without end (pp. 303–331). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. (1997). World culture in the world polity: A century of international non-governmental organization. American Sociological Review, 62, 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, E. H., Songora, F., & Foss, G. (2001). International discourse and local politics: Anti-female-genital-cutting laws in Egypt, Tanzania, and the United States. Social Problems, 48(4), 524–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhari, M. (1984). Nigeria population perspectives: Statements by world leaders (2nd ed., p. 120). New York: UNFPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A. (2005). South Africa’s HIV/AIDS policy, 1994–2004: How can it be explained? African Affairs, 104(417), 591–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. C., Orubuloye, I. O., & Caldwell, P. (1992). Fertility decline in Africa: A new type of transition? Population and Development Review, 18(2), 211–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Intelligence Agency. (2011). World Factbook. Retrieved July 8, 2011, from Central Intelligence Agency: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/.

  • Chamie, J. (1994). Trends, variations, and contradictions in national policies to influence fertility. Population and Development Review, 20, 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chimbwete, C., Watkins, S. C., & Zulu, E. M. (2005). The evolution of population policies in Kenya and Malawi. Population Research and Policy Review, 24(1), 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choices. (2000). Development strategies suffer until we address population issues. Choices, 1, 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapham, C. S. (1996). Africa and the international system: the Politics of state survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, M. (2006). Population control in India: Prologue to the emergency period. Population and Development Review, 32(4), 629–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Sweemer, C. C., & Lyons, T. (1975). Nigeria. Studies in family planning, 6(8), 291–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demeny, P. (2011). Population policy and the demographic transition: Performance, prospects, and options. Population and Development Review, 37, 249–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L., Kirk-Greene, A., & Oyediran, O. (1997). The politics of transition without end. In L. Diamond, A. Kirk-Greene, & O. Oyediran (Eds.), Transition without end (pp. 1–27). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibua, J. I. (2004). Collapse of purpose: Ibrahim Babangida, 1985–1993. In L. A. Nwachuku & G. N. Uzoigwe (Eds.), Troubled journey: Nigeria since the civil war (pp. 207–235). Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibua, J. I. (2006). Modernization and the crisis of development in Africa. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Mueller, R. (1993). The sexuality connection in reproductive health. Studies in Family Planning, 24(5), 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Mueller, R., & Germain, A. (1994). Population policy and feminist action in three developing countries. Supplement to Population and Development Review, 20 (The New Politics of Population and Consensus in Family Planning), 197–219.

  • Dlamini, S., Mngadi, T., Mkhatjwa, H., & Mohammed, N. (2010). Report on the Evaluation of the Fourth Government of Swaziland/UNFPA Country Programme (2006–2010).

  • Dugger, C. (2007, December 2). Ending famine, simply by ignoring the experts. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/02/world/africa/02malawi.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=malawi%20fertilizer&st=cse.

  • Eberstadt, N. (1994). Population policy: Ideology as science. First Things, 40, 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebigbola, J. A. (2000). National population policy: A viable option to human development. In J. A. Ebigbola & E. P. Renne (Eds.), Population and development issues: Ideas and debates: Essays in honor of Professor P.O. Olusanya (pp. 3–23). Ibadan: African Book Builders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehusani, G. O. (1994). The politics of population control. Zaria: Ahmadu Bello University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekwebalam, G., & Eseani, G. B. (1999). The USA’s Trojan gift to Nigeria: The criminal secrete behind population control politics. Nigeria: Face the Point Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englebert, P. (2000). State legitimacy and development in Africa. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falola, T., & Heaton, M. M. (2008). A history of Nigeria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Office of Statistics & IRD Macro International. (1992). Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 1990. Columbia: IRD Macro International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Republic of Nigeria. (1962). First National Development Plan, 1962–1968. Lagos: Federal Ministry of Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Republic of Nigeria. (1970). Second National Development Plan, 1970–74. Lagos: Federal Ministry of Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Republic of Nigeria. (1975). Third National Development Plan, 1975–80. Lagos: Federal Ministry of Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Republic of Nigeria. (1981). Fourth National Development Plan, 1981–85. Lagos: Ministry of National Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Republic of Nigeria. (1988). National policy on population for development, unity, progress, and self-reliance. Lagos: Federal Ministry of Health/Department of Population Activities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Republic of Nigeria. (2004). National policy on population for sustainable development. Abuja: National Population Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M. (1996). Review: Norms, culture, and world politics: Insights from sociology’s institutionalism. International Organization, 50(2), 325–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, T. (1995). Politics and economic development in Nigeria. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988). The political technologies of individuals. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with michel foucault (pp. 145–162). London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1994/2003). Omnes et Singulatim: Toward a Critique of Political Reason. In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The Essential Foucault: Selections from Essential Works of Foucault, 19541984 (pp. 180–201). New York: The New Press.

  • Frank, D. J., Hironaka, A., & Schofer, E. (2000). The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 96–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbon, P. (1991). Population and the Development Crisis in the South. Paper presented at the Population and the Development Crisis in the South, Bastad, Sweden.

  • Ginsburg, F., & Rapp, R. (1991). The politics of reproduction. Annual Review of Anthropology, 20, 311–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Committee of Parliamentarians on Population and Development. (1985). A statement on population stabilization by world leaders. Population and Development Review, 11(4), 787–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goliber, T. J. (1989). Africa’s expanding population: Old problems, new policies. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordin, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 1–51). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. A. (2003). Nigeria’s diverse peoples. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. (2003). Science, modernity, and the making of china’s one-child policy. Population and Development Review, 29(2), 163–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, J. I. (1993). Wealth in people and self-realization in equatorial Africa. Man, 28(2), 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner-Burton, E. M., & Tsutsui, K. (2005). Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. American Journal of Sociology, 110(5), 1373–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, B. (1995). Reproductive rights and wrongs. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W. J., Zelner, B. A., & Guillen, M. F. (2005). The worldwide diffusion of market-oriented infrastructure reform, 1977–1999. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 871–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, J. (2000). States and power in Africa. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, D., & Watkins, S. C. (1997). Feminists and neo-malthusians: Past and present alliances. Population and Development Review, 23(3), 469–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyden, G. (1980). Beyond Ujamma in Tanzania: Underdevelopment and an uncaptured peasantry. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ita, C. (2006, February 12). The Last of ‘Kuti Original’. OnlineNigeria. Retrieved from http://nm.onlinenigeria.com/templates/?a=6935&z=12.

  • Johnson-Hanks, J. (2006). Uncertain honor: Modern motherhood in an African crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokole, O. H. (1994). The politics of fertility in Africa. Population and Development Review, 20, 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D., Montgomery, J. D., & Migdal, J. S. (1979). Introduction—thinking about policies in patterns. In J. D. Montgomery, H. D. Lasswell, & J. S. Migdal (Eds.), Patterns of policy: Comparative and longitudinal studies of population events (pp. 1–16). New Brunswick: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. M. (2007). Growing apart: Oil, politics, and economic change in indonesia and nigeria. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liagin, E. (1996). Excessive force: Power, politics, and population control. Washington, DC: Information Project for Africa, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locoh, T., & Makdessi, Y. (1996). Population Policies and Fertility Decline in Sub-Saharan Africa (F. M. Moursund, Trans.). Paris: Centre Français sur la Population et le Développement.

  • Luke, N., & Watkins, S. C. (2002). Reaction of developing country elites to international population policy. Population and Development Review, 28(4), 707–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazrui, A. A. (1994). Islamic doctrine and the politics of induced fertility change: An African perspective. Population and Development Review, 20, 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzocco, K. (1988). Nigeria’s new population policy. International Health News, 9(3), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, R. S. (1984). Time bomb or myth: The population problem. Foreign Affairs, 62(5), 1107–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNicoll, G. (2011). Achievers and laggards in demographic transition: A comparison of Indonesia and Nigeria. Population and Development Review, 37, 191–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. (2004). The nation as babbit: How countries conform. Contexts, 3(3), 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The ‘Actors’ of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, J. S. (1988). Strong societies and weak states: State-society relations and state capabilities in the third world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, J. S. (2001). State in society: Studying how states and societies transform and constitute one another. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, S. W. (2008). Population control: Real costs, illusory benefits. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosley, H. H., & Branic, G. (1989). Population Policy in Sub-Saharan Africa: Agendas of International Agencies. Paper presented at the Population Policy in Sub-Saharan Africa: Drawing on International Experience, Kinshasa, Zaire.

  • National Population Commission, & ICF Macro. (2009). Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2008. Calverton: National Population Commission and ICF Macro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newland, L. (2001). The deployment of the prosperous family: Family planning in west Java. National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 13(3), 22–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obono, A. (2003). Cultural diversity and population policy in Nigeria. Population and Development Review, 29(1), 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odimegwu, C. O. (1998). An appraisal of the national population policy for development. Ibadan: Development Policy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olukoya, P., & Ferguson, J. (2003). Obituary: Olikoye Ransome-Kuti. The Lancet, 362, 175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organization of African Unity. (1981). Lagos Plan of Action for the Economic Development of Africa.

  • Orubuloye, I. O. (1983). Toward national population policy on population. In I. O. Orubuloye & O. Y. Oyeneye (Eds.), Population and development in Nigeria (pp. 170–178). Ibadan: Nigerian Institute of Social and Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osuide, S. O. (1988). The 1988 Nigerian population policy. Habitat International, 12(4), 119–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, T. O. (1995). Women’s reproductive practices and biomedicine: Cultural conflicts and transformations in Nigeria. In F. D. Ginsburg & R. Rapp (Eds.), Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction (pp. 195–208). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotrow, P. T., Rimon, J. G., Winnard, K., Kincaid, D. L., Huntington, D., & Convisser, J. (1990). Mass media family planning protection in three Nigerian cities. Studies in Family Planning, 21(5), 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Population Information Communication Branch. (Undated). A nation’s population as an asset, not a liability. Apapa, Nigeria: Federal Ministry of Information and Culture.

  • Raufu, A. (2003). Obituaries: Olikoye Ransome-Kuti. British Medical Journal, 326, 1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renne, E. P. (1996). Perceptions of population policy, development, and family planning programs in northern Nigeria. Studies in Family Planning, 27(3), 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renne, E. P. (2003). Population and progress in a Yoruba Town. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • République Centrafricaine. (1994). Projet de Politique Nationale de Population, Draft n° 2. Bangui: Ministere des Finances, du Plan et de la Cooperation Internationale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, L. A. (1999). Family planning and the politics of population in Tanzania: International to local discourse. Journal of Modern African Studies, 37(3), 457–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richey, L. A. (2004). Construction, control and family planning in Tanzania: Some bodies the same and some bodies different. Feminist Review, 78, 56–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richey, L. A. (2008). Population politics and development: From the policies to the clinics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rimon, J. G. (1986). Nigerian airwaves call for family planning. International Demographics, 5(6), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sai, F. T., & Chester, L. A. (1990). The role of the World Bank in shaping third world population policy. In G. Roberts (Ed.), Population policy: Contemporary issues (pp. 179–191). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneiberg, M., & Clemens, E. S. (2006). The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociological Theory, 24(3), 195–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R., Kanagaratnam, K., & Ginindza, T. (1989). Swaziland health, population, and nutrition sector assessment. Mbabane: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C., & Wright, S. (1997). Policy: A new field of anthropology. In C. Shore & S. Wright (Eds.), Anthropology of policy (pp. 3–39). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2006). Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 781–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinding, S. W. (1991). Strengthening the bank’s population work in the nineties. Washington, DC: Population and Human Resources Department the World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. J. (2003). Patronage, Per Diems and the “Workshop Mentality”: The practice of family planning programs in southeastern Nigeria. World Development, 31(4), 703–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. J. (2004). Contradictions in Nigeria’s fertility transition: The burdens and benefits of having people. Population and Development Review, 30(2), 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. J. (2007). The culture of corruption. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suberu, R. T. (2001). Federalism and ethnic conflict in Nigeria. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, R. (2007). Leveraging the global agenda for progress: Population policies and non-governmental organizations in sub-Saharan Africa. Unpublished Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

  • Swaziland Environment Authority. (2002). National Assessment Report—Swaziland—To the World Summit on Sustainable Development 2002. Mbabane: Swaziland Environment Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Futures Group. (1983). The effects of population factors on social and economic development. Washington, DC: The Futures Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. M. (2003). Politics of the womb: Women, reproduction, and the state in Kenya. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1988). Case studies in population policy: Nigeria. New York: Department of International Economic and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Population Fund. (1981). Inventory of population projects in developing countries around the world 1979/80. New York: United Nations Population Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Population Fund. (1986). Inventory of population projects in developing countries around the world 1984/85. New York: United Nations Population Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Population Fund. (1989). Inventory of population projects in developing countries around the world 1987/88. New York: United Nations Population Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanDeveer, S. D., & Dabelko, G. D. (2001). It’s capacity, stupid: International assistance and national implementation. Global Environmental Politics, 1(2), 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, J. R., Shore, C., Feldman, G., & Lathrop, S. (2005). Toward an anthropology of public policy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 600(1), 30–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1986). Population growth and policies in sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1989). Report of the Africa region task force on population FY 90–92. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1991) National population project between federal republic of Nigeria and International Development Association. Accessed June 11, 2008, from http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000114496_2004090121020411.

  • World Bank. (2008) Health project (01). Accessed June 11, 2008, from http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/0,,menuPK:115635~pagePK:64020917~piPK:64021009~theSitePK:40941,00.html.

  • World Bank. (2009). World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1998). Nigeria: Struggle for stability and status. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D. (1996). How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational actions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, S. (2007). Objections surface over Nigerian census results. Retrieved from http://www.prb.org/Articles/2007/ObjectionsOverNigerianCensus.aspx.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The fieldwork for this research was supported by the University of California, Berkeley Center for African Studies Rocca Scholarship in Advanced African Studies and the University of California, Berkeley Institute for Business and Economics Research. General support was provided by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. I am deeply indebted to my respondents in Abuja for their time and insights. I also gratefully acknowledge the thoughtful comments of the editor and reviewers at Population Research and Policy Review, as well as those of Phil Brenner, Neil Fligstein, Shannon Gleason, Gene Hammel, Jennifer Johnson-Hanks, Kate Haulman, Adrea Lawrence, Damon Mayrl, Benjamin Moodie, Aliya Saperstein, Susan Shepler, Sarah Staveteig, Ann Swidler, Bryan Sykes, Sarah Walchuk Thayer, Sarah Tom, Kenneth Wachter, Susan Watkins, Brenda Werth, and Danzhen You.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Sullivan Robinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, R.S. Negotiating Development Prescriptions: The Case of Population Policy in Nigeria. Popul Res Policy Rev 31, 267–296 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-011-9222-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-011-9222-5

Keywords

Navigation