Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel Co-immunoprecipitation Protocol Based on Protoplast Transient Gene Expression for Studying Protein–protein Interactions in Rice

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Reporter Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protein–protein interactions constitute the regulatory network that coordinates diverse cellular functions. Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) is a widely used and effective technique to study protein–protein interactions in living cells. However, the time and cost for the preparation of a highly specific antibody is the major disadvantage associated with this technique. In the present study, a co-IP system was developed to detect protein–protein interactions based on an improved protoplast transient expression system by using commercially available antibodies. This co-IP system eliminates the need for specific antibody preparation and transgenic plant production. Leaf sheaths of rice green seedlings were used for the protoplast transient expression system which demonstrated high transformation and co-transformation efficiencies of plasmids. The transient expression system developed by this study is suitable for subcellular localization and protein detection. This work provides a rapid, reliable, and cost-effective system to study transient gene expression, protein subcellular localization, and characterization of protein–protein interactions in vivo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bart R, Chern M, Park CJ, Bartley L, Ronald PC (2006) A novel system for gene silencing using siRNAs in rice leaf and stem-derived protoplasts. Plant Methods 2:13–21

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berggard T, Linse S, James P (2007) Methods for the detection and analysis of protein-protein interactions. Proteomics 7:2833–2842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ceriani MF (2007) Coimmunoprecipitation on Drosophila cells in culture. Methods Mol Biol 362:423–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Tao L, Zeng L, Vega-Sanchez ME, Umemura K, Wang GL (2006) A highly efficient transient protoplast system for analyzing defence gene expression and protein-protein interactions in rice. Mol Plant Pathol 7:417–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ciruela F (2008) Fluorescence-based methods in the study of protein-protein interactions in living cells. Curr Opin Biotech 19:338–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Citovsky V, Gafni Y, Tzfira T (2008) Localizing protein-protein interactions by bimolecular fluorescence complementation in planta. Methods 45:196–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Contreras I, Ortiz-Zapater E, Castilho LM, Aniento F (2000) Characterization of Cop I coat proteins in plant cells. Biochem Bioph Res Commun 273:176–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davey MR, Anthony P, Power JB, Lowe KC (2005) Plant protoplasts: status and biotechnological perspectives. Biotechnol Adv 23:131–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Z, Liu HL, Daxinger L, Pontes O, He X, Qian W, Lin H, Xie M, Lorkovic ZJ, Zhang S, Miki D, Zhan X, Pontier D, Lagrange T, Jin H, Matzke AJ, Matzke M, Pikaard CS, Zhu JK (2010) An RNA polymerase II- and AGO4-associated protein acts in RNA-directed DNA methylation. Nature 465:106–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He XJ, Hsu YF, Zhu S, Wierzbicki AT, Pontes O, Pikaard CS, Liu HL, Wang CS, Jin H, Zhu JK (2009) An effector of RNA-directed DNA methylation in Arabidopsis is an ARGONAUTE 4- and RNA-binding protein. Cell 137:498–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang L, Sun Q, Qin F, Li C, Zhao Y, Zhou DX (2007) Down-regulation of a SILENT INFORMATION REGULATOR2-related histone deacetylase gene, OsSRT1, induces DNA fragmentation and cell death in rice. Plant Physiol 144:1508–1519

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MA, Du H, Ning J, Ye H, Xiong L (2009) Characterization of Glossy1-homologous genes in rice involved in leaf wax accumulation and drought resistance. Plant Mol Biol 70:443–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kagaya Y (2002) Abscisic acid induced transcription is mediated by phosphorylation of an abscisic acid response element binding factor, TRAB1. Plant Cell 14:3177–3189

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiel C, Beltrao P, Serrano L (2008) Analyzing protein interaction networks using structural information. Annu Rev Biochem 77:415–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim GB, Bae JH, An CS, Nam YW (2013) Single or multiple gene silencing directed by U6 promoter-based shRNA vectors facilitates efficient functional genome analysis in medicago truncatula. Plant Mol Biol Rep 31:963–977

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasileva KV, Dahlbeck D, Staskawicz BJ (2010) Activation of an Arabidopsis resistance protein is specified by the in planta association of its leucine-rich repeat domain with the cognate oomycete effector. Plant Cell 22:2444–2458

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ (1976) Purification and viability determinations of plant protoplasts. Planta 128:213–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Jiang D, Zhou H, Li F, Yang J, Hong L, Fu X, Li Z, Liu Z, Li J, Zhuang C (2011) Expression of RNA-interference/antisense transgenes by the cognate promoters of target genes is a better gene-silencing strategy to study gene functions in rice. PloS ONE 6:e17444

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lilley KS, Dupree P (2007) Plant organelle proteomics. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:594–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ma JF, Yamaji N (2006) Silicon uptake and accumulation in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci 11:392–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ma JF, Yamaji N, Mitani N, Tamai K, Konishi S, Fujiwara T, Katsuhara M, Yano M (2007) An efflux transporter of silicon in rice. Nature 448:209–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masters SC (2004) Co-immunoprecipitation from transfected cells. Methods Mol Biol 261:337–350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miao YS, Jiang LW (2007) Transient expression of fluorescent fusion proteins in protoplasts of suspension cultured cells. Nat Protoc 2:2348–2353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miernyk JA, Thelen JJ (2008) Biochemical approaches for discovering protein-protein interactions. Plant J 53:597–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moffett P (2011) Fragment complementation and co-immunoprecipitation assays for understanding R protein structure and function. Methods Mol Biol 712:9–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohad N, Shichrur K, Yalovsky S (2007) The analysis of protein-protein interactions in plants by bimolecular fluorescence complementation. Plant Physiol 145:1090–1099

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey A, Chakraborty S, Datta A, Chakraborty N (2008) Proteomics approach to identify dehydration responsive nuclear proteins from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Mol Cell Proteomics 7:88–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2008) SAS/STAT 9.2 user’s guide. SAS Institute, Cary

  • Sheen J (2001) Signal Transduction in Maize and Arabidopsis Mesophyll Protoplasts. Plant Physiol 127:1466–1475

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer RJ, Salvucci ME (2002) Rubisco: structure, regulatory interactions, and possibilities for a better enzyme. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:449–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai CJ, Ma B, Nussinov R (2009) Protein-protein interaction networks: how can a hub protein bind so many different partners? Trends Biochem Sci 34:594–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uhrig JF (2006) Protein interaction networks in plants. Planta 224:771–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z, Zhao X, Chen L (2009) Identifying responsive functional modules from protein-protein interaction network. Mol Cell 27:271–277

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo SD, Cho YH, Sheen J (2007) Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat Protoc 2:1565–1572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Su J, Duan S, Ao Y, Dai J, Liu J, Wang P, Li Y, Liu B, Feng D, Wang J, Wang H (2011) A highly efficient rice green tissue protoplast system for transient gene expression and studying light/chloroplast-related processes. Plant Methods 7:30–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2013CBA01401), Genetically Modified Organisms Breeding Major Projects (2013ZX08001-004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30800596 and No. 31200191) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 20110490897). We thank Professor Li-Zhen Tao in South China Agricultural University for help with fluorescent microscope analysis; Professor Zheng-Hui He in San Francisco State University and Shi-Jiang Zhu in South China Agricultural University for the comments on the manuscript and Cole Johnson in University of Michigan for writing assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhen Lan Liu or Chu Xiong Zhuang.

Additional information

J.W. Yang and J.X. Fu both authors contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 2.60 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, J.W., Fu, J.X., Li, J. et al. A Novel Co-immunoprecipitation Protocol Based on Protoplast Transient Gene Expression for Studying Protein–protein Interactions in Rice. Plant Mol Biol Rep 32, 153–161 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-013-0633-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-013-0633-9

Keywords

Navigation