Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of potassium on plant uptake of non-exchangeable NH4 +-N

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims and background

Release of ‘non-exchangeable’ NH4 +-N from interlayers of 2:1 clay minerals is postulated to depend not only on soil solution NH4 +-N concentration but also on the concentration of K+ and Ca2+. Concentrations of all three cations are altered in rhizosphere compared to soil solution at larger distance from the root surface.

Methods

Non-exchangeable NH4 +-N pool was labelled with 15 N. Treatments including application of K+, Ca2+ and K+ + Ca2+ were established. In a compartment system approach we analysed changes in soil solution concentrations of 15NH4 +-N, 15NO3 -N, K+ and Ca2+ in situ at different distances from the root surface over time and related them to the release of non-exchangeable 15NH4 +-N and uptake of 15 N by plants.

Results and conclusions

The 15 N enrichment in plant tissue was significantly lower in treatments with K+ application compared to those without. This was in line with smaller depletion of non-exchangeable 15NH4 +-N in the rhizosphere for these treatments and also with lower 15 N abundance in soil solution NO3 -N fraction. Hence, K+ application hampered the release of NH4 + from the interlayers. A promoting effect of increasing Ca2+ concentrations on release of non-exchangeable NH4 +-N could not be evaluated since the Ca2+ concentration in soil solution was largely controlled by small amounts of carbonate contained in the substrate and thus the addition of Ca2+ did not result in a relevant increase of soil solution Ca2+ concentration as originally intended.

The use of 15 N to follow the fate of non-exchangeable NH4 +-N proved very useful as it provides a higher sensitivity for all measured fractions compared to total N. However, as soil N fractions equilibrate with each other labelling one fraction exclusively is not possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beuters P, Scherer HW (2012) Modification of the standard method for determination of non-exchangeable NH4-N in soil. Plant Soil Environ 58:557–560

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen PM, Turner FT, Dixon JB (1989) Ammonium fixation by high-charge smectite in Texas gulf coast soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:1035–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung J-B, Zasoski RJ (1994) Ammonium-potassium and ammonium-calcium exchange equilibria in bulk and rhizosphere soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1368–1375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corti G, Agnelli A, Ugolini FC (1999) A modified Kjeldahl procedure for determining strongly fixed NH4 + N. Eur J Soil Sci 50:523–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dou H, Steffens D (1995) Recovery of 15 N labelled urea as affected by fixation of ammonium by clay minerals. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 158:351–354

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelou VP, Lumbanraja J (2002) Ammonium-potassium-calcium exchange on vermiculite and hydroxy-aluminum vermiculite. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:445–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Göttlein A, Hell U, Blasek R (1996) A system for microscale tensiometry and lysimetry. Geoderma 69:147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinsinger P, Jaillard B (1993) Root induced release of interlayer potassium and vermiculitization of phlogopite as related to potassium depletion in the rhizosphere of ryegrass. J Soil Sci 44:525–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinsinger P, Bengough AG, Vetterlein D, Young IM (2009) Rhizosphere: biophysics, biogeochemistry and ecological relevance. Plant Soil 321:117–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mengel K, Scherer HW (1981) Release of nonexchangeable (fixed) soil ammonium under field conditions during the growing season. Soil Sci 131:226–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mengel K, Horn D, Tributh H (1990) Availability of interlayer ammonium as related to root vicinity and mineral type. Soil Sci 149:131–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newman ACD (1969) Cation exchange properties of micas. 1. The relation between mica composition and potassium exchange in solution of different pH. Soil Sci 20:357–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nieder R, Benbi DK, Scherer HW (2011) Fixation and defixation of ammonium in soils: a review. Biol Fertil Soils 47:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russow R, Götz A (1998) Automatic simultaneous determination of total carbon and 13C as well as total nitrogen and 15 N in isotopically enriched samples of soil and plant material using a quadrupole mass spectrometer coupled to an elemental analyser. Arch Agron Soil Sci 43:349–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer F, Schachtschabel P, Blume HP (2010) Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde. 16. Auflage, neu bearbeitet von H.-P. Blume, G.W. Brümmer, R. Horn, E. Kandeler, I. Kögel-Knabner, R. Kretzschmar, K. Stahr, B.M. Wilke. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg.

  • Scherer HW (1993) Dynamics and availability of the non-exchangeable NH4-N - A review. Eur J Agron 2:149–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer HW, Ahrens G (1996) Depletion of non-exchangeable NH4 in the soil-root interface in relation to clay mineral composition and plant species. Eur J Agron 5:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer HW, Werner W (1996) Significance of soil microorganisms for the mobilisation on nonexchangeable ammonium. Biol Fertil Soils 22:248–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks DL, Liebhardt WC (1982) Temperature effects on potassium exchange and selectivity in Delaware soils. Soil Sci 133:10–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Springob G, Richter J (1998) Measuring interlayer potassium release rates from soil materials. II. A percolation procedure to study the influence of the variable 'solute K' in the <1....10 μM range. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 161:323–329

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Springob G (1999) Blocking the release of potassium from clay interlayers by small concentrations of NH4+ and Cs+. EJSS 50:665–674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steffens D, Sparks L (1997) Kinetics of nonexchangeable ammonium release from soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:455–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stange CF, Spott O, Apelt B, Russow R (2007) Automated and rapid online determination of 15 N abundance and concentration of ammonium, nitrite, or nitrate in aqueous samples by the SPINMAS technique. Isot Environ Health Stud 43:227–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tinker PB, Nye PH (2000) Solute Movement in the Rhizosphere. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetterlein D, Marschner H, Horn R (1993) Microtensiometer technique for in situ measurements of soil matric potential and root water extraction from a sandy soil. Plant Soil 149:263–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vetterlein D, Jahn R (2004) Combination of micro suction cups and time-domain reflectometry to measure osmotic potential gradients between bulk soil and rhizosphere at high resolution in time and space. Eur J Soil Sci 55:497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vetterlein D, Kühn T, Kaiser K, Jahn R (2013) Illite transformation and potassium release upon changes in composition of the rhizosphere soil solution. Plant Soil 371:267–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welch LF, Scott AD (1960) Nitrification of fixed ammonium in clay minerals as affected by added potassium. Soil Sci 90:79–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Christine Krenkewitz carried out analyses of plants, soil solution and soil samples; Claudia Hoffmann-Jäniche maintained the compartment system experiment and conducted soil solution sampling. Bernd Apelt and Rolf Russow adapted the 15 N determination in soil solution to the small sample sizes and conducted the 15 N analyses. We are grateful to the staff of the Klein-Altendorf Research station; and to the coordination team (Timo Kautz, Miriam Athmann) of FOR 1320 at University of Bonn. The study was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (research group FOR 1320).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doris Vetterlein.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: N. Jim Barrow.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Figure S1

Sketch of compartment system. Dimensions are given in mm. Slots actually equipped with sensors in the experiment are marked in black. A hydrophilic nylon net of 30-μm mesh separates the root compartment from the bulk soil compartment. (PDF 23 kb)

Figure S2

Changes of non-exchangeable NH4 +-N in soil with increasing distance from the root surface at harvest (day 49) for control without plants (dashed line), treatments without K+ application (control, +Ca) and treatments with K+ application (+K, +Ca + K). 15 N-labelled soil has been placed initially at a distance of 0–30 mm. Points represent means of three replicates. Standard errors of residual variance are smaller than the symbol size and thus not visible. (GIF 70 kb)

High Resolution Image (TIFF 526 kb)

Figure S3

Changes in soil solution NH4 +-N concentrations with time and increasing distance from the root surface in treatments without K application (control, +Ca) and treatments with K application (+K, +Ca + K). The vertical line indicates the position of the nylon mesh (=root surface). 15 N-labelled soil has been placed initially at a distance of 0–30 mm. Points represent means of values measured in the right and left bulk soil compartment. R represents positions of suction cups, reaching 9 mm into the root compartment, i.e., at 9 mm distance of the nylon mesh. (GIF 73 kb)

High Resolution Image (TIFF 370 kb)

Figure S4

Changes in soil solution 15 N abundance of soil solution NH4 +-N with time and increasing distance from the root surface in treatments without K application (control, +Ca) and treatments with K application (+K, +Ca + K). The vertical line indicates the position of the nylon mesh (=root surface). 15 N-labelled soil has been placed initially at a distance of 0–30 mm. Points represent means of values measured in the right and left bulk soil compartment. R represents positions of suction cups, reaching 9 mm into the root compartment, i.e., at 9 mm distance of the nylon mesh. (GIF 53 kb)

High Resolution Image (TIFF 259 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beuters, P., Scherer, H.W., Spott, O. et al. Impact of potassium on plant uptake of non-exchangeable NH4 +-N. Plant Soil 387, 37–47 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2275-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2275-6

Keywords

Navigation