Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How can soil monitoring networks be used to improve predictions of organic carbon pool dynamics and CO2 fluxes in agricultural soils?

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As regional and continental carbon balances of terrestrial ecosystems become available, it becomes clear that the soils are the largest source of uncertainty. Repeated inventories of soil organic carbon (SOC) organized in soil monitoring networks (SMN) are being implemented in a number of countries. This paper reviews the concepts and design of SMNs in ten countries, and discusses the contribution of such networks to reducing the uncertainty of soil carbon balances. Some SMNs are designed to estimate country-specific land use or management effects on SOC stocks, while others collect soil carbon and ancillary data to provide a nationally consistent assessment of soil carbon condition across the major land-use/soil type combinations. The former use a single sampling campaign of paired sites, while for the latter both systematic (usually grid based) and stratified repeated sampling campaigns (5–10 years interval) are used with densities of one site per 10–1,040 km². For paired sites, multiple samples at each site are taken in order to allow statistical analysis, while for the single sites, composite samples are taken. In both cases, fixed depth increments together with samples for bulk density and stone content are recommended. Samples should be archived to allow for re-measurement purposes using updated techniques. Information on land management, and where possible, land use history should be systematically recorded for each site. A case study of the agricultural frontier in Brazil is presented in which land use effect factors are calculated in order to quantify the CO2 fluxes from national land use/management conversion matrices. Process-based SOC models can be run for the individual points of the SMN, provided detailed land management records are available. These studies are still rare, as most SMNs have been implemented recently or are in progress. Examples from the USA and Belgium show that uncertainties in SOC change range from 1.6–6.5 Mg C ha−1 for the prediction of SOC stock changes on individual sites to 11.72 Mg C ha−1 or 34% of the median SOC change for soil/land use/climate units. For national SOC monitoring, stratified sampling sites appears to be the most straightforward attribution of SOC values to units with similar soil/land use/climate conditions (i.e. a spatially implicit upscaling approach).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrén O, Kätterer T, Karlsson T, Eriksson J (2008) Soil C balances in Swedish agricultural soils 1990–2004, with preliminary projections. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 81:129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldocchi D (2008) Breathing of the terrestrial biosphere: lessons learned from a global network of carbon dioxide flux measurement systems. Aust J Bot 56:1–2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy PH, Loveland PJ, Bradley RI, Lark RM, Kirk GJD (2005) Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978–2003. Nature 437:245–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner J, Paustian K, Easter M, Killian K, Swan A, Williams S, Ogle S (2005) Final Report to US Department of Energy-Energy Information Agency 1605(b) Agriculture Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sequestration-National Land Resource Region Carbon Study. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

  • Cochran WG (1977) Sampling techniques, 3rd edn. Wiley, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman K, Jenkinson, DS (1999) RothC-26.3. A model for the turnover of carbon in soils. Herts, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK

  • Goidts E, van Wesemael B (2007) Regional assessment of the changes in soil organic carbon stocks of agricultural soils in southern Belgium between 1955 and 2005. Geoderma 141:341–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • González L, Etchevers J, Hidalgo C (2008) Carbon in hillsides soil: factors that must be considered to determine its change over time. Agrociencia 42:741–751

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2006) Generic methodologies applicable to multiple land use categories. In: Egglestone HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, volume iv, Agriculture, Forestry and other Land Use. The National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan, pp 2.1–2.59

  • Johnston AE, Poulton PR, Coleman K (2009) Soil organic matter: its importance in sustainable agriculture and carbon dioxide fluxes. Adv Agron 101:1–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk GJD, Bellamy PH (2010) Analysis of changes in organic carbon in mineral soils across England and Wales using a simple single-pool model. Eur J Soil Sci 61:406–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R, Follett RF, Stewart BA, Kimble JM (2007) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change and advance food security. Soil Sci 172:943–956

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Law BE, Turner D, Campbell J et al (2006) Carbon fluxes across regions. In: Wu J, Jones KB, Li H, Loucks OL (eds) Scaling and uncertainty analysis in ecology. Springer Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 167–190

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liao Q, Zhang X, Li Z, Pan G, Smith P, Jin Y, Wu X (2009) Increase in soil organic carbon stock over the last two decades in China’s Jiangsu Province. Glob Chang Biol 15:861–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig B, Mitscke R, Terhoeven-Urselmans T, Michel K, Flessa H (2008) Use of mid-infrared spectroscopy in the diffuse-reflectance mode for the prediction of the composition of organic matter in soil and litter. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171:384–391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maia SMF, Ogle SM, Cerri CC, Cerri CEP (2010) Changes in soil organic carbon storage under different agricultural management systems in the Southwest Amazon Region of Brazil. Soil Tillage Res 106:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meersmans J, van Wesemael B, Goidts E, Van Molle M et al (2010) Spatial analysis of soil organic carbon evolution in Belgian croplands and grasslands, 1960–2006. Glob Chang Biol. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02183.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Morvan X, Saby NPA, Arrouays D, Le Bas C, Jones RJA, Verheijen FGA, Bellamy PH, Stephens P, Kibblewhite MG (2008) Soil monitoring in Europe: a review of existing systems and requirements for harmonization. Sci Total Environ 391:1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nusser SM, Goebel JJ (1997) The natural resource inventory: a long term monitoring programme. Environ Ecol Stat 4:181–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogle SM, Breidt FJ, Easter M, Williams S, Paustian K (2007) Empirically-based uncertainty associated with modeling carbon sequestration rates in soils. Ecol Model 205:453–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan GX, Xu XW, Smith P, Pan WN, Lal R (2010) An increase in topsoil SOC stock of China’s croplands between 1985 and 2006 revealed by soil monitoring. Agric Ecosyst Environ 136:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton WJ, Ojima DS, Cole CV, Schimel DS (1994) A general model for soil organic matter dynamics: sensitivity to litter chemistry, texture and management. In: Bryant RB, Arnold RW (eds) Quantitative modeling of soil forming processes. Soil Sci Soc Am, Madison, WI, USA, pp 147–167, Special Publication 39

  • Paustian K, Cole CV, Sauerbeck D, Sampson N (1998) CO2 mitigation by agriculture: an overview. Clim Change 40:135–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saby NPA, Bellamy PH, Morvan X, Arrouays D, Jones RJA, Verheijen FGA, Kibblewhite MG, Verdoodt A, Berenyi Uveges J, Freudenschuss A, Simota C (2008) Will European soil monitoring networks be able to detect changes in topsoil organic carbon content? Glob Chang Biol 14:2432–2442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper LA, Baisden WT, Parfitt RL, Ross C, Claydon JJ, Arnold G (2007) Large losses of soil C and N from soil profiles under pasture in New Zealand during the past 20 years. Glob Chang Biol 13:1138–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Falloon P, Franko U, Körschens M, Lal R, Paustian K, Powlson D, Romanenkov V, Shevtsova L, Smith J (2006) Greenhouse gas mitigation potential in agricultural soils. In: Canadell JG, Pataki D, Pitelka LF (eds) Terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world. The IGBP series. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Lanigan G, Kutsch WL et al (2010) Measurements necessary for assessing the net ecosystem carbon budget of croplands. Agric Ecosyst Environ. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2010.04.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate KR, Giltrap DJ, Claydon JJ, Newsome PF, Atkinson IAE, Taylor MD, Lee R (1997) Organic carbon stocks in New Zealand’s terrestrial ecosystems. J R Soc NZ 27(3):315–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate KR, Wilde RH, Giltrap DJ, Baisden WT, Saggar S, Trustrum NA, Scott NA, Barton JP (2005) Soil organic carbon stocks and flows in New Zealand: System development, measurement and modeling. Can J Soil Sci 85:481–489

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbore S (2009) Radiocarbon and soil dynamics. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 37:47–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USDA-NRCS (1981) Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States. USDA Agriculture Handbook 296, United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE, pp 156

  • Van Wesemael B, Paustian K, Meersmans J, Goidts E, Barancikova G, Easter M (2010) Agricultural management explains historic changes in regional soil C stocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:14926–14930

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An estimation of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Li H (2006) Concepts of scaling. In: Wu J, Jones KB, Li H, Loucks OL (eds) Scaling and uncertainty analysis in ecology. Springer Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 3–15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Li H, Jones KB, Loucks OL (2006) Scaling with known uncertainty: a synthesis. In: Wu J, Jones KB, Li H, Loucks OL (eds) Scaling and uncertainty analysis in ecology. Springer Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 329–346

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yan X, Cai Z (2008) Number of soil profiles needed to give a reliable overall estimate of soil organic carbon storage using profile carbon density data. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 54:19–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann M, Leifeld J, Schmidt MWJ et al (2007) Measured soil organic matter fractions can be related to pools in the RothC model. Eur J Soil Sci 58:658–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The contribution of Bas van Wesemael is in the framework of a project financed as ‘Action de Recherche Concertée’ (Contract number 09/14–022) by the Communauté française de Belgique. The support is gratefully acknowledged. Support for Keith Paustian and Stephen Ogle from USDA/CSREES Carbon Cycle Science Program (Agreement No. 2005–35615–15223), USDA/NRCS (Agreement No. 68–7482–9–521) and NASA Applied Science Program (Agreement No. NNG05GL07G) is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bas van Wesemael.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Rich Conant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Wesemael, B., Paustian, K., Andrén, O. et al. How can soil monitoring networks be used to improve predictions of organic carbon pool dynamics and CO2 fluxes in agricultural soils?. Plant Soil 338, 247–259 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0567-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0567-z

Keywords

Navigation