Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An improved way to determine nitrogen fertiliser requirements of sugarcane crops to meet global environmental challenges

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) fertiliser management is increasingly important in sugarcane production as imperatives to reduce environmental impacts of N escalate. In this paper we report testing of a new concept for N management in sugarcane, the N Replacement system. This system relies on soil N cycling to ‘buffer’ differences in crop N needs and N fertiliser supply to individual crops, and aligns N applications with actual cane production over the longer-term rather than potential production. In 11 experiments, conducted in a wide range of environments over two to five crops, cane and sugar yields in the N Replacement treatment were similar to those achieved with the farmers’ conventional N management, with a trend over successive crops for yields to increase relative to conventional management. At sites where experiments ran for at least 4 years, this trend resulted in cumulative sugar yields being higher in the N Replacement treatment. Average N applications were 35% lower in the N Replacement treatment, and N lost to the environment was estimated to be ∼50% lower. Soil N ‘buffering’ was adequate to maintain sufficient N supply to crops even when yields were up to 30% greater than expected. Thus, it is not necessary to align fertiliser applications to potential sugarcane yields, which are rarely achieved in practice. Our results show that the ecologically-based N Replacement system has promise to deliver superior environmental outcomes without significantly reducing production of sugarcane, and potentially other semi-perennial crops, in the tropics and subtropics. Further evaluation of the system will be beneficial, and there is scope for determining more site-specific values of parameters in the system. However, care must be taken to evaluate the system over sufficient time frames (e.g. >2 crops) so that productivity improvement trends in the N Replacement system can be expressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As is standard practice in sugarcane agronomy, cane yields will be given as fresh weight throughout this paper.

References

  • Anon (2001) Sugarcane production handbook. LSU AgCenter, Louisiana State University (http://www.agctr.lsu.edu/NR/rdonlyres/807E6478-E556-44A8-8440-16A2CC4BFD4C/3272/pub2859sugarcane4.PDF)

  • Archer AA, Thorburn PJ, Hobson PA, Higgins AJ (2008) Evaluating alternate strategic options for agricultural value chains. J Chain Network Sci 8:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball-Coelho B, Tiessen H, Stewart JWB, Salcedo IH, Sampaio EVSB (1993) Residue management effects on sugarcane yield and soil properties in northeastern Brazil. Agron J 85:1004–1008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basanta MV, Dourado-Neto D, Reichardt K, Bacchi OOS, Oliveira JCM, Trivelin PCO, Timm LC, Tominaga TT, Correchel V, Cássaro FAM, Pires LF, Macedo LF (2003) Management effects on nitrogen recovery in a sugarcane crop grown in Brazil. Geoderma 116:235–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin N, Saad JK, Van Laethem C, Machet JM, Maucorps J, Mary B (2005) Nitrate leaching in intensive agriculture in Northern France: Effect of farming practices, soils and crop rotations. Agric Ecosyst Environ 111:292–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bell MA, Garside AL, Halpin NV, Slater B, Moody PW, Park G (2010) Interactions between rotation breaks, tillage and n management on sugarcane grown at Bundaberg and Ingham. Proc Aust Soc Sugar Cane Technol 32:119–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell MA, Moody PW, Halpin NV, Garside AL (2006) Impact of management of cane trash and legume residues on N mineralisation and crop N uptake. Proc Aust Soc Sugar Cane Technol 28:129–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwman AF, Boumans LJM, Batjes NH (2002) Emissions of N2O and NO from fertilized fields-summary of available measurement data. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 16:1058. doi:10.1029-2001GB001811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramley RGV, Roth CH (2002) Land-use effects on water quality in an intensively managed catchment in the Australian humid tropics. Marine Freshw Res 53:931–940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bramley RGV, Hill PA, Thorburn PJ, Kroon FJ, Panten K (2008) Precision Agriculture for improved environmental outcomes: Some Australian perspectives. Landbauforschung—vTi Agric For Res 58:161–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie J, Binney J, Fabricius K, Gordon I, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Hunter H, O’Reagain P, Pearson R, Quirk M, Thorburn P, Waterhouse J, Webster I, Wilkinson S (2008) Synthesis of evidence to support the Scientific Consensus Statement on Water Quality in the Great Barrier Reef. The State of Queensland (Department of the Premier and Cabinet), Reef Water Quality Protection Plan Secretariat, Brisbane, p 84

  • Calcino DV, Kingston G, Haysom M (2000) Nutrition of the plant. In: Hogarth DM, Allsopp PG (eds) Manual of cane growing. Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations, Indooroopilly, pp 153–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Carberry PS (2001) Are science rigour and industry relevance both achievable in participatory action research. Agric Sci 14:22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth PB, Chinn C, Bristow KL, Ham G (2002) Healthy crop and healthy groundwater: Sugarcane in the Burdekin delta. In: Proc Nat Conf Irrig Assoc Aust May 2002, Irrig Assoc Aust, Sydney, (on CD).

  • Cheesman OD (2004) The environmental impacts of sugar production. CABI Publishing, Wallingford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen PJ, Mosier AR, Smith KA, Winiwarter W (2008) N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels. Atmos Chem Phys 8:389–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Derby NE, Casey XM, Knighton RM (2009) Long-term observations of vadose zone and groundwater nitrate concentrations under irrigated agriculture. Vadose Zone J 8:290–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater LE, Snapp SS (2007) Nutrients in agroecosystems-Rethinking the management paradigm. Adv Agron 92:163–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eickhout B, Bouwmana AF, van Zeijts H (2006) The role of nitrogen in world food production and environmental sustainability. Agric Ecosyst Environ 116:4–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Everingham YL, Inman-Bamber NG, Thorburn PJ, McNeill TJ (2007) A bayesian modelling approach for improving long lead sugarcane yield forecasts. Aust J Agric Res 58:87–94

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006) Fertilizer use by crop. FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin 17. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

  • Gava GJ, Trivelin PCO, Vitti AC, Oliveira MW (2005) Urea and sugarcane straw nitrogen balance in a sol-sugarcane crop system. Pesq Agropec Bras 40:689–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henzell EF, Vallis I, Lindquist JK (1968) Automatic colorimetric methods for the determination of nitrogen in digests and extracts of soil. Trans. 9th Internat. Cong. Soil Sci, Adelaide, p 513

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman-Bamber NG, Smith DM (2005) Water relations in sugarcane and response to water deficits. Field Crops Res 92:185–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen BH, de Willinen P (2006) Ideal and saturated soil fertility as bench marks in nutrient management 1. Outline of the framework. Agric Ecosyst Environ 116:132–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PA, Shepherd MA, Hatley DJ, Smith PN (2002) Nitrate leaching from a shallow limestone soil growing a five course combinable crop rotation: the effects of crop husbandry and nitrogen fertilizer rate on losses from the second complete rotation. Soil Use Manag 18:68–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostka G, Polzin C, Scharrer J (2009) The future of sugar cane in China and India - Supply constraints and expansion potential. App Energy 86(Suppl 1):S100–S107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefroy RDB, Blair GJ, Strong WM (1993) Changes in soil organic matter with cropping as measured by organic carbon fractions and 13C natural isotope abundance. Plant Soil 156:399–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald RC, Isbell RF, Speight JG, Walker J, Hopkins MS (1990) Australian soil and land survey field handbook 2nd edn. Inkata Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier EA, Thorburn PJ, Wegener MK, Basford KE (2006) The availability of nitrogen from sugarcane trash on contrasting soils in the wet tropics of North Queensland. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 75:101–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JH, Wood RA (1994) Nitrogen management of sugar cane in South Africa. Proc Aust Soc Sugar Cane Technol 15:93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JH, Schumann AW, Wood RA, Nixon DJ, Van Den Berg M (2007) Recent advances to improve nitrogen use efficiency of sugarcane in the South African sugar industry. In: Hogarth DM (ed) Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol Proc XXVIth Congress, Durban July 2007, S Afr Soc Sugar Cane Technol Assoc and XXVIth ISSCT Organising Committee, pp 238–246 (on CD).

  • Mitchell RDJ, Thorburn PJ, Larsen P (2000) Quantifying the loss of nutrients from the immediate area when sugarcane residues are burnt. Proc Aust Soc Sugar Cane Technol 22:206–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell AW, Reghenzani JR, Furnas MJ (2001) Nitrogen levels in the Tully River—a long-term view. Water Sci Technol 43:99–105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muchow RC, Robertson MJ, Wood AW, Keating BA (1996) Effect of nitrogen on the time-course of sucrose accumulation in sugarcane. Field Crops Res 47:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neeteson JJ (1995) Nitrogen management for intensively grown arable crops and field vegetables. In: Bacon PE (ed) Nitrogen fertilisation and the environment. Dekker, New York, pp 295–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng Kee Kwong KF, Deville J, Cavalot PC, Riviere V (1986) Biological immobilization of fertilizer nitrogen in humid tropical soils of Mauritius. Soil Sci 141:195–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez O, Ufer C, Azañon V, Solares E (2010) Strategies for the optimal use of nitrogen fertilisers in the sugarcane crop in Guatemala. Proc Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol 27, 9 pp (on CD)

  • Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Australian Laboratory Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical Methods. Inkata Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Renouf MA, Wegener MK, Nielsen LK (2008) An environmental life cycle assessment comparing Australian sugarcane with US corn and UK sugar beet as producers of sugars for fermentation. Biomass Bioener 32:1144–1155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson FA, Thorburn PJ (2007) Decomposition of sugarcane harvest residue in different climatic zones. Aust J Soil Res 45:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy RN, Finck A, Blair GJ, Tandon HLS (2006) Plant nutrition for food security-A guide for integrated nutrient management. FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin 16, FAO, Rome, 2006.

  • Salgado García S, Palma-López DJ, Zavala-Cruz J, Lagunes-Espinoza LC, Castelán-Estrada M, Ortiz-García CF, Juárez-López JF, Ruiz-Rosado O, Armida-Alcudia l, Rincón-Ramírez JA (2010) A sustainable fertilisation program for a sugar factory in Mexico: A principle for precision agriculture. Proc Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol 27, 9 pp (on CD)

  • Schroeder BL, Hurney AP, Wood AW, Moody PW (2010) Concepts and value of the nitrogen guidelines contained in the Australian sugar industry’s ‘six easy steps’ nutrient management program. Proc Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol 27, 11 pp.

  • Smeets EMW, Bouwmanw LF, Stehfest E, van Vuuren DP, Posthuma A (2009) Contribution of N2O to the greenhouse gas balance of first-generation biofuels. Glob Change Biol 15:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DM, Inman-Bamber NG, Thorburn PJ (2005) Growth and function of the sugarcane root system. Field Crops Res 92:165–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson DWA, van der Merwe A, Benninga W, Allison JSC (1992) Response of different sugarcane varieties to greater than normal applications of nitrogen. Proc S Afr Sugar Technol Assoc 65:50–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart LK, Charlesworth PB, Bristow KL, Thorburn PJ (2006) Estimating deep drainage and nitrate leaching from the root zone under sugarcane using APSIM-SWIM. Agric Water Manag 81:315–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn PJ, Biggs JS, Weier KL, Keating BA (2003a) Nitrate in groundwaters of intensive agricultural areas in coastal Northeastern Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 94:49–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn PJ, Dart IK, Biggs IM, Baillie CP, Smith MA, Keating BA (2003b) The fate of nitrogen applied to sugarcane by trickle irrigation. In: Thorburn PJ, Bristow KL, Annandale J (eds) Micro-irrigation: Advances in system design and management. Irrig Sci 22:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn PJ, Horan HL, Biggs IM, Park SE (2004) Which is the most important crop when assessing nitrogen applications—the next or the last? Proc S Afr Sugar Technol Assoc 78:383–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn PJ, Biggs JS, Collins K, Probert ME (2010) Using the APSIM model to estimate nitrous oxide emissions from diverse Australian sugarcane production systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 136:343–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedenfeld RP (1995) Effects of irrigation and N fertilizer application on sugarcane yield and quality. Field Crops Res 43:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedenfeld R, Enciso J (2008) Sugarcane Responses to Irrigation and Nitrogen in Semiarid South Texas. Agron J 100:665–671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood AW, Muchow RC, Robertson MJ (1996) Growth of sugarcane under high input conditions in tropical Australia. III. Accumulation, partitioning and use of nitrogen. Field Crops Res 48:223–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the generous support of collaborating farmers and milling companies for this work and funding from the Australian Government and sugar industry through the Sugar Research and Development Corporation. We also thank Dr Jo Stringer (BSES Ltd.) for statistical advice. Steve Attard and Mike Spillman (CSIRO) provided valuable support for activities in the Burdekin region.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems and Sustainable Agriculture Flagship, 306 Carmody Rd, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia

    P. J. Thorburn, J. S. Biggs & I. M. Biggs

  2. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems and Sustainable Agriculture Flagship, PO Box 12139, Earlville BC, Cairns, Queensland, 4870, Australia

    A. J. Webster

Authors
  1. P. J. Thorburn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. S. Biggs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. J. Webster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. M. Biggs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. J. Thorburn.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Johan Six.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thorburn, P.J., Biggs, J.S., Webster, A.J. et al. An improved way to determine nitrogen fertiliser requirements of sugarcane crops to meet global environmental challenges. Plant Soil 339, 51–67 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0406-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0406-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation