Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transgenic Bt cotton has no apparent effect on enzymatic activities or functional diversity of microbial communities in rhizosphere soil

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A transgenic Bt cotton (Sukang-103) and its non-Bt cotton counterpart (Sumian-12) were investigated to evaluate the potential risk of transgenes on the soil ecosystem. The activities of urease, phosphatase, dehydrogenase, phenol oxidase, and protease in cotton rhizosphere were assayed during the vegetative, reproductive, and senescing stages of cotton growth and after harvest. A Biolog system was used to evaluate the functional diversity of microbial communities in soils after a complete cotton growth cycle. Enzymatic activities in soils amended with cotton biomass were also assayed. Results showed that there were few significant differences in enzyme activities between Bt and non-Bt cottons at any of the growth stages and after harvest; amendment with cotton biomass to soil enhanced soil enzyme activities, but there were no significant difference between Bt and non-Bt cotton; the richness of the microbial communities in rhizosphere soil did not differ between Bt and the non-Bt cotton, and close to that of control soil; the functional diversity of microbial communities were not different in rhizosphere soils between Bt and non-Bt cotton. All results suggested that there was no evidence to indicate any adverse effects of Bt cotton on the soil ecosystem in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai L, Zhang L, Chen X, Feng H (2003) Composition and diversity of the weed community in transgenic Bt cotton (four Bollgard strains) fields. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (in Chinese) 27:610–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch ANE, Geoghegan IE, Majenus MEN, Hackett C, Allen J (1998) Interactions between plant resistance genes, pest aphid population and beneficial aphid predators. Dundee Scottish Crop Res Instit Annu Rep 68–72

  • Cai H, Shen RF (2005) Determination of soil protease activity with modified ninhydrin colorimetry. Acta Pedologica Sinica (in Chinese) 42:306–313

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conner AJ, Glare TR, Nap J-P (2003) The release of genetically modified crops into the environment: II Overview of ecological risk assessment. Plant J 33: 19–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crecchio C, Stotzky G (2001) Biodegradation and insecticidal activity of the toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki bound on complexes of montmorillonite—humic acids—Al hydroxypolymers. Soil Biol Biochem 33:573–581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cui J, Xia J (2000) Effects of transgenic Bt cotton R93-6 on the insect community. Acta Entomologica Sinica (in Chinese) 43:43–51

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson J (1999) Genetic exchange between bacteria in the environment. Plasmid 42:73–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donegan KK, Palm CJ, Fieland VJ, Porteous LA, Ganio LM, Schaller DL, Bucao LQ, Seidler RJ (1995) Changes in levels, species and DNA fingerprints of soil microorganisms associated with cotton expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki endotoxin. Appl Soil Ecol 2:111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores S, Saxena D, Stotzky G (2005) Transgenic Bt plants decompose less in soil than non-Bt plants. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1073–1082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garland JL, Mills AL (1991) Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community—level sole-carbon-source utilization. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:2351–2359

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guan S (1986) Soil enzymes and their research methods. Agriculture Press, Beijing 303–304 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbeck A, Baumgartner M, Fried PM, Bigler F (1998) Effect of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn-fed prey on mortality and development time of immature Chrysoperla camea (Naeuroptera: Chrysopidea). Environ Entomol 27:480–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia S, Guo S, An D (2001) Transgenic cottons, Beijing, Science Press (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskella J, Stotzky G (1997) Microbial utilization of free and clay-bound insecticidal toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis and their retention of insecticidal activity after incubation with microbes. Appl Environ Microbiol 63(9):3561–3568

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koskella J, Stotzky G (2002) Larvicidal toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis subspp. Kurstaki, morrisoni (strain tenebrionis), and israelensis have no microbicidal or microbiostatic activity against selected bacteria, fungi, and algae in vitro. Can J Microbiol 48(3):262–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Liu Q, Jin X, Liu J, Liu J, Liu Y (2002) The niches of major pests and natural enemies between Bt cotton and common cotton. Entomol J East China (in Chinese) 11:51–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Wan F, Guo J (2002) Structure and seasonal dynamics of arthropods in a transgenic Bt cotton field. Acta Ecologica Sinica (in Chinese) 22:729–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Men X, Ge F, Yin X, Cai D (2003) Diversities of arthropod community in transgenic Bt cotton and nontransgenic cotton agroecosystems. Chinese J Ecol (in Chinese) 22:26–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Nap J-P, Metz PLJ, Escaler M, Conner AJ (2003) The release of genetically modified crops into the environment: I Overview of current status and regulations. Plant J 33:1–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poerschmann J, Gathmann A, Augustin J, Langer U, Gorecki T (2005) Molecular composition of leaves and stems of genetically modified Bt and near-isogenic non-Bt maize-characterization of lignin patterns. J Environ Qual 34:1508–1518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena D, Stotzky G (2000) Insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis is released from roots of transgenic Bt corn in vitro and in situ. FEMS Microbial Ecol 33:35–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena D, Stotzky G (2002) Bt toxin is not taken up from soil or hydroponic culture by corn, carrot, radish, or turnip. Plant Soil 239:165–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena D, Stotzky G (2001a) Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin released from root exudates and biomass of Bt corn has no apparent effect on earthworms, nematodes, protozoa, bacteria and fungi in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1225–1230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena D, Stotzky G (2001b) Bt corn has a higher lignin content than non-Bt corn. Am J Bot 88:1704–1706

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena D, Stotzky G (2001c) Bt toxin uptake from soil by plants. Nature Biotech 19:199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena D, Flores S, Stotzky G (2002) Vertical movement in soil of insecticidal Cry1Ab protein from Bacillus thuringiensis. Soil Biol Biochem 34:111–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler TH, Denholm I, Clark SJ, Stewart CN, Poppy GM (2004) Effects of Bt plants on the development and survival of the parasitoid Cotesia plutellae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in susceptible and Bt-resistant larvae of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J Insect Physiol 50:435–443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stotzky G (2000) Persistence and biological activity in soil of insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis and of bacterial DNA bound on clays and humic acids. J␣Environ Qual 29:691–705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stotzky G (2004) Persistence and biological activity in soil of the insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis, especially from transgenic plants. Plant Soil 266:77–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tan S, Chen X, Li D (2002) Progress in the studies on Helicoverpa spp Resistance to transgenic Bt cotton and its management strategy. Acta Entomologica Sinica (in Chinese) 45:138–144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tapp H, Stotzky G (1998) Persistence of the insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis Subsp Kurstaki in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 30(4):471–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yin X, Stotzky G (1997) Gene transfer among bacteria in natural environments. Adv Appl Microbiol 45:153–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zak JC, Willig MR, Moorhead DL, Wildman HG (1994) Functional diversity of microbial communities: a quantitative approach. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1101–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Li S, Chen Z, Fu H, Yang Y (2000) Study of the population dynamics changes of the beneficial and injurious living beings on the field of Bt cotton-33B. J␣Hebei Normal Uni (Nat Sci) (in Chinese) 24:521–523

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H, Zhang D (1982) Methods in researching dynamic biochemistry of soils. Science Press, Beijing, pp 256–257 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by CAS “100-talent program”, International Partnership Project (CXTD-Z2005-04), and “Knowledge Innovation Program” (ISSASIP0204). We thank Julie Hayes for her critical reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ren Fang Shen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shen, R.F., Cai, H. & Gong, W.H. Transgenic Bt cotton has no apparent effect on enzymatic activities or functional diversity of microbial communities in rhizosphere soil. Plant Soil 285, 149–159 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9000-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9000-z

Keywords

Navigation