Skip to main content
Log in

Stability of the MON 810 transgene in maize

  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analysed the DNA variability of the transgene insert and its flanking regions in maize MON 810 commercial varieties. Southern analysis demonstrates that breeding, since the initial transformation event more than 10 years ago, has not resulted in any rearrangements. A detailed analysis on the DNA variability at the nucleotide level, using DNA mismatch endonuclease assays, showed the lack of polymorphisms in the transgene insert. We conclude that the mutation rate of the transgene is not significantly different from that observed in the maize endogenous genes. Six SNPs were observed in the 5′flanking region, corresponding to a Zeon1 retrotransposon long terminal repeat. All six SNPs are more than 500 bp upstream of the point of insertion of the transgene and do not affect the reliability of the established PCR-based transgene detection and quantification methods. The mutation rate of the flanking region is similar to that expected for a maize repetitive sequence. We detected low levels of cytosine methylation in leaves of different transgenic varieties, with no significant differences on comparing different transgenic varieties, and minor differences in cytosine methylation when comparing leaves at different developmental stages. There was also a reduction in cryIAb mRNA accumulation during leaf development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clark RM, Tavaré S, Doebley J (2005) Estimating a nucleotide substitution rate for maize from polymorphism at a major domestication locus. Mol Biol Evol 22:2304–2312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delannay X, La Vallee BJ, Proksch RK, Fuchs RL, Sims SR, Greenplate JT, Marrone PG, Dodson RB, Augustine JJ, Layton JG, Fischhoff DA (1989) Field performance of transgenic tomato plants expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis var kurstaki insect control protein. Bio/Technology 7:1265–1269

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorlhac de Borne F, Vincentz M, Chupeau Y, Vaucheret H (1994) Co-suppression of nitrate reductase host genes and transgenes in transgenic tobacco plants. Mol Gen Genom 243:613–621

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duan X, Li X, Xue Q, Abo-el-Saad M, Xu D, Wu R (1996) Transgenic rice plants harboring an introduced potato proteinase inhibitor II gene are insect resistant. Nat Biotech 14:494–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fearing PL, Brown D, Vlachos D, Meghji M, Privalle L (1997) Quantitative analysis of Cry1A (b) expression in Bt maize plants, and silage and stability of expression over successive generations. Mol Breed 3:169–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gruntman E, Qi Y, Slotkin RK, Roeder T, Martienssen RA, Sachidanandam R (2008) Kismeth: analyzer of plant methylation states through bisulfite sequencing. BMC Bioinf 9:371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández M, Pla M, Esteve T, Prat S, Puigdomenech P, Ferrando A (2003) A specific real-time quantitative PCR detection system for event MON 810 in maize YieldGard based on the 3′-transgene integration sequence. Transg Res 12:179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holck A, Vaïtilingom M, Didierjean L, Rudi K (2002) 5′-Nuclease PCR for quantitative event-specific detection of the genetically modified MON 810 MaisGard maize. Eur Food Res Tech 214:449–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holst-Jensen A, De Loose M, van den Eede G (2006) Coherence between legal requirements and approaches for detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their derived products. J Agric Food Chem 19:2799–2809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli A, Griffiths S, Palacios N, Twyman RM, Vain P, Laurie DA, Christou P (1999) Molecular characterization of transforming plasmid rearrangements in transgenic rice reveals a recombination hotspot in the CaMV 35S promoter and confirms the predominance of microhomology mediated recombination. Plant J 17:591–601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • La Paz JL, Vicient CM, Puigdomènech P, Pla M (2010) Characterization of polyadenylated cryIA(b) transcripts in maize MON 810 commercial varieties. Anal Bioanal Chem 396:2125–2133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippman Z, May B, Yordan C, Singer T, Martienssen R (2003) Distinct mechanisms determine transposon inheritance and methylation via small interfering RNA and histone modification. PLoS Biol 1:e67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makarevitch I, Stupar RM, Iniguez AL, Haun WJ, Barbazuk WB, Kaeppler SM, Springer NM (2007) Natural variation for alleles under epigenetic control by the maize chromomethylase zmet2. Genetics 77:749–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mette MF, Aufsatz W, van der Winden J, Matzke MA, Matzke AJ (2000) Transcriptional silencing and promoter methylation triggered by double-stranded RNA. EMBO J 19:5194–5201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer P, Linn F, Heidmann I, Meyer H, Niedenhof I, Saedler H (1992) Endogenous and environmental factors influence 35S promoter methylation of a maize A1 gene construct in transgenic petunia and its colour phenotype. Mol Gen Genom 231:345–352

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Müller AJ, Mendel RR, Schiemann J, Simoens C, Inzé D (1987) High meiotic stability of a foreign gene introduced into tobacco by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Mol Gen Genom 207:171–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen HT, Jehle JA (2007) Quantitative analysis of the seasonal and tissue specific expression of Cry1Ab in transgenic maize MON 810. J Plant Dis Protec 114:82–87

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ogasawara T, Chikagawa Y, Arakawa F, Nozaki A, Itoh Y, Sasaki K, Umetsu H, Watanabe T, Akiyama H, Maitani T, Toyoda M, Kamada H, Goda Y, Ozeki Y (2005) Frequency of mutations of the transgene, which might result in the loss of the glyphosate-tolerant phenotype, was lowered in roundup ready soybeans. J Health Sci 51:197–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Padgette SR, Kolacz KH, Delannay X, Re DB, Re DB, LaVallee BJ, Tinius CN, Rhodes WK, Otero YI, Barry GF, Eichholtz DA, Peschke VM, Nida DL, Taylor NB, Kishore GM (1995) Development, identification, and characterization of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line. Crop Sci 35:1451–1461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowicz PD (2003) Constructing gene enriched genomic libraries using methylation filtration technology. Methods Mol Biol 236:21–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Register JC 3rd, Peterson DJ, Bell PJ, Bullock WP, Evans IJ, Frame B, Greenland AJ, Higgs NS, Jepson I, Jiao S, Lewnau CJ, Sillick JM, Wilson HM (1994) Structure and function of selectable and non-selectable transgenes in maize after introduction by particle bombardment. Plant Mol Biol 25:951–961

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosati A, Bogani P, Santarlasci A, Buiatti M (2008) Characterisation of 3′ transgene insertion site and derived mRNAs in MON 810 YieldGard maize. Plant Mol Biol 67:271–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Garcia L, Cervera MT, Martínez Zapater JM (2005) DNA methylation increases throughout development. Planta 222:301–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sunilkumar G, Mohr L, Lopata-Finch E, Emani C, Rathore KS (2002) Developmental and tissue-specific expression of CaMV 35S promoter in cotton as revealed by GFP. Plant Mol Biol 50:463–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rie J, Jansens S, Höfte H, Degheele D, Van Mellaert H (1989) Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins. Importance of specific receptors on the brush border membrane of the mid-gut of target insects. Eur J Bioch 186:239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigouroux Y, Jaqueth JS, Matsuoka Y, Smith OS, Beavis WD, Smith JS, Doebley J (2002) Rate and pattern of mutation at microsatellite loci in maize. Mol Biol Evol 19:1251–1260

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Widmer F, Seidler RJ, Donegan KK, Reed GL (1997) Quantification of transgenic plant marker gene persistence in the field. Mol Ecol 6:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson JD, Hirsch-Wyncott ME, Larkins BA, Gelvin SB (1989) Differential accumulation of a transcript driven by the CaMV 35S promoter in transgenic tobacco. Plant Physiol 90:1570–1576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yakovlev A, Khafizova M, Abdullaev Z, Loukinov D, Kondratyev A (2010) Epigenetic regulation of caspase-3 gene expression in rat brain development. Gene 450:103–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the European collaborative project Co-Extra (Co-Existence and Traceability of Genetically Modified Organisms in the European Supply Chain; http://www.coextra.eu/; VI Framework Programme), the Centre CONSOLIDER on Agrigenomics and the Xarxa de Referencia en Biotecnologia of the Generalitat de Catalunya. We thank Drs. Josep M. Casacuberta and Michael A. Phillips for their comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos M. Vicient.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Online Resource 1

SNP detection electropherograms. Representative examples of capillary micro-electropherograms of heteroduplex-DNA after CelI digestion. X-axis, fragment size (bp); Y-axis, fluorescence intensity. The first and last peaks (15 and 1,500 bp) correspond to the mw markers. a Mismatch C/G control, corresponding to a heteroduplex fragment of 612 bp with a single C/G SNP. b Example of a heteroduplex DNA digestion corresponding to PCR products with no polymorphisms. c Electropherogram corresponding to region R1, where multiple peaks indicate the presence of polymorphisms. (DOC 106 kb)

Online Resource 2

Sequence alignment of the 5′flanking region in maize MON 810 varieties. Alignment of the R1 region, comprising the 5′flanking region of the transgene, corresponding to a Zeon1 LTR copy, and the entire P-35S. Polymorphic sites are highlighted in green. Sequences were deposited in GeneBank under the accession numbers FN706511 to FN706516 (DOC 132 kb)

Online Resource 3

Methylation status of the transgene in leaves of maize MON 810 varieties. Average percentage of different types of methylated sites in leaves at the V7 stage of seven maize MON 810 varieties. Means (% methylation) and SD of at least 5 independent replicates are shown. (DOC 87 kb)

Online Resource 4

Statistical significance of the methylation levels comparing maize MON 810 varieties, transgene regions and type of methylation sites. Significances have been calculated using Student’s t-test. Significant differences are highlighted in red (P < 0.05). (DOC 480 kb)

Online Resource 5

Dot plot representation of the distribution of methylated sites in the transgene in leaves of different MON 810 varieties. The region analysed is indicated at the top of each graph. Each row represents an independent sequenced clone; the maize variety is indicated on the left and the replica number in brackets. Closed circles indicate methylated sites and open circles, unmethylated; red circles are CpG sites, blue circles, CpNpG sites and green circles are CpNpN sites. (DOC 124 kb)

Online Resource 6

Methylation status of the transgene in leaves of maize MON 810 varieties at different developmental stages. Average percentage of different types of methylated sites in leaves at the V3, V7, R3 and R6 stages of two maize MON 810 varieties. Means (% methylation) and SD of 5 independent replicates are shown. (DOC 118 kb)

Online Resource 7

Dot plot representation of the distribution of methylated sites in the transgene in leaves of two MON 810 varieties and at four developmental stages. The region analysed is indicated at the top of each graph. Each row represents an independent sequenced clone; the maize variety is indicated on the left and the replica number in brackets. V3, V7, R3 and R6 are the developmental stages. Closed circles indicate methylated sites and open circles, unmethylated; red circles are CpG sites, blue circles, CpNpG sites and green circles are CpNpN sites. (DOC 191 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paz, J.L.L., Pla, M., Papazova, N. et al. Stability of the MON 810 transgene in maize. Plant Mol Biol 74, 563–571 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-010-9696-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-010-9696-2

Keywords

Navigation