Abstract
In order to identify genes induced during the water stress response in maize (Zea mays) seedlings, suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) was performed using mixed cDNAs prepared from maize seedlings treated with 20% PEG as testers and cDNAs from unstressed maize seedlings as drivers. A forward subtractive cDNA library was constructed, from which 960 recombinant colonies were picked and amplified. Through differential screening of the subtractive cDNA library, 533 clones were identified as water stress induced. After sequencing, 190 unique expressed sequence tags (ESTs) were obtained by clustering and blast analysis, which included transcripts that had previously been reported as responsive to stress as well as some functionally unknown transcripts. The ESTs with significant protein homology were sorted into 13 functional categories. A cDNA marcoarray containing the 190 unique ESTs was used to analyze their expression profiles in maize seedling during both PEG treatment and natural drought. The results indicated that 67 ESTs in leaves and 113 ESTs in roots were significantly up-regulated by PEG-stress. 123 ESTs were found to be up-regulated for at least one time-course point in either maize leaves or roots. Correspondingly, 163 ESTs were significantly up-regulated by drought stress. Results from the hierarchical cluster analysis suggest that the leaves and roots of maize seedlings had different expression profiles after PEG treatment and that there was a lot of overlap between PEG- and drought-stress induced up-regulated transcripts. A set of transcripts has been identified, which have significantly increased expression and probably involved in water stress signaling pathway based on data analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- DRE:
-
dehydration-responsive element
- ESTs:
-
expressed sequence tags
- PEG:
-
polyethylene glycol
- SSH:
-
suppression subtractive hybridization
References
Bartels, D. and Nelson, D.E. 1994. Approaches to improve stress tolerance using molecular genetics. Plant Cell Environ. 17: 659–667.
Bohnert, H.J., Nelson, D.E. and Jensen, R.G. 1995. Adaptation to environmental stresses. Plant Cell 7: 1099–1111.
Bray, E.A. 1993. Molecular responses to water deficit. Plant Physiol. 103: 1035–1040.
Diatchenko, L., Chrislau, Y.F., Campbell, A.P., Chenchik, A., Mooadam, F., Huang, B., Lukyanov, S., Lukyanov, K., Gurskaya, N., Sverdlov, E. and Siebert, P.D. 1996. Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating differentially regulatedor tissue- specific cDNA probe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 6025–6030.
Eisen, M.B., Spellman, P.T., Brown, P.O. and Botstein, D. 1998. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 14863–14868.
Fowler, S. and Thomashow, M.F. 2002. Arabidopsis transcriptome profiling indicates that multiple regulatory pathways are activated during cold acclimation in addition to the CBF cold response pathway. Plant Cell 14: 1675–1690.
Gao, P., Wang, G.Y., Zhao, H.J., Fan, L. and Tao, Y.Z. 2003. Isolation and identification of submergence-induced genes in maize (Zea mays) seedlings by suppression subtractive hybridization. Acta. Bot. Sin. 45: 479–483.
Hirai, M.Y., Fujiwara, T., Awazuhara, M., Kimura, T., Noji, M. and Saito, K. 2003. Global expression profiling of sulfur-staved Arabidopsis by DNA macroarray reveals the role of O-acetyl-L-serine as a general regulator of gene expression in response to sulfur nutrition. Plant J. 33: 651–663.
Hirayama, T., Ohto, C., Mizoguchi, T. and Shinozaki, K. 1995. A gene encoding a phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C is induced by dehydration and salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 3903–3907.
Ingram, J. and Bartels, D. 1996. The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47: 377–403.
Ji, S.J., Lu, Y.C., Feng, J.X., Wei, G., Li, J., Shi, Y.H., Fu, Q., Liu, D., Luo, J.C. and Zhu, Y.X. 2003. Isolation and analyses of genes preferentially expressed during earlycotton fiber development by subtractive PCR and cDNA array. Nucl. Acids Res. 31: 2534–43.
Kawasaki, S., Borchert, C., Deyholos, M., Wang, H., Brazille, S., Kawai, K., Galbraith, D. and Bohnert, H.J. 2001. Gene expression profiles during the initial phase of salt stress in rice. Plant Cell 13: 889–905.
Kay, R., Chan, A., Daly, M. and Mcpherson, J. 1987. Duplication of CaMV 35S promoter sequences creats a strong enhancer for plant genes. Science 236: 1299–1302.
Kim, J.Y., Mahe, A., Brangeon, J. and Prioul, J. L. 2000. A maize vacuolar invertase, IVR2, is induced by water stress. Organ/tissue specificity and diurnal modulation of expression. Plant Physiol. 124: 71–84.
Kizis, D. and Pages, M. 2002. Maize DRE-binding proteins DBF1 and DBF2 are involved in rab17 regulation through the drought-responsive element in an ABA-dependent pathway. Plant J. 30: 679–689.
Liu, Q., Kasuga, M., Sakuma, Y., Abe, H., Miura, S., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. and Shinozaki, K. 1998. Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought- and low temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 10: 1391–1406.
Ozturk, Z.N., Talame, V., Deyholos, M., Michalowski, C.B., Galbraith, D.W., Gozukirmizi, N., Tuberosa, R. and Bohnert, H.J. 2002. Monitoring large-scale changes in transcript abundance in drought- and salt-stressed barley. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 551–573.
Riccardi, F., Gazeau, P., Vienne, D. and Zivy, M. 1998. Protein Changes in Response to Progressive Water Deficit in Maize. Plant Physiol. 117: 1253–1263.
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F. and Maniatis, T. 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
Schenk, P.W. and Snaar-Jagalska, B.E. 1999. Signal perception and transduction: the role of protein kinase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1449: 1–24.
Seki, M., Narusaka, M., Abe, H., Kasuga, M., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., Carninci, P., Hayashizaki,Y. and Shinozaki, K. 2001. Monitoring the expression pattern of 1300 Arabidopsis genes under drought and cold stresses by using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant Cell 13: 61–72.
Seki, M., Narusaka, M., Ishida, J., Nanjo, T., Fujita, M., Oono, Y., Kamiya, A., Nakajima, M., Enju, A. and Sakurai, T. 2002. Monitoring the expression profiles of 7,000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and highsalinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J. 31: 279–292.
Shinozaki, K. and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. 1997. Gene expression and signal transduction in water stress response. Plant Physiol. 115: 327–334.
Wang, Y., Mi, G.H., Chen, F.J. and Zhang, F.S. 2002. Genotypic difference in nitrogen efficiency of five maize inbred lines as affected by nitrate levels. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 8(4): 361–365.
Xiong, L.M., Schumaker, K.S. and Zhu, J.K. 2002. Cell signal during cold, drought, and salt stress. Plant Cell suppl. s165–s183.
Yang, G.P., Ross, D.T., Kang, W.W., Brown, P.O. and Weigel, R.J. 1999. Combining SSH and cDNA microarrays for rapid identification of differentially expressed genes. Nucl. Acids Res. 27: 1517–1523.
Yu, L.X. and Setter, T.L. 2003. Comparative transcriptional profiling of placenta and endosperm in developing maize kernels in response to water deficit. Plant Physiol. 131: 568–582.
Zhu, J.K. 2002. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53: 247–273.
Zhu, J.K., Hasegawa, P.M. and Bressan, R.A. 1997. Molecular aspects of osmotic stress in plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 16: 253–277.
Zinselmeier, C., Sun, Y., Helentjaris, T., Beatty, M., Yang, S., Smith, H. and Habben, J. 2002. The use of gene expression profiling to dissect the stress sensitivity of reproductive development in maize. Field Crop Res. 75: 111–121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, J., Zhao, J., Tao, Y. et al. Isolation and analysis of water stress induced genes in maize seedlings by subtractive PCR and cDNA macroarray. Plant Mol Biol 55, 807–823 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-005-1969-9
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-005-1969-9