Skip to main content
Log in

Experience and self-consciousness

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Does all conscious experience essentially involve self-consciousness? In his Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person, Dan Zahavi answers “yes”. I criticize three core arguments offered in support of this answer—a well-known regress argument, what I call the “interview argument,” and a phenomenological argument. Drawing on Sartre, I introduce a phenomenological contrast between plain experience and self-conscious experience. The contrast challenges the thesis that conscious experience entails self-consciousness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Sartre (1957, p. 49).

  2. Zahavi (2006, p. 16).

  3. Sydney Shoemaker (1968).

  4. Zahavi (2006, p. 127).

  5. Compare Hubert Dreyfus’s recent charge against John McDowell in their exchange in the pages of Inquiry. See Dreyfus (2007, p. 372).

  6. Zahavi (2006, p. 21), my italics.

  7. Compare Charles Siewert’s dicussion of the ‘conscious-of’ trap in Siewert (1998).

  8. Shaun Gallagher says on the back of Zahavi’s book: “Zahavi delivers a critical phenomenological account of the subjectivity of experience that shows how phenomenology is not just a description but an analysis that can contribute to explanations of consciousness, self, and intersubjectivity.”

  9. Zahavi (2006, p. 69).

  10. Zahavi (2006, p. 24).

  11. Zahavi (2006, p. 124).

  12. Sartre (1957, p. 46).

  13. See Urial Kriegel (2007) for the philosophical modesty of what he calls the “method of contrast.”

  14. Heidegger (1986), p. 152.

  15. I thank Steven Delay, Hubert Dreyfus, Wayne Martin and Dan Zahavi for helpful comments on and reaction to this essay. I am especially indebted to Charles Siewert for several instructive conversations on self-consciousness and for his illuminating work on the topic.

References

  • Dreyfus, H. (2007). Response to McDowell. Inquiry, 40(4), 370–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1986). Sein und Zeit. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer; Being and time (Macquarrie & Robinson, Trans. 1962). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Kreigel, U. (2007). The phenomenologically manifest. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(1–2), 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longuenesse, B. (2007). Self-consciousness and self-reference: Sartre and Wittgenstein. European Journal of Philosophy, 16(1–2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1936). La transcendence de l’ego. Paris: Vrin; The transcendence of the ego (F. Williams & R. Kirkpatrick, Trans. 1957). New York: The Noonday Press.

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1976). Being and nothingness (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). New York: Philadelphia Library.

  • Shoemaker, S. (1968). Self-reference and self-awareness. Journal of Philosophy, 65, 556–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siewert, C. (1998). The significance of consciousness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D. (2006). Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph K. Schear.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schear, J.K. Experience and self-consciousness. Philos Stud 144, 95–105 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9381-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9381-y

Keywords

Navigation