Skip to main content
Log in

Photochemical Removal of Gaseous Elemental Mercury in a Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Reactor

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The plasma process has the potential to serve as a low cost mercury oxidation technology that will facilitate elemental mercury removal in a downstream of Flue Gas Desulfurization system. The performance of the main gas constituents, such as H2O, O2 and HCl on elemental mercury oxidation under plasma atmosphere was investigated in simulated flue gas. Experiments were carried out in a dielectric barrier discharge reactor operated at 140 °C. Photochemical effects of nanocrystalline titania on oxidation of elemental mercury were also tested. The results indicated that both H2O and O2 promote the oxidation of elemental mercury significantly. Active radicals generated by ionization, such as O, O2 and OH, play the crucial roles in oxidation process. The presence of HCl in N2/O2 stream in plasma system is a very effective way of oxidizing elemental mercury, the nearly complete oxidation of elemental mercury was observed by 4 kV of applied voltage only. The best photocatalytic activity of anatase TiO2 which was calcined at 600 °C was found in our tests. Compared with the plasma process alone, the oxidation efficiency increased 18.7–26.3 % with the addition of photocatalyst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Galbreath KC, Zygarlicke CJ (2000) Mercury transformations in coal combustion flue gas. Fuel Process Technol 65–66:289–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yudovich YE, Ketris MP (2005) Mercury in coal: a review. Coal use and environmental problems. Int J Coal Geol 62:153–165

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pavlish JH, Sondreal EA, Mann MD et al (2003) Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants. Fuel Process Technol 82:89–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li LC, Ping P, Tian AM et al (2003) A study on there action mechanism and kinetic of mercury oxidation by chlorine species. J Mol Struct 625:277–281

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xu MH, Qiao Y, Zheng CG et al (2003) Modeling of homogeneous mercury speciation using detailed chemical kinetics. Combust Flame 132:208–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liang XH, Looy PC, Jayaram S (2002) Mercury and other trace elements removal characteristics of DC and pulse energized electrostatic precipitator. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 38:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang WC, Zhao ZB, Liu F, Wang S (2005) Study of NO/NOx removal from flue gas contained fly ash and water vapor by pulsed corona discharge. J Electrostat 63:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ighigeanu D, Martin D, Zissulescu E et al (2005) SO2 and NOx removal by electron beam and electrical discharge induced non-thermal plasma. Vaccum 77:493–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kyung BK, Young BY, Cho MY (2008) Oxidation of elemental mercury using atmospheric pressure non-thermal plasma. Chemosphere 72:652–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kyung BK, Young BY, Cho MY (2008) Influence of HCl on oxidation of gaseous elemental mercury by dielectric barrier discharge process. Chemosphere 71:1674–1682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeong JY, Jurng JS (2007) Removal of gaseous elemental mercury by dielectric barrier discharge. Chemosphere 68:2007–2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Calvert JG, Lindberg SE (2005) Mechanisms of mercury removal by O3 and OH in the atmosphere. Atmos Environ 39:3355–3367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Christopher RM, Evan JG, Henry WP (2005) The PCO process for photochemical removal of mercury from flue gas. Fuel Process Technol 87:85–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Granite EJ, Pennline HW (2002) Photochemical removal of mercury from flue gas. Ind Eng Chem Res 41:5470–5476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee YG, Park JW, Kim JH et al (2004) Comparison of mercury capture efficiency from a simulated exhaust gas by several types of TiO2 under various light sources. Chem Lett 33:36–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee TG, Hyun JE (2006) Structural effect of the in situ generated titania on its stability to oxidize and capture the gas-phase elemental mercury. Chemosphere 62:26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin WF, Zhang B, Yang HM et al (2009) Characteristics of emissive spectrum and the removal of nitric oxide in N-2/O-2/NO plasma with argon additive. J Environ Sci 21:790–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang QH, Gao L, Guo JK (1999) Preparation and characterization of nanosized TiO2 powders from aqueous TiCl4 solution. Nanostruct Mater 11:1293–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang QH, Gao L, Guo JK (2000) Effects of calcination on the photocatalytic properties of nanosized TiO2 powders prepared by TiCl4 hydrolysis. Appl Catal B 26:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee TG, Biswas P, Hedrick E (2004) Overall kinetics of heterogeneous elemental mercury reactions on TiO2 sorbent particles with UV irradiation. Ind Eng Chem Res 43:1411–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sommar J, Gardfeldt K, Stromberg D et al (2001) A kinetic study of the gas-phase reaction between the hydroxyl radical and atomic mercury. Atmos Environ 35:3049–3054

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (50976049) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK2011788).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongmin Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, H., Liu, H., Wu, H. et al. Photochemical Removal of Gaseous Elemental Mercury in a Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Reactor. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 32, 969–977 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-012-9393-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-012-9393-9

Keywords

Navigation