Abstract
Raman spectroscopy was used to determine the stress and phase compositions of the zirconia scale in situ during the oxidation of zirconium at 600–900 °C in ambient air. The results show that the compressive stresses in the zirconia scale vary with the oxidation temperature and the oxidation time. The tetragonal (t) phase forms at the metal/oxide interface and the t to monoclinic phase transformation occurs far away from the interface during the oxide scale growth. The compressive growth stress at the oxidation temperature is favourable to the formation of t phase.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T. R. Allen, R. J. M. Konings and A. T. Motta, in Comprehensive Nuclear Materials, eds. R. J. M. Konings, T. R. Allan, R. Stoller and S. Yamanaka (Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam, 2012), pp. 49–68.
A. P. Zhilyaev and J. A. Szpunar, Journal of Nuclear Materials 264, 1999 (327).
C. Roy and B. Burgess, Oxidation of Metals 2, 1970 (235).
C. Roy and G. David, Journal of Nuclear Materials 37, 1970 (71).
J. H. Baek, Y. H. Jeong and I. S. Kim, Journal of Nuclear Materials 280, 2000 (235).
A. Yilmazbayhan, A. T. Motta, R. J. Comstock, G. P. Sabol, B. Lai and Z. H. Cai, Journal of Nuclear Materials 324, 2004 (6).
H. X. Zhang, D. Fruchart, E. K. Hlil, L. Ortega, Z. K. Li, J. J. Zhang, J. Sun and L. Zhou, Journal of Nuclear Materials 396, 2010 (65).
B. Benali, M. H. Ghysel, I. Gallet, A. M. Huntz and M. Andrieux, Applied Surface Science 253, 2006 (1222).
N. Pétigny, P. Barberis, C. Lemaignan, Ch. Valot and M. Lallemant, Journal of Nuclear Materials 280, 2000 (318).
L. Kurpaska, J. Favergeon, L. Lahoche, G. Moulin, M. E. Marssi and J.-M. Roelandt, Oxidation of Metals 79, 2013 (261).
J. Lin, H. Li, C. Nam and J. A. Szpunal, Journal of Nuclear Materials 334, 2004 (200).
M. Bartosik, R. Pitonak and J. Keckes, Advanced Engineering Materials 13, 2011 (705).
J. Birnie, C. Craggs, D. J. Gardiner and P. R. Graves, Corrosion Science 33, 1992 (1).
M. Kemdehoundja, J. L. Grosseau-Poussard, J. F. Dinhut and B. Panicaud, Journal of Applied Physics 102, 2007 (093513).
P. Y. Hou, J. Ager, J. Mougin and A. Galerie, Oxidation of Metals 75, 2011 (229).
X. Zhao, F. Yang, A. Shinmi, P. Xiao, I. S. Molchan and G. E. Thompson, Scripta Materialia 63, 2010 (117).
J. Mougin, N. Rosman, G. Lucazeau and A. Galerie, Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 32, 2001 (739).
D. M. Lipkin and D. R. Clarke, Oxidation of Metals 45, 1996 (267).
G. Pezzotti and A. A. Porporati, Journal of Biomedical Optics 9, 2004 (372).
V. Presser, M. Keuper, C. Berthold and K. G. Nickel, Applied Spectroscopy 63, 2009 (1288).
P. Tejland and H. O. Andren, Journal of Nuclear Materials 430, 2012 (35).
R. E. Westerman, Journal of the Electrochemical Society 111, 1964 (140).
V. N. Konev, A. L. Nadolskii and L. A. Minyacheva, Oxidation of Metals 47, 1997 (237).
D. H. Bradhurst and P. M. Heuer, Journal of Nuclear Materials 37, 1970 (35).
N. B. Pilling and R. E. Bedworth, Journal of the Institute of Metals 29, 1923 (529).
F. N. Rhines and J. S. Wolf, Metallurgical Transactions 1, 1970 (1701).
D. R. Clarke, Acta Materialia 51, 2003 (1393).
B. Panicaud, J. L. Grosseau-Poussard and J. F. Dinhut, Computational Materials Science 42, 2008 (286).
S. Maharjan, X. Zhang and Z. Wang, Oxidation of Metals 77, 2012 (93).
E. Y. Fogaing, Y. Lorgouilloux, M. Huger and C. P. Gault, Journal of Materials Science 41, 2006 (7663).
U. Messerschmidt, B. Baufeld and D. Baither, Key Engineering Materials 153–154, 1998 (143).
S. J. Bull, Oxidation of Metals 49, 1998 (1).
B. Holmberg and T. Dagerhamn, Acta Chemica Scandinavica 15, 1961 (919).
A. T. Donaldson and H. E. Evans, Journal of Nuclear Materials 99, 1981 (47).
A. T. Donaldson and H. E. Evans, Journal of Nuclear Materials 99, 1981 (57).
D. R. Clarke and F. Adar, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 65, 1982 (284).
N. Ni, D. Hudson, J. Wei, P. Wang, S. Lozano-Perez, G. D. W. Smith, J. M. Sykes, S. S. Yardley, K. L. Moore, S. Lyon, R. Cottis, M. Preuss and C. R. M. Grovenor, Acta Materialia 60, 2012 (7132).
X. IItis, F. Lefebvre and C. Lemaignan, Journal of Nuclear Materials 224, 1995 (121).
R. C. Garvie, Journal of Physical Chemistry 69, 1965 (1238).
E. Djurado, P. Bouvier and G. Lucazeau, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 149, 2000 (399).
G. L. Kulcinski, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 51, 1968 (582).
I. A. El-Shanshoury, V. A. Rudenko and I. A. Ibrahim, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 53, 1970 (264).
Ch. Valot, D. Ciosmak and M. Lallemant, Solid State Ionics 101–103, 1997 (769).
V. Busser, J. Desquines, S. Fouguet, M. C. Bauetto and J. P. Mardon, Materials Science Forum 595–598, 2008 (419).
E. Polatidis, P. Frankel, J. Wei, M. Klaus, R. J. Comstock, A. Ambard, S. Lyon, R. A. Cottis and M. Preuss, Journal of Nuclear Materials 432, 2013 (102).
E. Polatidis, PhD Thesis, University of Manchester (2012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Fan Yang and Xiaofeng Zhao have contributed equally to this work.
Appendix: Determination of the Piezospectroscopic Tensor of Zirconia Scale
Appendix: Determination of the Piezospectroscopic Tensor of Zirconia Scale
To obtain the stress from the Raman peak shift, the piezospectroscopic tensor П ij should be determined. Therefore, a designed four-point bending test, in which the strain can be applied precisely, was carried out. A schematic view of the experiment setup is shown in Fig. 6a. A strain gauge was located at the bottom oxide layer and used to precisely measure the applied strain. As illustrated in Fig. 6b, the biaxial stresses around the strain gauge are:
where σ 0 is the original stress inside the oxide scale, ε is the applied strain, υ is the Poisson ratio and E is the Young’s modulus of the zirconia scale. Therefore, the stress due to the applied strain in the bottom oxide layer is:
The top oxide layer, where the Raman spectra were collected from, was under compressive stress, which has the same magnitude with the tensile stress in the bottom oxide layer. Thus, the compressive stress in the top oxide layer due to the applied strain is written as:
Combining Eq. (6) and (1), the Raman peak shift has a linear relationship with the applied strain:
Figure 6c shows the variation of the Raman peak position and its peak shift as a function of the applied strain. From the slope of the linear relationship, using E = 194 GPa (measured by nano-indentation [MTS Systems Corp., USA]) and ν = 0.25, the constant П is obtained as −3.21 cm−1 GPa−1. Therefore, the relationship between peak shift and the stress state is established as:
Unless otherwisely indicated, the stresses of the oxide scale were all calculated based on the peak shift of the 330 cm−1 peak according to Eq. (8) in this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, F., Zhao, X. & Xiao, P. In Situ Measurement of Stresses and Phase Compositions of the Zirconia Scale During Oxidation of Zirconium by Raman Spectroscopy. Oxid Met 81, 331–343 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11085-013-9433-8
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11085-013-9433-8