Skip to main content
Log in

How can interactions among interdependent structures, institutions, and agents inform financial stability? What we have still to learn from global financial crisis

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How national financial systems can avoid costly banking crises is a persistent and intriguing question for institutional scholars and policymakers worldwide. In this context, although considerable research has recently focused on structural, institutional, and agency-level factors in explaining the global financial crisis, it mostly offered each of these explanatory factors in isolation, thus leaving interactions among these interrelated factors incomplete. Building on a deviant case study on Australian exceptionalism examined in a comparative perspective, this paper introduces an integrative framework that views financial stability as a function of these interactions that reinforce prudent financial behavior. In doing so, it offers an insight into the previous research on institutional complementarity and how to guard against similar crises in the future. It suggests that financial stability (instability) is more likely when interactions among structural and institutional complementarities and agents reinforce conservative (opportunistic) banking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Author thanks Peter Katzenstein and referees of the journal for their insightful comments and John Laker for his generous support and encouragement .

  2. Active citation refers to ‘a technologically enabled citation standard, according to which any citation in a scholarly paper, article, or book chapter that supports a contestable empirical claim is hyperlinked to an excerpt from the original source and an annotation explaining how that excerpt supports the empirical claim, located in a ‘transparency appendix’ attached to the document’ (Moravcsik 2014, p. 48).

  3. Policy is ‘an instrument of government’ and arises from within an ‘institutional framework’ (Howlett and Lejano 2012, p. 347). It also informs institutions’ and actor behavior by ‘influencing the allocation of economic and political resources, modifying the costs and benefits associated with alternative political strategies, and consequently altering ensuing political development’ (Pierson 1993, p. 596). This section locates ‘policy’ theme under the ‘institution’ dimension of the emerging framework. This is due to difficulty in separating, for example, prudential regulation from prudential policy, or competition regulation from competition policy in informing actor behavior, and the limited analytical value of doing so in the current research context.

  4. Section 63 of the Banking Act 1959 established an institutional framework requiring the Treasurer’s approval before any party may purchase more than a 15 % share of bank’s voting rights.

References

  • Aaron, M., Armstrong, J., & Zelmer, M. (2007). An overview of risk management at Canadian banks. Financial System Review, 39–47 June 2007.

  • Admati, A. R., & Hellwig, M. F. (2013). The bankers’ new clothes: What’s wrong with banking and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, D. (2013). How Australia weathered the global financial crisis while Europe failed. Guardian. 28 Aug 2013.

  • Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2000). Comparing financial systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arjani, N., & Paulin, G. (2013). Lessons from the financial crisis: Bank performance and regulatory reform. Bank of Canada, Discussion Paper/2013-4.

  • Augar, P. (2010). Reckless: The rise and fall of the city. London: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. (2013). The new political economy of the macroprudential ideational shift. New Political Economy, 18(1), 112–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, C. (2005). The exoteric politics of bank mergers in Australia. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 51(2), 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, C. (2013). Bank behavior and resilience: The effect of structures, institutions and agents. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, C. (2015). Fragile by design: The political origins of banking crises and scarce credit. Public Administration, 9(3), 828–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J. R., Caprio, G, Jr., & Levine, R. (2011). Rethinking bank regulation: Till angels govern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battellino, R. (2010). Some comments on bank funding. RBA Bulletin. http://www.rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2010/mar/pdf/bu0310-11.pdf

  • Bebchuk, L. A. (2010). Regulating bankers’ pay. Georgetown Law Journal, 98(2), 247–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & Hindmoor, A. (2015). Masters of the universe, slaves of the market. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell-Wignall, A., Atkinson, P., & Lee, S. H. (2008). The current financial crisis: Causes and policy issues. Financial Market Trends., 2008(2), 1–21. doi:10.1787/fmt-v2008-art10-en

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, M., Redish, A., & Rockoff, H. (2011). Why didn’t Canada have a banking crisis in 2008 (or in 1930, or 1907, or…)? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 17312.

  • Brummer, A. (2009). The crunch: How greed and incompetence sparked the credit crisis. London: Random House Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calomiris, C. W., & Haber, S. H. (2014). Fragile by design: The political origins of banking crises and scarce credit (p. 2014). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2011). The U.S. financial crisis: Lessons for theories of institutional complementarity. Socioeconomic Review, 9, 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. & Pedersen, O. K. (2001). The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (2007). The varieties of capitalism and hybrid success: Denmark in the global economy. Comparative Political Studies, 40, 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, F. G., Dean, G., & Oliver, K. (2003). Corporate collapse: Accounting, regulatory and ethical failure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W. D. (1996). Financial services, globalisation and domestic policy change. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 173–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K., & Gioia, D. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36, 12–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2005). Three meanings of complementarity. Socioeconomic Review, 3, 359–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2010). Complementarity. In G. Morgan, J. L. Campbell, C. Crouch, O. K. Pedersen, & R. Whitley (Eds.), The oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis (pp. 117–137). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. F. (2009). Managed by the markets: How finance re-shaped America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debelle, G. (2008). A comparison of the US and Australian housing markets. RBA Bulletin, 35–46 June 2008.

  • Deeg, R. (2007). Complementarity and institutional change in capitalist systems. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(4), 611–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Financial Stability Forum. (2008). Report of the financial stability forum on enhancing market and institutional resilience. Basel: Financial Stability Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • FitchRatings. (2012). Australian and Canadian major banks. Special Report. January 30.

  • Freeland, C. (2010). What Toronto can teach New York and London. Financial Times. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/db2b340a-0a1b-11df-8b23-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1tPiEjbZl

  • Froud, J., Nilsson, A., Moran, M., & Williams, K. (2012). Stories and interests in finance: Agendas of Governance before and after the Financial Crisis. Governance, 25(1), 35–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FSA (Financial Services Authority). (2009). The Turner review: A regulatory response to the global banking crisis. London: Financial Services Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • G-30 (Group of Thirty). (2008). The structure of financial supervision: Approaches and challenges in a global marketplace. A report of the G30 Regulatory Systems Working Group. Washington, DC: G-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • G-30 (Group of Thirty). (2009). Financial reform: A framework for financial stability. Washington, DC: Group of Thirty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gali, J. (2014). Monetary policy and rational asset price bubbles. American Economic Review, 104(3), 721–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, A. (2009). The spectre at the feast: Capitalist crisis and the politics of recession. Houdmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnaut, R. (2009). The great crash of 2008. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Integrating comparative and within-case analysis: Typological theory. In A. George & G. A. Bennett (Eds.), Case studies and theory development in the social science (pp. 233–262). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central croblems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gieve, J., & Provost, C. (2012). Ideas and coordination in policymaking: The financial crisis of 2007–2009. Governance, 25(1), 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., & Thomas, J. B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 370–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M., & Chittipeddi, K. (1994). Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sensemaking and influence. Organization Science, 5(3), 363–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emergence vs forcing basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valey: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., & Hay, C. (2015). Towards a new political economy of the crisis: Getting what went wrong right. New Political Economy, 20(3), 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, A. (2010). The crisis. Brookings papers on economic activity. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Treasury Committee. (2009a). Banking crisis: Reforming corporate governance and pay in the city. London: The Stationery Office Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Treasury Committee. (2009b). Banking crisis: Regulation and supervision. London: The Stationery Office Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2009). Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences, 42(1), 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., & Lejano, R. P. (2012). Tales from the crypt: The rise and fall (and Rebirth?) of policy design. Administration and Society, 20(10), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2006). Australia: Financial system stability assessment, including reports on the observance of standards and codes on the following topics: Banking supervision, insurance regulation, securities regulation, and payment systems. IMF Country Report No. 06/372. Washington: IMF.

  • IMF. (2008). Canada: financial system stability assessment—Update. Washington: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2009). Global financial stability report. Washington: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2012). Global financial stability report. Washington: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2014). Canada: Financial sector assessment program: Intensity and effectives of federal bank supervision in Canada-technical note. IMF Country Report No. 14/70. March. Washington: IMF.

  • Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, P. (2009). The march of patriots: The struggle for modern Australia. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, S. (2009). Australia’s response to the global financial crisis. Speech delivered at Australia Israel Leadership Forum, 24 June.

  • Ketokivi, M., & Choi, T. (2014). Renaissance of case research as a scientific method. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 232–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, G. (2009). The corporate governance lessons from the financial crisis. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, M. (2011). Canada’s banks: Too conservative to fail? In G. Anderson & C. Sands (Eds.), Forgotten partnership redux: Canada–U.S. relations in the 21st century (pp.223–268). Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, J. (2012). The President, congress, and the financial crisis: Ideology and moral hazard in economic governance. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 42(1), 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (2009). The return of depression economics. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laker, J. (2009). The global financial crisis- lessons for the Australian financial system. Address to the Australian Economic Forum, 19 August. http://www.apra.gov.au/Speeches/upload/03-Aust-Economic-Forum-Opening-Remarks-19-Aug-09.pdf

  • Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Institutional work: A new agenda for institutional studies of organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, I. (2009). The crisis: Causes, consequences and lessons for the future. The Australian perspective. The ASIC Summer School 2009 in Sydney, 2–3 March.

  • Martin, S. (2012). GFC and sovereign risk- Mitigating measures and solutions from down under. In: Paper presented at the international federation of accountants conference, March 19–20, 2012, Vienna, Austria.

  • Mason, P. (2009). Meltdown: The end of greed. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, T., & Morling, S. (2011). The Australian economy and the global downturn part 1: Reasons for resilience. Economic roundup 2, Canberra: Australian Government Printing Services.

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Washington, DC: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Min, D. (2010). True north: The facts about Canadian mortgage system. Washington: Center for American Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (2014). Transparency: The revolution in qualitative research. PS. Political Science and Politics, 47(1), 48–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010a). OECD economic surveys: Australia. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010b). OECD reviews of regulatory reform Australia 2-1: Towards a seamless economy. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(4), 595–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, R. (2009). Global Imbalances. In M. Dewatripont, X. Freixas, & R. Portes (Eds.), Macroeconomic stability and financial regulation: Key issues for the G20 (pp. 19–26). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2004). Investigation into foreign exchange losses at the National Australia Bank. http://www2.owen.vanderbilt.edu/nick.bollen/themes/pwcreport.pdf

  • Royo, S. (2013). How did the Spanish financial system survive the first stage of the global crisis? Governance, 26, 631–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G. (2009). Australia and Canada—Comparing notes on recent experiences address. RBA Bulletin, 36–44 June 2009.

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R. (2006). What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, T. (1994). The bold riders: Behind Australia’s corporate collapses. St. Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. B. (2009). Getting off track: How government actions and interventions caused, prolonged, and worsened the financial crisis. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L., & Uren, D. (2010). Shitstorm: Inside Labor’s darkest days. Melbourne: University Publishing, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1979). The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 539–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanna, J., Lindquist, E. A., & De Vries, J. (Eds.). (2015). The global financial crisis and its budget impacts in OECD nations fiscal responses and future challenges. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanna, J., & Weller, P. (2003). Traditions of Australian governance. Public Administration, 81(1), 63–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zysman, J. (1983). Governments, markets, and growth: Financial systems and the politics of industrial change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caner Bakir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bakir, C. How can interactions among interdependent structures, institutions, and agents inform financial stability? What we have still to learn from global financial crisis. Policy Sci 50, 217–239 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9261-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9261-1

Keywords

Navigation