Abstract
Landslides represent some of the most important geological disasters and not only pose a threat to human beings but also have a serious destructive impact on the environment and property. Delimiting the potential distribution of landslide risk zones is of great significance for reducing casualties and economic losses and promoting sustainable development. Research has been performed on landslide hazard risk assessment for decades; however, the risk factors for landslide disasters in China are still not well understood. Based on the assembled georeferenced landslide occurrence records and a set of spatial covariates, the risk factors for landslide disasters are estimated, and a landslide susceptibility map is generated using the maximum entropy model. The results suggest that distance to roads, rainfall, and land use are the main risk factors affecting landslide occurrence, with relative contribution rate values of 32.9%, 29.8%, and 14.3%, respectively. The estimate map reveals that the potential landslide risk for zones in eastern and southern parts of China is higher than that in zones in western and northern China and that the predicted highest risk provinces are Yunnan, Sichuan and Hunan. Our findings provide an important basis for decision-making regarding disaster prevention and mitigation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Data are from the following websites, such as https://landslides.nasa.gov, http://www.gscloud.cn, http://data.cma.cn, http://www.resdc.cn, http://www.igsnrr.ac.cn/, and http://www.geodoi.ac.cn.
References
Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65:15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.010
Baldwin RA (2009) Use of maximum entropy modeling in wildlife research. Entropy 11:854–866. https://doi.org/10.3390/e11040854
Binh Thai P, Jaafari A, Prakash I, Dieu Tien B (2019) A novel hybrid intelligent model of support vector machines and the MultiBoost ensemble for landslide susceptibility modeling. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:2865–2886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1281-y
Cabrera JS, Lee HS (2020) Flood risk assessment for Davao Oriental in the Philippines using geographic information system-based multi-criteria analysis and the maximum entropy model. J Flood Risk Manag. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12607
Chang J, Slaymaker O (2002) Frequency and spatial distribution of landslides in a mountainous drainage basin: Western Foothills, Taiwan. Catena 46:285–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0341-8162(01)00157-6
Chen W et al (2018) Landslide susceptibility modelling using GIS-based machine learning techniques for Chongren County, Jiangxi Province. China Sci Total Environ 626:1121–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.124
Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Kornejady A, Zhang N (2017) Landslide spatial modeling: introducing new ensembles of ANN, MaxEnt, and SVM machine learning techniques. Geoderma 305:314–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.06.020
Chen W, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Bin Ahmad B, Zhang S, Hong H, Zhang N (2017) A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on the rotation forest ensemble and naive Bayes tree classifiers for a landslide susceptibility assessment in Langao County, China. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 8:1955–1977. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1401560
Corominas J et al (2014) Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Env 73:209–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0538-8
Cui Y, Cheng D, Choi CE, Jin W, Lei Y, Kargel JS (2019) The cost of rapid and haphazard urbanization: lessons learned from the Freetown landslide disaster. Landslides 16:1167–1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01167-x
Dahal RK, Hasegawa S, Nonomura A, Yamanaka M, Masuda T, Nishino K (2008) GIS-based weights-of-evidence modelling of rainfall-induced landslides in small catchments for landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ Geol 54:311–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0818-3
Dai FC, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 40:381–391
Devkota KC et al (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling-Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya. Nat Hazards 65:135–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0347-6
Dieu Tien B, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I (2012) Landslide susceptibility assessment in Vietnam using support vector machines, decision tree, and Naive Bayes models. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/974638
Dieu Tien B, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2012) Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Hoa Binh province (Vietnam): a comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models. Catena 96:28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2012.04.001
Ekinci YL, Turkes M, Demirci A, Erginal AE (2013) Shallow and deep-seated regolith slides on deforested slopes in Canakkale, NW Turkey. Geomorphology 201:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.06.008
Froude MJ, Petley DN (2018) Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 18:2161–2181. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2161-2018
Fu J, Jiang D, Huang Y (2014) Grid dataset of population in China. Acta Geogr Sin 69:41–44. https://doi.org/10.3974/geodb.2014.01.06.v1
Garosi Y, Sheklabadi M, Conoscenti C, Pourghasemi HR, Van Oost K (2019) Assessing the performance of GIS-based machine learning models with different accuracy measures for determining susceptibility to gully erosion. Sci Total Environ 664:1117–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.093
He Q et al (2019) Landslide spatial modelling using novel bivariate statistical based Naive Bayes, RBF Classifier, and RBF Network machine learning algorithms. Sci Total Environ 663:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.329
Hong Y, Adler R, Huffman G (2007) Use of satellite remote sensing data in the mapping of global landslide susceptibility. Nat Hazards 43:245–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-9104-z
Hong H, Chen W, Xu C, Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Dieu Tien B (2017) Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment at the Chongren area (China) using frequency ratio, certainty factor, and index of entropy. Geocarto Int 32:139–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2015.1130086
Huang Y, Jiang D, Fu J (2014) Grid dataset of gross domestic product (GDP) in China. Acta Geogr Sin 69:45–48. https://doi.org/10.3974/geodb.2014.01.07.v1
Huang Y, Zhao L (2018) Review on landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machines. Catena 165:520–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.03.003
Jaynes ET (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys Rev 106:620–630. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.620
Jaynes ET (1982) On the rationale of maximum-entropy methods. Proc IEEE 70:939–952. https://doi.org/10.1109/proc.1982.12425
Jiang D, Chen S, Hao M, Fu J, Ding F (2018) Mapping the potential global codling moth (Cydia pomonella L.) distribution based on a machine learning method. Sci Rep 8:10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31478-3
Kalantar B, Pradhan B, Naghibi SA, Motevalli A, Mansor S (2018) Assessment of the effects of training data selection on the landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural networks (ANN). Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 9:49–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1407368
Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Sarkar S, Gupta RP (2006) A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedures for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas. Eng Geol 85:347–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.03.004
Kavzoglu T, Sahin EK, Colkesen I (2015) An assessment of multivariate and bivariate approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study of Duzkoy district. Nat Hazards 76:471–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1506-8
Kornejady A, Ownegh M, Bahremand A (2017) Landslide susceptibility assessment using maximum entropy model with two different data sampling methods. Catena 152:144–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.01.010
Lay US, Pradhan B, Yusoff ZBM, Bin Abdallah AF, Aryal J, Park H-J (2019) Data mining and statistical approaches in debris-flow susceptibility modelling using airborne LiDAR data. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19163451
Lee S (2005) Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data journals. Int J Remote Sens 26:1477–1491. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160412331331012
Liu G, Xi J, Dai E, Wu W (2014) Loss risk assessment of the hazard-affectted body of landslides in China. J Nat Disasters 23:39–46
Lombardo L, Bachofer F, Cama M, Marker M, Rotigliano E (2016) Exploiting maximum entropy method and ASTER data for assessing debris flow and debris slide susceptibility for the Giampilieri catchment (north-eastern Sicily, Italy). Earth Surf Proc Land 41:1776–1789. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3998
Merow C, Smith MJ, Silander JA Jr (2013) A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 36:1058–1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x
Mohammady M, Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster-Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models. J Asian Earth Sci 61:221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.10.005
Nandi A, Shakoor A (2010) A GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses. Eng Geol 110:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.10.001
Peng L, Niu R, Huang B, Wu X, Zhao Y, Ye R (2014) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on rough set theory and support vector machines: a case of the Three Gorges area, China. Geomorphology 204:287–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.08.013
Peng L, Xu S, Hou J, Peng J (2015) Quantitative risk analysis for landslides: the case of the Three Gorges area, China. Landslides 12:943–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0518-5
Peruccacci S, Brunetti MT, Gariano SL, Melillo M, Rossi M, Guzzetti F (2017) Rainfall thresholds for possible landslide occurrence in Italy. Geomorphology 290:39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.031
Petley D (2012) Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology 40:927–930. https://doi.org/10.1130/g33217.1
Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2012) Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Nat Hazards 63:965–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0217-2
Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Mohammadi M, Moradi HR (2013) Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Arab J Geosci 6:2351–2365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0532-7
Pradhan B (2010a) Landslide susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches. J Indian Soc Remote 38:301–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-010-0020-z
Pradhan B (2010b) Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide hazard analysis and cross-validation using multivariate logistic regression model on three test areas in Malaysia. Adv Space Res 45:1244–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.01.006
Pradhan B (2011) Use of GIS-based fuzzy logic relations and its cross application to produce landslide susceptibility maps in three test areas in Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 63:329–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0705-1
Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR, Melesse AM (2016) Application of GIS-based data driven random forest and maximum entropy models for groundwater potential mapping: a case study at Mehran Region, Iran. Catena 137:360–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.10.010
Raja NB, Cicek I, Turkoglu N, Aydin O, Kawasaki A (2017) Landslide susceptibility mapping of the Sera River Basin using logistic regression model. Nat Hazards 85:1323–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2591-7
Ramesh V, Anbazhagan S (2015) Landslide susceptibility mapping along Kolli hills Ghat road section (India) using frequency ratio, relative effect and fuzzy logic models. Environ Earth Sci 73:8009–8021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3954-6
Regmi AD, Devkota KC, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Pourghasemi HR, Kumamoto T, Akgun A (2014) Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya. Arab J Geosci 7:725–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0807-z
Regmi NR, Giardino JR, Vitek JD (2010) Modeling susceptibility to landslides using the weight of evidence approach: Western Colorado, USA. Geomorphology 115:172–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.10.002
Siahkamari S, Haghizadeh A, Zeinivand H, Tahmasebipour N, Rahmati O (2018) Spatial prediction of flood-susceptible areas using frequency ratio and maximum entropy models. Geocarto Int 33:927–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2017.1316780
Solaimani K, Mousavi SZ, Kavian A (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Arab J Geosci 6:2557–2569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0526-5
Tian Y, Xu C, Hong H, Zhou Q, Wang D (2019) Mapping earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility by use of artificial neural network (ANN) models: an example of the 2013 Minxian (China) Mw 5.9 event. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 10:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2018.1487471
Wang Y, Sun D, Wen H, Zhang H, Zhang F (2020) Comparison of random forest model and frequency ratio model for landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) in Yunyang County (Chongqing, China). Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124206
Wu Y, Ke Y, Chen Z, Liang S, Zhao H, Hong H (2020) Application of alternating decision tree with AdaBoost and bagging ensembles for landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104396
Yalcin A, Reis S, Aydinoglu AC, Yomralioglu T (2011) A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. Catena 85:274–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2011.01.014
Yang SR (2016) Probability of road interruption due to landslides under different rainfall-return periods using remote sensing techniques. J Perform Constr Facil. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000737
Acknowledgements
We thank myriad research staff who participated in compiling the most comprehensive occurrence dataset of landslide.
Funding
This research is supported and funded by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA20010203).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DJ and FYD contributed to the study design. DW, DJ and FYD collected the data. DW, DJ, FYD and MMH analyzed the data, which were interpreted by all authors. DW, DJ and FYD wrote the manuscript. MMH, SC and ZM gave some useful comments and suggestions to this work. DJ and FYD revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, D., Hao, M., Chen, S. et al. Assessment of landslide susceptibility and risk factors in China. Nat Hazards 108, 3045–3059 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04812-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04812-8